Frontal Alpha Asymmetry and Its Modulation by Monoaminergic Neurotransmitters in Depression.

Frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) is an electroencephalography (EEG) measure that quantifies trait-like left versus right hemisphere lateralization in alpha power. Increased FAA indicates relatively greater left than right frontal cortex activation and is associated with enhanced reward-related approach behaviors rather than avoidance or withdrawal. Studies dating back several decades have often suggested that having greater FAA supports enhanced positive affect and protection against major depressive disorder (MDD), whereas having greater right frontal activation (i.e., reduced FAA) is associated with negative affect and risk for MDD. While this hypothesis is widely known, a number of other studies instead have found increased FAA in MDD, or evidence that either leftward or rightward bias in FAA is associated with depression. Here we briefly review the literature on leftward or rightward lateralization in FAA in MDD, and find much evidence that MDD is not always characterized by reduced FAA. We also review the limited literature on FAA and monoaminergic neurotransmitter systems, including pharmacologic agents that act on them. Studies of serotonin in particular provide genetic and pharmacologic evidence for modulation of FAA, where some of these data may suggest that serotonin reduces FAA. In a synthesis of the collective literature on FAA and the monoamines, we suggest that serotonin and norepinephrine may differentially affect FAA, with serotonin tending to promote right frontal activation and norepinephrine biased toward left frontal activation. These putative differences in frontal lateralization may influence MDD phenotypes or potential subtypes of the disorder, and suggest pharmacologic treatment strategies.

Insulin resistance, clinical presentation and resistance to selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors in major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: The understanding of mechanisms underlying non-response to antidepressants is limited. The latest data highlights the role of insulin resistance (IR) in major depressive disorder (MDD) pathophysiology, presentation, and treatment efficacy. This work aimed to assess IR in MDD and explore the relationships between IR, MDD presentation and non-response to selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). METHODS: 67 MDD individuals: 36 responsive (MDD T[+]), 31 non-responsive (MDD T[-]) to SNRI and 30 healthy controls were recruited. The treatment response criteria were: Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement score of 1 or 2 after ≥ 8 weeks of treatment. Participants were assessed by physician and self-report tools measuring depression, anhedonia, anxiety, bipolarity, sleep quality. Blood samples were collected to assess fasting glucose and insulin levels and calculate HOMA-IR (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance). RESULTS: MDD T[-] vs. MDD T[+] had significantly higher body mass index, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR. MDD T[-] presented higher levels of depressed mood, appetite/weight changes, loss of interest, energy, overall depressive symptoms, and sleep impairment; some evaluations suggested higher anhedonia and anxiety in MDD T[-] vs. MDD T[+]. Insulin and IR were weakly but significantly correlated with the severity of psychomotor symptoms, energy level, thoughts of death/suicide, self-criticism, appetite/weight, depressed mood symptoms, sleep problems. IR was weakly but significantly correlated with anhedonia. CONCLUSION: IR appears to be linked to depressive symptoms characteristic of the "metabolic" MDD subtype, such as psychomotor changes, energy level, anhedonia, sleep problems, appetite/weight changes, state and trait anxiety, sleep quality, and non-response to SNRI.

Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in managing neuropathic pain following spinal and non-spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) offer promise in managing Post-surgical neuropathic pain (PSNP), uncertainties remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of SNRIs in managing PSNP. METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to January 1st 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SNRIs to placebo for PSNP. The primary outcome measures were pain at rest and adverse events post-surgery. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on surgical type and specific SNRIs. RESULTS: A total of 19 RCTs, encompassing 1440 participants (719 in the SNRI group vs 721 in the placebo group), met the inclusion criteria and were included. The pooled results demonstrated that pain scores were significantly lower in patients treated with SNRIs at 2 hours (MD:-0.26; 95%CI: -0.47 to -0.04; p=0.02), 6 hours (MD:-0.68; 95%CI: -1.01 to -0.34; p<0.0001), 24 hours (MD:-0.54; 95%CI: -0.99 to -0.09; p=0.02), and 48 hours (MD:-0.66; 95%CI: -1.23 to -0.10; p=0.02) post-surgery. In terms of adverse events, dizziness (OR:2.53; 95%CI: 1.34-4.78; p=0.004) and dry mouth (OR:2.21; 95%CI: 1.25-3.92; p=0.007) were significantly higher in the SNRIs group. Subgroup analysis showed that SNRI was found to significantly lower the 24-hour pain score after spinal surgery (MD:-0.45; 95%CI: -0.84 to -0.05; p=0.03). Duloxetine (MD:-0.63; 95%CI: -1.15 to -0.11; p=0.02) had a significant effect in lowering the 24-hour pain score at rest compared to placebo, whereas venlafaxine did not. CONCLUSIONS: SNRIs yielded considerable pain score reductions across multiple post-surgical intervals, although accompanied by an increased incidence of dizziness and dry mouth.

