Systolic blood pressure time in target range within 24 hours and incident heart failure: insights from the real-world setting.

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) time in target (TTR) over months were associated with lower risk of adverse clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients, whether short-term of 24-h SBP TTR was effective in predicting heart failure (HF) risk in the general population remained unclear. This prospective study aimed to investigate the association of 24-h SBP TTR with HF in the real-world settings. Based on Kailuan study, 24-h SBP target range defined as 110-140 mmHg was calculated with linear interpolation. Among 5152 participants included in the analysis, 186 (3.61%) cases of incident HF occurred during a median follow-up of 6.96 years. Compared with participants with SBP TTR of 0 to <25%, those with TTR of 75% to 100% had 47% lower risk of HF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.89). The restricted spline curve depicted an inverse relationship between SBP TTR and incident HF. Additionally, the addition of SBP TTR, rather than mean SBP and SBP variation, to a conventional risk model had an incremental effect on the predictive value for HF, with integrated discrimination improvement value of 0.31% (P = 0.0003) and category-free net reclassification improvement value of 19.79% (P = 0.0081). Higher SBP TTR was associated with a lower risk of incident HF. Efforts to attain SBP within 110 to 140 mmHg may be an effective strategy to prevent HF.

Blood Pressure Time in Target Range and its Impact on Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine the concept of time in target range for blood pressure (BP) management, exploring its calculation methods, implications for patient outcomes, and potential use in patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent post-hoc analyses of clinical trials and observational studies highlight the importance of BP time in target range in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. Higher time in target range correlates with reduced risks of major adverse cardiovascular events including heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Additionally, longer time in target range decreases the risk of incident atrial fibrillation and risk of developing dementia. BP time in target range is a novel metric offering valuable insights into BP control and its impact on clinical outcomes. Higher time in target range is consistently associated with better cardiovascular outcomes across various patient populations. However, the clinical application of BP time in target range requires further investigation through prospective clinical trials and real-world studies. Integrating wearable devices for continuous BP monitoring could enhance the practical utility of BP time in target range in hypertension management.

Optimizing time-in-target-range assessment for blood pressure: insights from a large-scale study with continual cuffless monitoring.

Introduction: Blood pressure (BP) time-in-target-range (TTR) is an emerging predictor of cardiovascular risk. Conventional BP methods are fundamentally unable to provide an optimal assessment of TTR, using irregular measurements separated by lengthy intervals. We investigated the optimal duration and frequency for reliable, practical TTR assessment in clinical settings using continual monitoring. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 2.3 million BP readings from 5,189 European home users (55 ± 11 years, 82% male, BMI 28.0 ± 5.8) using a cuffless BP monitor (Aktiia SA). Systolic BP (SBP) data over 15 consecutive days were assessed (29 ± 11 readings/subject/24-h; 434 + 132 readings/subject/15-day). Subjects were classified into risk-related TTR groups based on 15-day SBP data (24-h, target 90-125 mmHg; ≥6 daytime readings). Various measurement frequencies and durations (1-14 days; 24-h/daytime; 2, 4 or ≥ 6 readings/day) were compared to this reference. Two specific configurations paralleling ambulatory ("One-Day-24 h") and home ("One-Week-Daytime") BP monitoring were selected for detailed analysis. Results: The reference TTR classified 63.0% of the subjects as high risk, 19.0% intermediate, and 18.0% low. "One-Day-24 h" schedule inaccurately classified 26% of subjects compared to the reference TTR, and "One-Week-Daytime" schedule inaccurately classified 45%. Classification accuracy with both schedules was high for subjects with very low or very high reference TTR, but poor otherwise. Accuracy of ≥90% in TTR classification only occurred with 7 days of continual 24-h monitoring. Discussion: For the first time, with the benefit of a cuffless device that measures BP with sufficient frequency and duration, practical use of TTR is enabled as a potentially enhanced metric to manage hypertension.

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure time in target range and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and pre-frailty or frailty status.

