Elevación de seno transcrestal con inserción de implantes ultracortos de 4.5 mm de longitud en zonas maxilares posteriores con hueso residual menor o igual a 3 mm de altura / Transcrestal sinus lift with insertion of 4.5 mm long ultrashort implants in posterior maxillary areas with residual bone less than or equal to 3 mm in height

Introducción: La atrofia posterior del maxilar con la neumatización del seno maxilar es un problema frecuente. Los protocolos para rehabilitar esta zona han ido cambiando desde la elevación de seno convencional, hasta la elevación transcrestal. Aun así, existen casos con un volumen óseo disponible en altura muy disminuido que precisan de nuevos procedimientos como los implantes de 4,5 mm. En la siguiente serie de casos clínicos se muestran pacientes tratados con este procedimiento. Material y métodos: Se presenta un estudio retrospectivo en el que se han evaluado implantes de 4,5 mm de longitud, insertados en sectores posteriores maxilares con una altura ósea residual igual o menor a 3 mm, realizándose al mismo tiempo una elevación de seno transcrestal. Posteriormente, se realiza un seguimiento radiográfico estimándose la pérdida ósea crestal y la supervivencia de los implantes.La variable principal fue la supervivencia del implante y como variables secundarias se registraron la pérdida ósea mesial y distal. Resultados: Fueron reclutados 13 pacientes en los que se insertaron 15 implantes. La media de la altura inicial de la cresta, en el estudio fue de 2,85 mm (+/- 0,20) con un rango entre 2,50 y 3 mm. Los implantes presentaron un seguimiento medio de 13,33 meses tras la carga (+/- 3,09) no encontrándose complicaciones ni fracasos durante este tiempo, por lo que la supervivencia fue del 100%. Conclusiones: Los datos preliminares obtenidos en el presente estudio muestran una alternativa a la elevación de seno mediante ventana lateral con una menor morbilidad para los pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: PPosterior maxillary atrophy with pneumatization of the maxillary sinus is a common problem. The protocols for rehabilitating this area have changed from conventional sinus lift to transcrestal lift. Even so, there are cases with a very low available bone volume in height that require new procedures such as 4.5 mm implants. The following case series shows patients treated with this procedure. Material and methods: A retrospective study is presented in which 4.5 mm long implants inserted in maxillary posterior sectors with a residual bone height equal to or less than 3 mm were evaluated and a transcrestal sinus lift was performed at the same time. Subsequently, a radiographic follow-up was carried out, estimating crestal bone loss and implant survival. The primary variable was implant survival and mesial and distal bone loss were recorded as secondary variables. Results: Thirteen patients were recruited and 15 implants were inserted that met the previously established inclusion criteria. The mean initial ridge height where the implants included in the study were placed was 2.85 mm (+/- 0.20) with a range between 2.50 and 3 mm. No complications related to the surgery were reported in any of the cases. The implants had a mean follow-up of 13.33 months after loading (+/- 3.09) with no complications or failures during this follow-up time, so survival was 100%. Conclusions: Preliminary data obtained in the present study show a predictable alternative to lateral window sinus lift with less morbidity for patients. (AU)

Elevación de seno transcrestal con inserción de implantes ultracortos de 4.5 mm de longitud en zonas maxilares posteriores con hueso residual menor o igual a 3 mm de altura / Transcrestal sinus lift with insertion of 4.5 mm long ultrashort implants in posterior maxillary areas with residual bone less than or equal to 3 mm in height

Introducción: La atrofia posterior del maxilar con la neumatización del seno maxilar es un problema frecuente. Los protocolos para rehabilitar esta zona han ido cambiando desde la elevación de seno convencional, hasta la elevación transcrestal. Aun así, existen casos con un volumen óseo disponible en altura muy disminuido que precisan de nuevos procedimientos como los implantes de 4,5 mm. En la siguiente serie de casos clínicos se muestran pacientes tratados con este procedimiento. Material y métodos: Se presenta un estudio retrospectivo en el que se han evaluado implantes de 4,5 mm de longitud, insertados en sectores posteriores maxilares con una altura ósea residual igual o menor a 3 mm, realizándose al mismo tiempo una elevación de seno transcrestal. Posteriormente, se realiza un seguimiento radiográfico estimándose la pérdida ósea crestal y la supervivencia de los implantes.La variable principal fue la supervivencia del implante y como variables secundarias se registraron la pérdida ósea mesial y distal. Resultados: Fueron reclutados 13 pacientes en los que se insertaron 15 implantes. La media de la altura inicial de la cresta, en el estudio fue de 2,85 mm (+/- 0,20) con un rango entre 2,50 y 3 mm. Los implantes presentaron un seguimiento medio de 13,33 meses tras la carga (+/- 3,09) no encontrándose complicaciones ni fracasos durante este tiempo, por lo que la supervivencia fue del 100%. Conclusiones: Los datos preliminares obtenidos en el presente estudio muestran una alternativa a la elevación de seno mediante ventana lateral con una menor morbilidad para los pacientes. (AU)

