RESUMEN
Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is an acute coronary syndrome event where myocardial ischemia is present, with an increase of cardiac troponins without an elevation of the ST segment. One of the fundamental measures used to diagnose or rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is troponin levels in the blood. Troponin is a broad term used for the category of muscle contraction regulatory proteins and is commonly measured during ACS evaluation. Troponin I is only released by cardiac tissue, while some assay measurements will also pick up troponin released by skeletal muscle injury. This retrospective observational study was performed investigating troponin assays and how they relate to patient's outcomes. The troponin assays used in this Miami hospital where the database of patients was collected between 2018 and 2023 were troponin I (cTnI), the conventional troponin assay, and the newer high-sensitivity troponin I assay (hs-cTn). In this observational study patients who received an admitting diagnosis of NSTEMI corroborated by an independent cardiologist had their respective troponin assay levels included. Patients found to have ECG changes significant for non-ischemic pathologies, or echocardiogram findings suggestive of myocardial dysfunction not clinically correlated to an ACS were excluded from the study. A total of 75 patients were included in this study and the mean age was 75.97 ±14.72 years, with a presentation of chest pain, dyspnea and general weakness recorded in 59% (n = 45) of patients. The median time between troponin samples was 6.63 hours across both assays and hs-cTn showed a 4.99% increase in variation between samples while cTnI had a decrease of 2.53%. The study objective is to support whether there is a difference in rates of cardiac catheterization or mortality based on the type of troponin testing. There was no significant association found between, the type of troponin assay used during hospital admission, and the outcomes of catheterization and death (p > 0.009).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to compare the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: We categorized 4558 patients with NSTEMI as either RASI users (3752 patients) or non-users (806 patients). The 3-year patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCO), which included all-cause death, recurrent MI, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF), were the primary outcomes. To compare clinical outcomes, a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated after performing multicollinearity tests on all significant confounding variables (P <0.05) RESULTS: Among RASI users, the aHRs for POCO, all-cause death, and cardiac death were significantly higher in the HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) subgroup than in the HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF; 1.610, 2.120, and 2.489, respectively; P <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF; 2.234, 3.920, 5.215, respectively; P <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively) subgroups. The aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFmrEF subgroup than the HFpEF subgroup (1.416, 1.843, and 2.172, respectively). Among RASI non-users, the aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFrEF subgroup than the HFmrEF (2.573, 3.172, and 3.762, respectively) and HFpEF (2.425, 3.805, and 4.178, respectively) subgroups. In three LVEF subgroups, RASI users exhibited lower aHRs for POCO and all-cause death than RASI non-users. CONCLUSIONS: In the RASI users group, the aHRs for POCO and mortality were highest in the HFrEF subgroup, intermediate in the HFmrEF subgroup, and lowest in the HFpEF subgroup.
RESUMEN
Chest pain is a common and complex symptom that can arise from various etiologies, ranging from benign musculoskeletal conditions to life-threatening cardiovascular events. It is a hallmark symptom of myocardial infarction, angina, and other ischemic heart diseases, necessitating prompt and thorough evaluation. Ongoing chest pain post-procedures and medication administration presents a diagnostic challenge, as it may be indicative of an exacerbation of underlying conditions. We present the case of a 64-year-old Caucasian male who initially presented with severe and persistent chest pain suggestive of an anterior wall ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). He had a history of coronary artery disease and had recently undergone cardiac catheterization. Despite prompt administration of nitroglycerin and aspirin, the patient's symptoms persisted, prompting emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Subsequent to PCI, ongoing chest discomfort persisted, prompting further investigation, which revealed a concurrent lung mass and nodules on imaging. Additional interventions, including repeated PCI procedures and thoracentesis, were undertaken. Unfortunately, the patient's clinical course rapidly deteriorated, culminating in cardiac arrest and unsuccessful resuscitative efforts. This case highlights the complexities inherent in managing intricate cardiovascular conditions and emphasizes the critical importance of maintaining vigilance for concomitant pathologies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Older people less frequently receive invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for NSTEMI than younger patients. We describe care, ICA data, and in-hospital and 30-day outcomes of NSTEMI by age in a contemporary and geographically diverse cohort. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by age (≥75 years, n = 761). Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions, and data collected on ICA. Outcomes included in hospital acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, repeat myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, BARC Type ≥3 bleeding and death, as well as 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Patients aged ≥75 years, compared with younger patients, at presentation had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and oral anticoagulation prescription (22.4% vs 7.6%, p < 0.001). Older patients less frequently received ICA than younger patients (78.6% vs 90.6%, p < 0.001) with the recorded reason more often being advanced age, comorbidities or frailty. Of those who underwent ICA, older patients more frequently demonstrated 3-vessel, 4-vessel and/or left main stem coronary artery disease compared to younger patients (49.7% vs 34.1%, p < 0.001) but less frequently received revascularisation (63.6% vs 76.9%, p < 0.001). Older patients experienced higher rates of in-hospital acute heart failure (15.0% vs 8.4%, p < 0.001) and bleeding (2.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.006), as well as in-hospital and 30-day mortality (3.4% vs 1.3%, p < 0.001; 4.8% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001; respectively), than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged ≥75 years with NSTEMI, compared with younger patients, less frequently received ICA and guideline-recommended care, and had worse short-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Anciano , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Comorbilidad , Factores de Riesgo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) increase the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). This study aimed to evaluate the combined risk estimates of DM and CMD, assessed by the angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (angio-IMR), in patients with NSTEMI. METHODS: A total of 2212 patients with NSTEMI who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were retrospectively enrolled from three centers. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Post-PCI angio-IMR did not significantly differ between the DM group and the non-DM group (20.13 [17.91-22.70] vs. 20.19 [18.14-22.77], P = 0.530). DM patients exhibited a notably higher risk of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years compared to non-DM patients (9.5% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). NSTEMI patients with both DM and CMD experienced the highest cumulative incidence of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years (24.0%, P < 0.001). The combination of DM and CMD in NSTEMI patients were identified as the most powerful independent predictor for cardiac death or readmission for heart failure at 2 years (adjusted HR: 7.894, [95% CI, 4.251-14.659], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NSTEMI, the combination of DM and CMD is an independent predictor of cardiac death or readmission for heart failure. Angio-IMR could be used as an additional evaluation tool for the management of NSTEMI patients with DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; Unique identifier: NCT05696379.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Circulación Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus , Microcirculación , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Readmisión del Paciente , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resistencia Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Anciano , Medición de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , China/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
This study explored 1-year follow-up of Parmaco-invasive strategy with half-dose recombinant human prourokinase (PHDP) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The follow-up endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurring within 30 days and 1 year, as well as postoperative bleeding events. The study ultimately included 150 subjects, with 75 in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) group and 75 in the PHDP group. This study found that the PHDP group had a shorter FMC-reperfusion time (42.00 min vs 96.00 min, P < 0.001). During PCI, the PHDP group had a lower percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (P = 0.021), intropin (P = 0.002) and tirofiban (P < 0.001) use. And the incidence of intraoperative arrhythmia, malignant arrhythmia, and slow flow/no-reflow was lower in the PHDP group (P < 0.001). At the 30-day follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the PPCI group who were readmitted due to unstable angina (P = 0.037). After 1 year of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in MACEs between the two groups (P = 0.500). The incidence of postoperative major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and minor bleeding did not differ between the PHDP and PPCI groups (P > 0.05). The PHDP facilitates early treatment of infarct-related vessels, shortens FMC-reperfusion time, and does not increase the risk of MACEs.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anciano , Pronóstico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Smoking paradox has generated inconsistent findings concerning the clinical prognosis of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, while providing limited insights into coronary anatomy and function which are crucial prognostic factors. Therefore, this study aimed to further investigate the existence of smoking paradox in coronary anatomy and function. METHODS: This study divided STEMI patients into smokers and non-smokers. Quantitative coronary angiography, angiographyderived microcirculatory resistance (AMR) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) were utilized to analyze coronary anatomy and function. These parameters were compared using multivariable analysis and propensity score matching. