Trastornos de la conducción en el posoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca / Conduction disorders in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery / Distúrbios de condução no pós-operatório de cirurgia cardíaca

Resumen: Durante el posoperatorio de cirugía cardíaca es frecuente observar trastornos en la generación o conducción del ritmo cardíaco, o en ambos, los cuales en su mayoría son transitorios. Sin embargo, un porcentaje de ellos requerirán implante de marcapasos definitivo. Conocer los predictores preoperatorios que se asocian a implante de marcapasos definitivo (características del paciente, tipo de cirugía, etcétera) nos permitirá adecuar el tratamiento y reducir la morbimortalidad, la estadía hospitalaria y los costos sanitarios durante el posoperatorio.

Summary: During postoperative care of cardiac surgery heart rhythm disorders are frequently seen. Most of them are transient, but some may need permanent pacemaker implantation. Knowing preoperative permanent pacemaker implantation predictors (i.e. patients characteristics, surgery type, etc.) will allow us to provide a better patient treatment, reduce morbidity and mortality, in-hospital length of stay and health care costs.

Resumo: Durante o período pós-operatório de cirurgia cardiaca é comum observar distúrbios na geração e/ou condução do ritmo cardíaco, que em sua maioria, são transitórios. No entanto, uma porcentagem deles exigirá o implante do marcapasso definitivo. Por este motivo, é fundamental o conhecimento dos preditores pré-operatórios associados à implantação definitiva do marcapasso (características do paciente, tipo de cirurgia, etc.) para que se possa melhorar o tratamento e reduzir a morbimortalidade, o tempo de internação e os custos de saúde.

Implante de marcapasos transitorio en una terapia intensiva municipal / Implantation of temporary pacemaker in a municipal intensive care unit

Introducción: Las bradi-arritmias son cardiopatías graves que ocasionan trastornos hemodinámicos severos; llevar al paciente a un gasto cardiaco normal puede implicar que se implante un marcapasos. Objetivo: Describir algunos aspectos clínicos y epidemiológicos de pacientes que recibieron la técnica de implantar un marcapasos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo y transversal, con 36 pacientes que necesitaron marcapasos transitorio, ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos del Hospital General Docente "Orlando Pantoja Tamayo" de Contramaestre, en el período desde octubre de 2015 hasta mayo de 2019. Las variables utilizadas fueron: grupo de edades y sexo, causas de arritmias y antecedentes patológicos personales, medicamentos más usados previos al ingreso, tiempo de uso del marcapasos transitorio y necesidad de implantación del permanente. Resultados: Predominó el sexo masculino y edades de 80 y más años, el trastorno de la conducción auriculoventricular más frecuente fue el bloqueo auriculoventricular de tercer grado; el tiempo promedio de uso de marcapaso transitorio fue entre 2 y 6 días. Conclusiones: La implantación precoz en esta entidad municipal mejoró notablemente la supervivencia de los pacientes(AU)

Introduction: Bradyarrhythmias are serious heart diseases that cause severe hemodynamic disorders. Bringing the patient to normal cardiac output may imply that a pacemaker be implanted. Objective: To describe some clinical and epidemiological aspects of patients who received the technique of implanting a pacemaker. Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out with 36 patients who needed a temporary pacemaker, admitted to the intensive care unit of Orlando Pantoja Tamayo General Teaching Hospital in Contramaestrem, in the period from October 2015 to May 2019. The variables used were age group and sex, causes of arrhythmias, and personal pathological history, most used medications prior to admission, time of usage of the temporary pacemaker, and the need for permanent implantation. Results: The male sex and ages 80 and older predominated, the most frequent atrioventricular conduction disorder was the third-degree atrioventricular block. The average time of temporary pacemaker usage was between two and six days. Conclusions: Early implantation in this municipal institution significantly improved patient survival(AU)

Timing of Onset and Outcome of New Conduction Abnormalities Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Role of Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the timing of onset and outcome of conduction abnormalities (CA) following balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this study was to examine the timing of CA and determine the impact of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) on the persistence of these abnormalities. METHODS: A total of 347 patients were included. Of these, 75 had a continuous electrocardiogram recording and a 6-lead electrocardiogram at each step of the procedure. RESULTS: In the transcatheter aortic valve implantation population undergoing continuous electrocardiogram monitoring, new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) or third-degree atrioventricular block occurred in 48 (64%) and 16 (21.3%) patients, with 51.5% of CA occurring before valve implantation. Left bundle branch block persisted more frequently at hospital discharge (53.8 vs 22.7%; P=.028) and at 1-month follow-up (38.5 vs 13.6%; P=.054) when occurring before valve implantation. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty prior to valve implantation was used in 264 (76.1%) patients, and 78 (22.5%) had persistent LBBB or complete atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker implantation. Persistent LBBB or unresolved atrioventricular block at 1 month occurred more frequently in the BAV group (76.1 vs 47.6%; P=.021), and the use of BAV was associated with a lack of CA resolution (OR, 3.5; 95%CI, 1.17-10.43; P=.021). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing a balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation, more than half of CA occurred before valve implantation. Early occurrence of CA was associated with a higher rate of persistence at 1-month follow-up. The use of BAV was associated with an increased risk of CA persistence.

Conduction Abnormalities and Pacemaker Implantations After SAPIEN 3 Vs SAPIEN XT Prosthesis Aortic Valve Implantation.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly used in patients with aortic stenosis. Post-procedural intraventricular conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker implantations remain a serious concern. Recently, the Edwards SAPIEN 3 prosthesis has replaced the SAPIEN XT. We sought to determine the incidences of new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker implantations by comparing the 2 devices. METHODS: We analyzed the last consecutive 103 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN XT before SAPIEN 3 was used in the next 105 patients. To analyze permanent pacemaker implantations and new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities, patients with these conditions at baseline were excluded. Electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline, after the procedure, and before discharge. RESULTS: SAPIEN 3 was associated with higher device success (100% vs 92%; P=.005) and less paravalvular leakage (0% vs 7%; P<.001). The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations was 12.6% (23 of 183) with no difference between the 2 groups (SAPIEN 3: 12.5% [12 of 96] vs SAPIEN XT: 12.6% [11 of 87]; P=.99). SAPIEN 3 was associated with a higher rate of new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities (49% vs 27%; P=.007) due to a higher rate of fascicular blocks (17% vs 5%; P=.021). There was no statistically significant difference in transient (29% [20 of 69] vs persistent 19% [12 of 64]; P=.168) left bundle branch blocks (28% [19 of 69] vs 17% [11 of 64]; P=.154) when SAPIEN 3 was compared with SAPIEN XT. CONCLUSIONS: We found a trend toward a higher rate of new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities with SAPIEN 3 compared with SAPIEN XT, although this did not result in a higher permanent pacemaker implantation rate.