Evaluation of the safety of medication-use systems in hospital emergency services. / Evaluación de la seguridad del sistema de utilización de los medicamentos en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the implementation of safe medication practices in hospital emergency services, in order to understand the points of greatest risk as well as the safety challenges faced by these departments, and to plan collaboratively improvement initiatives. METHOD: Multicentric and descriptive study based on completion of the "Medication safety self-assessment of emergency services" from 5/16/2023 to 11/16/2023, at voluntarily participating emergency services. The survey contained 93 items grouped into 10 key elements. Mean score and mean percentages based on the maximum possible values for the overall survey, for the key elements and for each individual item of evaluation, were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 72 emergency services completed the questionnaire. The mean score obtained for the overall questionnaire was 428.3 points (51.1% of the maximum score). Results showed a large variation among the scores of the participating services (range: 164-620.5). Four key elements had values below 50%, corresponding to competence and training of professionals in safety practices (38.4%); incorporation of pharmacists in emergency departments (42.1%), availability and accessibility of information about patients (43.1%), and patient education (48.1%). The highest values corresponded to labeling, packaging, and naming of medications (69.2%) and communication of prescriptions and other medication information (64%). No differences were found between emergency services in the key elements according to the dependency or size of the hospital, or the type of service, except for the item referring to the incorporation of pharmacists in the emergency service, where differences were observed between hospitals with less than 200 beds (28.9%) and those with more than 500 (52.2%). CONCLUSION: The application of the specific self-assessment questionnaire has made it possible to identify safety practices that are insufficiently implemented into emergency services in our country and to identify critical points for improvement for which planning collaborative initiatives to reduce medication errors in these departments should become a priority.

Health care safety incidents in paediatric emergency care.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize safety incidents in paediatric emergency departments (PEDs): frequency, sources, root causes, and consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, observational and descriptive study in the PED of the Clinical University Hospital XX (blinded for review). Patients were recruited through opportunity sampling and the data were collected during care delivery and one week later through a telephone survey. The methodology was based on the ERIDA study on patient safety incidents related to emergency care, which in turn was based on the ENEAS and EVADUR studies. RESULTS: The study included a total of 204 cases. At least one incident was detected in 25 cases, with two incidents detected in 3 cases, for a total incidence of 12.3%. Twelve incidents were detected during care delivery and the rest during the telephone call. Ten percent did not reach the patient, 7.1% reached the patient but caused no harm, and 82.1% reached the patient and caused harm. Thirteen incidents (46.4%) did not have an impact on care delivery, 8 (28.6%) required a new visit or referral, 6 (21.4%) required additional observation and 1 (3.6%) medical or surgical treatment. The most frequent root causes were health care delivery and medication. Incidents related to procedures and medication were most frequent. Of all incidents, 78.6% were considered preventable, with 50% identified as clear failures in health care delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Safety incidents affected 12.3% of children managed in the PED of the HCUVA, of which 78.6% were preventable.

Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for bacterial infection in the Emergency Department: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The care of patients with a suspected infectious process in hospital emergency departments (ED) accounts for 15%-35% of all daily care in these healthcare areas in Spain and Latin America. The early and adequate administration of antibiotic treatment (AB) and the immediate making of other diagnostic-therapeutic decisions have a direct impact on the survival of patients with severe bacterial infection. The main objective of this systematic review is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PCT to predict bacterial infection in adult patients treated with clinical suspicion of infection in the ED, as well as to analyze whether the different studies manage to identify a specific value of PCT as the most relevant from the diagnostic point of view of clinical decision that can be recommended for decision making in ED. METHOD: A systematic review is carried out following the PRISMA regulations in the database of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2005 to May 31, 2023 without language restriction and using a combination of MESH terms: "Procalcitonin", "Infection/Bacterial Infection/Sepsis", "Emergencies/Emergency/Emergency Department", "Adults" and "Diagnostic". Observational cohort studies (diagnostic performance analyses) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the method used and the risk of bias of the included articles. Observational cohort studies were included. No meta-analysis techniques were performed, but results were compared narratively. RESULTS: A total of 1,323 articles were identified, of which 21 that met the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. The studies include 10,333 patients with 4,856 bacterial infections (47%). Eight studies were rated as high, 9 as moderate, and 4 as low. The AUC-ROC of all studies ranges from 0.68 (95% CI: 0.61-0.72) to 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-1). The value of PCT 0.2-0.3 ng/ml is the most used and proposed in up to twelve of the works included in this review whose average estimated performance is an AUC-ROC of 0.79. If only the results of the 5 high-quality studies using a cut-off point of 0.2-0.3 ng/ml PCT are taken into account, the estimated mean AUC-COR result is 0.78 with Se:69 % and Es:76%. CONCLUSIONS: PCT has considerable diagnostic accuracy for bacterial infection in patients treated in ED for different infectious processes. The cut-off point of 0.25 (0.2-0.3) ng/ml has been positioned as the most appropriate to predict the existence of bacterial infection and can be used to help reasonably rule it out.

Diseño de un panel de indicadores para programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los Servicios de Urgencias / Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department

Objetivo: desarrollar un panel de indicadores para monitorizar la actividad de los programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los servicios de urgencias. Métodos: un grupo multidisciplinar formado por expertos en el manejo de la infección en urgencias y en la implantación de programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) evaluó una propuesta de indicadores utilizando una metodología Delphi modificada. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos clasificó la relevancia de cada indicador propuesto en 2 dimensiones (repercusión asistencial y facilidad de implantación) y 2 atributos (nivel de priorización y periodicidad de medida). La segunda ronda se realizó a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas y nuevos indicadores sugeridos por los participantes. Los expertos efectuaron modificaciones en el orden de priorización y calificaron los nuevos indicadores propuestos de la misma manera que en la primera ronda. Resultados: se propusieron un total de 61 potenciales indicadores divididos en 4 grupos: indicadores de consumo, microbiológicos, de proceso y de resultado. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, 31 indicadores fueron clasificados como de alta prioridad, 25 de prioridad intermedia y 5 de baja prioridad. Además se generaron 19 nuevos indicadores. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron los 61 indicadores inicialmente propuestos y adicionalmente se incorporaron 18 nuevos: 11 como de alta prioridad, 3 como de intermedia y 4 como de baja prioridad. Conclusiones: los expertos consensuaron un panel de indicadores PROA adaptado a los servicios de urgencias priorizados por nivel de relevancia como un elemento de ayuda para el desarrollo de estos programas, que contribuirá a monitorizar la adecuación del uso de antimicrobianos en estas unidades.(AU)

