Diosmetin-7-O-ß-D-glucopyranoside from Pogostemonis Herba alleviated SARS-CoV-2-induced pneumonia by reshaping macrophage polarization and limiting viral replication.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Viral pneumonia is the leading cause of death after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite effective at early stage, long-term treatment with glucocorticoids can lead to a variety of adverse effects and limited benefits. The Chinese traditional herb Pogostemonis Herba is the aerial part of Pogostemon Cablin (Blanco) Benth., which has potent antiviral, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer effects. It was used widely for treating various throat and respiratory diseases, including COVID-19, viral infection, cough, allergic asthma, acute lung injury and lung cancer. AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects of chemical compounds from Pogostemonis Herba in SARS-CoV-2-infected hACE2-overexpressing mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cells and hACE2 transgenic mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The hACE2-overexpressing RAW264.7 cells were exposed with SARS-CoV-2. The cell viability was detected by CCK8 assay and cell apoptotic rate was by flow cytometric assay. The expressions of macrophage M1 phenotype markers (TNF-α and IL-6) and M2 markers (IL-10 and Arg-1) as well as the viral loads were detected by qPCR. The mice were inoculated intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant to induce viral pneumonia. The levels of macrophages, neutrophils, and T cells in the lung tissues of infected mice were analyzed by full spectrum flow cytometry. The expressions of key proteins were detected by Western blot assay. RESULTS: Diosmetin-7-O-ß-D-glucopyranoside (DG) presented the strongest anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Intervention with DG at the concentrations of 0.625-2.5 µM not only reduced the viral replication, cell apoptosis, and the productions of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) in SARS-CoV-2-infected RAW264.7 cells, but also reversed macrophage polarity from M1 to M2 phenotype. Furthermore, treatment with DG (25-100 mg/kg) alleviated acute lung injury, and reduced macrophage infiltration in SARS-COV-2-infected mice. Mechanistically, DG inhibited SARS-COV-2 gene expression and HK3 translation via targeting YTHDF1, resulting in the inactivation of glycolysis-mediated NF-κB pathway. CONCLUSIONS: DG exerted the potent antiviral and anti-inflammatory activities. It reduced pneumonia in SARS-COV-2-infected mice via inhibiting the viral replication and accelerating M2 macrophage polarization via targeting YTHDF1, indicating its potential for COVID-19 treatment.

Safety of remdesivir in the treatment of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Transaminase and creatinine elevations have been well described in adults treated with remdesivir for COVID-19. It is hypothesized that a similar safety profile exists in children with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir, but available data are limited, especially in children < 12 months. The primary aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and timing of elevations in transaminases and creatinine in children with COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study including all pediatric patients admitted to a single, freestanding children's hospital who were positive for COVID-19 and received at least 1 dose of remdesivir between 1/1/2020 and 5/31/2022. Available baseline and peak transaminase and creatinine concentrations were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for transaminase elevation. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients met inclusion criteria. Creatinine elevation of any grade was noted in 16% and remained elevated only in those with underlying chronic kidney disease. Transaminase elevation of any grade was noted in 58% of patients and remained elevated in only 1%. Older age and critical respiratory disease were associated with higher risk of significant transaminase elevation, whereas non-Hispanic ethnicity was strongly associated with protection against significant transaminase elevation. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of hospitalized children with COVID-19 who were treated with remdesivir, most patients experienced only mild transaminitis and normal creatinine concentrations. A limited number of patients experienced laboratory abnormalities which were transient, suggesting a favorable safety profile for remdesivir use in pediatrics.

