Estudio observacional de pacientes de una Unidad de Lípidos en tratamiento hipolipemiante para prevención primaria y secundaria: Estudio ULFI / Observational study of patients from a Lipid Unit on lipid-modifying therapy for primary and secondary prevention: ULFI Study

Objetivos: Evaluar la consecución de los objetivos de colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL) establecidos por las guías europeas de manejo de las dislipemias de 2019 y de prevención cardiovascular de 2021, describir el tratamiento hipolipemiante realizado, analizar el logro de los objetivos según el tratamiento hipolipemiante recibido y estudiar los factores asociados al éxito terapéutico. Diseño: Estudio observacional con 185 pacientes de ambos sexos de 18 años o más en tratamiento hipolipemiante para prevención primaria o secundaria, atendidos en la Unidad de Lípidos. Resultados: El 62,1% de los pacientes presentó un riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) muy alto según la guía de 2019, y el 60,5% según la de 2021. Del total de casos, el 22,7% logró un control adecuado del cLDL según la guía de 2019 y el 20% lo hizo de acuerdo con la de 2021. El 47,6% de los pacientes recibió tratamiento hipolipemiante de muy alta intensidad y el 14,1% lo recibió de extremadamente alta intensidad. El 76% de los sujetos con muy alto RCV en tratamiento hipolipemiante de extremadamente alta intensidad logró los objetivos terapéuticos de ambas guías. En el análisis multivariante, los factores asociados al éxito terapéutico fueron la presencia de enfermedad cardiovascular arteriosclerótica, la intensidad del tratamiento hipolipemiante, la diabetes mellitus y el consumo bajo o moderado de alcohol. Conclusiones: El control de la dislipemia es mejorable. Los tratamientos hipolipemiantes de alta o extremadamente alta intensidad pueden contribuir a optimizar el control de los pacientes con mayor RCV. (AU)

Objectives: To evaluate the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) goals established by the 2019 European Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias and 2021 Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines, describe the lipid-lowering treatment received, analyze the achievement of goals according to the lipid-lowering treatment received and study the factors associated with therapeutic success. Design: Observational study that included 185 patients of both sexes aged 18 or over undergoing lipid-lowering treatment for primary or secondary prevention, attended at the Lipid Unit. Results: 62.1% of the patients had a very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the 2019 guidelines, and 60.5% according to the 2021 guidelines. Of the total cases, 22.7% achieved adequate control of LDLc according to the 2019 guidelines and 20% according to the 2021 guidelines. 47.6% of the patients received very high intensity lipid-lowering treatment, and 14.1% received extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment. 76% of subjects with very high CVR on extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment achieved the therapeutic objectives of both guides. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with therapeutic success were the presence of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the intensity of lipid-lowering treatment, diabetes mellitus, and low to moderate alcohol consumption. Conclusions: Dyslipidemia control is improvable. High or extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatments can contribute to optimizing control of patients with higher CVR. (AU)

Observational study of patients from a Lipid Unit on lipid-modifying therapy for primary and secondary prevention: ULFI Study. / Estudio observacional de pacientes de una Unidad de Lípidos en tratamiento hipolipemiante para prevención primaria y secundaria: Estudio ULFI.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) goals established by the 2019 European Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemias and 2021 Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines, describe the lipid-lowering treatment received, analyze the achievement of goals according to the lipid-lowering treatment received and study the factors associated with therapeutic success. DESIGN: Observational study that included 185 patients of both sexes aged 18 or over undergoing lipid-lowering treatment for primary or secondary prevention, attended at the Lipid Unit. RESULTS: 62.1% of the patients had a very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the 2019 guidelines, and 60.5% according to the 2021 guidelines. Of the total cases, 22.7% achieved adequate control of LDLc according to the 2019 guidelines and 20% according to the 2021 guidelines. 47.6% of the patients received very high intensity lipid-lowering treatment, and 14.1% received extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment. 76% of subjects with very high CVR on extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatment achieved the therapeutic objectives of both guides. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with therapeutic success were the presence of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the intensity of lipid-lowering treatment, diabetes mellitus, and low to moderate alcohol consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Dyslipidemia control is improvable. High or extremely high intensity lipid-lowering treatments can contribute to optimizing control of patients with higher CVR.