In patients with hypertension and pre-frailty or frailty, the influence of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) time in target range (TTR) on clinical outcomes is unclear. Thus, we conducted a post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). Classifying 4208 participants into frail and non-frail groups using a frailty index, the study calculated blood pressure time in target range (BP-TTR) for the first three months using the Rosendaal method. The primary endpoint included a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), and cardiovascular death. Relationships between BP-TTR and outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox models, and restricted cubic spline curves, with subgroup analysis for further insights. In a median follow-up of 3.17 years, primary outcomes occurred in 6.7% of participants. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that a lower systolic blood pressure time in target range (SBP-TTR) (0%-25%) correlated with an increased cumulative incidence of the primary outcome (p < .001), nonfatal MI (P = .021), stroke (P = .004), and cardiovascular death (P = .002). A higher SBP-TTR (75%-<100%) was linked to a reduced risk of these outcomes. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) curve revealed a linear association between SBP-TTR and the primary outcome (non-linear P = .704). Similar patterns were observed for diastolic blood pressure time in target range (DBP-TTR). Subgroup analysis showed that the protective effect of higher SBP-TTR was less pronounced at low DBP-TTR levels (P for interaction = .023). In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of maintaining BP within the target range to mitigate cardiovascular risks in this population.

New Insights into Rate Control: Time in Target Range of Resting Heart Rate and Major Adverse Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Few studies have examined the relationship between the fluctuation of heart rate control over time and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. Our study sought to evaluate the independent association between time in target range (TIR) of resting heart rate and cardiovascular outcomes in the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management) study. Methods: Target range of resting heart was defined as less than 80 beats per minute (bpm) for both rate and rhythm control groups. Time in target range was estimated over the first 8 months of follow-up using Rosendaal interpolation method. The association between TIR of resting heart rate and cardiovascular outcomes was estimated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: Time in target range of resting heart rate (months 0 through 8) was 71 ± 34% in the rate control group and 83 ± 27% in the rhythm control group. Each 1-SD increase in TIR of resting heart rate was significantly associated with lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after full adjustment for demographics, medical history and history of prior heart surgery, as well as all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Time in target range of resting heart rate independently predicts the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. Long-term maintenance of heart rate on target is of great importance for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Long-term physical activity time-in-target range in young adults with cardiovascular events in later life.

AIMS: Achieving at least 150 min per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) is a 'Class I, A level' recommendation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, long-term PA is a complex behaviour and varied by lifetime, which was insufficiently reflected by the current studies. This study used time-in-target range (TTR) to measure the long-term PA level during young adulthood and investigated its relationship with cardiovascular events in later life. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study were recruited (n = 2902) and allocated into four groups by PA TTR: <25% (n = 1028), 25 to <50% (n = 444), 50 to <75% (n = 424), 75 to 100% (n = 1006). TTR was estimated with linear interpolation across the first 15 years. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events. The mean (SD) age after the exposure period was 40.3 (3.6) years. After a median follow-up for an additional 18.9 years, the participants with a TTR of at least 75% had a 40% lower risk of the primary outcome (HR: 0.60; 95%CI: 0.38 to 0.95) compared with the lowest TTR group. Each 1-SD increase in TTR was also significantly associated with a 21% decreased risk of the primary outcome (HR: 0.79; 95%CI: 0.65-0.97). CONCLUSION: Increasing PA is essential in young adulthood. In young adults, maintaining long-term guidelines-recommended PA levels may help to lower the risk of cardiovascular events in later life. Maintaining the guidelines-recommended PA level for at least 75% of time across young adulthood may be preferable.

Maintaining long-term guidelines-recommended PA levels may decrease the risk of cardiovascular events in later life, and young adults maintaining that PA level for at least 75% of time may be preferable.

Association between time in target range and risk of vertebral fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes / 中华内分泌代谢杂志

Objective:To investigate the association between time in target range and risk of vertebral fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods:The clinical data of 1 032 patients with type 2 diabetes who were hospitalized in endocrine department of Henan Provincial People′s Hospital from June 2017 to July 2021 were collected. Among which 632 patients were included into final analysis. The diabetes-specific risk score for vertebral fracture was used to assess the risk of vertebral fracture. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to test the association between time in target range and risk score of vertebral fracture. Risk score≥9 was defined as increased risk of vertebral fracture. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between time in target range and risk of vertebral fracture. Results:Among the included patients, mean age was(55.0±12.4) years and the percent of male was 72.5%. The mean course of diabetes was(9.4±8.0) years, and mean score of risk of vertebral fracture was 5.6±4.3. Time in target range was negatively correlated with risk score of vertebral fracture( P for trend <0.001), which was independent of potential confounders and continuous glucose monitoring parameters. The included patients were divided into four groups based on quartiles of time in target range. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that the risk of vertebral fracture in the first quartile of time in target range was 4.6 times higherthanthatinthe4thquartile, and the significance remained adjusted for potential confounders, s, CV, or meanamplitudeofglycemicexcursions(MAGE), respectively. Conclusion:Timein target rangewasnegativelycorrelatedwithriskscoreofvertebralfracturein patient with type 2 diabetes. Low time in range level was an independent risk factor for increased risk of vertebral fracture.