Enhanced Treatment in Severe-Critical COVID-19 With Tocilizumab, Remdesivir, Dexamethasone: A Jordanian Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Several medications have been proposed to manage COVID-19, with controversial data regarding their clinical benefits. We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of using remdesivir (RDV) with and without tocilizumab (TCZ) and standard therapy in treating severe COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Jordanian tertiary hospital (September 26th, 2020 - August 28th, 2021) and included adult COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen support. Patients were categorized into three groups based on treatment: TCZ+RDV and standard therapy; RDV and standard therapy; and standard therapy alone, which included dexamethasone, vitamins, anticoagulants, and ceftriaxone. RESULTS: Of 1,556 screened, 1,244 patients (mean age 62.33, 60.8% men) were included. Distribution was 106 in TCZ+RDV, 520 in RDV, and 618 in standard therapy. No significant differences were observed in age, gender, or BMI. Mortality was lowest in TCZ+RDV (32.1%), followed by RDV (40.6%) and standard therapy (47.1%) (p=0.005). Among ICU patients, TCZ+RDV showed significantly lower mortality (51.1%) compared to RDV (75%) and standard therapy (85.8%) (p<0.001). The ICU stays and invasive mandatory ventilation (IMV) durations were significantly shorter with TCZ+RDV (4.30 and 2.69 days, respectively) compared to RDV (7.61 and 4.52 days) and standard therapy (7.98 and 5.32 days) (p<0.001 for ICU stays, p=0.025 for IMV durations). CONCLUSIONS: Combining TCZ, RDV, and dexamethasone shows promise in reducing mortality and ICU/IMV duration for severe COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 viral load is linked to remdesivir efficacy in severe Covid-19 admitted to intensive care.

Remdesivir therapy has been declared as efficient in the early stages of Covid-19. Of the 339 patients (males 55.8%, age 71(59;77) years) with a detectable viral load, 140 were treated with remdesivir (of those 103 in the ICU and 57 immunosuppressed) and retrospectively compared with 199 patients (of those 82 in the ICU and 28 immunosuppressed) who were denied therapy due to advanced Covid-19. The viral load was estimated by detecting nucleocapsid antigen in serum (n = 155, median 217(28;1524)pg/ml), antigen in sputum (n = 18, COI 18(4.6;32)), nasopharyngeal antigen (n = 44, COI 17(8;35)) and the real-time PCR (n = 122, Ct 21(18;27)). After adjustment for confounders, patients on remdesivir had better 12-month survival (HR 0.66 (0.44;0.98), p = 0.039), particularly when admitted to the ICU (HR 0.49 (0.29;0.81), p = 0.006). For the immunocompromised patients, the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.55 (0.18;1.69), p = 0.3). The other most significant confounders were age, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio, admission creatinine and immunosuppression. The impact of monoclonal antibodies or previous vaccinations was not significant. Despite frequent immune suppression including haemato-oncology diseases, lymphopenia, and higher inflammatory markers in the remdesivir group, the results support remdesivir administration with respect to widely available estimates of viral load in patients with high illness severity.

Computational investigation of novel synthetic analogs of C-1'ß substituted remdesivir against RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase of SARS-CoV-2.

Remdesivir, a C-nucleotide prodrug binds to the viral RNA-dependent-RNA polymerase (RdRp) and inhibits the viral replication by terminating RNA transcription prematurely. It is reported in literature that interaction between the C-1'ß-CN moiety of Remdesivir (RDV) and the Ser861 residue in RdRp enzyme, causes a delayed chain termination during the RNA replication process and is one of the important aspect of its mechanism of action. In the pursuance of increasing the biological activity of RDV and enhancing the SAR studies, against RNA viruses, we have designed its fourteen C1'ß substituted analogs, 10 -23 bearing 4/5-membered heterocyclic rings. The docking and 100 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of 10-23 to the RdRp protein (PDB ID: 7L1F) revealed important interactions between 2',3'-diol, oxo group of phosphoramidate, nitrogen residues of heterocyclic rings of synthetic molecules with Arg555, Arg553, Ser759, Cys622, Asn691, Asp623 amino acid residues of protein. The docking score of 2-ethylbutyl ((S)-(((2R,3S,4R,5R)-5-(4-aminopyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-7-yl)-3,4-dihydroxy-5-(1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)methoxy)(phenoxy)phosphoryl)-L-alaninate, 11 was found to be the higher than RDV among 14 new compounds i.e. -5.20 kcal/mol. Out of 3 compounds, 10, 12 and 13 submitted for MD simulations and Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MMPBSA) analysis, trifluoro-oxadiazole derivative, 13 showed higher binding energy as compared to Remdesivir. The predicted ADMET properties of 14 compounds showed their potential for being drug candidates. The present study suggests that substitution at the C1'ß position by 4/5-membered rings plays an important role in the interactions between nucleoside/tide and target protein.

Prevalence of Potential Drug Interactions With Direct-Acting Antivirals for COVID-19 Among Hospitalized Patients.