Impacto de los tratamientos hipolipemiantes en los resultados cardiovasculares según la puntuación de calcio coronario. Revisión sistemática y metanálisis / Impact of lipid-lowering therapies on cardiovascular outcomes according to coronary artery calcium score. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introducción y objetivos: La puntuación de calcio arterial coronario (CAC) mejora la precisión de la estratificación del riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular ateroesclerótica (ECVA) en comparación con los factores de riesgo cardiovascular tradicionales. Se evaluó la interacción de la carga ateroesclerótica coronaria determinada por la puntuación de CAC con el beneficio pronóstico de los tratamientos hipolipemiantes en el contexto de la prevención primaria. Métodos: Se revisaron las bases de datos MEDLINE, EMBASE y Cochrane en busca de estudios que incluyeran a individuos sin ECVA previa y con datos sobre la puntuación de CAC y el tratamiento hipolipemiante según los valores de CAC. El objetivo primario fue la aparición de ECVA. Se evaluó el efecto del tratamiento hipolipemiante agrupado y estratificado por grupos de CAC (0, 1-100 y> 100) mediante un modelo de efectos aleatorios. Resultados: Se incluyeron 5 estudios (1 aleatorizado, 2 de cohortes prospectivas y 2 retrospectivas) que incluyeron a 35.640 individuos (el 38,1% mujeres) con medias de edad de 62,2 (rango, 49,6-68,9) años, colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad de 128 (114-146) mg/dl y seguimiento de 4,3 (2,3-11,1) años. La aparición de la ECVA aumentó de manera constante en los estratos crecientes de CAC tanto en los pacientes con como en aquellos sin tratamiento hipolipemiante. Al comparar a los pacientes con (34,9%) y sin (65,1%) exposición al tratamiento hipolipemiante, este se asoció con menos aparición de ECVA en los pacientes con CAC> 100 (OR=0,70; IC95%, 0,53-0,92), pero no en aquellos con CAC de 1-100 o 0. Los resultados concordaron al agrupar los datos ajustados. Conclusiones: Entre los individuos sin ECVA previa, una puntuación de CAC> 100 identifica a los sujetos con mayor probabilidad de beneficiarse del tratamiento hipolipemiante, mientras que un CAC indetectable indica ausencia de beneficio (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score improves the accuracy of risk stratification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events compared with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. We evaluated the interaction of coronary atherosclerotic burden as determined by the CAC score with the prognostic benefit of lipid-lowering therapies in the primary prevention setting. Methods: We reviewed the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies including individuals without a previous ASCVD event who underwent CAC score assessment and for whom lipid-lowering therapy status stratified by CAC values was available. The primary outcome was ASCVD. The pooled effect of lipid-lowering therapy on outcomes stratified by CAC groups (0, 1-100,> 100) was evaluated using a random effects model. Results: Five studies (1 randomized, 2 prospective cohort, 2 retrospective) were included encompassing 35 640 individuals (female 38.1%) with a median age of 62.2 [range, 49.6-68.9] years, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 128 (114-146) mg/dL, and follow-up of 4.3 (2.3-11.1) years. ASCVD occurrence increased steadily across growing CAC strata, both in patients with and without lipid-lowering therapy. Comparing patients with (34.9%) and without (65.1%) treatment exposure, lipid-lowering therapy was associated with reduced occurrence of ASCVD in patients with CAC> 100 (OR, 0.70; 95%CI, 0.53-0.92), but not in patients with CAC 1-100 or CAC 0. Results were consistent when only adjusted data were pooled. Conclusions: Among individuals without a previous ASCVD, a CAC score> 100 identifies individuals most likely to benefit from lipid-lowering therapy, while undetectable CAC suggests no treatment benefit (AU)