Objective: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. Methods: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritization level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritization order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. Results: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analyzing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. Conclusions: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritized by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.(AU)

Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department / Diseño de un panel de indicadores para programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los Servicios de Urgencias

Objetivo: desarrollar un panel de indicadores para monitorizar la actividad de los programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los servicios de urgencias. Métodos: un grupo multidisciplinar formado por expertos en el manejo de la infección en urgencias y en la implantación de programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) evaluó una propuesta de indicadores utilizando una metodología Delphi modificada. En una primera ronda, cada uno de los expertos clasificó la relevancia de cada indicador propuesto en 2 dimensiones (repercusión asistencial y facilidad de implantación) y 2 atributos (nivel de priorización y periodicidad de medida). La segunda ronda se realizó a partir del cuestionario modificado de acuerdo con las sugerencias planteadas y nuevos indicadores sugeridos por los participantes. Los expertos efectuaron modificaciones en el orden de priorización y calificaron los nuevos indicadores propuestos de la misma manera que en la primera ronda. Resultados: se propusieron un total de 61 potenciales indicadores divididos en 4 grupos: indicadores de consumo, microbiológicos, de proceso y de resultado. Tras el análisis de las puntuaciones y los comentarios realizados en la primera ronda, 31 indicadores fueron clasificados como de alta prioridad, 25 de prioridad intermedia y 5 de baja prioridad. Además se generaron 19 nuevos indicadores. Tras la segunda ronda, se mantuvieron los 61 indicadores inicialmente propuestos y adicionalmente se incorporaron 18 nuevos: 11 como de alta prioridad, 3 como de intermedia y 4 como de baja prioridad. Conclusiones: los expertos consensuaron un panel de indicadores PROA adaptado a los servicios de urgencias priorizados por nivel de relevancia como un elemento de ayuda para el desarrollo de estos programas, que contribuirá a monitorizar la adecuación del uso de antimicrobianos en estas unidades.(AU)

Objective: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. Methods: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritization level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritization order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. Results: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analyzing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. Conclusions: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritized by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.(AU)

Precisión diagnóstica de la procalcitonina para la bacteriemia en el servicio de urgencias: una revisión sistemática / Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for bacteremia in the emergency department: a systematic review

Introducción. La obtención de hemocultivos (HC) se realiza en el 15% de los pacientes atendidos con sospecha de infección en los Servicios de Urgencias Hospitalarios (SUH) con unarentabilidad diagnóstica variable (2-20%). La mortalidad a 30 días de los pacientes con bacteriemia es dos o tres veces mayor que el resto con el mismo proceso. La procalcitonina (PCT) es un biomarcador que se ha utilizado como herramienta de ayuda en la predicción de bacteriemia en los SUH. El objetivo principal de esta revisión sistemática es investigar la precisión diagnóstica de la PCT para predecir bacteriemia verdadera en los pacientes adultos atendidos con sospecha clínica de infección enel SUH, así como identificar un valor específico de PCT como el más relevante desde el punto de vista diagnóstico de decisión clínica que pueda recomendarse para la toma de decisiones. Método. Se realiza una revisión sistemática siguiendo la normativa PRISMA en las bases de datos de PubMed, Web of Sciencie, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase y ClinicalTrials.gov desde enero de 2010 hasta 31 mayo 2023 sin restricción de idiomas y utilizando una combinación de términos MESH: “Bacteremia/Bacteraemia/Blood Stream Infection”, “Procalcitonin”, “Emergencies/Emergency/ Emergency Department” y “Adults”. Se incluyeron estudios de cohortes observacionales y parcialmente una revisión sistemática. No se realizaron técnicas de metaanálisis, pero los resultados se compararon narrativamente. Resultados. Se identificaron un total de 1.372 artículos de los cuales se analizaron finalmente 20 que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Los estudios incluidos representan un total de 18.120 HC procesados con 2.877 bacteriemias (15,88%). Diez estudios fueron calificados de calidad alta, 9 moderada y 1 baja. El ABC-COR de todos los estudios se sitúa desde 0,68 (IC 95%: 0,59-0,77) hasta 0,98 (IC 95%: 0,97-0,99). . ...Conclusiones. ... . (AU)

Introduction. Obtaining blood cultures (HC) is performed in 15% of the patients treated with suspicion of infection in the Hospital Emergency Services (ED) with a variable diagnostic yield (2-20%). The 30-day mortality of patients with bacteremia is two or three times higher than the rest with the same process. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker that has been used as a tool to help predict bacteremia in HEDs. The main objective of this systematic review is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of PCT in predicting true bacteraemia in adult patients treated with clinical suspicion of infection in the ED, as well as to identify a specific PCT value as the most relevant from the clinical decision diagnostic point of view that can be recommended for decision making. Method. A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines in the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase and ClinicalTrials. gov databases from January 2010 to May 31, 2023 without language restrictions and using a combination of MESH terms: “Bacteremia/ Bacteraemia/ Blood Stream Infection”, “Procalcitonin”, “Emergencies/ Emergency/ Emergency Department” and “Adults”. Observational cohort studies and partially an systematic review were included. No meta-analysis techniques were performed, but the results were compared narratively. Results. A total of 1,372 articles were identified, of which 20 that met the inclusion criteria were finally analyzed. The included studies represent a total of 18,120 processed HC with 2,877 bacteraemias (15.88%). Ten studies were rated as high, 9 moderate and 1 low quality. The AUC-COR of all the studies ranges from 0.68 (95% CI: 0.59-0.77) to 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97- 0.99). The PCT value >0.5 ng/ml is the most widely used and proposed in up to ten of the works included in this systematic review, whose estimated mean yield is an AUC-COR of 0.833. ...Conclusions. ... (AU)

Urgencias hospitalarias por consumo de alcohol en tiempos de la COVID-19 en la Costa del Sol / Hospital emergencies due to alcohol consumption in times of COVID-19 on the Costa del Sol (Spain)