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression. RESULTS: The study included 1258 patients, with 730 in non-smoker group and 528 in smoker group. Smokers were significantly younger, predominantly male, and had fewer comorbidities. Without adjusting for confounders, smokers exhibited larger lumen diameter [2.03(1.45-2.57) vs. 1.90(1.37-2.49), P = 0.033] and lower AMR [244(212-288) vs. 260(218-301), P = 0.006]. After matching and multivariate adjustment, smokers exhibited inversely smaller lumen diameter [1.97(1.38-2.50) vs. 2.15(1.63-2.60), P = 0.002] and higher incidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction [233(53.9%) vs. 190(43.6%), P = 0.002], but showed similar AMR and clinical outcomes compared to non-smokers. There was no difference in QFR between two groups. CONCLUSION: Smoking among STEMI patients undergoing pPCI was associated with smaller lumen diameter and higher occurrence of coronary microvascular dysfunction, although it had no further impact on clinical prognosis. The smoking paradox observed in coronary anatomy or function may be explained by younger age, gender, and lower prevalence of comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Circulación Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Microcirculación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Fumadores , Fumar , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Anciano , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , No Fumadores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resistencia VascularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital heparin administration has been reported to improve prognosis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This beneficial effect may be limited to the subgroup of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. METHODS: To assess the impact of pre-hospital heparin loading on TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow grade and mortality in STEMI patients with OHCA, we analyzed data from 2,566 consecutive patients from two hospitals participating in the prospective Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (FITT-STEMI) trial. RESULTS: In 394 participants with OHCA, 272 (69%) received heparin from the emergency medical service (EMS). Collapse witnessed by EMS (odds ratio (OR) = 3.53, 95%-confidence interval (CI) = 1.54-8.09; p = 0.003) and pre-hospital ECG recording (OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.06-10.35; p = 0.039) were identified as parameters significantly associated with pre-hospital heparin use. In univariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was lower in the group receiving heparin in the pre-hospital setting (26.8% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.002). However, in a regression model, pre-hospital heparin use was no longer a significant predictor of mortality (OR = 0.992; p = 0.981). Patency of the infarct artery prior to coronary revascularization, as measured by TIMI flow grade, was not associated with pre-hospital administration of heparin in OHCA patients (OR = 0.840; p = 0.724). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients with OHCA, pre-hospital use of heparin is neither associated with improved early patency of the infarct artery nor with a better prognosis. Our results do not support the assumption of a positive effect of heparin administration in the pre-hospital treatment phase in STEMI patients with OHCA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00794001.
RESUMEN
The Dressler-de Winter sign is an electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern characterized by upsloping ST-segment depression in leads V1-V6 followed by tall, hyperacute T waves, typically indicating an occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). We present a case involving an inferoposterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with a variant of the de Winter sign, a concept of ST-segment continuum in the precordial leads. Despite initial ECG findings suggesting right coronary artery (RCA) or left circumflex artery (LCX) involvement, coronary angiography confirmed occlusion of the wrap-around LAD distal to the first septal (S1) and diagonal branch (D1) and revealed a left dominant system accompanied by a small non-dominant RCA. This case highlights the diagnostic complexity in accurately localizing the culprit artery in STEMI cases exhibiting the de Winter sign. Understanding such ECG variants is crucial for analyzing the mechanisms of acute ischemia and ensuring accurate assessment of the culprit vessel for effective revascularization.
RESUMEN
Coxsackie B virus is primarily associated with fever, pharyngitis, and gastrointestinal symptoms, while myocarditis is rarely reported. We present a rare case of a 47-year-old male with a history of hypertension and obesity, who developed Coxsackie B virus-induced myositis, myocarditis, and polyarthralgia. The patient presented with worsening back pain radiating to his chest, migratory arthralgia, exertional dyspnea, and bilateral shoulder pain with arm weakness. Initial investigations revealed elevated creatinine kinase (CK) levels and troponin I, alongside a high white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Given the patient's symptoms and uptrending troponin without EKG changes, there was a high concern for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), leading to initial treatment with aspirin and IV heparin. However, further questioning revealed a recent sore throat and contact with an ill family member, prompting investigations for an infectious etiology. A viral panel confirmed Coxsackie B virus infection. The patient made a full recovery with supportive care. This case highlights the importance of considering viral causes, particularly the Coxsackie B virus, in patients presenting with muscle pain, cardiac symptoms, and joint pain. Comprehensive viral testing is crucial for early identification and appropriate management to prevent long-term complications. Understanding the mechanisms of Coxsackie B virus infection is essential for developing effective treatment strategies addressing both the viral infection and the inflammatory response.
