The Use of the Taylor Spatial Frame in Treating Tibial Osteomyelitis Following Traumatic Tibial Fracture.

Introduction: Tibial osteomyelitis can follow open fractures with bacteria colonising the wound and persisting through biofilm and sequestrum formation. The treatment is complex, requiring eradication through debridement before limb reconstruction, for which the Taylor spatial frame (TSF) is one option. This study evaluates patient outcomes after reconstruction and identifies factors associated with post-operative complications. Materials and methods: Fifty-one cases of tibial osteomyelitis were treated by the Ilizarov technique from 2015 to 2021 at a major trauma centre. Bacterial samples and treatment factors were assessed. Patient outcomes were complication rates and time to bony union. Complications were expressed as odds-ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Linear regression was used to assess factors associated with time to union. Results: The mean follow-up was 24.1 months with the mean time to radiological union being 11 months. Post-operative complications were noted in 76.5% of patients with pin-site infections most common (52.9%), followed by fracture malunion (29.4%). Smoking was associated with increased fracture malunion (OR = 4.148, 95% confidence Interval [1.13-15.18], p = 0.031). The time to union was positively associated with complications, age and time to full weight-bearing (FWB). All other measured factors were found not significant. Conclusion: Tibial osteomyelitis is treated reliably by debridement and reconstruction using the Ilizarov technique using a TSF application. The most common complication was pin-site infection. Optimising patients through cessation of smoking and encouraging post-operative weight-bearing can reduce the complication rate and improve time to union. Clinical significance: The Ilizarov technique using a TSF can treat significant deformities that result from the management of tibial osteomyelitis. How to cite this article: Geetala R, Zhang J, Maghsoudi D, et al. The Use of the Taylor Spatial Frame in Treating Tibial Osteomyelitis Following Traumatic Tibial Fracture. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):32-35.

Circular frame versus reamed intramedullary tibial nail in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures.

BACKGROUND: Grade III open tibial diaphyseal fractures are challenging to treat and controversy exists on whether to treat them with an intramedullary nail (IMN) or a circular frame (CF). This study aims to compare outcomes for intramedullary nail and circular frame in the treatment of open tibial diaphyseal fractures. METHODOLOGY: Retrospective study at a major trauma center of all patients admitted with a grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture between January 2016 and January 2022. The primary outcome measures were major complications: non-union, malunion, refracture, DBI and amputation. Secondary outcome measures were time to union and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in the study, 32 patients in CF group and 23 patients in IMN group. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographics of patients in both groups. Major complications were recorded in 13 limbs (54%) in IMN group and in 18 limbs (56%) in CF group which were not statistically significant (p = 0.797). Deep bone infection rates were noted in 4 (12.5%) in the CF group, compared to 1 (4%) in IMN group; however, the result was not statistically significant (p = 0.240). Amputation rates as a result of infected non-unions were seen in 1 limb (4%) in IMN group and 2 limbs (6%) in CF group (p = 0.99). Median time to union was significantly shorter in IMN group at 30 weeks compared to 30 weeks for CF group (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: IMN should be the treatment of choice in the treatment of grade III open tibial diaphyseal fracture, but CF should be considered for delayed treatment and in patients with bone loss.

The Clinical Application of Double Taylor Spatial Frame in Segmental Tibial Fracture.