Impact of lipid-lowering therapies on cardiovascular outcomes according to coronary artery calcium score. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score improves the accuracy of risk stratification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events compared with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. We evaluated the interaction of coronary atherosclerotic burden as determined by the CAC score with the prognostic benefit of lipid-lowering therapies in the primary prevention setting. METHODS: We reviewed the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies including individuals without a previous ASCVD event who underwent CAC score assessment and for whom lipid-lowering therapy status stratified by CAC values was available. The primary outcome was ASCVD. The pooled effect of lipid-lowering therapy on outcomes stratified by CAC groups (0, 1-100,> 100) was evaluated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Five studies (1 randomized, 2 prospective cohort, 2 retrospective) were included encompassing 35 640 individuals (female 38.1%) with a median age of 62.2 [range, 49.6-68.9] years, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of 128 (114-146) mg/dL, and follow-up of 4.3 (2.3-11.1) years. ASCVD occurrence increased steadily across growing CAC strata, both in patients with and without lipid-lowering therapy. Comparing patients with (34.9%) and without (65.1%) treatment exposure, lipid-lowering therapy was associated with reduced occurrence of ASCVD in patients with CAC> 100 (OR, 0.70; 95%CI, 0.53-0.92), but not in patients with CAC 1-100 or CAC 0. Results were consistent when only adjusted data were pooled. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals without a previous ASCVD, a CAC score> 100 identifies individuals most likely to benefit from lipid-lowering therapy, while undetectable CAC suggests no treatment benefit.

Incidence of cardiovascular events and changes in the estimated risk and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia: the SAFEHEART registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The SAFEHEART study was designed to analyze the situation of familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia (FHH) and improve knowledge of this disease in Spain. Our objective was to determine the incidence rate of cardiovascular events, the estimated risk of developing an event and its modification, the use of lipid-lowering treatment, and the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in patients with FHH. METHODS: SAFEHEART is a prospective, open, multicenter, nationwide cohort study, with long-term protocol-based follow-up in a population of individuals with molecularly-characterized FHH. We analyzed patients older than 18 years with complete follow-up. RESULTS: We included 2648 patients with FHH. The median follow-up was 6.6 (4.8-9.7) years. The overall incidence rate of cardiovascular events was 1.3 events/100 patient-years. After the follow-up, the 10-year estimated risk of developing a cardiovascular event was reduced from 1.6% to 1.3% (P <.001). In the last follow-up, 20.6% and 22.2% of the patients in primary and secondary prevention achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values <100mg/dL and <70mg/dL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study was performed in the largest population of patients with FHH in Spain. We identified the incidence rate of cardiovascular events, the estimated risk of developing a cardiovascular event and its modification, the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets, and the therapeutic management in this population. Although the cardiovascular risk of FHH is high, appropriate treatment reduces the likelihood of an event. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02693548.

Recommendations to improve lipid control. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiology.

T***he current control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is very low and this is associated with an increase of cardiovascular outcomes. In addition, the latter this happens, the risk will be greater. This is mainly due to an insufficient use of the lipid-lowering therapy currently available. In fact, with current treatments (statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors), the majority of patients in secondary prevention should achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. For these reasons, in this manuscript promoted by the Spanish Society of Cardiology we propose three simple and feasible decision-making algorithms that include the majority of clinical scenarios among patients with ischemic heart disease, with the double aim of attaining therapeutic goals in the majority of patients as soon as possible; in secondary prevention the magnitude of the benefit is risk- and time-dependent.

LDL-cholesterol: The lower the better. / Colesterol LDL, cuanto más bajo mejor.

The reduction of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-chol) has been associated with a decrease in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It has been demonstrated that there is no value of LDL-chol below which there ceases to be a preventive benefit with its reduction, and neither has it been observed that there is a higher incidence of secondary effects associated with lower concentrations of LDL-chol. Although there is a wide range of lipid-lowering drugs available, a high percentage of patients do not achieve the desired LDL-chol levels. The high-potency statins reduce the LDL-chol by 15-30%, and can double the percentage of patients that reach their desired level. This combination has shown to be safe and effective in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Another option is the combination of statins with exchange resins, although this requires a more complex management. The inhibition of PCSK9 protein with monoclonal antibodies reduces the LDL-chol by more than 60%, and is effective in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, due to its cost, its use is restricted to patients with ischaemia or familial hypercholesterolaemia that do not achieve the desired levels with conventional drugs. The evidence base as regards the benefit and safety of achieving the desired levels of LDL-chol is very wide and is still increasing. In the next few years, it may be necessary to adjust the intensity of the hypercholesterolaemia treatment to the level of vascular risk of the patients, and to the level of reduction necessary to achieve the therapeutic targets. This will result in a more effective cardiovascular prevention and in a better quality of life, particularly in the large group of patients at higher vascular risk.