RESUMEN
Background: The predictive value of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is unclear. Methods: This study continuously recruited STEMI patients treated with PPCI at the Chest Pain Center of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from April 2023 to December 2023. Blood samples were taken before PPCI and the level of circulating GDF-15 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the patients were divided into CMD and Control group according to angiographic microvascular resistance (AMR) (cut-off value 2.50 mmHg*s/cm). The differences in GDF-15 expression levels between the two groups were compared, and the predictive value of GDF-15 for CMD was systematically evaluated. Results: A total of 134 patients, with an average age of 59.78 ± 12.69 years and 75.37 % being male, were included in this study. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a significant association between GDF-15 and CMD (adjusted OR = 2.505, 95 % CI: 1.661-3.779, P < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of GDF-15 for CMD was 0.782 (95 % CI: 0.704-0.861), with a sensitivity of 0.795 and specificity of 0.643 in predicting CMD in PPCI. The AUC of the GDF-15 model (Model With GDF-15) was 0.867 (95 % CI: 0.806-0.928), significantly outperforming the clinical baseline model (Model Without GDF-15) (Δ AUC = 0.079, 95 % CI: 0.020-0.138, P = 0.009). Furthermore, the net reclassification improvement (NRI) was 0.854 (95 % CI: 0.543-1.166, P < 0.001), and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) was 0.151 (95 % CI: 0.089-0.213, P < 0.001). Conclusions: GDF-15 can serve as a biomarker for predicting the development of CMD in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to the occlusion of left coronary artery are worse in patients with proximal occlusion than in those with non-proximal occlusion. However, there are few reports that focus on the comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI between proximal and non-proximal right coronary artery (RCA) occlusions. METHODS: We included 356 patients with STEMI whose infarct-related artery is RCA and divided them into the proximal group (nâ¯=â¯129) and the non-proximal group (nâ¯=â¯227). We defined segment 1 of RCA as proximal, and segments 2, 3, and 4 as non-proximal according to the reporting system of the American Heart Association. The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE), which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, readmission for heart failure, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Incidence of shock at admission, requirement for catecholamine during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or mechanical support during PCI tended to be higher in the proximal group (42.6â¯%) than in the non-proximal group (33.5â¯%) (pâ¯=â¯0.088). Although the incidence of right ventricular infarction tended to be higher in the proximal group (17.8â¯%) than in the non-proximal group (10.6â¯%) without reaching statistical significance (pâ¯=â¯0.072), the incidence of in-hospital death was similar between the 2 groups (1.6â¯% versus 1.8â¯%, pâ¯=â¯1.000). The MACE-free survival curves were not different between the 2 groups (pâ¯=â¯0.400). Multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE (HR 1.095, 95%CI 0.691-1.737, pâ¯=â¯0.699). CONCLUSIONS: Although the acute phase conditions such as shock or right ventricular infarction tended to be more severe in patients with proximal occlusion, overall clinical outcomes including long-term outcomes were comparable between the proximal and distal RCA occlusions. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the proximal RCA occlusion was not associated with MACE after hospital discharge.