OBJECTIVES: Multi-planar external fixation has been used for the management of segmental tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. However, fewer specialized studies have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to describe our experience of treating fractures of this type using the Taylor Spatial Frame and Ilizarov external fixation methods. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with segmental tibial fracture treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. The patients were divided into double Taylor Spatial Frame (D-TSF) and Ilizarov groups based on the external fixation structure. Baseline demographic data included sex, age, injury side and cause, open or closed fracture, time from injury to surgery, complications, and external frame removal and fracture healing time. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured from preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up full-length X-rays of bilateral lower limbs. We determined the degree of deviation in the HKA by calculating the difference between the measured angle and the ideal value of 180°; the absolute value was used to assess recovery of the lower limb force line. At the final follow-up, Johner-Wruhs tibial fracture outcome criteria (J-W TFOC) were used to classify the postoperative function of the affected limb as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Count data were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for rank data. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of injury, cause of injury, closed or open fracture, or time between injury and surgery, which indicates that the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in external frame removal and fracture healing time between the D-TSF and Ilizarov groups (36.24 ± 8.34 vs 45.42 ± 10.21 weeks, p = 0.009; 33.33 ± 8.21 vs 42.00 ± 9.78 weeks, p = 0.011). The Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to assess the function of the affected limb, the D-TSF group performed better in correcting the lower limb force line than the Ilizarov group. A statistically significant difference in terms of excellent ratings was observed between the two groups (18/2/1/0 vs 5/5/1/1, p = 0.010). Postoperative follow-up X-rays demonstrated a significant improvement in the HKA in both groups immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up compared to the angle before surgery. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was observed in the degree of deviation in the HKA between the two groups (1.58° ± 0.84° vs 2.37° ± 1.00°, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The D-TSF treatment is associated with minimal secondary damage to soft tissue, a straightforward and minimally invasive procedure, multiplanar stable fracture fixation, and optimization of fracture alignment and lower limb force lines, therefore, it is highly effective therapeutic option for segmental tibial fracture.

[Corrective osteotomies around the knee joint using hexapods]. / Kniegelenknahe Korrekturosteotomien mittels Hexapoden.

OBJECTIVE: Correction of deformities around the knee joint in the frontal and sagittal axis, torsion, length and translation. INDICATIONS: Complex deformities of the proximal tibia, and to a lesser extent of the distal femur, which cannot be treated with acute correction using plate or nail osteosynthesis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Nicotine abuse, soft tissue problems, lack of patient compliance. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: First, mounting of the proximal ring of the ring fixator strictly parallel to the joint line in 2 planes, fixation with 3 or 4 pins or wires. Then mounting of the distal ring, fixation also with 3 or 4 wires, connection of both rings with 6 struts (movement units with which the length can be adjusted). Then the fibula osteotomy is performed in the transition from the distal to the middle third, and finally the tibial osteoclasia is performed via a mini-incision as a drill hole chisel osteotomy in the CORA (center of rotation and angulation) of the malposition. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Immediately postoperatively, the deformity is defined usimg computer software, the exact position and size of the ring and struts are entered, and a knee image is taken in 2 planes with X­ray signal adapter (beacon) on the ring fixator to plan the continuous correction. Thereupon continuous correction of the deformity via daily rotation on the 6 struts, which is done by the patients themselves at home after the hospital stay. At the time of correction, pain-adapted partial weight-bearing with 20 kg up to half body weight. After completion of the correction, repeat X­ray diagnosis and check whether the correction goal has been achieved. If necessary, reprogram a program for renewed continuous correction if residual deformity remains. When the correction goal is reached, X­ray check. After 6 weeks, with bony consolidation, gradual loading. The treatment of the correction can either be carried out in the ring fixator (wearing time of 0.5-1 year not unusual) or secondarily via a change of procedure to plate osteosynthesis. RESULTS: We report on 25 knee joint corrections in 23 patients (12 women and 11 men) using hexapods (Taylor spatial frame) during the period 2016-2023. One patient had a femoral and a tibial fixator at the same time; another patient had a triple fixator at the tibia. The mean age was 32 (6-73) years. 15 left and 10 right corrections were performed. 19 fixators had been applied tibial, 5 fixators femoral, and 1 fixator cross-jointly (for contracture). The indications were 6 congenital complex deformities, 10 posttraumatic complex deformities, 3 pseudarthroses after correction osteotomies, 2 patients with osteomyelitis, 1 knee contracture and 1 infection after fracture osteosynthesis with nails. The forms of correction performed were varizations and valgizations in frontal axis, extension and flexion in sagittal plane, torsional corrections, lengthening also after acute shortening (pseudarthrosis resection) and segmental transport. Acute shortening without lengthening was also treated with the fixator only until bone healing and a Masqualet procedure was bridged with it. The average duration of fixator wear was 144 (31-443) days. All patients were followed up until final metal removal. There were 19 change of procedure to another osteosynthesis procedure (18 plate osteosynthesis, 1 ESIN); 6 times the treatment in TSF (Taylor Spatial Frame) was performed until final bone healing.