PURPOSE: Clinicians consider polypharmacy, comorbidities, and other factors including the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when evaluating therapeutic options for specific clinical diagnoses. Contemporary treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) includes direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). We sought to characterize patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and medications received during their hospitalization for COVID-19 and quantify potential DDIs that clinicians consider in selecting appropriate DAAs. METHODS: Patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 between May 2020 and December 2022 from the PINC AI Healthcare Database were identified. Medications administered during the hospitalization with the potential to cause DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, remdesivir, or molnupiravir (per the Emergency Use Authorization factsheet or package insert) were assessed. For DDIs with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, medications are categorized as "Contraindicated," "Avoid Concomitant Use," or "Other DDIs" (includes recommendation for dose modification or clinical and laboratory monitoring). For remdesivir, coadministration with chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate was not recommended. For molnupiravir, no drugs are listed as having potential DDIs. In a subset of patients, a multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the association between documented patient/hospital characteristics and the likelihood of being "Contraindicated" to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. FINDINGS: Of the 788,238 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 920 hospitals, 53% were ≥ 65 years old, and 31% had Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 3. During the study period, about half of the patients received medications categorized as "Contraindicated" (11%) and/or "Avoid Concomitant Use" (41%) with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The frequency of administered drugs was higher in those aged ≥ 65 years (68%), CCI ≥ 3 (78%), with high-risk underlying conditions (55%). About 1% of patients received medications that were not recommended to be coadmistered with remdesivir. Among a subset of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2022, those who were older, had higher CCI, high-risk underlying conditions, severe hepatic impairment, Medicare insurance, and hospitalized in larger hospitals were significantly more likely to be categorized as "Contraindicated" when considering nirmatrelvir/ritonavir as a therapeutic option to manage COVID-19. IMPLICATIONS: A significant proportion of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 receive medications for other conditions that have the potential to result in DDIs with DAAs; most predominantly with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, a strong CYP3A enzyme inhibitor, fewer with remdesivir, and none with molnupiravir. Higher age and comorbidity burden were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of receiving medications that are "Contraindicated" with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. In the evolving COVID-19 era, these findings provide insights into patients hospitalized for COVID-19, and the polypharmacy evaluations that clinicians may encounter when selecting among DAAs to manage COVID-19.

Oral pharmacokinetics and efficacy of oral phospholipid remdesivir nucleoside prodrugs against SARS-CoV-2 in mice.

Oral broad-spectrum antivirals are urgently needed for the treatment of many emerging and contemporary RNA viruses. We previously synthesized 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-benzyl-sn-glyceryl-P-RVn (ODBG-P-RVn, V2043), a phospholipid prodrug of GS-441524 (remdesivir nucleoside, RVn), and demonstrated its in vivo efficacy in a SARS-CoV-2 mouse model. Structure-activity relationship studies focusing on the prodrug scaffold identified two modifications, 3-fluoro-4-methoxy-benzyl (V2053) and 4-cyano-benzyl (V2067), that significantly enhanced the in vitro broad-spectrum antiviral activity against multiple RNA viruses when compared to V2043. Here, we demonstrate that V2043, V2053, and V2067 are all orally bioavailable, well-tolerated, and achieve high sustained plasma levels after single oral daily dosing. All three phospholipid prodrugs are significantly more active than RVn in vitro and significantly reduce SARS-CoV-2 lung titers in prophylaxis and treatment mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 infection. On a molar basis, V2043 and V2067 are substantially more active than obeldesivir/GS-5245 and molnupiravir in vivo. Together, these data support the continued development of phospholipid RVn prodrugs for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 and other RNA viruses of clinical concern.