Potential Effect of Vortioxetine on Restless Leg Syndrome.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a chronic progressive movement disorder characterized by abnormal sensations, especially at rest and at night, as the need and urge to move the lower extremity. It has been reported that RLS severity and frequency increase in patients with anxiety and depression. It has been reported that serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors such as venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline can cause RLS symptoms. No adverse effects of vortioxetine on RLS have been reported in the literature. In this case series, we report the effect of vortioxetine in patients with RLS with symptoms of depression and anxiety. In this case series, the effect of adding vortioxetine to treatment on RLS symptoms is reported in 7 patients (5 female). After the use of vortioxetine, 5 of 7 patients' symptoms regressed without the need to start a separate drug for primary movement disorder. In conclusion, we believe that studies should be conducted to investigate the efficacy of vortioxetine in the treatment of RLS. Therefore, randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the effect and safety of vortioxetine on RLS symptoms.

Repurposing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for severity of COVID-19: A population-based study.

The World Health Organization has proposed that a search be made for alternatives to vaccines for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19, with one such alternative being selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This study thus sought to assess: the impact of previous treatment with SSRI antidepressants on the severity of COVID-19 (risk of hospitalisation, admission to an intensive care unit [ICU], and mortality), its influence on susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 and progression to severe COVID-19. We conducted a population-based multiple case-control study in a region in the north-west of Spain. Data were sourced from electronic health records. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95%CIs were calculated using multilevel logistic regression. We collected data from a total of 86,602 subjects: 3060 cases PCR+, 26,757 non-hospitalised cases PCR+ and 56,785 controls (without PCR+). Citalopram displayed a statistically significant decrease in the risk of hospitalisation (aOR=0.70; 95% CI 0.49-0.99, p = 0.049) and progression to severe COVID-19 (aOR=0.64; 95% CI 0.43-0.96, p = 0.032). Paroxetine was associated with a statistically significant decrease in risk of mortality (aOR=0.34; 95% CI 0.12 - 0.94, p = 0.039). No class effect was observed for SSRIs overall, nor was any other effect found for the remaining SSRIs. The results of this large-scale, real-world data study indicate that, citalopram, could be a candidate drug for being repurposed as preventive treatment aimed at reducing COVID-19 patients' risk of progressing to severe stages of the disease.

Effectiveness and adverse effects of the use of mirtazapine as compared to duloxetine for fibromyalgia: real-life data from a retrospective cohort.

On the background of a restricted armamentarium of drugs available for the management of fibromyalgia (FM), we aimed to compare the real-world effectiveness of two serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), mirtazapine (MTZ) and duloxetine (DLX) in FM. A medical records review was done to identify patients diagnosed with FM and prescribed a stable dose of either MTZ or DLX for more than 6 months. Their present status was determined by a telephonic interview which included a subjective assessment of improvement (Likert scale), FIQR (Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire), adverse drug effects and compliance. One-fifty-eight patients were screened to include 81 patients [mean age 46.7 (± 13.0) years, 64 (79%) females]. Sixty (79%) had primary fibromyalgia and 66 (81.5%) were on DLX (20-40 mg) while 15(18.5%) were on MTZ (7.5 mg). In addition to the drugs, lifestyle modification was followed by 57 (70.3%). A moderate-to-good improvement was seen in 66 (81.5%), while 15 (18.5%) reported poor to no improvement overall. In the DLX group, a majority (59, 89.4%) showed moderate-to-good improvement compared to 7(46.7%) on MTZ [p = 0.001, 9.6(2.6-34)]. However, FIQR was similar for those on DLX (3.6 ± 0.9) and MTZ (3.8 ± 0.7). Adverse effects were reported for 51 (77%) of patients on DLX and all (100%) on MTZ with a poorer compliance with MTZ 5 (33.3%) compared to DLX 47 (71.2%) [p = 0.008, OR 0.1(0.03-0.4)]. On multivariate analysis, DLX use [OR 16.7 (95% CI 2.7-100); p = 0.008] and lifestyle modification [p = 0.002; OR 11.2(1.5-83.3)] were associated with better subjective outcomes. Low-dose MTZ appears to be inferior to DLX in the management of FM in this real-world cohort.

Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors for Premature Ejaculation in Adult Men: A Cochrane Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently used to treat premature ejaculation (PE) in men. We performed a Cochrane review to assess the efficacy of SSRI treatment for PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We extensively searched a range of databases up to May 2020 and only included randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: A total of 31 studies with 8,254 men were included in this analysis. We found that SSRI treatment probably improves self-perceived PE symptoms (defined as a rating of 'better' or 'much better'; risk ratio [RR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-2.23; moderate-certainty evidence) and satisfaction with intercourse (defined as a rating of 'good' or 'very good'; RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.42-1.87; moderate-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. Furthermore, SSRI treatment likely improve participants' self-perceived control over ejaculation (defined as rating of 'good' or 'very good'; RR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.72-3.05; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably lessens distress (defined as rating of 'a little bit' or 'not at all') about PE (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.26-1.88; moderate-certainty evidence). SSRI treatment may increase IELT compared to placebo (mean difference, 3.09 minutes higher; 95% CI, 1.94 higher to 4.25 higher; low-certainty evidence). However, SSRIs may increase treatment cessations due to adverse events compared to placebo (RR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.61-5.51; low-certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: SSRI treatment for PE appears to substantially improve a number of outcomes of direct patient importance such as symptom improvement, satisfaction with intercourse and perceived control over ejaculation when compared to placebo.

Association of different antidepressant classes with clinical attachment level and alveolar bone loss in patients with periodontitis: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to determine the relationship of antidepressant medicine use with periodontal diseases, exploring the association of different pharmacological classes of antidepressant with observations of clinical attachment loss (CAL) and alveolar bone level (BL) in patients with periodontitis. BACKGROUND: Existing evidence on the impact of antidepressant medication on periodontal tissues has focused on some classes only and is still unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study evaluated the association of different antidepressant classes with clinical attachment loss (CAL) and alveolar bone level (BL). METHODS: This study was carried out in a population of patients aged ≥ 30 years old with periodontitis who sought treatment at the University of Florida from 2014 to 2018. The following variables were obtained from patients' records; usage of antidepressant medications and their pharmacological classes (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRI], tricyclic, atypical, and monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAO]), age, gender, smoking habit, mild systemic diseases, CAL, and cement-enamel junction (CEJ) and alveolar bone crest (BC) distance, defined as BL, in the Ramfjord index teeth. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty-two periodontitis patients were evaluated, of which 113 (19.4%) were antidepressant users. Antidepressant users exhibited significantly lower BL and fewer sites with severe CAL (≥5 mm), than non-users (p < .05). Among all single-class antidepressant users, the SSRI users showed significantly less CAL and lower BL than non-users (p < .05). Patients taking combinations of the different classes of antidepressants also showed better CAL and BL than non-users. Generalized linear models, including variables such as gender, age, systemic diseases, and smoking, demonstrated that antidepressant users were more likely to have lower mean BL and fewer sites with severe bone loss (i.e. BL > 3 and >5 mm) than non-users (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant medications were associated with higher alveolar bone level and less clinical attachment loss in patients with periodontitis. When the different classes of antidepressants were analyzed individually, only the SSRI class users and the multiple-class users showed significantly less periodontal breakdown than non-users.

Effects of different antidepressant classes on dental implant failure: A retrospective clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested an association between taking antidepressants and dental implant failure. This study aimed to investigate the association of different antidepressant classes with dental implant failure. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients that received dental implants at the University of Florida from 2011 to 2016. The variables of implant failure, antidepressant use and classes (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRI], serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRI], tricyclic antidepressants [TCA], atypical antidepressants [AA], and monoamine oxidase inhibitors [MAOI]), age, sex, smoking, mild systemic diseases, and implant location were obtained from patients' records. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) of implant failure in patients taking different antidepressant classes, in relationship to non-antidepressant users, were estimated, and the influence of multiple variables on implant failure were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 771 patients and 1,820 implants were evaluated. The statistically significant predictors for implant failure included smoking (OR = 5.221), use of antidepressants (OR = 4.285), posterior maxilla location (OR = 2.911), mild systemic disease (OR = 2.648), and age (OR = 1.037) (P <0.05). The frequency of implant failure was 33.3% in TCA users, 31.3% in SNRI users, 6.3% in SSRI users, 5.2% in Atypical antidepressant users, and 3.9% in non-users. Significant associations were observed between the use of SNRI (OR: 11.07; 95% CI: 3.265 to 33.82) and TCA (OR: 12.16; 95% CI: 1.503 to 71.58) and implant failure (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Users of antidepressants were at higher risk of implant failure than non-users. Patients taking SNRI and TCA were at the highest risk of implant loss, when compared with non-users. Conclusions about TCA, however, are based on a limited number of cases.

