Five-year recurrence after endoscopic approach to pilonidal sinus disease: A multicentre experience.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year recurrence rate of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) after endoscopic sinusectomy and identify risk factors for recurrence. METHODS: All consecutive patients from September 2011 through December 2017 who underwent endoscopic sinusectomy at seven referral centres for pilonidal sinus treatment were retrospectively analysed from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Out of 290 patients (185 males versus 105 female, with a mean age of 25.5±6.9), 73 presented recurrence at 5-year follow-up with a recurrence rate of 25.2%. The number of pilonidal sinus with pits off the midline (p = 0.001) and the mean (SD) distance from the most lateral orifice to the midline (p = 0.001) were higher in the group of patients with recurrence at 5-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the position of the pits off the midline (p = 0.001) and the distance of the most lateral orifice from the midline (p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for recurrence at 5-year follow-up. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the distance of lateral orifice from midline predicted an 82.2% possibility of recurrence at 5-year follow-up and Youden's test identified the best cut-off as 2 cm for this variable. Out of 195 cases with the most lateral orifice less than 2 cm from the midline, 13 presented recurrence at 5-year follow-up with a recurrence rate of 6.7%. Out of 95 cases with the most lateral orifice more than 2 cm from midline, 60 showed recurrence at 5-year follow-up with a recurrence rate of 63.2%. CONCLUSIONS: This data may help guide which disease characteristics predict the optimal use of an endoscopic pilonidal sinus technique.

Maxillary sinus mucocele in a 20-year-old male: a case report of a rare occurrence / Mucocele de seno maxilar en un varón de 20 años: reporte de un caso de rara ocurrencia

Mucocele of Maxillary sinus is a rare entity comprising 2-10% of all mucoceles and develops due to obstruction of drainage ostium. Here, we present a case of maxillary sinus mucocele in a 20-year-old male who presented with diffuse swelling on the left side of his face. Provisional diagnosis of mucocele was made on a computed tomography scan, which was later confirmed on histopathology. The lesion was managed surgically with uneventful healing at 2 weeks and 3 months follow-up.Mucoceles are often misdiagnosed as cysts or tumours of odontogenic origin on the conventional radiograph. Delay in diagnosis can result in complications due to the expansion of mucocele towards adjacent structures such as the nose and orbit. Therefore, it becomes crucial to diagnose it appropriately with the help of higher imaging modalities so that it can be managed well in time. (AU)

El mucocele del seno maxilar es una entidad rara que comprende el 2-10% de todos los mucoceles y se desarrolla debido a la obstrucción del ostium de drenaje. A continuación, presentamos un caso de mucocele del seno maxilar en un hombre de 20 años que presentó una inflamación difusa en el lado izquierdo de la cara. El diagnóstico provisional de mucocele se realizó en una tomografía computarizada, que luego se confirmó en la histopatología. La lesión se manejó quirúrgicamente con curación sin incidentes a las 2 semanas y 3 meses de seguimiento.Los mucoceles a menudo se diagnostican erróneamente como quistes o tumores de origen odontogénico en la radiografía convencional. El retraso en el diagnóstico puede dar lugar a complicaciones debido a la expansión del mucocele hacia estructuras adyacentes como la nariz y la órbita. Por lo tanto, se vuelve crucial diagnosticarlo adecuadamente con la ayuda de modalidades de imágenes superiores para que pueda manejarse bien a tiempo. (AU)

Endoscopic sinusectomy: 'a rose by any other name'. A systematic review of different endoscopic procedures to treat pilonidal disease.

AIM: Pilonidal sinus or Pilonidal Disease (PD) is a relatively common, benign but challenging condition. Although commonly encountered in practice, its ideal treatment is controversial. One of the most validated treatments is video-assisted surgery. In this context, very similar endoscopic techniques have been published under different names. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the differences among these proposed techniques and their outcomes. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed during all stages of this systematic review. A systematic search of the English literature was performed on multiple databases from 1 January 2014 to 3 April 2022. The primary outcome measure was the IDEAL framework stage of innovation. The key secondary outcome measures were the adherence to the IDEAL reporting guidelines, the Blencowe framework and the core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating the introduction and evaluation of novel surgical techniques, the qualitative assessment using appropriate tools, the procedural variations and outcomes of each technique. RESULTS: A total of 38 articles were included reporting a very similar technique under eight different acronyms. The number of patients varied from 9 to 250. Mean follow-up ranged from 1 to 60 months. There was only one published study of IDEAL 3. The majority (58%) were IDEAL 2a studies. Reporting of domains in the IDEAL reporting guidelines and Blencowe framework was poor, with most studies not reporting the component steps of procedures or efforts to standardize them. Half of COS domains were markedly underreported. The quality of the evidence was categorized as having a risk of bias from moderate to critical level in all nine comparative non-randomized series. Postoperative complications occurred in 0%-6% of cases, including surgical site infection, poor or failed wound healing bleeding, granuloma, haematoma, and pain requiring intervention. The recurrence rate varied from 0% to 22%. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that reporting on technical aspects of interventions for PD is poor, thus warranting a better-quality control of surgical techniques. It is advisable to group all endoscopic procedures under the umbrella term of 'endoscopic sinusectomy', thus embracing the two main principles of this technique, that is, video assistance and PD ablation.

Minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease in a paediatric population: comparison of two techniques.

BACKGROUND: Pilonidal disease (PD) is a common and debilitating inflammatory condition with significant impact on quality of life. Minimally invasive techniques (MIT) have shown promising results comparing to traditional excision. Herein we present a comparison of two MIT techniques -sinusectomy (SE) and pit-picking plus laser ablation (PPL). METHODS: All cases of paediatric PD treated by PPL and SE at our center between August 2018 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: One-hundred and six patients were included, with a median age of 16 years (IQR 15-16). PPL was the procedure of choice in 36 patients (34%) and the remaining underwent SE (66%). Median healing time was significantly lower in SE group (20 days), comparing to PPL (30 days) (p = 0.002). Early healing failure occurred more frequently in the PPL group (p = 0.003). Recurrence rate was similar between groups - PPL 17% versus SE 16% (p = 0.89). Overall complication rate was 9% and was significantly higher in PPL (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: MIT techniques are promising solutions in PD treatment. Although similarly easy and fast to perform, SE technique showed better healing profile and lower complication rate but no significant difference on recurrence rates was observed.

Sacro-coxxygial hygiene, a key factor in the outcome of pilonidal sinus surgical treatment?

BACKGROUND: Surgical wound infection contributes to prolonged recovery time after pilonidal sinus excision. As a standard procedure after surgery, we recommend our patients to perform water irrigations in the intergluteal cleft 4 to 6 times a day during the post-operative period. Our hypothesis is that this should reduce healing time and complication rates. The aim of this study was to measure the importance of sacro coccygeal hygiene in the management of pilonidal sinus disease. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data after surgical management of pilonidal sinus (sinusectomy procedures) in our division over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into three groups according to their local hygiene during postoperative follow-up and scored one (G1: good hygiene) to three (G3: poor hygiene). Primary outcome was complication rates. Secondary endpoints were, healing time, follow-up, time off work, and recurrence rate. RESULTS: In G1 (N = 112), complication rate was 3.6%. In G2 (N = 109), it was 5.5%, whereas in G3 (N = 71), it reached 7.03%. However, there were no statistically significant differences between hygiene groups regarding complication rates in both univariate and multivariable analysis. Regarding secondary outcomes, there were significant differences between hygiene groups concerning median follow-up (p = 0.0001) and median time off work (p = 0.0127). CONCLUSION: Good hygiene of wound is essential for optimal, rapid healing without complications. The importance of this report is to show that thanks to our hygiene follow-up strategy with frequent perineal irrigations and regular follow-up checks, patients with at a first glance "unclean local conditions", reached similar complications, median healing time and recurrences rates to patients with medium and good wound hygiene level.

Sinusectomy and primary closure versus excision and primary closure in pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical procedures are available for the treatment of pilonidal sinus diseases (PSD), but the best surgical approach remains controversial. Minimally invasive surgical procedures are more popular than surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sinusectomy with primary closure (SPC) in comparison with excision and primary closure (EPC) in primary or recurrent cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted with two cohort groups in which 351 patients with PSD underwent either SPC or EPC. The two procedures were compared according to the presence of short-term complications and recurrence of PSD. RESULTS: Of the patients, 134 underwent EPC and 217 underwent SPC. The length of stay and the wound healing time were significantly longer in the EPC group than in the SPC group. The occurrence rates of wound site infection and abscess were significantly higher in the EPC group than in the SPC group; however, seroma was statistically significantly more common in the SPC group than in the EPC group. The recurrence rates were 18.7% and 5.5% in the EPC and SPC groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: SPC is an efficient procedure for the treatment of patients with PSD showing simple and complicated disease patterns.