Among Patients with COVID-19, should Remdesivir be Used for Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Remdesivir is an intravenously administered antiviral drug that inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. In vitro studies have shown that remdesivir can inhibit the growth of the COVID-19 virus in infected Vero cells and can inhibit infection in human cell lines. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of remdesivir in treating patients with COVID-19 infection. Methods: A systematic search of electronic medical literature databases was done from inception until September 4, 2022. Search for ongoing studies and preprints was also done. Risk of bias assessment was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool version 2.0. Measures of effect used were relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis by disease severity was preplanned. The estimates for efficacy and safety of remdesivir was calculated using Review Manager 5.4 software. Results: Nine randomized controlled trials with 13,085 participants were identified. Eight of the included studies recruited confirmed COVID-19 patients needing hospitalization, while one study limited recruitment to non-hospitalized patients. Remdesivir showed significant benefit for outpatients with mild to moderate disease with at least one risk factor for disease progression in terms of COVID 19-related hospitalization (RR 0.13 95% CI 0.03 to 0.59), all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.75), and need for medically-attended visits (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.56). For hospitalized patients, remdesivir had a slight benefit in reducing all-cause mortality at day 28 (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.98). Subgroup analysis by disease severity showed a trend towards reduction in mortality among those with severe disease (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.07), with no effect on those with critical disease (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.04), and inconclusive effect for those with mild-moderate disease (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.11). Remdesivir showed benefit in decreasing clinical deterioration (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.89), improving recovery rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.13), and reducing the need for mechanical ventilation (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.90). There was inconclusive effect on the need for ICU admission (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.22). No increased risk of adverse events (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.06), including serious adverse events (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.03), was seen. Discussion: Based on the available evidence, remdesivir shows benefit in the treatment for patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 infection. However, there was no benefit in mortality noted among those with critical disease requiring mechanical ventilation. Remdesivir demonstrated a good safety profile, with no increased risk of adverse events compared to control. These results are consistent with the international agencies' recommendations for the use of remdesivir among patients with mild, moderate or severe COVID-19 infection, but not for those with critical infection. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the use of remdesivir as treatment for selected patients with COVID-19.

The first five years of SARS-CoV-2: inpatient treatment updates and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in adults with pneumonia in Wuhan, China. AREAS COVERED: It is now believed that several billion humans have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and more than ten million have died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. EXPERT OPINION: The first five years of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have been marked by unfathomable suffering as well as remarkable scientific progress. This manuscript examines what has been learned about the treatment of inpatients with COVID-19 and explores how the therapeutic approach may evolve in the years ahead.

Retinal and Corneal OCT Results of Patients Hospitalized and Treated in the Acute Phase of COVID-19.

Objective: This study aimed to assess changes in the morphology of the retina and cornea in patients treated and hospitalized during the acute active phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: A total of 24 patients with symptomatic early COVID-19 disease and 38 healthy participants from a control group were enrolled in our study. Among them, 20 received oxygen therapy at flow rates ranging from 1-10 L, while four received high-flow intranasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT). Some patients were treated with other types of therapy, such as Remdesivir, COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy, or Tocilizumab. In the study, we focused on the analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the cornea and retina including corneal thickness, central retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and optic disc parameters. The measurements were acquired using Spectral-domain OCT REVO FC 130. Results: The analysis did not show significant changes between the examined ophthalmological parameters before and after therapy. Furthermore, there were no detected significant differences between the tested parameters of the retina and cornea in COVID-19-positive patients compared to the control group. Conclusions: No ophthalmological manifestations of COVID-19 disease were observed during the study. Taking into account the results of other publications, the lack of an unambiguous position on this topic requires further research.

Eco-Friendly Synchronous Spectrofluorimetric Method for Simultaneous Determination of Remdesivir and Acetyl Salicylic Acid in Spiked Human Plasma.

Remdesivir and acetyl salicylic acid are often co-administered medications in the treatment of COVID-19, specifically targeting the viral infection and thromboembolism associated with the condition. Hence, it is essential to establish a technique that enables the concurrent quantification of these pharmaceutical compounds in plasma while also keeping environmentally friendly methods. Accordingly, the aim of this work is to simultaneously determine remdesivir and acetyl salicylic acid through a bioanalytical validated synchronous spectrofluorimetric method with applying principles of green chemistry. Since, the two drugs showed severe overlap after excitation at 242.0 nm, 284.0 nm for remdesivir and acetyl salicylic acid, respectively. The overlap was effectively overcome by using synchronous mode with a wavelength difference (Δλ) of 160.0 nm for remdesivir and 100.0 nm for acetyl salicylic acid. Different parameters have been optimized such as Δλ, solvent, pH and surfactant. A linear calibration was obtained over the concentration range 0.01-4.00 µg/mL for remdesivir and 0.01-3.00 µg/mL for acetyl salicylic acid and the method was precise and accurate. The method was successfully used for the investigation of pharmaceutical formulation and the quantification of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of the two drugs. The method has been evaluated as an excellent green analytical method based on three greenness assessment tools.