Fundamentos: el consumo de alcohol es un problema de salud pública que impacta en la esfera de la salud, tanto como a nivel social y económico. Fueron objetivos del presente estudio describir las características de las urgencias hospitalarias relacionadas con consumo de alcohol (rca) en una zona de alto turismo lúdico, y las implicaciones de la pandemia de la covid-19 en dicha actividad .Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal descriptivo de periodo de la actividad de urgencias rca en el área hospitalaria costa del sol durante los años 2019 a 2021. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo estratificado según el periodo de la pandemia de la covid-19, incluyendo el cálculo de la incidencia de urgencias rca atendidas diariamente. Se realizó análisis descriptivo evaluando diferencias entre los tres periodos mediante el test de ji-cuadrado para variables cualitativas, y el test de kruskal-wallis para las cuantitativas. Resultados: en el periodo de estudio se registraron 479.204 urgencias hospitalarias, de las cuales el 0,51% se identificaron como urgencia rca, con un promedio de 2,2 diarias. Dicha cifra osciló entre 2,7 urgencias diarias en periodo de normalidad, 1 durante el confinamiento y 2,1 en periodo de nueva normalidad. La tasa de urgencias rca del periodo evaluado fue de 16,5 por cada 10.000 habitantes/año. Conclusiones: las personas atendidas por consumo de alcohol de nuestra serie tienen un perfil habitual en cuanto a edad (adulto) y sexo (varones), aunque con un peso relativamente elevado de pacientes extranjeros. Las restricciones por el confinamiento durante la pandemia por la covid-19 tienen un impacto positivo en la atención urgente de pacientes rca, aunque correlacionado con un descenso generalizado de la actividad asistencial no relacionada con la covid-19.(AU)

Background: alcohol consumption is a public health problem that impacts the health, social and economic spheres. The objec-tives of this study were to describe the characteristics of alcohol-related emergencies (ari) in an area of high recreational tourism, and the implications of the covid-19 pandemic on this activity. Methods: a descriptive cross-sectional study of the period of ari emergency activity in the costa del sol hospital area during the years 2019-2021 was carried out. A stratified descriptive analysis was performed according to the covid-19 pandemic period, including the calculation of the incidence of ari emergencies attended daily. Descriptive analysis was performed evaluating differences between the three periods using the chi-square test for qualitative variables, and the kruskal-wallis test for quantitative variables. Results: during the study period, 479,204 hospital emergencies were recorded, of which 0.51% were identified as ari emergen-cies, with an average of 2.2 per day. This figure ranged from 2.7 emergencies per day during normality, 1 during confinement and 2.1 during new normality. The rate of ari emergencies for the period evaluated was 16.5 per 10,000 inhabitants/year. Conclusions: the patients treated for alcohol consumption in our series have a typical profile in terms of age (adult) and sex (male), although with a high relative weight of foreign patients. Restrictions due to confinement during the covid-19 pandemic have a positive impact on the emergency care of ari patients, although correlated with a generalised decrease in non-covid-19 related care activity.(AU)

Capacidad del biomarcador suPAR para estratificar el pronóstico en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios / Value of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor as a predictor of prognosis in patients attended in hospital emergency departments

Objetivos. Determinar la capacidad del receptor soluble del activador del plasminógeno tipo uroquinasa (suPAR) para la estratificación pronóstica en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). Los objetivos secundarios son: 1)medir la capacidad de los puntos de decisión habituales, 2)identificar una población de bajo riesgo de mortalidad que puede darse de alta de forma segura desde el SUH, y 3)medir la correlación entre suPAR y otros biomarcadores. Métodos. Estudio observacional de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes atendidos en SUH. Se registraron variables sociodemográficas, de comorbilidad, datos del episodio agudo, biomarcadores de uso común en urgencias y suPAR. Las variables de resultado fueron la necesidad de ingreso en el episodio índice, reconsulta al SUH y mortalidad a los 90 días. Resultados. Se incluyeron 990 pacientes, la edad fue de 68 (53-81) años, 50,8% eran hombres, la mediana de suPAR fue de 3,8 (2,8-6,0) ng/ml, 112 pacientes (11,31%) requirieron ingreso. En el seguimiento a 90 días hubo 276 reconsultas (27,9%) y 47 pacientes (4,74%) fallecieron. Los pacientes con suPAR<4 ng/ml (52,5%) tenían menor mortalidad (1%), menor reconsulta (24,4%) y menor necesidad de ingreso hospitalario (20,6%), que pacientes con suPAR>6 ng/ml (mortalidad 13,5%, reconsulta 39,6% e ingreso 56,3%). Un suPAR>6 ng/ml mostró una hazard ratio (IC 95%) ajustada de 4,61 (1,68-12,67) para predecir mortalidad a 90 días y de 1,59 (1,13-2,10) para la reconsulta, y una odds ratio de 1,62 (0,99-2,62) para la necesidad de ingreso hospitalario. Conclusiones. Un valor de suPAR < 4 ng/ml identifica pacientes con riesgo bajo de mortalidad a 90 días, de reconsulta y de necesidad de ingreso, mientras que los pacientes con suPAR>6 ng/ml tienen mayor mortalidad, reconsulta y necesidad de ingreso. (AU)

Objectives. To determine the value of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for predicting outcomes in emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary objectives were 1)to measure the predictive value of the usual decision points, 2)to identify patients at low risk for mortality who could be safely discharged from the ED, and 3)to measure the correlation between suPAR and other biomarkers. Methods. Prospective observational cohort study of patients attended in the EDs of participating hospitals. We recorded sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, variables related to the acute episode, prognostic markers commonly used in EDs, and suPAR concentration. Outcome variables were the need for hospital admission during the index episode, ED revisits within 90 days, and 90-day mortality. Results. A total of 990 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 68 (53-81 years) were studied; 50.8% were men. The median suPAR concentration was 3.8 (2.8-6.0) ng/mL, and 112 patients (11.31%) required admission. At 90 days there were 276 revisits (27.9% of the cohort), and 47 patients (4.74%) had died. Mortality was lower (1%) in patients with suPAR concentrations less than 4 ng/mL (52.5%), and fewer of these patients revisited (24.4%) or required hospitalization (20.6%) than patients with suPAR concentrations higher than 6 ng/mL (mortality, 13.5%; revisits, 39.6%; admissions, 56.3%). A suPAR concentration over 6 ng/mL was associated with 90-day mortality and revisits (adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs of 4.61 [1.68-12.67] and 1.59 [1.13-2.10]), respectively. The high suPAR concentration was also associated with hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.62 [0.99-2.62]). Conclusions. A suPAR concentration of less than 4 ng/mL identifies patients at low risk of 90-day mortality and revisits or need for hospitalization, whereas a suPAR concentration higher than 6 ng/mL is associated with higher risk for these outcomes. (AU)

Modelos predictivos de bacteriemia en el servicio de urgencias: revisión sistemática / Models to predict bacteremia in the emergency department: a systematic review

