Case Report: Evidence of Migratory Silicone Particles Arising From Cohesive Silicone Breast Implants.

Background: Silicone implants have been used since the 1960s for aesthetic purposes and breast reconstructions. During this period, many women have reported up to 40 similar symptoms, including fatigue, the emergence of autoimmune diseases, Raynaud Phenomenon, arthritis, arthralgias, and hair loss, among others. However, most of the time, these symptoms are neglected by doctors across different specialties and are most often considered a psychosomatic disease. Since 2017, many women suffering from the same complaints have formed social media groups to report their histories and subsequently describe the disease as Breast Implant Illness (BII). The phenomenon of gel bleed and silicone toxicity is known and accepted in literature, but silicone migration into the extracapsular space is still poorly demonstrated, due to the difficulty of monitoring its particles and access to patient data. Methods: This work demonstrated the presence of silicone through pathological examination in post-explant breast capsules and in the synovial tissue of the right wrist, detected with special Modified Oil Red O (MORO) staining in a patient with a history of BII. The pathological results were compared to the breast MRI imaging files. Results: The MRI images show the permeability change of the implant shell diagnosed as a water-droplet signal. It was also possible to diagnose the gel bleeding as the silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsule (SIGBIC) in both implants. Silicone gel bleed and migration of silicone were detected with MORO staining in and outside the capsule and in the synovial tissue of the right wrist. Conclusion: In this case study, we showed that silicone migration is possible via cohesive silicone gel breast implant leakage. The accumulation of silicone in the synovial tissue of the right wrist suggests local silicone toxicity and defects.

Hydrocolloid versus silicone gel for the prevention of nasal injury in newborns submitted to noninvasive ventilation: A randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of the hydrocolloid and the silicone gel on the nasal protection of the newborns (NBs) during the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three NBs were selected. They were randomly divided into three groups of 11 NBs, according to the type of nasal protection used: hydrocolloid, thick silicone gel, and thin silicone gel. The stage of the nasal injury and need for exchanging nasal protection were assessed before the connection to the NIV and every 24 h until the physician's authorization for NIV's suspension. RESULTS: The mean gestational age was 32.03 ± 3.93 weeks, and the median birth weight was 1760 g (750-3535 g). The incidence of nasal injury using hydrocolloid, thick silicone gel, and a thin silicone gel group was 36.36%, 81.81%, and 72.72%, respectively (p = 0.06). Regarding the injury stage, there was no statistical significance between the three study groups. The hydrocolloid protection type had the best adhesion (p = 0.03) on the NBs' skin. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was conducted by local practice patterns, the results showed that the hydrocolloid could be the best choice to prevent the nasal septum base injury in the NB submitted to NIV.

O tratamento das cicatrizes de esternotomia mediana com injeções de triancinolona, placas de silicone e terapia combinada: um estudo prospectivo randomizado / Treatment of median sternotomy scars using Triamcinolone injections, Silicone Dressings and a combination group: a prospective randomized comparative study

Introdução: Placas de silicone e injeções de triancinolona melhoram o tamanho dos queloides e das cicatrizes hipertróficas, além do eritema, da elasticidade e de sintomas como dor e prurido. Esses tratamentos não são invasivos, têm um bom custo-beneficio e são amplamente utilizados como terapia inicial para queloides e cicatrizes hipertróficas; entretanto, faltam estudos comparativos dos dois tratamentos. Objetivo: Comparar o uso de placas de silicone, triancinolona intralesional, e a combinação de ambas as modalidades terapêuticas, no tratamento de cicatrizes hipertróficas na mesma área anatômica e causadas pelo mesmo mecanismo de lesão. Métodos e Materiais: Em um estudo prospectivo, 12 pacientes com cicatrizes de esternotomia mediana foram randomizados em 3 grupos (4 pacientes em cada grupo): Grupo 1. injeções mensais de triancinolona; Grupo 2. uma combinação de placas de silicone e injeções de triancinolona e Grupo 3. placas de silicone. Os pacientes foram avaliados em consultas clínicas mensais com o uso da Escala de Vancouver e durômetro. Foram realizadas imunohistoquímica e microscopia confocal para os colágenos de tipos I e VI em amostras de cicatriz. Os grupos foram comparados com os testes de Kruskall-Wallis e Friedman com significância de p< 0.05. Resultados: Os três tratamentos mostraram-se eficazes na melhora das cicatrizes, conforme demonstrado pela redução nos parâmetros da Escala de Vancouver. Foi observada uma diferença entre os três grupos no tempo 2, quando a triancinolona mostrou-se menos eficaz. O grupo 2 apresentou melhora na pigmentação (p = 0,042). Os colágenos de tipos I e VI apresentaram aumento de fluorescência em toda a derme superficial e profunda nas lesões não-tratadas, que diminuiu após do tratamento. Apesar do número pequeno de pacientes, este foi o primeiro estudo prospectivo que comparou estas modalidades de tratamento de cicatrizes, evitando vieses frequentemente vistos em publicações sobre tratamentos de cicatrizes