Outpatient remdesivir treatment program for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease-2019: Patient perceptions, process and economic impact.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is FDA-approved for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Many patients improve clinically to allow for hospital dismissal before completing the 5-day course. In a prior work, patients who continued remdesivir in an outpatient setting experienced better 28-day clinical outcomes. Here, we assessed patients' perspectives and the economic impact of this outpatient practice. METHODS: Hospitalized patients who received remdesivir for COVID-19 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, from 11/6/2020 to 11/5/2021 and were dismissed to continue remdesivir in the outpatient setting were surveyed. The cost of care was compared between those who remained hospitalized versus those who were dismissed. RESULTS: 93 (19.8 %) among 470 eligible patients responded to the electronic survey. Responders were older than non-responders. The majority (70.5 %) had symptoms resolved by the time of the survey. Ten (11.4 %) patients had persistent symptoms attributed to long COVID-19. The majority were satisfied with the quality of care (82.3 %) and overall experience (76.0 %) in the infusion clinic. After adjusting for gender, comorbidity score, and WHO severity scale, the predicted costs for the groups were $16,544 (inpatient) and $9,097 (outpatient) per patient (difference of $7,447; p < .01). An estimate of 1,077 hospital bed-days were made available to other patients as a result of this transition to outpatient. CONCLUSION: An outpatient remdesivir program that allowed for early dismissal was perceived favorably by patients. The program resulted in significant cost and resource savings, the latter in terms of the availability of hospital beds for other patients needing critical services.

Real-world evaluation of early remdesivir in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients during Omicron including BQ.1/BQ.1.1/XBB.1.5.

BACKGROUND: A trial performed among unvaccinated, high-risk outpatients with COVID-19 during the delta period showed remdesivir reduced hospitalization. We used our real-world data platform to determine the effectiveness of remdesivir on reducing 28-day hospitalization among outpatients with mild-moderate COVID-19 during an Omicron period including BQ.1/BQ.1.1/XBB.1.5. METHODS: We did a propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study of non-hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection between April 7, 2022, and February 7, 2023. Electronic healthcare record data from a large health system in Colorado were linked to statewide vaccination and mortality data. We included patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test or outpatient remdesivir administration. Exclusion criteria were other SARS-CoV-2 treatments or positive SARS-CoV-2 test more than seven days before remdesivir. The primary outcome was all-cause hospitalization up to day 28. Secondary outcomes included 28-day COVID-related hospitalization and 28-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 29,270 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1,252 remdesivir-treated patients were matched to 2,499 untreated patients. Remdesivir was associated with lower 28-day all-cause hospitalization (1.3% vs. 3.3%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.39 [95% CI 0.23-0.67], p < 0.001) than no treatment. All-cause mortality at 28 days was numerically lower among remdesivir-treated patients (0.1% vs. 0.4%; aOR 0.32 [95% CI 0.03-1.40]). Similar benefit of RDV treatment on 28-day all-cause hospitalization was observed across Omicron periods, aOR (95% CI): BA.2/BA2.12.1 (0.77[0.19-2.41]), BA.4/5 (0.50[95% CI 0.50-1.01]), BQ.1/BQ.1.1/XBB.1.5 (0.21[95% CI 0.08-0.57]. CONCLUSION: Among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 during recent Omicron surges, remdesivir was associated with lower hospitalization than no treatment, supporting current National Institutes of Health Guidelines.

Electrophysiological and sick sinus syndrome effects of Remdesivir challenge in guinea-pig hearts.

Remdesivir (RDV) is the first drug approved by the FDA for clinical treatment of hospitalized patients infected with COVID-19 because it has been shown to have good antiviral activity against a variety of viruses, including Arenaviridae and Coronaviridae viral families. However, it has been reported that its clinical treatment leads to the symptoms of sick sinus syndrome such as sinus bradycardia, conduction block, and sinus arrest, but the electrophysiological mechanism of its specific cardiac adverse events is still unclear. We report complementary, experimental, studies of its electrophysiological effects. In wireless cardiac telemetry experiments in vivo and electrocardiographic studies in ex vivo cardiac preparations, RDV significantly caused sinus bradycardia, sinus atrial block, and prolongation of the QT interval in guinea pigs. Dose-dependent effects of RDV on the electrical activities of sinoatrial node (SA node) preparations of guinea pigs were characterised by multielectrode, optical RH237 voltage mapping. These revealed reversibly reduced sinoatrial conduction time (SACT), increased AP durations (APDs), and decreased the pacemaking rate of the SA node. Patch-clamp experiments showed that RDV significantly inhibited the If current of HCN4 channels, resulting in a significant decrease in the spontaneous firing rate of SA node cells, which may underlie the development of sick sinus node syndrome. In addition, RDV significantly inhibits IKr currents in hERG channels, leading to prolongation of the QT interval and playing a role in bradycardia. Therefore, these findings provide insights into the understanding the bradycardia effect of RDV, which may be used as basic theoretical guidance for the intervention of its adverse events, and prompt safety investigations of RDV's cardiac safety in the future.