RESUMEN
Background: ST elevation myocardial infarctions are usually a consequence of the occlusion of a single coronary artery, but in 2.5% of the cases, two or more culprit lesions are found. Simultaneous coronary artery occlusion is a potentially life-threatening condition that leads to cardiogenic shock or ventricular arrhythmias. Case summary: We presented the case of a 74-year-old man presenting with chest pain and ST segment elevation (STE) in inferior leads and evidence of alternating STE in anterior leads in a pattern like Wellens syndrome type A in subsequent electrocardiogram (ECGs). Emergency coronary angiography (CA) revealed thrombotic occlusion of the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and sub-occlusion of mid left anterior descending artery (LAD). During the CA, he became haemodynamically unstable requiring intravenous inotropes and vasopressors, and he underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention of both RCA and LAD culprit lesions. His subsequent hospital stay was uneventful, and he was discharged 5 days later. Discussion: ST elevation myocardial infarction with more than one culprit coronary artery is a rare but at high risk of haemodynamic decompensation. The causes of occlusion of multiple coronary arteries may be several: coronary embolism, coronary ectasia, simultaneous plaque disruption, coronary vasospasm, hypercoagulability states, smoking, and illicit drug abuse. The presumed mechanism behind the presented case may be a combination of release of pro-thrombotic cytokines due to the thrombotic occlusion of the first coronary and low output state secondary to myocardial dysfunction leading to impaired flow in a severe stenotic coronary artery with subsequent thrombosis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI are significantly improved by reducing time from vessel occlusion to coronary blood flow restoration. In an effort to improve outcomes, we developed a secure mobile application, STEMIcathAID, and designed a pilot project implementing the app into the workflow for STEMI patients transfer. The aim of the study is to assess the impact of the app on key metrics for STEMI transfer before (historic) and after app launch. METHODS: The pilot project included physicians, nurses and technicians from the Emergency Medicine and Nursing Departments at the referring center, the catheterization laboratory and transfer center. From July 2021 to February 2023, the referring center activated STEMIcathAID alarms in parallel with the previously established STEMI activation with traditional phone call to transfer center. RESULTS: One hundred eleven suspected STEMI calls were activated through the app with 66 accepted and 45 rejected cases; thirty-one STEMI cases with available device time were compared with 42 STEMIs activated through the traditional pathway before the app implementation. Median door-to-device time for STEMIcathAID-assisted transfer decreased from 106 to 86 min (p < 0.001). The significant improvement, 20 min (19%), of the key metric for interhospital transfer resulted in all STEMI cases meeting the AHA goal of door-to-device time ≤ 120 min. In addition, median door-in-door-out time at the referral hospital decreased from 56 to 50 min (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a mobile app into STEMI workflow of a large urban healthcare system significantly improved the quality of care for transfer of STEMI patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: AHA Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease® (GWTG-CAD) registry is a national quality improvement program and is not subject to the institutional review board approval.
RESUMEN
Objective: To assess the changes in QRS duration (â³QRSd) before and after primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI) regarding the relation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients after a first acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: A total of 244 patients with STEMI were enrolled, and clinical, biochemical, and angiographic parameters were compared between two groups based on LVEF at 6 months post-discharge. QRS duration (QRSd) was analyzed in relation to LVEF, and feature selection using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO) regression was performed. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluation were conducted to identify predictors and assess model efficacy. Results: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of various parameters, including age, time from symptom onset to balloon dilation (STB), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, Left ventricular end-diastolic volume(LVEDV) at baseline, left ventricular end-systolic volume(LVESV)at baseline, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDD)at baseline and six months, hospital length of stay(days), ST-segment resolution (STR), the left anterior descending artery as the infarction-related artery (IRA-LAD), frequency of TIMI 3 flow post PPCI, thrombus aspiration and/or intracoronary thrombolysis, the use of tirofiban, and the number of implanted stents(stents).In addition, postoperative QRSd and â³QRSd were significantly higher in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction(LVSD). LASSO regression selected six variables as predictors of postoperative LVEF. Logistic regression analysis identified age, STB, NT-proBNP, LVESV at baseline,â³QRSd, and stents, as independent factors associated with LVSD within six months for patients with a first occurrence of STEMI. The models achieved AUC values of 0.906 (using ΔQRSd),0.922(using 6 variables excluding ΔQRSd) and 0.962 (using 6 variables). Conclusion: This study identified ΔQRSd as a potential predictor of LVSD in patients with STEMI. The developed models showed good efficacy in predicting postoperative LVEF changes. These findings may contribute to risk stratification and individualized management strategies for STEMI patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A growing population of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although little is known about their longer-term mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the MINAP (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics mortality data, we analyzed 363 559 UK patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, with or without CKD. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for baseline demographics. Compared with patients without CKD, patients with CKD were less frequently prescribed P2Y12 inhibitors (89% versus 86%, P<0.001) less likely to undergo invasive angiography (67% versus 41%, P<0.001) or percutaneous coronary intervention (41% versus 25%, P<0.001), and were less often referred to cardiac rehabilitation (80% versus 66%, P<0.001). Following non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, patients with CKD had higher risk of 30-day (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 1.20-1.29], 1-year 1.47 [95% CI, 1.44-1.51]) and 5-year mortality 1.55 (95% CI, 1.53-1.58) than patients without CKD (all P<0.001). Risk of mortality over the entire study period was highest in CKD Stage 5 (HR, 2.98 [95% CI, 2.87-3.10]), even after excluding mortality ≤30 days (HR, 3.03 [95% CI, 2.90-3.17]) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in proportion of deaths attributable to cardiovascular disease at 30 days (CKD; 76% versus no CKD; 76%), or 1 -year (CKD; 62% versus no CKD; 62%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CKD were significantly less likely to receive invasive investigation or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention and had significantly higher risk of short- and longer-term mortality. Risk of mortality increased with reducing CKD stage. Cardiovascular disease was the main cause of mortality in patients with CKD, but at comparable rates to the general population with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Sistema de Registros , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medición de Riesgo , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Percutaneous coronary intervention is the main strategy of revascularization and has been shown to improve outcomes in some patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, multivessel disease (MVD), a common condition in these patients, is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to single-vessel disease. Despite intervention being a standard treatment for coronary artery disease, optimal strategies and timings for patients with STEMI and MVD remain unclear. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have investigated this topic; however, many current conclusions are based on observational studies. Furthermore, clinical guidelines regarding the management of patients with STEMI and MVD contain conflicting recommendations. Therefore, we aimed to compile relevant studies and newly available evidence-based medicines to explore the most effective approach.