Objetivo. La obtención de hemocultivos (HC) se realiza en el 15% de los pacientes atendidos con sospecha de infección en los servicios de urgencias (SU) con una rentabilidad diagnóstica variable (2-20%). La mortalidad a 30 días de estos pacientes con bacteriemia es elevada, doble o triple que el resto con el mismo proceso. Así, encontrar un modelo predictivo de bacteriemia eficaz y aplicable en los SU sería muy importante. Clásicamente, el modelo de Shapiro ha sido la referencia en todo el mundo. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática (RS) es comparar la capacidad para predecir bacteriemia en los SU de los distintos modelos predictivos publicados desde el año 2008 (fecha de publicación del modelo de Shapiro). Métodos. Se realiza una RS siguiendo la normativa PRISMA en las bases de datos de PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase y ClinicalTrials.gov desde enero de 2008 hasta 31 mayo 2023 sin restricción de idiomas y utilizando una combinación de términos MESH: “Bacteremia/Bacteraemia/Blood Stream Infection”, “Prediction Model/Clinical Prediction Rule/Risk Prediction Model”, “Emergencies/Emergency/Emergency Department” y “Adults”. Se incluyeron estudios de cohortes observacionales (analíticos de rendimiento diagnóstico). Para valorar la calidad del método empleado y el riesgo de sesgos de los artículos incluidos se utilizó la NewcastleOttawa Scale (NOS). No se incluyeron estudios de casos y controles, revisiones narrativas y en otros tipos de artículos. No se realizaron técnicas de metanálisis, pero los resultados se compararon narrativamente. El protocolo de la RS se registró en PROSPERO (CRD42023426327). Resultados. Se identificaron 917 artículos y se analizaron finalmente 20 que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Los estudios incluidos contienen 33.182 HC procesados con 5.074 bacteriemias (15,3%). Once estudios fueron calificados de calidad alta, 7 moderada y 2 baja... (AU)

Objective. Blood cultures are ordered in emergency departments for 15% of patients with suspected infection. The diagnostic yield varies from 2% to 20%. Thirty-day mortality in patients with bacteremia is high, doubling or tripling the rate in patients with the same infection but without bacteremia. Thus, finding an effective model to predict bacteremia that is applicable in emergency departments is an important goal. Shapiro’s model is the one traditionally used as a reference internationally. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the predictive power of bacteremia risk models published since 2008, when Shapiro’s model first appeared. Methods. We followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) statement, searching in the following databases for articles published between January 2008 and May 31, 2023: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Trip Medical Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No language restrictions were specified. The search terms were the following Medical Subject Headings: bacteremia/bacteraemia/blood stream infection, prediction model/clinical prediction rule/risk prediction model, emergencies/emergency/emergency department, and adults. Observational cohort studies analyzing diagnostic yield were included; case-control studies, narrative reviews, and other types of articles were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to score quality and risk of bias in the included studies. The results were compared descriptively, without meta-analysis. The protocol was included in the PROSPERO register (CRD42023426327). Results. Twenty studies out of a total of 917 were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The included studies together analyzed 33 182 blood cultures, which detected 5074 cases of bacteremia (15.3%). Eleven studies were of high quality, 7 of moderate quality, and 2 of low quality... (AU)

Capacidad del biomarcador suPAR para estratificar el pronóstico en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios / Value of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor as a predictor of prognosis in patients attended in hospital emergency departments

Objetivos. Determinar la capacidad del receptor soluble del activador del plasminógeno tipo uroquinasa (suPAR) para la estratificación pronóstica en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). Los objetivos secundarios son: 1)medir la capacidad de los puntos de decisión habituales, 2)identificar una población de bajo riesgo de mortalidad que puede darse de alta de forma segura desde el SUH, y 3)medir la correlación entre suPAR y otros biomarcadores. Métodos. Estudio observacional de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes atendidos en SUH. Se registraron variables sociodemográficas, de comorbilidad, datos del episodio agudo, biomarcadores de uso común en urgencias y suPAR. Las variables de resultado fueron la necesidad de ingreso en el episodio índice, reconsulta al SUH y mortalidad a los 90 días. Resultados. Se incluyeron 990 pacientes, la edad fue de 68 (53-81) años, 50,8% eran hombres, la mediana de suPAR fue de 3,8 (2,8-6,0) ng/ml, 112 pacientes (11,31%) requirieron ingreso. En el seguimiento a 90 días hubo 276 reconsultas (27,9%) y 47 pacientes (4,74%) fallecieron. Los pacientes con suPAR<4 ng/ml (52,5%) tenían menor mortalidad (1%), menor reconsulta (24,4%) y menor necesidad de ingreso hospitalario (20,6%), que pacientes con suPAR>6 ng/ml (mortalidad 13,5%, reconsulta 39,6% e ingreso 56,3%). Un suPAR>6 ng/ml mostró una hazard ratio (IC 95%) ajustada de 4,61 (1,68-12,67) para predecir mortalidad a 90 días y de 1,59 (1,13-2,10) para la reconsulta, y una odds ratio de 1,62 (0,99-2,62) para la necesidad de ingreso hospitalario. Conclusiones. Un valor de suPAR < 4 ng/ml identifica pacientes con riesgo bajo de mortalidad a 90 días, de reconsulta y de necesidad de ingreso, mientras que los pacientes con suPAR>6 ng/ml tienen mayor mortalidad, reconsulta y necesidad de ingreso. (AU)

Objectives. To determine the value of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for predicting outcomes in emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary objectives were 1)to measure the predictive value of the usual decision points, 2)to identify patients at low risk for mortality who could be safely discharged from the ED, and 3)to measure the correlation between suPAR and other biomarkers. Methods. Prospective observational cohort study of patients attended in the EDs of participating hospitals. We recorded sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, variables related to the acute episode, prognostic markers commonly used in EDs, and suPAR concentration. Outcome variables were the need for hospital admission during the index episode, ED revisits within 90 days, and 90-day mortality. Results. A total of 990 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 68 (53-81 years) were studied; 50.8% were men. The median suPAR concentration was 3.8 (2.8-6.0) ng/mL, and 112 patients (11.31%) required admission. At 90 days there were 276 revisits (27.9% of the cohort), and 47 patients (4.74%) had died. Mortality was lower (1%) in patients with suPAR concentrations less than 4 ng/mL (52.5%), and fewer of these patients revisited (24.4%) or required hospitalization (20.6%) than patients with suPAR concentrations higher than 6 ng/mL (mortality, 13.5%; revisits, 39.6%; admissions, 56.3%). A suPAR concentration over 6 ng/mL was associated with 90-day mortality and revisits (adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs of 4.61 [1.68-12.67] and 1.59 [1.13-2.10]), respectively. The high suPAR concentration was also associated with hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.62 [0.99-2.62]). Conclusions. A suPAR concentration of less than 4 ng/mL identifies patients at low risk of 90-day mortality and revisits or need for hospitalization, whereas a suPAR concentration higher than 6 ng/mL is associated with higher risk for these outcomes. (AU)