[Update of planning tables of cholesterol-lowering therapy orientated to achieve LDL therapeutic targets]. / Actualización de las tablas de planificación terapéutica hipocolesterolemiante orientada a la obtención de los objetivos.

This is the third update of a planning-table for use in cholesterol-lowering therapy, so as to obtain LDLc objectives. This is an easy to use laptop tool to help choose the best statin or combination therapy (statin plus ezetimibe) depending on the current LDL concentration of the patient, and the LDLc objective to achieve. It is based on a colour code that indicates the drugs that are efficient enough to help patients to achieve their LDL goal. Along with the table, recommendations are given for the best strategy in order to implement the optimal therapy in a maximum of two clinical encounters.

[Familial combined hyperlipidemia: consensus document]. / Hiperlipidemia familiar combinada: documento de consenso.

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) is a frequent disorder associated with premature coronary artery disease. It is transmitted in an autosomal dominant manner, although there is not a unique gene involved. The diagnosis is performed using clinical criteria, and variability in lipid phenotype and family history of hyperlipidemia are necessaries. Frequently, the disorder is associated with type2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and central obesity. Patients with FCH are considered as high cardiovascular risk and the lipid target is an LDL-cholesterol <100mg/dL, and <70mg/dL if cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes are present. Patients with FCH require lipid lowering treatment using potent statins and sometimes, combined lipid-lowering treatment. Identification and management of other cardiovascular risk factors as type 2 diabetes and hypertension are fundamental to reduce cardiovascular disease burden. This document gives recommendations for the diagnosis and global treatment of patients with FCH directed to specialists and general practitioners.

[Familial combined hyperlipidemia: consensus document]. / Hiperlipidemia familiar combinada: documento de consenso.

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) is a frequent disorder associated with premature coronary artery disease. It is transmitted in an autosomal dominant manner, although there is not a unique gene involved. The diagnosis is performed using clinical criteria, and variability in lipid phenotype and family history of hyperlipidemia are necessaries. Frequently, the disorder is associated with type2 diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and central obesity. Patients with FCH are considered as high cardiovascular risk and the lipid target is an LDL-cholesterol <100mg/dL, and <70mg/dL if cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes are present. Patients with FCH require lipid lowering treatment using potent statins and sometimes, combined lipid-lowering treatment. Identification and management of other cardiovascular risk factors as type 2 diabetes and hypertension are fundamental to reduce cardiovascular disease burden. This document gives recommendations for the diagnosis and global treatment of patients with FCH directed to specialists and general practitioners.

[Combined treatment: regimens, indications and safety profile]. / Tratamiento combinado: pautas, indicaciones y perfil de seguridad.

Statins are the current basis of lipid-lowering therapy, despite which may have limitations on efficacy and safety. In high risk patients who do not achieve current lipid goals, in those intolerant to statins or those with atherogenic dyslipidemia, it is possible combine two or more lipid lowering drugs, including statins, ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, niacin and prescription omega-3 fatty acids. However, for most of these combination therapies pivotal data on clinical outcomes are still lacking.

Hipercolesterolemias graves en pediatría: Presentación de dos casos / Severe hypercholesterolemia in children: Presentation of two cases and update of the literature

La hipercolesterolemia familiar es uno de los trastornos genéticos más comunes y aporta información sustancial sobre papel etiológico que el colesterol LDL tiene para el desarrollo de la ateroesclerosis. Se presentan dos pacientes con hipercolesterolemia grave. Se remarca la importancia del diagnóstico y tratamiento temprano para evitar o demorar la enfermedad ateromatosa y la enfermedad coronaria precoz.

Familial hypercholesterolemia is one of the most common genetic disorders and it provides the best evidence on the etiologic role of LDL-colesterol for arteroesclerosis development. Two patients with severe hypercholesterolemia had been presented. Importance of early diagnosis and treatment has been stated to avoid or delay atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease.