Approaching patients with panfacial fractures by using an anatomical reference: A novel concept and preliminary study.

Panfacial fractures are challenging for craniofacial surgeons. Aside from involving multiple subunits, they also lack the reliability of a useful landmark of the facial skeleton. Properly, reducing and fixing palatal fracture to re-establish the premorbid maxillary dental arch is important. This was a retrospective study conducted from 2015 to 2020. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scan for surgical planning of orthognathic surgery due to either esthetic or occlusion concerns. The classification of occlusion was recorded as class I, II, and III. The parameters measured on CT were the distance between the midpoint of the supra-orbital foramen/notch (IS), mesio-buccal cusp tips (IB), central fossa (IC), palatal cusp tips (IP), and the midpoint of the palatal marginal gingiva (IM) of the bilateral maxillary first molars. The IS was compared with the IB, IC, IP, and IM. The results were analyzed by using one-way repeated measurement analysis of variance. Eighty-seven patients (36 men and 51 women) were included in the study. There were 13 patients of class I malocclusion, 8 of class II malocclusion, and 66 of class III malocclusion. The IS was comparable to the IC in all three groups. The IS can predict the IC, regardless of the patient's occlusion, and can be subsequently used to decide the width of maxillary dental arch in panfacial fracture management. Further studies are necessary to obtain more definite results.

Microsurgical Anatomy Review of Bifrontal Limited Transbasal Approach - Quantitative and Anatomy Study.

INTRODUCTION: The bifrontal transbasal approach is an anterior midline skull base approach to anterior skull base, sellae region and, if needed, to posterior skull base in the midline, often used for tumoral lesions but also useful for vascular or infectious pathologies. METHODS: Descriptive anatomic study, 5 formalin-fixed human cadaveric heads were used injected with colored silicone. The dissection was made step-by-step to describe every anatomic structure encountered. The working distance was obtained from the posterior wall of the frontal sinus with and without orbital rim to the pituitary stalk, the sellae, the pontomedullary sulcus, and the anterior margin of the foramen magnum. RESULTS: Stepwise anatomic dissection was performed dividing the surgical technique into 6 stages: soft-tissue stage, bone stage, sinus stage, clival stage, intradural, and measurements. The objective of making the supraorbital osteotomy was to improve the vision over the neural structures without brain retraction and limited to the midline supraorbital rim to avoid aggressive manipulation and injury to the orbit. The working distances measured with the orbital rim were on average: to the pituitary stalk, 70.5 mm; to the sellae, 81.3 mm; to the pontomedullary sulcus, 97 mm; and the foramen magnum, 99.5 mm. Without the orbital rim measures were: to the pituitary stalk, 57 mm; to the sellae, 62.5 mm; to the pontomedullary sulcus, 96 mm; and the foramen magnum, 98.5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of osteotomies including removing of the orbital rim improves the access to the central skull base with special benefits on the working distances to the sellae region.

Supraorbital Rim Fracture Involving Frontal Sinus by Sports Injury.

Supraorbital rim fracture is a rare sports-related injury encountered by craniofacial specialty and great challenge to the surgeons because of their anatomical location and relation with vital structures in close relation. Currently, in the literature, no classification system or treatment protocol exists for the supraorbital rim fracture. Supraorbital rim fracture forms a small proportion of sports-related injuries. Here we present a case with supraorbital rim fracture by sports injury diagnosed by computed tomography and treated surgically by open reduction methods using mini plates.

Can Sonography Distinguish a Supraorbital Notch From a Foramen?

Diagnostic tools for evaluating the supraorbital rim in preparation for nerve decompression surgery in patients with chronic headaches are currently limited. We evaluated the use of sonography to diagnose the presence of a supraorbital notch or foramen in 11 cadaver orbits. Sonographic findings were assessed by dissecting cadaver orbits to determine whether a notch or foramen was present. Sonography correctly diagnosed the presence of a supraorbital notch in 7 of 7 cases and correctly diagnosed a supraorbital foramen in 4 of 4 cases. We found that sonography had 100% sensitivity in diagnosing a supraorbital notch and foramen. This tool may therefore be helpful in characterizing the supraorbital rim preoperatively and may influence the decision to use a transpalpebral or endoscopic approach for supraorbital nerve decompression as well as the decision to use local or general anesthesia.