Study on orthopaedic path planning of Taylor spatial frame.

AIM: Taylor spatial frame (TSF) is a kind of six-axis external fixator based on Stewart platform, which is widely used in the fields of trauma orthopaedics and orthopaedic reconstruction. PURPOSE: To reduce the irregular movement of TSF's moving platform during orthopaedic process and decrease the risk of complications caused by collision between bone and surrounding tissue. METHOD: We combine the kinematics solutions with the multi-objective genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization to get the optimal solution for adjustment of strut length and order. We conduct simulation and physical experiment of orthodontic process respectively to prove the effectiveness of our method. RESULT: After optimization, the average offset during a single adjustment is less than 1 mm, and the offset during the whole orthopaedic process is reduced by about 38.8%. CONCLUSION: It demonstrates that our method can effectively reduce the offset of moving platform while ensuring orthopaedic accuracy.

Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series.

Aim: Bone transport is a beneficial reconstructive method for bone defects caused by infected non-unions or bone tumours. The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a three-dimensional corrective external fixator that can be used to achieve bone transport and correct any residual deformities easily at any time. This study reports the results of bone transport using TSF. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of ten patients who underwent bone transport using the TSF. The mean age was 32.3 years; the femur was affected in one case and the lower leg in nine. Bone defects were due to infected non-unions in seven cases and bone tumours in three. The duration of external fixation, bone transport distance, distraction index (DI), alignment at the end of correction, leg length discrepancy, and complications were investigated. Results: The average bone transport distance was 76.0 mm. The external fixation period averaged 367 days with the DI at 20.8 days/cm. Deformity at the docking site was assessed to have an average 2.6° deformity and 2.0 mm translation in the frontal view, as well as 3.3° deformity and 3.7 mm translation in the lateral view. The mean leg length discrepancy was 10.9 mm and the percentage of the mechanical axis (%MA) was 40.6%. Four patients underwent plate conversion after correction and two required additional surgery for non-union at the docking site. Bone union was achieved in all patients and there was no reaggravation of infection or tumour recurrence. Conclusion: The TSF allowed for the correction of deformities and translations that occurred during bone transport giving excellent results. However, as with bone transport using this or other devices, additional procedures are often needed to obtain consolidation or docking site union. How to cite this article: Shimokawa K, Matsubara H, Hikichi T, et al. Bone Transport with the Taylor Spatial Frame Technique: A Case Series. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):117-122.

Developments in circular external fixators: A review.

Circular external fixators (CEFs) are successfully used in orthopedics owing to their highly favorable stiffness characteristics which promote distraction osteogenesis. Although there are different designs of external fixators, how these features produce optimal biomechanics through structural and component designs is not well known. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a review on CEFs following the PRISMA statement. A search for relevant research articles was performed on Scopus and PubMed databases providing the related keywords. Furthermore, a patent search was conducted on the Google Patent database. 126 records were found to be eligible for the review. Different designs of CEFs were summarized and tabulated based on their specific features. A bibliometric analysis was also performed on the eligible research papers. Based on the findings, the developments of CEFs in terms of materials, automation, adjustment methods, component designs, wire-clamping, and performance evaluation have been extensively discussed. The trends of the CEF design and future directions are also discussed in this review. Significant research gaps include a lack of consideration towards ease of assembly, effective wire-clamping methods, and CEFs embedded with online patient-monitoring systems, among others. An apparent lack of research interest from low-middle and low-income countries was also identified.

A comparative evaluation of the time to frame removal for tibia fractures treated with hexapod and Ilizarov circular frames.

