Characteristics of Veterans With Depression Who Use the Veterans Choice Program of the Veterans Health Administration.

OBJECTIVE: The Veterans Choice Program (VCP) of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) allowed eligible veterans to use their benefits with participating providers outside the VHA. The authors aimed to identify characteristics of veterans with depression who used or did not use mental health care through the VCP. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, the authors analyzed secondary data from the national VHA Corporate Data Warehouse. VHA administrative data were linked with VCP claims to examine characteristics of VCP-eligible veterans with depression. The study sample included 595,943 unique veterans who were enrolled in the VHA before 2013, were eligible for the VCP in 2016, were alive in 2018, and had an assessed Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score or depressive disorder diagnosis documented in the VHA between 2016 and 2018. RESULTS: Veterans who used the VCP had lower medical comorbidity scores and lived in less socioeconomically disadvantaged counties, compared with veterans who received only VHA care. VCP veterans were also more likely to have a PHQ-9 score assessment and to have higher mean depression scores. Mean counts of annual mental health visits per 1,000 veterans were markedly higher for direct VHA care than for care provided via the VCP. As a percentage of the total counts of visits per 1,000 veterans across the VCP and VHA, residential programs and outpatient procedures were the services that were most frequently delivered through the VCP. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2016 and 2018, the VCP was used primarily to augment mental health care provided by the VHA, rather than to fill a gap in care.

Rural-Urban Disparities in Quality of Inpatient Psychiatric Care.

OBJECTIVE: Rural residents have higher rates of serious mental illness than urban residents, but little is known about the quality of inpatient psychiatric care available to them locally or how quality may have changed in response to federal initiatives. This study aimed to examine differences and changes in the quality of inpatient psychiatric care in rural and urban hospitals. METHODS: This national retrospective study of 1,644 facilities examined facility-level annual quality-of-care data from the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting program, 2015-2019. Facility location was categorized as urban, large rural, or small or isolated rural on the basis of zip code-level rural-urban commuting area codes. Generalized regression models were used to assess rural-urban differences in care quality (five continuity-of-care and two patient experience measures) and changes over time. RESULTS: Rural inpatient psychiatric units performed better than urban units in nearly all domains. Improvements in quality of care (excluding follow-up care) were similar in rural and urban units. Rates of 30- and 7-day postdischarge follow-up care decreased in all hospitals but faster in rural units. Timely transmission of transition records was more frequent in small or isolated rural versus urban units (mean marginal difference=22.5, 95% CI=6.3-38.8). Physical restraint or seclusion use was less likely in rural than in urban units (OR=0.6, 95% CI=0.5-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Rural psychiatric units had better care quality at baseline (better follow-up care, better timely transmission of transition records, and lower rates of physical restraint use) than urban units, but during 2015-2019, follow-up care performance decreased overall and more in rural than urban units.

Implementing Collaborative Care in Low-Resource Government, Research, and Academic Settings in Rural Nepal.

The collaborative care model (CoCM) is a strategy of integrating behavioral health into primary care to expand access to high-quality mental health services in areas with few psychiatrists. CoCM is multifaceted, and its implementation is accelerating in high-resource settings. However, in low-resource settings, it may not be feasible to implement all CoCM components. Guidance is lacking on CoCM implementation when only some of its components are feasible. In this column, the authors used a cost-benefit approach to refine strategies for addressing common implementation challenges, incorporating the authors' experiences in what was gained and what was lost at each implementation step in three CoCM programs in diverse clinical settings in rural Nepal.

