Exercise echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of acute chest pain.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Up to 4% of patients with acute chest pain, normal electrocardiogram, and negative troponins present major adverse cardiac events as a result of undiagnosed acute coronary syndrome. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography and exercise echocardiography in patients with a low-to-intermediate probability of coronary artery disease. METHODS: We prospectively included 69 patients with acute chest pain, normal electrocardiogram, and negative troponins who underwent coronary tomography angiography and exercise echocardiography. Patients with coronary stenosis ≥ 50% or Agatston calcium score ≥ 400 on coronary tomography angiography or positive exercise echocardiography, or with inconclusive results, were admitted to rule out acute coronary syndrome. RESULTS: An acute coronary syndrome was confirmed in 17 patients (24.6%). This was lower than the suspected 42% based on coronary tomography angiography (P<.05) and not significantly different than the suspected 29% based on the results of exercise echocardiography (P=.56). Exercise echocardiography was normal in up to 37% of patients with pathological findings on coronary tomography angiography. The latter technique provided a higher sensitivity (100% vs 82.3%; P=.21) but lower specificity (76.9% vs 88.4%; P=.12) than exercise echocardiography for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, although without reaching statistical significance. Increasing the stenosis cutoff point to 70% increased the specificity of coronary tomography angiography to 88.4%, while maintaining high sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary tomography angiography offers a valid alternative to exercise echocardiography for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome among patients with low-to-intermediate probability of coronary artery disease. A combination of both techniques could improve the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.

Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of patients with congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Although congenital heart defects are the most common major congenital abnormalities, the associated mortality has been decreasing due to improvements in their diagnosis and treatment. We assessed the usefulness of 64-multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of these patients. METHODS: This 5-year observational, analytical, retrospective, cohort study included a total of 222 tomographic studies of patients with congenital heart disease. Computed tomography scans were read twice and medical records were reviewed. We assessed the complexity of the disease, patient, and radiological technique, and evaluated the contribution of new data in relation to clinical suspicion and diagnostic change. A confidence interval was set at 95% and a P value of<.05 was used as the cutoff for statistical significance. RESULTS: In 35.1% of patients, the treatment procedure was performed after computed tomography without other tests. Additional diagnostic catheterization was performed in 12.5% of patients. There were new findings in 77% of patients (82.9% with complex disease), which prompted a change in patient management in 35.6%. All unexpected reports described new findings. No significant differences were found by age, sex, study period, urgency of the test order, patient complexity, or difficulty of the technique. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 64-detector computed tomography yields good diagnostic performance in congenital heart disease, prompts changes in management in more than one-third of patients, and reveals new findings in relation to the presumed diagnosis in 77% of patients.