Introduction: PPosterior maxillary atrophy with pneumatization of the maxillary sinus is a common problem. The protocols for rehabilitating this area have changed from conventional sinus lift to transcrestal lift. Even so, there are cases with a very low available bone volume in height that require new procedures such as 4.5 mm implants. The following case series shows patients treated with this procedure. Material and methods: A retrospective study is presented in which 4.5 mm long implants inserted in maxillary posterior sectors with a residual bone height equal to or less than 3 mm were evaluated and a transcrestal sinus lift was performed at the same time. Subsequently, a radiographic follow-up was carried out, estimating crestal bone loss and implant survival. The primary variable was implant survival and mesial and distal bone loss were recorded as secondary variables. Results: Thirteen patients were recruited and 15 implants were inserted that met the previously established inclusion criteria. The mean initial ridge height where the implants included in the study were placed was 2.85 mm (+/- 0.20) with a range between 2.50 and 3 mm. No complications related to the surgery were reported in any of the cases. The implants had a mean follow-up of 13.33 months after loading (+/- 3.09) with no complications or failures during this follow-up time, so survival was 100%. Conclusions: Preliminary data obtained in the present study show a predictable alternative to lateral window sinus lift with less morbidity for patients. (AU)

Update on Maxillary Sinus Augmentation.

Implant stability is critical to implant success, and the amount of available bone is vital to achieving that end. Because of low-lying maxillary sinuses, adequate alveolar height on the posterior maxilla is often lacking in many patients in need of implant replacement. This chapter reviews both the traditional lateral sinus lift maxillary approach to achieve vertical augmentation as well as the transcrestal osteotome intraoral approach. A discussion of osseodensification will also be mentioned as an alternative approach.

Full arch rehabilitation in severe maxillary atrophy with palatal approach implant placement: a case report.

PURPOSE: The edentulous severely atrophic maxilla, as consequence of alveolar bone resorption and pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus, represents a serious limitation to the implant rehabilitation. Implants insertion via palatal approach (PA), in combination with relatively minimally invasive techniques aimed at increasing bone volume without the use of autologous bone harvesting is a valid alternative among the options for the rehabilitation of the upper jaw. CLINICAL CASE: In a 70-year-old female, with a severe maxillary atrophy, 6 spiral taper implants were placed with the PA, combined with the bilateral transcrestal elevation of both the sinus floors and nasal cavities; a further GBR, with resorbable pericardium membrane covering a termoplastic allograft associated to a xenograft, was performed. The second stage was performed after 6 months. Implant prosthetic functionalization was carried out in 4 months by placing the removable prosthesis in direct contact with the healing cup screws. After that period the case was finalized with a hybrid prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic follow-ups were carried out at 6 months and at one year after prosthetic finalization, during which no pathological signs were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The PA implant insertion described by the Authors, combined with bone augmentation procedures, performed in the same stage, may represent a valid and reliable solution to rehabilitate maxillary edentulous patients.

Endoscopic management of the schneiderian membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus augmentation: a case report.

PURPOSE: In this article the Authors describe a procedure aimed to restore under endoscopic control, the continuity, of the Schneiderian membrane (SM) incidentally teared during a sinus lift with transcrestal approach. MATERIALS E METHODS: In a 44-year-old male, due to aforementioned complication, the SM was gently detached via transcrestal approach, with a customized small ball burnisher, in order to facilitate the placement of a collagen sponge, to close the communication with the sinus, followed by the subsequent insertion of a graft material. All the procedure was endoscopically controlled and, considering the successful grafted area elevation, was simultaneously followed by implant placement. After 6 months the second stage was performed always under endoscopic control. RESULTS: The endoscopic view of the grafted area showed a dome-shaped elevation sited on the top of the implant, the SM was apparently normal with no signs of inflammation, the antrum was empty and normally functioning. Periapical X-rays were performed: immediately after the surgery; at both 14 days and 6 months post-operative; at 6 months post prosthetic finalization. The volume of the grafted area progressively decreased over the time while its radiopacity, on the contrary, gradually increased, as expected after graft integration and remodelling. The implant was submitted to no functional load for 4 months by means of a temporary screwable acrylic crown inserted on a peek abutment and then finalized with a cementable metal-ceramic crown on a preformed titanium abutment. CONCLUSION: The Authors recommend the use of endoscope to repair the SM incidentally teared during transcrestal sinus lift.