Incidence of Elevated Liver Enzyme Levels in Patients Receiving Remdesivir and Its Effective Factors.

Background: Emergency use of remdesivir was approved for COVID-19 in some countries. Based on the promising results of remdesivir, the most common side effects were nausea, worsening respiratory failure, increased alanine aminotransferase levels, and constipation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of elevated liver enzymes in patients with COVID-19 receiving remdesivir. Methods: In this retrospective study, information was collected from patients' files. The study population included patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 who were admitted to Rouhani Babol Hospital. For daily patient selection, the list of patients was extracted from the system, and based on the census, the patient file was selected. Data were analyzed using Stata 16. Results: 620 patients suffering from moderate to severe COVID-19 were included in this study, 43% of whom were men. Of these patients, 120 were selected as the control group who did not receive remdesivir. The increase in liver enzymes in patients receiving remdesivir compared with the control, for alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST), respectively, was 6.20 and 3.64 times, but it was not statistically significant for alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Also, the increase in bilirubin levels in patients receiving remdesivir was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The recipients of remdesivir had high liver enzymes, which is one of the possible side effects of this drug. The intensity of the enzymes was mild and moderate, and they were not dangerous to the health of any of the consumers. Deaths in patients with COVID-19 were not due to drug-induced liver complications but to other factors such as disease-related complications.

COVID-19 throughout pandemic waves and virus variants: a real-life experience in an Italian hospital.

New therapies and vaccines changed the management of COVID-19. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe characteristics, in-hospital mortality and its predictors in patients with moderate/severe COVID-19, considering the 4 different pandemic waves and viral variants' prevalence from February 2020 to January 2022. Among 1135 patients included, 873 (77%) had at least one comorbidity, 177 (16%) were immunocompromised. From waves 1 to 4, patients with severe respiratory failure and ICU admission decreased over time (p < 0.001), like the length of in-hospital stay (p < 0.001). Despite a reduction of in-hospital mortality from 19% to 11%, increased risk of death was related to older age and immunocompromising conditions, especially during the 4th wave (HR = 5.07 and HR = 10.86, p < 0.001 respectively) while remdesivir treatment in the 3rd wave (HR = 0.41, p = 0.010) and positive serology (aHR = 0.66, p = 0.027) were protective for survival. These data support the need for tailoring vaccine campaign for future COVID-19 waves.

Comparable Efficacy of Lopinavir/Ritonavir and Remdesivir in Reducing Viral Load and Shedding Duration in Patients with COVID-19.

The spread of COVID-19 has significantly increased research on antiviral drugs and measures such as case isolation and contact tracing. This study compared the effects of lopinavir/ritonavir and remdesivir on COVID-19 patients with a control group receiving no antiviral drugs. Patients confirmed to have a SARS-CoV-2 infection via real-time RT-PCR were divided into three groups: lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir, and control. We assessed the efficacy of these drugs in reducing viral load and viral shedding duration using real-time RT-PCR and Vero E6 cell cultures. Lopinavir/ritonavir led to no detectable infectious SARS-CoV-2, with a median viral clearance time of one day, whereas one remdesivir-treated case remained culture-positive until day 12. Lopinavir/ritonavir significantly reduced viral load compared to remdesivir and control groups (p = 0.0117 and p = 0.0478). No infectious virus was detected in the lopinavir/ritonavir group, and the non-infectious SARS-CoV-2 proportion remained constant at 90%, higher than in the remdesivir and control groups (p = 0.0097). There was a significant difference in culture positivity among the groups (p = 0.0234), particularly between the lopinavir/ritonavir and remdesivir groups (p = 0.0267). These findings suggest that lopinavir/ritonavir reduces viral load and shortens the viral shedding duration compared to remdesivir, despite not being an effective treatment option.