INTRODUCTION: Traditional Ilizarov and hexapod frames have different biomechanical properties and there is limited literature regarding their effect on time to fracture union or time to frame removal. METHODS: Tibial fractures managed with a circular frame at a tertiary limb reconstruction referral centre between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. They were classified into three treatment groups; Ilizarov style, Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) and TrueLok Hex (TL-Hex). Data were extracted from electronic patient records and digital radiographs. The primary outcome was time to frame removal, which was seen as an indicator of clinical and radiological fracture union. Odds ratios were calculated with the clinical significance set at 30 days. RESULTS: 274 patients (median age 49 years, 36% female) were included in the analysis. 8.4% Ilizarov, 10.5% TSF and 13.5% TL-Hex frames required further surgery to aid fracture healing (p = 0.38). 30% of patients had open fractures. Median time to removal for Ilizarov, TSF & TL Hex frames was 167, 198 and 185 days respectively. There was a significant difference between Ilizarov and hexapod frames. Both TSF (OR 2.2, p<0.003) and TL-Hex (OR 1.8, p<0.04) had a significantly increased time to removal of 30 days or more compared with Ilizarov frames.The time to frame removal in metaphyseal fractures was significantly shorter for Ilizarov frame fixation than hexapod frames (p = 0.04). Open fractures were significantly more likely to require at least 30 days extra time to removal than closed fractures (OR 3.3, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the time to frame removal between fracture location, age or sex. CONCLUSION: Ilizarov frames have demonstrated a reduced time to frame removal in the management of tibial fractures than hexapod frames. Differences in the time to frame removal, an indicator of time to fracture union, may be due to the different mechanical properties of the frame, or early disruption of the fracture haematoma through secondary frame manipulation and fracture reduction, increased proportion of metaphyseal fractures treated with Ilizarov, or patient selection. The healing time was comparable across the tibia. Pooled meta-analyses may be able to further quantify these associations.

Supra tubercular tibial osteotomy and gradual correction with Taylor spatial frame for the management of Torsional malalignment syndrome - surgical technique and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of Torsional Malalignment Syndrome (TMS) traditionally consists of simultaneous correction of both femoral anteversion and external tibial torsion. We hypothesise that a single supra tubercular osteotomy followed by tibial derotation with Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is sufficient to provide significant improvement in both appearance and function. METHOD: This is a retrospective single surgeon case series performed at a tertiary referral centre in the UK. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical findings and CT rotational profile measurements. All patients completed pre and post-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) functional outcome scores for analysis. RESULTS: There were 16 osteotomies in 11 patients with complete data sets for analysis performed between 2006 and 2017. Mean age of 16.7 ± 0.8 years. The results show significant improvements in post-operative functional assessment scores, with mean OKS increasing by 18.3 and mean AKPS increasing by 31.4. Average pre-operative thigh-foot angle (TFA) was 44.7°, this was reduced to 12.8° post-operatively, representing an average correction of 31.9°. CONCLUSION: The results show that supra tubercular osteotomy, followed by gradual correction with TSF, can be used to provide a significant improvement in both appearance and function for patients suffering from TMS.

Three-stage total knee arthroplasty combined with deformity correction and leg lengthening using Taylor spatial frames and conversion to internal fixation for severe intra- and extra-articular deformities and hypoplasia in a patient with hemophilic knee arthropathy: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Hemophilic arthropathy is a cause of severe knee deformity, because chronic synovitis due to repeated hemarthrosis affects the area of the epiphyseal plates in juvenile cases. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the standard treatment for end-stage knee arthropathy. However, it is difficult to perform one-stage TKA in patients with severe intra- and extra-articular deformities. CASE PRESENTATION: We reported a case of hemophilic arthropathy in a 55-year-old male with leg length discrepancy of 4 cm, limited range of knee motion (-40° extension and 85° flexion), intra-articular deformity (medial proximal tibial angle: 69°; mechanical lateral distal femoral angle: 79°), extra-articular deformity at the distal femoral metaphyseal (30° valgus and 45° flexion deformity), and varus malalignment (% mechanical axis: 33%). We planned a three-stage TKA. Firstly, we performed gradual correction and lengthening of the distal femur using Taylor spatial flame. Six months after surgery, we performed conversion surgery from external fixation to internal fixation. Finally, we performed TKA with rotating hinged type implant. Two years after surgery, physical examination showed a normal gait, leg length discrepancy of 2 cm (the right leg was shorter), improvement in the range of knee motion (0° extension and 100° flexion). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this presents the first combination of three-stage TKA with correction of femoral deformity and leg lengthening using a Taylor spatial frame and conversion to internal fixation in a patient with hemophilic knee arthropathy and severe intra- and extra-articular deformities.