Suicide Prevention Programs Across U.S. Outpatient Mental Health Care Settings: Differences by Facility Ownership.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether facility ownership (public, private nonprofit, private for-profit ownership) was associated with provision of suicide prevention programs. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study identified self-reported suicide prevention program status across 7,597 mental health facilities with outpatient settings by using data from the 2019 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Behavioral Health Treatment Services Locator. Multivariable logistic regression models examined whether facility ownership was associated with availability of these programs. RESULTS: In 2019, only 61.2% of facilities provided outpatient suicide prevention programs. Higher odds of program provision were associated with public ownership (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.37-1.97, p<0.001), facilities serving young adults (AOR=2.16, 95% CI=1.66-2.82, p<0.001) or serving seniors (AOR=1.44, 95% CI=1.27-1.63, p<0.001), and facilities accepting Medicare (AOR=1.34, 95% CI=1.16-1.53, p<0.001), compared with their counterparts, with significant differences across facility ownership types by rurality of locations. Facilities accepting uninsured patients (AOR=0.81, 95% CI=0.68-0.98, p=0.027) or Medicaid patients (AOR=0.76, 95% CI=0.62-0.92, p=0.006) had lower odds of providing these programs. CONCLUSIONS: Facility ownership contributed to significantly different decisions on provision of outpatient suicide prevention programs. Maldistribution of these services should raise concerns, given nationwide efforts to prevent suicide and weak ownership regulations for mental health facilities. Understanding barriers and facilitators for deployment of these programs may improve access to suicide prevention services for all, especially for eligible patients in rural areas.

Rural-Urban Differences in Physician Bias Toward Patients With Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Effective treatments for opioid use disorder exist, but rural areas of the United States have a shortage of services offering such treatments. Physician bias toward patients with opioid use disorder can also limit care access, but no studies have assessed whether physician bias is a more acute barrier in rural compared with urban communities. METHODS: In total, 408 board-certified physicians in Ohio, a state with a high rate of opioid overdoses, completed an online survey examining perspectives on clinical care for patients who misuse opioids. Respondents with missing county-level data were excluded, leaving a total sample of 274. The authors used t tests to determine rural-urban differences in bias, key predictors of bias, and availability of opioid services. Multivariable regression modeling was used to estimate rural-urban differences in bias independent of key bias predictors. RESULTS: Physicians in rural areas (N=37) reported higher levels of bias toward patients with opioid use disorder than did their urban counterparts (N=237). This difference remained statistically significant even after accounting for known bias predictors and physician specialty. Physicians specializing in addiction medicine reported lower bias than did physicians not working in this specialty. CONCLUSIONS: Given existing disparities in harm reduction and addiction treatment services in rural areas, increased physician bias in counties lacking these services suggests that rural patients with opioid use disorder face numerous challenges to finding effective treatment. Bias reduction interventions should target health care professionals in rural communities where such efforts may have the most pronounced impact on improving health care access.

Barriers to Integrated Medication-Assisted Treatment for Rural Patients With Co-occurring Disorders: The Gap in Managing Addiction.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for treatment of opioid use disorder stipulate for mental health assessment and the option for treatment alongside medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Yet efforts to expand MOUD treatment capacity have focused on expanding the workforce of buprenorphine providers. This article aims to describe the processes facilitating and impeding integrated care for rural patients with co-occurring opioid use disorder and mental health conditions. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with primary care and specialty providers (N=26) involved in integrated care through the state's hub-and-spoke system and with system-level stakeholders (N=16) responsible for expanding access to MOUD in rural California. RESULTS: Rural primary care providers struggled to offer adequate mental health resources to patients with co-occurring conditions because of personnel shortages and inadequate availability of telehealth. Efforts to intensify care through referral to county mental health systems and private community providers were thwarted by access barriers. The bifurcated nature of treatment systems resulted in inadequate training in integrated care and the deprioritization of mental health in patient evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Significant system-level barriers undermine the implementation of integrated MOUD in rural areas, potentially increasing the suffering of residents with co-occurring conditions and intensifying burnout among providers.