Modelos predictivos de bacteriemia en el servicio de urgencias: revisión sistemática / Models to predict bacteremia in the emergency department: a systematic review

Objetivo. La obtención de hemocultivos (HC) se realiza en el 15% de los pacientes atendidos con sospecha de infección en los servicios de urgencias (SU) con una rentabilidad diagnóstica variable (2-20%). La mortalidad a 30 días de estos pacientes con bacteriemia es elevada, doble o triple que el resto con el mismo proceso. Así, encontrar un modelo predictivo de bacteriemia eficaz y aplicable en los SU sería muy importante. Clásicamente, el modelo de Shapiro ha sido la referencia en todo el mundo. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática (RS) es comparar la capacidad para predecir bacteriemia en los SU de los distintos modelos predictivos publicados desde el año 2008 (fecha de publicación del modelo de Shapiro). Métodos. Se realiza una RS siguiendo la normativa PRISMA en las bases de datos de PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase y ClinicalTrials.gov desde enero de 2008 hasta 31 mayo 2023 sin restricción de idiomas y utilizando una combinación de términos MESH: “Bacteremia/Bacteraemia/Blood Stream Infection”, “Prediction Model/Clinical Prediction Rule/Risk Prediction Model”, “Emergencies/Emergency/Emergency Department” y “Adults”. Se incluyeron estudios de cohortes observacionales (analíticos de rendimiento diagnóstico). Para valorar la calidad del método empleado y el riesgo de sesgos de los artículos incluidos se utilizó la NewcastleOttawa Scale (NOS). No se incluyeron estudios de casos y controles, revisiones narrativas y en otros tipos de artículos. No se realizaron técnicas de metanálisis, pero los resultados se compararon narrativamente. El protocolo de la RS se registró en PROSPERO (CRD42023426327). Resultados. Se identificaron 917 artículos y se analizaron finalmente 20 que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Los estudios incluidos contienen 33.182 HC procesados con 5.074 bacteriemias (15,3%). Once estudios fueron calificados de calidad alta, 7 moderada y 2 baja... (AU)

Objective. Blood cultures are ordered in emergency departments for 15% of patients with suspected infection. The diagnostic yield varies from 2% to 20%. Thirty-day mortality in patients with bacteremia is high, doubling or tripling the rate in patients with the same infection but without bacteremia. Thus, finding an effective model to predict bacteremia that is applicable in emergency departments is an important goal. Shapiro’s model is the one traditionally used as a reference internationally. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the predictive power of bacteremia risk models published since 2008, when Shapiro’s model first appeared. Methods. We followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) statement, searching in the following databases for articles published between January 2008 and May 31, 2023: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Trip Medical Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No language restrictions were specified. The search terms were the following Medical Subject Headings: bacteremia/bacteraemia/blood stream infection, prediction model/clinical prediction rule/risk prediction model, emergencies/emergency/emergency department, and adults. Observational cohort studies analyzing diagnostic yield were included; case-control studies, narrative reviews, and other types of articles were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to score quality and risk of bias in the included studies. The results were compared descriptively, without meta-analysis. The protocol was included in the PROSPERO register (CRD42023426327). Results. Twenty studies out of a total of 917 were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The included studies together analyzed 33 182 blood cultures, which detected 5074 cases of bacteremia (15.3%). Eleven studies were of high quality, 7 of moderate quality, and 2 of low quality... (AU)

Models to predict bacteremia in the emergency department: a systematic review. / Modelos predictivos de bacteriemia en el servicio de urgencias: revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVES: Blood cultures are ordered in emergency departments for 15% of patients with suspected infection. The diagnostic yield varies from 2% to 20%. Thirty-day mortality in patients with bacteremia is high, doubling or tripling the rate in patients with the same infection but without bacteremia. Thus, finding an effective model to predict bacteremia that is applicable in emergency departments is an important goal. Shapiro's model is the one traditionally used as a reference internationally. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the predictive power of bacteremia risk models published since 2008, when Shapiro's model first appeared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We followed the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, searching in the following databases for articles published between January 2008 and May 31, 2023: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Trip Medical Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov. No language restrictions were specified. The search terms were the following Medical Subject Headings: bacteremia/bacteraemia/blood stream infection, prediction model/clinical prediction rule/risk prediction model, emergencies/emergency/emergency department, and adults. Observational cohort studies analyzing diagnostic yield were included; case-control studies, narrative reviews, and other types of articles were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to score quality and risk of bias in the included studies. The results were compared descriptively, without meta-analysis. The protocol was included in the PROSPERO register (CRD42023426327). RESULTS: Twenty studies out of a total of 917 were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The included studies together analyzed 33 182 blood cultures, which detected 5074 cases of bacteremia (15.3%). Eleven studies were of high quality, 7 of moderate quality, and 2 of low quality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of Shapiro's model varied from 0.71 to 0.83. Sensitivity was as high as 98%, and specificity ranged from 26% to 69%. Three models with high scores for quality were also supported by both internal and external validation studies: Lee's model (AUC, 0.81; sensitivity 68%; specificity, 81%), the 5MPB-Toledo model (AUC, 0.906 to 0.946), and the MPB-INFURG-SEMES model (AUC, 0.924; sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 76%. CONCLUSION: The 5MPB-Toledo and MPB-INFURG-SEMES are useful for assessing the true risk of bacteremia in patients attended in emergency departments.