RESUMEN
Background: Deferred stenting has been recognized as beneficial for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) accompanied by a high thrombus burden. Nevertheless, its efficacy and safety specifically in geriatric STEMI patients remain to be elucidated. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap and assess the potential advantages of deferred stenting in an older patient cohort. Methods: In this study, 208 geriatric patients (aged ≥ 80 years) with STEMI and a high thrombus burden in the infarct-related artery (IRA) were enrolled. They were categorized into two groups: the deferred stenting group, where stent implantation was conducted after 7-8 days of continuous antithrombotic therapy, and the immediate stenting group, where stent implantation was performed immediately. Results: In the deferred stenting group, the stents used were significantly larger in diameter and shorter in length compared to those in the immediate stenting group (p < 0.05). This group also exhibited a lower incidence of distal embolism in the IRA, and higher rates of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) blood flow grade 3 and myocardial blush grade 3 (p < 0.05). Additionally, the left ventricular ejection fractions at the 1-year follow-up were significantly higher in the deferred stenting group than in the immediate stenting group (p < 0.05). The rate of the major adverse cardiac events in the deferred stenting group was significantly lower than in the immediate stenting groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Deferred stenting for geriatric patients with STEMI and high thrombus burden demonstrates significant clinical benefits. This approach not only reduces the incidence of distal embolism in the IRA, but also enhances myocardial tissue perfusion and preserves cardiac ejection function. Moreover, deferred stenting has proven to be safe in this patient population, indicating its potential as a preferred treatment strategy in such cases.
RESUMEN
Background: Studies reporting the status of coronary microvascular function in the infarct-related artery (IRA) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain limited. This study utilized the coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) to assess coronary microvascular function in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI. Methods: We used the FlashAngio system to measure the caIMR after primary PCI in 157 patients with STEMI. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as a composite endpoint encompassing cardiac mortality, target vessel revascularization, and rehospitalization due to congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction (MI), or angina. Results: Approximately 30% of patients diagnosed with STEMI and who experienced successful primary PCI during the study period had a caIMR in the IRA of > 40. The caIMR in the IRA was significantly higher than in the reference vessel (32.9 ± 15.8 vs. 27.4 ± 11.1, p < 0.001). The caIMR in the reference vessel of the caIMR > 40 group was greater than in the caIMR ≤ 40 group (30.9 ± 11.3 vs. 25.9 ± 10.7, p = 0.009). Moreover, the caIMR > 40 group had higher incidence rates of MACEs at 3 months (25.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.009) and 1 year (29.8% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.04), than in the caIMR ≤ 40 group, which were mainly driven by a higher rate of rehospitalization due to CHF, MI, or angina. A caIMR in the IRA of > 40 was an independent predictor of a MACE at 3 months (hazard ratio (HR): 3.459, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.363-8.779, p = 0.009) and 1 year (HR: 2.384, 95% CI: 1.100-5.166, p = 0.03) in patients with STEMI after primary PCI. Conclusions: Patients with STEMI after primary PCI often have coronary microvascular dysfunction, which is indicated by an increased caIMR in the IRA. An elevated caIMR of > 40 in the IRA was associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.