The Gradual Correction of Adult Severe Rigid Equinus Deformity Using Minimal Invasive U-Osteotomy With Taylor Spatial Frame.

BACKGROUND: U-osteotomy with Taylor Spatial Frame correction is a rarely reported treatment method particularly well-suited for severe rigid equinus deformity in adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of deformity correction and clinical outcome using this technique. METHODS: We present a retrospective review of 30 feet in 26 patients who received U-osteotomy with Taylor Spatial Frame. Radiologic outcomes were measured using the anterior tibiotalar angle (TTA) with conventional weightbearing radiographs. Functional assessments included American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot scores and patient satisfaction using Likert scale. RESULTS: The etiology included trauma (9), neglected or relapsed clubfoot (6), spina bifida (5), poliomyelitis (4), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (4), and iatrogenic (2). All patients had equinus deformity with TTA more than 140 degrees (median 157.5, 141-177). There were varus deformity in 19 feet, limb length discrepancy in 6 legs, and genu procurvatum deformity in 2 legs. The duration of gradual correction was 53.6±13.5 days (33-73 days), and the external fixation time was 147.8±25.2 days (98-203 days). At last follow-up, TTA in all patients improved significantly (P < .001) to 113.5 degrees (111.8-116.0). All patients had plantigrade feet, except for 2 cases of residual mild equinovarus deformity, 2 cases of residual mild hindfoot varus deformity, 1 case of moderate hindfoot varus recurrence. The AOFAS scores significantly improved (P < .001) from 51.0 points (29.0-66.0) to 76.0 points (69.5-88.0). Eighteen patients were very satisfied, 6 patients were somewhat satisfied, and 2 patients were somewhat dissatisfied. CONCLUSION: Using minimally invasive U-osteotomy with Taylor Spatial Frame to gradually correct the adult severe rigid equinus deformity proved to be an effective and relatively safe method associated with high patient satisfaction rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Locking the Taylor Spatial Frame - The effect of three additional longitudinal rods on osteotomy site movements.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, even when the fixator is locked, a noticeable laxity of the construct can be observed. This study was designed to measure the stiffness of the fixator and to analyze the movements of the osteotomy site. Furthermore, the effect of three additional longitudinal rods on the locking of the construct was analyzed. METHODS: Five synthetic tibia/fixator models (Model A) were tested under rotational torque (40 Nm) and axial compression (700 N). Three additional rigid rods were subsequently mounted, and the tests were repeated (Model B). The movements of the fixator as well as the osteotomy site were registered by a digital optical measurement system. Load- deformation curves, and so stiffness of the models, were calculated and compared. FINDINGS: Under rotational and axial loadings, Model A was found to be less rigid than Model B (p = 0.034; p = 0.194). Notably, Model A showed a region of laxity around neutral rotational (ΔF = 5 Nm) and axial (ΔF = 16.64 N) loading before a linear deformation trend was measured. Concomitantly, greater osteotomy site movement was measured for Model A than for Model B under full loading (p = 0.05) and within the region of increased laxity (p = 0.042). INTERPRETATION: The fixator showed an element of laxity around neutral axial and rotational loading, which transferred to the bone and led to a notable amount of osteotomy gap movement. Mounting three additional rods increased the stiffness of the construct and therefore reduced the movement of the osteotomy site.

Distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children.

AIMS: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess and investigate the safety and efficacy of using a distal tibial osteotomy compared to proximal osteotomy for limb lengthening in children. METHODS: In this study, there were 59 consecutive tibial lengthening and deformity corrections in 57 children using a circular frame. All were performed or supervised by the senior author between January 2013 and June 2019. A total of 25 who underwent a distal tibial osteotomy were analyzed and compared to a group of 34 who had a standard proximal tibial osteotomy. For each patient, the primary diagnosis, time in frame, complications, and lengthening achieved were recorded. From these data, the frame index was calculated (days/cm) and analyzed. RESULTS: All patients ended their treatment with successful lengthening and deformity correction. The frame index for proximal versus distal osteotomies showed no significant difference, with a mean 48.5 days/cm (30 to 85) and 48.9 days/cm (28 to 81), respectively (p = 0.896). In the proximal osteotomy group, two patients suffered complications (one refracture after frame removal and one failure of regenerate maturation with subsequent valgus deformity) compared to zero in the distal osteotomy group. Two patients in each group sustained obstacles that required intervention (one necessitated guided growth, one fibula lengthening, and two required change of wires). There was a similar number of problems (pin-site infections) in each group. CONCLUSION: Our data show that distal tibial osteotomies can be safely employed in limb lengthening for children using a circular frame, which has implications in planning a surgical strategy; for example, when treating a tibia with shortening and distal deformity, a second osteotomy for proximal lengthening is not required.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1273-1278.

Transfocal Osteotomy to Treat Shear (Oblique) Non-union of Tibia.

Aseptic non-unions of tibial shaft fractures often need surgical treatment which carry significant socio-economic implications. The causes for non-union include patient co-morbidities, high energy trauma, open fractures and fracture geometry. Oblique fractures are subject to shear forces and, if not adequately neutralised, will fail to unite. Experiments have shown that callus formation is poor in oblique fractures due to local shear stresses. We report a technique of minimally invasive transfocal transverse osteotomy and compression in a hexapod circular fixator, Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) for 12 patients treated with a shear non-union of tibia between 2010 and 2019. There are four female and eight male patients. The average age is 49 years (range from 26 to 72 years). The fracture pattern was oblique (30-45°) in all cases. Healing of the non-union occurred in 12 cases with one case needed additional treatment with bone marrow aspirate and demineralized bone matrix. The technique of creating a minimally invasive transfocal transverse osteotomy through the oblique non-union of tibia and the use of a hexapod circular fixator to compress the osteotomy is described and adds to the range of treatments available for aseptic non-union of tibia. How to cite this article: Lahoti O, Abhishetty N, Al-Mukhtar M. Transfocal Osteotomy to Treat Shear (Oblique) Non-union of Tibia. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(2):117-122.

Comparison of Three Circular Frames in Lower Limb Deformity Correction: A Biomechanical Study.

Background The use of circular frames in correcting lower limb deformity is well-established and has evolved dramatically over the years. Three new frames have been introduced recently, and this study is set to compare them in terms of accuracy and efficiency in correcting a similar long bone deformity. These frames are the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF; Smith & Nephew, London, United Kingdom), the Truelok Hexapod System (TL-HEX; Orthofix, Lewisville, Texas), and Orthex (OrthoPediatrics, Warsaw, Indiana). Methods This is a biomechanical study comparing the above three types of circular frames to correct similar deformities in Sawbones models. The deformities that are compared were: (1) 30° valgus deformity of the distal femur; (2) 30° varus deformity of the proximal tibia. Each frame was applied to the deformed bone in the standard way that we apply to normal bone. X-rays were taken before and after the deformity correction. The frames' software was used to estimate the deformities. The variations between the software's estimations and the known bone deformities were compared. Residual deformity after initial correction and the number of re-programmings was compared among these three frames. The least residual deformity and re-programming is the favorable outcome. Results All the Sawbones models had a 30° actual coronal angulation. The Orthex software estimated the deformity at around 25.35° (SD 4.6), TSF 25.6° (SD 2), and TL-HEX 29.87° (SD 2.1). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant difference in the findings (P-value 0.014). Accuracy was measured by comparing the residual deformity in angulation in the coronal plane after the first and second correction. The Orthex median residual deformity was 1°, TSF was 2.5°, and TL-HEX was 3° with a range of less than 5° for all of them. The independent samples Kruskal-Wallis test shows that there is no significant difference between the three groups (P=0.549). The frequency of strut changes required throughout the correction was not significant among the three frames using the Fisher exact test (P=0.336). TSF struts are not designed to be readjusted. Conclusion The three frames were comparable in terms of accurate correction of the two deformities, strut changes, and strut adjustments. The TL-HEX frame software was superior to other frames in terms of analyzing the deformity but the difference, although statistically significant clinically, was not.