OBJETIVO: La obtención de hemocultivos (HC) se realiza en el 15% de los pacientes atendidos con sospecha de infección en los servicios de urgencias (SU) con una rentabilidad diagnóstica variable (2-20%). La mortalidad a 30 días de estos pacientes con bacteriemia es elevada, doble o triple que el resto con el mismo proceso. Así, encontrar un modelo predictivo de bacteriemia eficaz y aplicable en los SU sería muy importante. Clásicamente, el modelo de Shapiro ha sido la referencia en todo el mundo. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática (RS) es comparar la capacidad para predecir bacteriemia en los SU de los distintos modelos predictivos publicados desde el año 2008 (fecha de publicación del modelo de Shapiro). METODO: Se realiza una RS siguiendo la normativa PRISMA en las bases de datos de PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, Tripdatabase y ClinicalTrials.gov desde enero de 2008 hasta 31 mayo 2023 sin restricción de idiomas y utilizando una combinación de términos MESH: "Bacteremia/Bacteraemia/Blood Stream Infection", "Prediction Model/Clinical Prediction Rule/Risk Prediction Model", "Emergencies/Emergency/Emergency Department" y "Adults". Se incluyeron estudios de cohortes observacionales (analíticos de rendimiento diagnóstico). Para valorar la calidad del método empleado y el riesgo de sesgos de los artículos incluidos se utilizó la Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). No se incluyeron estudios de casos y controles, revisiones narrativas y en otros tipos de artículos. No se realizaron técnicas de metanálisis, pero los resultados se compararon narrativamente. El protocolo de la RS se registró en PROSPERO (CRD42023426327). RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 917 artículos y se analizaron finalmente 20 que cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Los estudios incluidos contienen 33.182 HC procesados con 5.074 bacteriemias (15,3%). Once estudios fueron calificados de calidad alta, 7 moderada y 2 baja. El ABC-COR conseguida por el modelo de Shapiro varía de 0,71 a 0,83, con sensibilidad (Se) hasta del 98%, con especificidad (Es) (26% a 69%). Para los tres modelos que tienen validación interna y externa y una buena calidad metodológica, el modelo de Lee consigue un ABC-COR de 0,81 con Se: 68% y Es: 81%, el modelo 5MPB-Toledo consigue un ABC-COR entre 0,91 y 0,95, y el MPB-INFURG-SEMES obtiene una ABC-COR de 0,92 con una Se: 97% y Es: 76%. CONCLUSIONES: Los modelos 5MPB-Toledo y MPB-INFURG-SEMES representan herramientas útiles para la estratificación del riesgo real de bacteriemia en los pacientes atendidos en los SU.

Value of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor as a predictor of prognosis in patients attended in hospital emergency departments. / Capacidad del biomarcador suPAR para estratificar el pronóstico en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for predicting outcomes in emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary objectives were 1) to measure the predictive value of the usual decision points, 2) to identify patients at low risk for mortality who could be safely discharged from the ED, and 3) to measure the correlation between suPAR and other biomarkers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study of patients attended in the EDs of participating hospitals. We recorded sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, variables related to the acute episode, prognostic markers commonly used in EDs, and suPAR concentration. Outcome variables were the need for hospital admission during the index episode, ED revisits within 90 days, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 990 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 68 (53-81 years) were studied; 50.8% were men. The median suPAR concentration was 3.8 (2.8-6.0) ng/mL, and 112 patients (11.31%) required admission. At 90 days there were 276 revisits (27.9% of the cohort), and 47 patients (4.74%) had died. Mortality was lower (1%) in patients with suPAR concentrations less than 4 ng/mL (52.5%), and fewer of these patients revisited (24.4%) or required hospitalization (20.6%) than patients with suPAR concentrations higher than 6 ng/mL (mortality, 13.5%; revisits, 39.6%; admissions, 56.3%). A suPAR concentration over 6 ng/mL was associated with 90-day mortality and revisits (adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CIs of 4.61 [1.68-12.67] and 1.59 [1.13-2.10]), respectively. The high suPAR concentration was also associated with hospital admission (odds ratio, 1.62 [0.99-2.62]). CONCLUSION: A suPAR concentration of less than 4 ng/mL identifies patients at low risk of 90-day mortality and revisits or need for hospitalization, whereas a suPAR concentration higher than 6 ng/mL is associated with higher risk for these outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Determinar la capacidad del receptor soluble del activador del plasminógeno tipo uroquinasa (suPAR) para la estratificación pronóstica en pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). Los objetivos secundarios son: 1) medir la capacidad de los `puntos de decisión habituales, 2) identificar una población de bajo riesgo de mortalidad que puede darse de alta de forma segura desde el SUH, y 3) medir la correlación entre suPAR y otros biomarcadores. METODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes prospectivo de pacientes atendidos en SUH. Se registraron variables sociodemográficas, de comorbilidad, datos del episodio agudo, biomarcadores de uso común en urgencias y suPAR. Las variables de resultado fueron la necesidad de ingreso en el episodio índice, reconsulta al SUH y mortalidad a los 90 días. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 990 pacientes, la edad fue de 68 (53-81) años, 50,8% eran hombres, la mediana de suPAR fue de 3,8 (2,8-6,0) ng/ml, 112 pacientes (11,31%) requirieron ingreso. En el seguimiento a 90 días hubo 276 reconsultas (27,9%) y 47 pacientes (4,74%) fallecieron. Los pacientes con suPAR 4 ng/ml (52,5%) tenían menor mortalidad (1%), menor reconsulta (24,4%) y menor necesidad de ingreso hospitalario (20,6%), que pacientes con suPAR 6 ng/ml (mortalidad 13,5%, reconsulta 39,6% e ingreso 56,3%). Un suPAR 6 ng/ml mostró una hazard ratio (IC 95%) ajustada de 4,61 (1,68-12,67) para predecir mortalidad a 90 días y de 1,59 (1,13-2,10) para la reconsulta, y una odds ratio de 1,62 (0,99-2,62) para la necesidad de ingreso hospitalario. CONCLUSIONES: Un valor de suPAR 4 ng/ml identifica pacientes con riesgo bajo de mortalidad a 90 días, de reconsulta y de necesidad de ingreso, mientras que los pacientes con suPAR 6 ng/ml tienen mayor mortalidad, reconsulta y necesidad de ingreso.

Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department. / Diseño de un panel de indicadores para programas de optimización del uso de antimicrobianos en los Servicios de Urgencias.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritization level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritization order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. RESULTS: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analyzing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. CONCLUSIONS: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritized by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.

[Translated article] Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritisation level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritisation order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round. RESULTS: 61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed: consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analysing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated: 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority. CONCLUSIONS: The experts agreed on a panel of ASP Indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritised by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.