Efficacy and safety of the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, TAS-303, in women with stress urinary incontinence: Results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, early phase II trial.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out an exploratory assessment of the efficacy and safety of TAS-303, a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, early phase II study, women with stress urinary incontinence and stress urinary incontinence-predominant mixed urinary incontinence were randomized to a placebo or TAS-303 (3 or 6 mg) once daily for 8 weeks. The main efficacy end-points were mean percentage change in incontinence episode frequency per 24 h from baseline to week 8 (the primary end-point) and week 4. RESULTS: At week 8, the mean percentage change in incontinence episode frequency per 24 h was -34.73% in the TAS-303 3 mg group, -35.41% in the TAS-303 6 mg group and -28.07% in the placebo group (differences vs placebo, not significant). In patients with stress urinary incontinence, or incontinence episode frequency less than two episodes per 24 h at baseline, TAS-303 significantly reduced incontinence episode frequency versus placebo after 4 weeks; some secondary end-points also showed a tendency to improve in the same subgroups. No serious adverse events (e.g. central nervous system or cardiovascular effects) were observed; TAS-303 was well tolerated and had a favorable safety profile. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that TAS-303 is effective for improving stress urinary incontinence symptoms in some subgroups of patients with stress urinary incontinence. Therefore, further research is warranted.

[Pharmacotherapy of chronic neuropathic pain]. / Pharmakologische Therapie chronischer neuropathischer Schmerzen.

Chronic neuropathic pain has a prevalence of 6.9-10% in the general population. The current recommendations for treatment are presented based on a literature search. Neuropathic pain requires the use of co-analgesic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant drugs and topical agents because non-opioid analgesic drugs are usually ineffective. The use of meta-analyses tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin-norephinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and calcium channel anticonvulsants are recommended as the drugs of first choice. Under certain conditions chronic neuropathic pain can be treated with opioids. Topical therapeutics are only used to treat peripheral neuropathic pain. At present the use of drugs is independent of the etiology of the pain. Comorbidities, concomitant medication, potential side effects and patients' age have to be considered in treatment planning.

Medication and medical diagnosis as risk factors for falls in older hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of medication and medical conditions on the fall risk in older hospitalized patients. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. SETTING: Large regional hospital in a mid-sized German city. SUBJECTS: Four hundred eighty-one inpatients aged ≥ 65 years who fell during hospitalization ("cases") and a control group of 481 controls, matched for age, gender, and hospital department. METHODS: Diagnosis, medication, vital parameters, and injuries were compared between cases and controls. Univariate and multivariable odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Several drugs were significantly associated with falls in multivariate analyses: long-acting benzodiazepines (adjusted OR = 3.49; 95%-CI = 1.16-10.52), serotonin-noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) (2.57; 1.23-5.12), Z-drugs (2.29; 1.38-3.59), low-potency neuroleptics (1.87; 1.08-3.23), ACE inhibitors/sartans (1.42; 1.07-1.89). Digoxin (0.32; 0.11-0.99) and aldosterone receptor antagonists (0.54; 0.33-0.88) were negatively associated with falls. No significant association in multivariate analyses was found for short- and intermediate-acting benzodiazepines, mirtazapine, and opioids. Hyponatremia (1.52; 1.15-2.03) and leukocytosis (1.39; 1.05-1.87) in blood examination on admission showed significant association with falls. As secondary diagnoses, Parkinson syndrome (2.38; 1.27-4.46) and delirium (3.74; 2.26-6.21) were strongly associated with falls. The use of more than one psychoactive drug was a separate risk factor for falls (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Several drugs including SNRI, neuroleptics, and Z-drugs showed a significant association with inpatient falls. The frequently prescribed tetracyclic antidepressant mirtazapine did not appear to increase the risk of falls. Psychoactive polypharmacy should be avoided.

Antidepressants for Depression, Apathy, and Gait Instability in Parkinson's Disease: A Multicenter Randomized Study.