An Abnormal Presentation of Pediatric Genu Varum, Managed by Bilateral Tibial and Fibular Osteotomies With External Spatial Frame Placement: A Case Report.

Genu varum is a common finding in the pediatric population with a large differential, including but not limited to Blount's disease, rickets, and physiologic bowing of the legs. Here we report a case of a 12-year-old Caucasian male who presented for an atraumatic stress fracture of the fifth metatarsal after an athletic event. Further evaluation showed significant genu varum with a Q angle of 9 degrees and medial knee joint space narrowing. The patient was unable to undergo conservative management due to early completion of puberty with relatively premature skeletal maturity. A bilateral tibial and fibular osteotomy with external spatial frame placement was performed successfully followed by six months of minor activity complicated by subclinical enoxaparin-induced purpura. The unique presentation of a stress fracture caused by compensatory mechanisms for the severe varus deformity, as well as the rarity of this procedure being performed on both legs simultaneously with good outcomes was the primary reason for the publication of this paper.

Total knee arthroplasty, following application of Taylor Spatial Frames to treat knee osteoarthritis with severe tibia extraarticular deformity due to fracture malunion: A case report.

Obtaining alignment during end-stage knee osteoarthritis with extraarticular deformities has always been challenging. Therefore, we report a case of total knee arthroplasty, following the application of Taylor Spatial Frame to treat knee osteoarthritis with severe tibia extraarticular deformity due to a proximal tibia fracture injury for more than 50 years ago. First, proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy was conducted below the patellar tendon insertion from the anterior to the posterior direction to correct the deformity in multiple planes gradually. Then, osteotomy was done to restore both the varus and recurvatum deformities. Finally, Taylor Spatial Frame was used as a virtual hinge, with gradual adjustments to correct the deformity. Afterward, patient-specific instrumentation-assisted total knee arthroplasty was conducted after correcting the extraarticular deformity. During the two-year follow-up, no superficial and deep infection occurred, and his Oxford Knee Score had improved from 32 to 19 out of 48 at the time of the latest follow-up. Moreover, the patient walked using a one-hand clutch without protective limping. Hence, patient-specific instrumentation-assisted total knee arthroplasty, following proximal tibial osteotomy with Taylor Spatial Frame, should be considered a treatment option for patients with knee osteoarthritis having severe proximal tibia extraarticular deformity.

Marker- three dimensional measurement versus traditional radiographic measurement in the treatment of tibial fracture using Taylor spatial frame.