Urinary catheterization of patients with acute heart failure in a hospital emergency department: a factor associated with prognosis. / El sondaje vesical de los pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario se asocia al pronóstico.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze whether urinary catheterization in a hospital emergency department (ED) affects short-term prognosis in patients with acute heart failure (AHF). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded baseline and other clinical data in a consecutive cohort of ED patients treated for AHF. Crude and adjusted associations were calculated between catheterization and a primary composite outcome (30-day readmission for AHF and/or death) and secondary outcomes (in-hospital mortality, urinary tract infection [UTI], and duration of hospital stay.). RESULTS: Nine hundred ninety-one patients were admitted for AHF. The mean (SD) age was 66 (10.5) years; 71% were women. Catheterization was required for 29.2% in the ED. The primary composite outcome was observed in 7.7% of the patients who were not catheterized and 12.8% of the catheterized patients (P = .02). In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.9% and 9.7% of non-catheterized and catheterized patients, respectively (P = .04), and UTIs occurred in 19.1% and 26.6% (P = .01). Twelve of the non-catheterized patients (1.7%) were readmitted for AHF (vs 11 (3.8%) of the catheterized patients (P = .06), and there were no differences between the groups in hospital stay (11 vs 10.9 days, P = .78). In the adjusted analysis of associations between catheterization and the primary outcome the odds and hazard ratios (OR and HR, respectively) were OR, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7) (P = .02) and HR, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.5) (P = .03). For secondary outcomes, significant associations emerged between catheterization and UTIs (OR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.2]; P = .008) and readmission for AHF (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.2-7.3]; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Routine insertion of a urinary catheter in patients with AHF in the ED is associated with worse 30-day clinical outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Analizar si el sondaje vesical (SV) rutinario en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) de pacientes diagnosticados de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) está asociado con la evolución a corto plazo. METODO: Se recogieron prospectivamente datos basales y clínicos de una cohorte de pacientes consecutivos que ingresaron por ICA. Se analizó la asociación cruda y ajustada del SV con el evento combinado de muerte o reingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca a 30 días (objetivo primario), así como mortalidad intrahospitalaria, infección del tracto urinario (ITU) y estancia hospitalaria (objetivos secundarios). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 991 pacientes hospitalizados por ICA, la edad media fue de 66 años (DE 10,5) y el 71% fueron mujeres. Un 29,2% de los pacientes requirieron SV en el SUH. El evento combinado fue del 7,7% para el grupo no SV y 12,8% para grupo SV (p = 0,02); mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue del 5,9% en el grupo no SV y 9,7% en el grupo SV (p = 0,04); se diagnosticó ITU en el 19,1% de pacientes en el grupo no SV y en el 26,6% en el grupo SV (p = 0,01). A 30 días, 12 pacientes (1,7%) reingresaron por insuficiencia cardiaca en el grupo no SV versus 11 (3,8%) pacientes en el grupo SV (p = 0,06). No hubo diferencias en la estancia hospitalaria (11 versus 10,9 días); p = 0,78). En el análisis ajustado, el SV se asoció con el objetivo primario; [OR = 1,7 (IC 95%: 1,1-2,7; p = 0,02); HR = 1,6 (IC 95%: 1,1-2,5; p = 0,03)]; con la ITU (OR = 1,8; IC 95%: 1,1­2,2; p = 0,008) y con el reingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca (OR = 2,9; IC 95%: 1,2-7,3; p = 0,02). CONCLUSIONES: La inserción rutinaria del SV en el SUH en pacientes con ICA se asoció a peores resultados clínicos a los 30 días.

Manejo de la fibrilación auricular en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: actualización a 2023 del consenso de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias (SEMES), la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (SEC) y la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hem / Emergency department management of atrial fibrillation: 2023 consensus from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH)

La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia sostenida de mayor prevalencia en los servicios de urgencias (SU), y en España presenta una frecuentación elevada y creciente. Esta arritmia es una enfermedad grave, que incrementa la mortalidad y asocia una relevante morbilidad e impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes y en el funcionamiento de los servicios sanitarios. La diversidad de aspectos clínicos a considerar y el elevado número de opciones terapéuticas posibles justifican la implementación de estrategias de actuación coordinadas entre los diversos profesionales implicados, con el fin de incrementar la adecuación del tratamiento y optimizar el uso de recursos. Este documento, realizado por un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos en arritmias cardiacas miembros de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias, la Sociedad Española de Cardiología y la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia, recoge las recomendaciones para el manejo de la FA en los SU hospitalarios, basadas en la evidencia disponible y adaptadas a las especiales circunstancias de los mismos. En él se analizan con detalle las estrategias de profilaxis tromboembólica, control de frecuencia y control del ritmo, y los aspectos logísticos y diagnósticos relacionados. (AU)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia managed in emergency departments, and the already high prevalence of this arrhythmia is increasing in Spain. This serious condition associated with increased mortality and morbidity has a negative impact on patient quality of life and the functioning of the health care system. The management of AF requires consideration of diverse clinical variables and a large number of possible therapeutic approaches, justifying action plans to coordinate the work of several medical specialties in the interest of providing appropriate care and optimizing resources. This consensus statement brings together recommendations for emergency department management of AF based on available evidence adapted to special circumstances. The statement was drafted by a multidisciplinary team of specialists from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH). Strategies for stroke prophylaxis, measures to bring heart rate and heart rhythm under control, and related diagnostic and logistic issues are discussed in detail. (AU)

Emergency department management of atrial fibrillation: 2023 consensus from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH). / Manejo de la fibrilación auricular en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios: actualización a 2023 del consenso de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias (SEMES), la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (SEC) y la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH).

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia managed in emergency departments, and the already high prevalence of this arrhythmia is increasing in Spain. This serious condition associated with increased mortality and morbidity has a negative impact on patient quality of life and the functioning of the health care system. The management of AF requires consideration of diverse clinical variables and a large number of possible therapeutic approaches, justifying action plans to coordinate the work of several medical specialties in the interest of providing appropriate care and optimizing resources. This consensus statement brings together recommendations for emergency department management of AF based on available evidence adapted to special circumstances. The statement was drafted by a multidisciplinary team of specialists from the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC), and the Spanish Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH). Strategies for stroke prophylaxis, measures to bring heart rate and heart rhythm under control, and related diagnostic and logistic issues are discussed in detail.

OBJETIVO: La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia sostenida de mayor prevalencia en los servicios de urgencias (SU), y en España presenta una frecuentación elevada y creciente. Esta arritmia es una enfermedad grave, que incrementa la mortalidad y asocia una relevante morbilidad e impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes y en el funcionamiento de los servicios sanitarios. La diversidad de aspectos clínicos a considerar y el elevado número de opciones terapéuticas posibles justifican la implementación de estrategias de actuación coordinadas entre los diversos profesionales implicados, con el fin de incrementar la adecuación del tratamiento y optimizar el uso de recursos. Este documento, realizado por un grupo multidisciplinario de expertos en arritmias cardiacas miembros de la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias, la Sociedad Española de Cardiología y la Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia, recoge las recomendaciones para el manejo de la FA en los SU hospitalarios, basadas en la evidencia disponible y adaptadas a las especiales circunstancias de los mismos. En él se analizan con detalle las estrategias de profilaxis tromboembólica, control de frecuencia y control del ritmo, y los aspectos logísticos y diagnósticos relacionados.