Conservative Sinusectomy vs. excision and primary off-midline closure for pilonidal disease: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Pilonidal sinus disease (PD) is a common acquired disease, responsible for discomfort and time off work. There is currently no consensus on the best surgical therapy. We aimed at comparing conservative sinusectomy (S) to excision and paramedian primary closure (PC). METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial compatible with the CONSORT statement standards. We included all patients with chronic PD between 2012 and 2017. We excluded patients with acute abscesses, recurrent PD after surgery with a curative intent and patients needing complex reconstructions with rotation flaps. Patients with chronic symptomatic PD were randomized to S or PC. Primary end-point was the rate of patients healed at 3 weeks, secondary outcomes were total healing time, pain, time off work, patient satisfaction and recurrence at 1 year. Patients were seen at a wound clinic until healed and contacted at 3, 6, and 12 months for follow-up. RESULTS: After inclusion of 58 patients the study was stopped prematurely due to discrepancy between expected and observed outcomes. Only 4/30 (13.3%) patients in the S group had healed completely at 3 weeks compared with 14/28 (50%) in the PC group (p = 0.01). Median time to complete healing was 54 (23-328) days in the S group compared to 34 (13-141) in the PC group (p = 0.025). Number of outpatient visits, time off work, analgesia requirement, and recurrence rates at 12 months 4 (16%) in the S group and 3 (11.1%) in the PC group (p = 0.548) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: PC leads to faster healing compared to S, with similar healthcare burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the local ethics committee and registered in www.clinicaltrials.gov (REF: NCT03271996). The study was carried out at the Regional Hospital of Lugano, Switzerland.

Improving Resource Utilization and Outcomes Using a Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Protocol.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resource utilization and outcome of a minimally invasive pilonidal protocol (MIPP) versus surgical excision (SE) in adolescents with pilonidal disease. METHODS: Improved hygiene, laser epilation (LE), and sinusectomy were implemented as a minimally invasive pilonidal protocol (MIPP) in March 2016. Following IRB approval, 34 consecutive MIPP patients with moderate and severe disease were compared with a random sample of 17 SE patients treated prior to MIPP implementation. Number of visits, laser epilation (LE) treatments, care duration, operations, operating room (OR) time, charges, and condition at last visit were analyzed. Charges were standardized for 2018. RESULTS: No differences were found in age or body mass index between groups. SE patients underwent an average 1.6 excisions/patient (cumulative 2598 OR minutes) and no LE. MIPP patients underwent an average 1.4 sinusectomies and 3.5 LEs/patient. Six sinusectomies (0.17/patient) were performed in OR (cumulative 258 OR minutes). No differences in number of visits or care duration were found between groups. At last follow-up, 82% of MIPP and 18% of SE patients were healed or asymptomatic (p < 0.01). Average charges were $29,098 for SE versus $8440 for MIPP (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: A minimally invasive pilonidal protocol reduces charges and improves outcome compared with surgical excision in adolescents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study.

The management of pilonidal disease: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee was to derive recommendations from the medical literature regarding the management of pilonidal disease. METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 1965 through June 2017 were queried for any papers addressing operative or non-operative management of pilonidal disease. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived for three questions based on the best available evidence, and a clinical practice guideline was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 193 articles were fully analyzed. Some non-operative and minimally invasive techniques have outcomes at least equivalent to operative management. Minimal surgical procedures (Gips procedure, sinusectomy) may be more appropriate as first-line treatment than radical excision due to faster recovery and patient preference, with acceptable recurrence rates. Excision with midline closure should be avoided. For recurrent or persistent disease, any type of flap repair is acceptable and preferred by patients over healing by secondary intention. There is a lack of literature dedicated to the pediatric patient. CONCLUSIONS: There is a definitive trend towards less invasive procedures for the treatment of pilonidal disease, with equivalent or better outcomes compared with classic excision. Midline closure should no longer be the standard surgical approach. TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review of level 1-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1-4 (mainly level 3-4).

Video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) versus sinusectomy for treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease: a comparative study.

Since its first description in 1883, different treatments for pilonidal sinus disease have been proposed, but we are still far from the identification of an ideal approach. The objective of this study is to determine if video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) could be considered superior/non-inferior to standard sinusectomy for treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. After applying propensity score analysis, data from 40 patients who underwent sinusectomy and 40 patients who underwent VAAPS, from March 2011 to August 2013, were collected. The two groups were similar in terms of sex, age, BMI, smoking status and complexity of sinus. The mean operative time was less for the sinusectomy group compared with the minimally invasive treatment group (30.38 ± 6.23 vs 44.39 ± 7.76; p = 0.001). On the other hand, the recurrence rate (7.5% vs 25%; p = 0.035) was significantly lower in the VAAPS group and the infection rate showed a trend toward reduction in the endoscopically treated patients (12.5% vs 30%; p = 0.057). No differences were found in terms of pain score at 1 week from surgery (3.71 ± 1.24 vs 3.76 ± 1.39; p = 0.883), satisfaction at 6 months (8.3 ± 1.2 vs 8.2 ± 1.3; p = 0.78) and time off work (2.01 ± 1.30 vs 2.08 ± 1.24; p = 0.620). The effectiveness of our new technique can be assessed again and the comparative analysis with the conventional sinusectomy shows the feasibility of VAAPS, suggesting that this procedure is the best way to perform a sinusectomy.