Objective Depression, apathy, and gait instability are cardinal symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are used for treating the psychiatric symptoms of PD. This is the first prospective randomized study to compare the efficacy of an SNRI (duloxetine) with SSRIs (paroxetine, escitalopram) in improving depressive symptoms and apathy (primary) and freezing of gait (FOG; secondary) in patients with PD. Methods In this prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized study, Japanese PD patients with a Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Japanese (QIDS-J) score ≥6 were randomly assigned to receive an SSRI (27 enrolled, 25 analyzed) or duloxetine (28 enrolled, 27 analyzed) and were assessed at 6 and 10 weeks. Results The mean change (SD) in the QIDS J [SSRI -2.4 (3.6), p=0.015; SNRI -2.3 (3.9), p=0.029] and FOG-Questionnaire [SSRI -2.9 (4.2), p=0.012; SNRI -3.4 (4.7), p=0.010] scores (from baseline) at 10 weeks was statistically significant, while the mean change in the Apathy Scale scores was not [SSRI -2.7 (5.4), p=0.054; SNRI -1.5 (3.7), p=0.109]. No significant differences were observed between the SSRI and SNRI groups. The treatments were well-tolerated; however, gastrointestinal events were more common with SSRIs. Two SNRI-treated patients reported an exacerbation of tremor. Conclusion SSRIs and SNRIs improve the depressive symptoms and FOG in PD patients with mild to severe depressive symptoms. However, their effectiveness in treating apathy remains to be elucidated.

Fibromyalgia in Primary Care.

Fibromyalgia is a common disorder and has substantial impact on quality of life. The cause remains unknown, but current evidence points to multifactorial involvement of pain processing. Clinical diagnosis is aided by evidence-based diagnostic criteria with subscores for widespread pain and symptom severity. Nonpharmacologic treatments, including cognitive behavioral therapy, sleep hygiene, and regular aerobic exercise, form the cornerstone of management. Pharmacologic intervention is an important adjunct, but benefit is variable. There is no cure for fibromyalgia at this time, but persistence and patience in management may lead to a satisfactory lifestyle.

A meta-analysis of effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on blood pressure in depression treatment: outcomes from placebo and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have been commonly prescribed for depression treatment. However, their effects on blood pressure are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Effects on blood pressure of depressive patients in two groups (SSRIs versus placebo and SSRIs versus SNRIs) were evaluated. A search was conducted for double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, PsycNET, CCRCT, and DARE (up to March 2017). The outcomes were systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes from baseline to endpoint or to a certain period of treatment duration. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs were calculated and pooled using random effects models. The χ2 test and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. Funnel plots, Begg's test, and Egger's test were used to estimate publication bias. RESULTS: A total of 23 RCTs involving 13,285 participants were included. Patients on SSRIs showed no significant differences in blood pressure changes compared with placebo. In the group of SSRIs versus SNRIs, overall SBP changes and DBP changes revealed statistical significances (WMD 1.5 mmHg, 95% CI -2.15, -0.84, Z=4.46, P<0.00001 and WMD 1.34 mmHg, 95% CI -1.92, -0.75, Z=6.18, P<0.00001). Subgroup analyses on treatment duration and age further evidenced these findings. CONCLUSION: It was established that SSRIs did not affect blood pressure, while SNRIs led to a modest increase in SBP and DBP with statistical significance compared with SSRIs.

Validation of maternal recall of early pregnancy medication exposure using prospective diary data.

PURPOSE: Data about maternal recall accuracy for classifying early pregnancy medication exposure are meager. Nonetheless, studies often rely on recall to evaluate potential impact of pharmaceuticals on the developing fetus. METHODS: Right from the Start is a community-based pregnancy cohort that enrolled women from North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas. A subset of 318 women participated in daily medication diaries initiated before conception (2006-2012). We examined nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as an example of a drug type that is difficult to study due to its intermittent and primarily over-the-counter use as well as its incomplete documentation in medical and pharmaceutical records. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) were assessed as a prescription medication comparator. Maternal recall of NSAID and SSRI use in early pregnancy was examined by comparing diary data (gold standard) to first-trimester interview. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for recall of NSAID exposure were 78.6% and 62.3%, respectively (kappa statistic: 0.41), with 72.3% agreement for exposure classification. Sensitivity and specificity for recall of SSRI exposure were 77.8% and 99.0%, respectively (kappa statistic: 0.79), with 97.8% agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the validity of maternal recall varies with medication type and prospective data collection should be prioritized when studying early pregnancy drug exposures.