Errores de medicación en niños que acuden a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas / Medication errors in children visiting pediatric emergency departments

Objetivos: la seguridad de los medicamentos en pediatría supone un verdadero reto. Se dispone de escasos estudios que hayan analizado los errores de medicación en los pacientes pediátricos que acuden a los servicios de urgencias. El objetivo de este estudio ha sido caracterizar los errores detectados en estos pacientes, determinando su gravedad, los procesos afectados, los medicamentos implicados y los tipos de errores y causas asociados. Métodos: estudio multicéntrico observacional prospectivo realizado en los servicios de urgencias de 8 hospitales públicos españoles durante 4 meses. Los errores de medicación detectados por los pediatras de urgencias en pacientes entre 0 y 16 años fueron evaluados por un farmacéutico y un pediatra. Los errores de medicación fueron analizados utilizando la Taxonomía Española de Errores de Medicación actualizada. Resultados: en 99.797 visitas a urgencias se detectaron 218 (0,2%) errores de medicación, de los cuales 74 (33,9%) causaron daños (eventos adversos por medicamentos). Los preescolares fueron el grupo poblacional con mayor número de errores de medicación (126/218). Los errores se originaron mayoritariamente en la prescripción (66,1%), por automedicación (16,5%) y por administración equivocada por parte de los familiares (15,6%). Los tipos de errores más frecuentes fueron: «dosis incorrectas» (51,4%) y «medicamento inapropiado» (46,8%). Los antiinfecciosos (63,5%) fueron los fármacos más comúnmente implicados en los errores con daño. Las causas subyacentes asociadas a una mayor proporción de errores de medicación fueron: «falta de conocimiento del medicamento» (63,8%), «falta de seguimiento de los procedimientos» (48,6%) y «falta de información del paciente» (30,3%). Conclusiones: los errores de medicación en la población pediátrica que acude a urgencias se producen en la prescripción, por automedicación y en la administración, provocando daños a los pacientes en un tercio de las ocasiones. ...(AU)

Objectives: Medication safety represents an important challenge in children. There are limited studies on medication errors in pediatric patients visiting emergency departments. To help bridge this gap, we characterized the medication errors detected in these patients, determining their severity, the stages of the medication process in which they occurred, the drugs involved, and the types and causes associated with the errors. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study in the pediatric emergency departments of 8 Spanish public hospitals over a 4-month period. Medication errors detected by emergency pediatricians in patients between 0 and 16 years of age were evaluated by a clinical pharmacist and a pediatrician. Each medication error was analyzed according to the updated Spanish Taxonomy of Medication Errors. Results: In 99,797 visits to pediatric emergency departments, 218 (0.2%) medication errors were detected, of which 74 (33.9%) resulted in harm (adverse drug events). Preschoolers were the age group with the most medication errors (126/218). Errors originated mainly in the prescribing stage (66.1%), and also by self-medication (16.5%) and due to wrong administration of the medication by family members (15.6%). Dosing errors (51.4%) and wrong/improper drugs (46.8%) were the most frequent error types. Anti-infective drugs (63.5%) were the most common drugs implicated in medication errors with harm. Underlying causes associated with a higher proportion of medication errors were “medication knowledge deficit” (63.8%), “deviation from procedures/guidelines” (48.6%) and “lack of patient information” (30.3%). Conclusions: Medication errors presented by children attending emergency departments arise from prescriptions, self-medication, and administration, and lead to patient harm in one third of cases. Developing effective interventions based on the types of errors and the underlying causes identified will improve patient safety. (AU)

Diferencias de sexo en los beneficios de la anticoagulación en pacientes ancianos con fibrilación auricular: un subanálisis del estudio EMERG-AF / Sex-related differences in benefits of anticoagulation therapy in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a subanalysis of the EMERG-AF study

Objetivos: Analizar los beneficios y seguridad a largo plazo de la anticoagulación oral (ACO) prescrita en los servicios de urgencias (SU) a pacientes mayores con fibrilación auricular (FA) y las diferencias en función del sexo. Método: Se trata de un análisis post-hoc del estudio EMERG-AF. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos $ 75 años, que consultaron en 62 SU por FA. Se recogieron datos clínicos y ACO. La variable principal estuvo compuesta por muerte, tromboembolia o sangrado mayor en 1 año. Resultados: Se incluyeron 690 pacientes, 386 mujeres (55,9%). Al alta, 575 pacientes (83,3%) estaban con ACO. En 96 de ellos se inició en el SU. Tras 1 año, la variable principal sucedió en 158 pacientes (22,9%): 118 (17,1%) fallecieron, 22 (2,7%) tuvieron una complicación tromboembólica y 34 (4,9%) una hemorragia mayor. Tras ajustar por las principales características clínicas, la ACO se asoció a una reducción en la variable principal (HR: 0,372, IC 95%: 0,236-0,587, p < 0,001), pero no se asoció con la hemorragia mayor. En las mujeres, la ACO se asoció con una reducción en la variable principal (HR: 0,372, IC 95%: 0,236-0,587, p < 0,001) y una menor mortalidad (HR: 0,281, IC 95%: 0,168-0,469, p < 0,001), incluidos pacientes con nueva prescripción y en aquellos dados de alta. Esta asociación no alcanzó significación en los hombres. (AU)

Objectives: To analyze the long-term benefits and safety of oral anticoagulation therapy prescribed in emergency departments for elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, and to detect any sex-related differences present. Material and methods: Post-hoc analysis of data compiled by the EMERG-AF group (Spanish acronym for Emergency Department Stroke Prophylaxis and Guidelines Implementation in Atrial Fibrillation). Consecutive patients aged 75 years or older with atrial fibrillation who were treated in 62 EDs were included. We recorded clinical data and anticoagulants prescribed. Patients were followed for 1 year. The main outcome variable was a composite of death, thromboembolism, or major bleeding within 1 year. Results: Data for 690 patients were registered; 386 (55.9%) were women. At discharge, 575 patients (83.3%) were on anticoagulants; therapy was started in the ED for 96 of them. A total of 158 patients (22.9%) had experienced at least 1 component of the main outcome within 1 year: 118 (17.1%) died, 22 (2.7%) had thromboembolic complications, and 34 (4.9%) had major bleeding. After adjustment for main clinical characteristics, hazard ratios (HRs) showed that anticoagulation therapy was associated with a reduction in the composite outcome (HR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.236-0.587; P .001) but not specifically with major bleeding overall. When data for women were analyzed separately, anticoagulant therapy was again associated with a reduction in the composite outcome (HR, 0.372; 95% CI, 0.236-0.587; P .001) and also with death (HR, 0.281; 95% CI, 0.168-0.469; P .001), even in patients with anticoagulant prescriptions initiated on discharge from the ED. These associations did not reach statistical significance in men. (AU)