Rural-Nonrural Differences in Telemedicine Use for Mental and Substance Use Disorders Among Medicaid Beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated recent rural-nonrural trends in the prevalence and amount of mental and substance use disorder telemedicine received by adult Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS: An analysis of 2012-2017 claims data from the IBM MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database for adult beneficiaries ages 18-64 years with mental and substance use disorder diagnoses (N= 1,603,066) identified telemedicine services by using procedure modifier codes and ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes. Unadjusted trends in telemedicine use were examined, and multivariate regression models compared the prevalence and amount of telemedicine and in-person outpatient treatment received by rural (N=428,697) and nonrural (N= 1,174,369) beneficiaries and by diagnosis. RESULTS: Rates of telemedicine treatment for mental and substance use disorders among Medicaid beneficiaries increased during the study period but remained low. Among rural beneficiaries, there was a 5.9 percentage point increase in telemedicine for mental disorders and a 1.9 percentage point increase in telemedicine for substance use disorders. After control for other individual characteristics, rural beneficiaries were more likely than nonrural beneficiaries to receive any telemedicine for mental disorder (2.2 percentage points more likely) or substance use disorder (0.6 percentage points) treatment. Receipt of telemedicine was associated with receipt of more in-person outpatient services by rural beneficiaries (11.2 more visits for mental disorders and 8.2 more for substance use disorders). CONCLUSIONS: Although provision of telemedicine for mental and substance use disorders increased during the study period and was somewhat more common among rural Medicaid beneficiaries, it remains an underused resource for addressing care shortages in rural areas.

Designing an Academic-Community Telepsychiatry Partnership to Provide Inpatient and Outpatient Services in a Critical Access Hospital.

To expand access to mental health treatment in an underserved area, the University of Washington (UW) and Dayton General Hospital (DGH) entered into a partnership to provide comprehensive telepsychiatry services to individuals living in rural Columbia County. Outpatient care is provided by behavioral health consultants at two DGH-affiliated primary care clinics in consultation with a UW-based psychiatrist with expertise in addictions. Inpatient care is supported by regular consultation with UW psychiatrists as well as unscheduled "curbside" consults with attending UW psychiatrists. Patients with complex treatment options can participate in direct videoconferencing sessions with a UW psychiatrist.

An Innovative Approach to Care: Integrating Mental Health Services Through Telemedicine in Rural School-Based Health Centers.

In rural communities, primary care providers continue to provide mental health services, and about 70% of children and adolescents identified to have a psychiatric disorder never receive treatment. A telehealth model for providing integrated mental health services in a school-based health clinic has the potential to increase access to specialized care for the most vulnerable youths. This column provides an overview of the strategies used to implement and integrate such a model in West Virginia. Operationalization, barriers, challenges, and judicious resource use are discussed. Appropriate reimbursement for services and state-specific legislation to ensure consistent revenue to sustain the program are considered.

Improving Access to Collaborative Behavioral Health Care for Rural-Dwelling Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether a telephone-delivered collaborative care intervention (SUpporting Seniors Receiving Treatment And INtervention [SUSTAIN]) improved access to mental health services similarly among older adults in rural areas and those in urban-suburban areas. METHODS: This cohort study of 8,621 older adults participating in the SUSTAIN program, a clinical service provided to older adults in Pennsylvania newly prescribed a psychotropic medication by a primary care or non-mental health provider, examined rural versus urban-suburban differences in rates of initial clinical interview completion, patient clinical characteristics, and program penetration. RESULTS: Participants in rural counties were more likely than those in urban-suburban counties to complete the initial clinical interview (27.0% versus 24.0%, p=.001). Program penetration was significantly higher in rural than in urban-suburban counties (p=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Telephone-based care management programs such as SUSTAIN may be an effective strategy to facilitate access to collaborative mental health care regardless of patients' geographic location.

The Changing Context of Rural America: A Call to Examine the Impact of Social Change on Mental Health and Mental Health Care.

Recent social changes and rising social inequality in the rural United States have affected the experience and meaning of mental illness and treatment seeking within rural communities. Rural Americans face serious mental health disparities, including higher rates of suicide and depression compared with residents of urban areas, and substance abuse rates in rural areas now equal those in urban areas. Despite these increased risks, people living in rural areas are less likely than their urban counterparts to seek or receive mental health services. This Open Forum calls for a research agenda supported by anthropological theory and methods to investigate the significance of this changed rural social context for mental health.