BACKGROUND: The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) has been widely used for tibial fracture. However, traditional radiographic measurement method is complicated and the reduction accuracy is affected by various factors. The purpose of this study was to propose a new marker- three dimensional (3D) measurement method and determine the differences of reduction outcomes, if any, between marker-3D measurement method and traditional radiographic measurement in the TSF treatment. METHODS: Forty-one patients with tibial fracture treated by TSF in our institution were retrospectively analyzed from January 2016 to June 2019, including 21 patients in the marker-3D measurement group (experimental group) and 20 patients in the traditional radiographic measurement group (control group). In the experimental group, 3D reconstruction with 6 markers installed on the TSF was performed to determine the electronic prescription. In the control group, the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were performed for the traditional parameter measurements. The effectiveness was evaluated by the residual displacement deformity (RDD) and residual angle deformity (RAD) in the coronal and sagittal plane, according to the AP and lateral X-rays after reduction. RESULTS: All patients achieved functional reduction. The residual RDD in AP view was 0.5 (0, 1.72) mm in experimental group and 1.74 (0.43, 3.67) mm in control group. The residual RAD in AP view was 0 (0, 1.25) ° in experimental group and 1.25 (0.62, 1.95) °in control group. As for the lateral view, the RDD was 0 (0, 1.22) mm in experimental group and 2.02 (0, 3.74) mm in control group, the RAD was 0 (0, 0) ° in experimental group and 1.42 (0, 1.93) ° in control group. Significant differences in all above comparisons were observed between the two groups (AP view RDD: P = 0.024, RAD: P = 0.020; Lateral view RDD: P = 0.016, RAD: P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The present study introduced a marker-3D measurement method to complement the current TSF treatment. This method avoids the manual measurement error and improves the accuracy of fracture reduction, providing potential advantages of bone healing and function rehabilitation.

Efficacy of Temporary Intentional Leg Shortening and Deformation for Treatment of Massive Bone and Soft Tissue Defects in Three Patients.

Aim: This study describes the intentional deformation and shortening of a limb using external fixation (EF) in three patients with post-traumatic injury tibial defects and to assess the outcomes. Case description: Three patients with infected non-unions and massive bone and soft tissue defects who were treated with temporary intentional leg shortening and deformation using a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) EF were retrospectively reviewed. The alignment was restored by gradual deformity correction and lengthening after a 2-week interval. No additional surgical intervention was required for soft tissue reconstruction after primary skin closure. Skin closure and good bone alignment were achieved in all patients. The functional outcomes and bone outcomes were evaluated for all cases according to the Paley criteria modified by the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov. All patients showed excellent bone outcomes. Two patients achieved excellent functional outcomes and one had a good outcome. The patient with a good outcome was unable to descend the stairs comfortably. Conclusion: This technique is suitable for treating massive bone and soft tissue defects and should be considered as a treatment option. How to cite this article: Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Aikawa T, et al. Efficacy of Temporary Intentional Leg Shortening and Deformation for Treatment of Massive Bone and Soft Tissue Defects in Three Patients. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):195-201.

Comparison of Intramedullary Magnetic Nail, Monolateral External Distractor, and Spatial External Fixator in Femur Lengthening in Adolescents with Congenital Diseases.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the course of the treatment and clinical and functional outcomes of femur lengthening in adolescents with congenital disorders by the application of different surgical methods. This retrospective study comprised 35 patients (39 procedures). A total of 11 patients underwent femur lengthening with the use of the intramedullary magnetic nail (IMN) Precise 2 (NuVasive, San Diego, CA, USA), 7 patients (11 procedures) with the use of the monolateral external distractor Modular Rail System (MRS) (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA), and 17 with the use of the computer-assisted external fixator Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) congenital femoral length deficiency without any axial deformities and (2), independently of the finally applied treatment, the technical possibility of use of each of the analyzed methods. The distraction index did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.89). The median lengthening index was the lowest in the IMN group (24.3 d/cm; IQR 21.8-33.1) and statistically different in comparison to the MRS (44.2 d/cm; IQR 42-50.9; p < 0.001) and the TSF groups (48.4 d/cm; IQR 38.6-63.5; p < 0.001). Similarly, the consolidation index in the IMN group (12.9 d/cm; IQR 10.7-21.3) was statistically lower than that in the MRS (32.9 d/cm; IQR 30.2-37.6; p < 0.001) and the TSF (36.9 d/cm; IQR 26.6-51.5; p < 0.001) groups. This study indicates that IMN is a more valuable method of treatment for femoral length discrepancy without axial deformity than MRS and TSF in complication rate and indexes of lengthening and consolidation.