Introduction: Silicone dressings and Triamcinolone injections are known to improve keloids and hypertrophic scars size, erythema, flexibility, and symptoms such as pain and itching. These treatments are non-invasive, inexpensive, and widely used as first or second-line therapy; however, studies comparing them are still lacking. Objective: To compare silicone dressings, triamcinolone injections, and a combination group, to treat hypertrophic scars, at the same anatomical area, caused by the same mechanism of injury. Materials and methods: In a prospective study, 12 patients with median-sternotomy scars were randomized into 3 groups (n=4 patients each): group 1, monthly triamcinolone injections; group 2, a combination of silicone dressings and triamcinolone injections; and group 3, silicone dressings. Patients were evaluated in monthly clinical appointments using the Vancouver Scale and the durometer. Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy for collagen types I and VI were performed in scar samples. The groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests, with p<0,05 indicating significance. Results: The three treatments were effective in reducing the Vancouver scores. A difference between the three groups was observed at time 2 when triamcinolone was less effective. Group 2 showed an improvement on pigmentation (p = 0,042). Collagens types I and VI presented increased fluorescence throughout the superficial and deep dermis in untreated lesions, which decreased after the treatment. Although the number of patients is limited, this is the first prospective study addressing some of the major bias in scars treatment

Cohesive silicone gel implants with smooth, textured or polyurethane-coated surface to restore volume in eviscerated sockets.

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the three different surface coating on cohesive silicone gel implants in eviscerated rabbit eye sockets. Forty-five albino rabbits underwent right eye evisceration and received hemisphere-shaped cohesive silicone gel implants with smooth (Group 1), textured (Group 2), or polyurethane-coated surface (Group 3) in the socket. The animals were euthanized at 7, 30, and 90 days postoperatively. Computed tomography of the orbits was performed prior to euthanasia. Subsequently, the orbital contents were removed and underwent histologic and morphometric examination. Data were statistically analyzed. There were no adverse effects throughout the study. The majority of implants in the Group 1 exhibited 180° rotation. The Group 3 experienced an intense inflammatory reaction around the implant and implant deformation probably due to pseudocapsule contraction. Cohesive silicone gel implants had good integration into the scleral socket. Optimal results were obtained with cohesive silicone gel textured implants (Group 2). Smooth implants (Group 1) rotated significantly, whereas polyurethane (Group 3) coated implants precipitated an intense inflammatory reaction and were deformed postoperatively.

Early use of CO2 lasers and silicone gel on surgical scars: Prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Some publications have shown good aesthetic results for scars through the early application of fractional CO2 lasers on elective surgery scars. The aim of this randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was to compare the aesthetic quality of the scar from a group of patients submitted to super-pulsed fractional CO2 laser applications (10,600 nm fractional CO2 , set at a density of 20% and an energy of 10 mJ, a scanner of 03 × 03 mm, and a pulse repetition time of 0.3 seconds) in contrast with the other group that used only the silicone gel on the scar after plastic surgery. METHOD: A prospective study was conducted by analyzing 42 patients with recent scars of up to three weeks in patients with a I-IV Fitz-Patrick skin phototype. The scars were evaluated aesthetically in the second and sixth months by applying the Vancouver scale. RESULTS: At 2 months of treatment, the statistical data showed a discrete superiority in the LASER group's treatment, as compared to that of the SILICONE group, in both percentage and significance concerning flexibility (P = 0.05) and pigmentation (P = 0.01). Laser group presented better results in the sixth month (P = 0,03). CONCLUSION: The early use of the fractional CO2 laser contributed to improving the aesthetic quality of scars from elective surgeries in the second and in the 6th months. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:570-576, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Reacción a un tatuaje de henna negra tratado con furoato de mometasona y gel de silicona: Caso clínico / Reaction to a black henna tattoo treated with mometasone furoate and silicone gel: case report

Black henna tattoos have paraphenylenediamine (PPD), which contains a product of herbal origin, which due to its molecular characteristics is capable of inducing, in susceptible individuals, a type IV hypersensitivity reaction. It clinically manifests as a contact dermatitis that usually when it disappears, scarring and hypopigmentation are left in the injured area. Objective: To describe the case of a patient with hypersensitivity to henna tattoo and to present the most relevant phenomena associated with this condition. Case report: The case of a 6 year-old patient with a black henna tattoo on his right leg, who was diagnosed with contact dermatitis probably attributed to PPD, is presented. Mometasone furoate and topical silicone gel treatment was started with good response. Conclusion: Mometasone furoate and silicone gel are a good possible therapeutic option for treating contact dermatitis caused by PPD as the dermatosis was resolved without residual lesions.

Los tatuajes de henna negra son aquellos que contienen parafenilendiamina (PPD), que contienen un producto de origen herbal, que por sus características moleculares es capaz de inducir, en individuos susceptibles, una reacción de hipersensibilidad tipo IV. Se manifiesta clínicamente como una dermatitis de contacto, que generalmente al desaparecer, persiste de manera residual una cicatriz hipertrófica e hipopigmentación en la zona lesionada. Objetivo: Describir el caso de un paciente con hipersensibilidad al tatuaje de henna, y presentar los fenómenos más relevantes asociados a esta patología. Caso clínico: Paciente de 6 años de edad, que se realizó un tatuaje con henna negra en la pierna derecha, en quien se diagnosticó posteriormente una dermatitis de contacto atribuida probablemente a la PPD. Se comenzó tratamiento con furoato de mometasona y gel de silicona con buena respuesta por vía tópica. Conclusión: El furoato de mometasona y gel de silicona son una posible opción terapéutica de utilidad para tratar la dermatitis de contacto causada por el PPD, debido a que la dermatosis se resolvió sin lesiones residuales.