Follow-up after major traumatic injury: a survey of services in Australian and New Zealand public hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Increased survival from traumatic injury has led to a higher demand for follow-up care when patients are discharged from hospital. It is currently unclear how follow-up care following major trauma is provided to patients, and how, when, and to whom follow-up services are delivered. The aim of this study was to describe the current follow-up care provided to patients and their families who have experienced major traumatic injury in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS: Informed by Donabedian's 'Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care' model and the Institute of Medicine's Six Domains of Healthcare Quality, a cross-sectional online survey was developed in conjunction with trauma experts. Their responses informed the final survey which was distributed to key personnel in 71 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand that (i) delivered trauma care to patients, (ii) provided data to the Australasian Trauma Registry, or (iii) were a Trauma Centre. RESULTS: Data were received from 38/71 (53.5%) hospitals. Most were Level 1 trauma centres (n = 23, 60.5%); 76% (n = 16) follow-up services were permanently funded. Follow-up services were led by a range of health professionals with over 60% (n = 19) identifying as trauma specialists. Patient inclusion criteria varied; only one service allowed self-referral (3.3%). Follow-up was within two weeks of acute care discharge in 53% (n = 16) of services. Care activities focused on physical health; psychosocial assessments were the least common. Most services provided care for adults and paediatric trauma (60.5%, n = 23); no service incorporated follow-up for family members. Evaluation of follow-up care was largely as part of a health service initiative; only three sites stated evaluation was specific to trauma follow-up. CONCLUSION: Follow-up care is provided by trauma specialists and predominantly focuses on the physical health of the patients affected by major traumatic injury. Variations exist in terms of patient selection, reason for follow-up and care activities delivered with gaps in the provision of psychosocial and family health services identified. Currently, evaluation of trauma follow-up care is limited, indicating a need for further development to ensure that the care delivered is safe, effective and beneficial to patients, families and healthcare organisations.

Patient-facing, Semi-automated, solutions to enhance patient participation in measurement-based care practice standards in a tele-mental health specialty clinic for populations at higher risk for self-harm.

PURPOSE: Collecting validated surveys that describe symptom severity (measurement based care) during evidence-based psychotherapy is crucial to allow a therapist to tailor the speed and intensity of treatment. COVID clinic closures mandated we create a flexible, remote system to conduct measurement-based care, which was accomplished via RedCap. METHODS: RedCap was used to create a semi-automated workflow allowing all clinically-indicated evidence-based surveys (including the PHQ-9) to be delivered via email to patients; with results automatically sent to their provider. Importantly, indications of suicidal ideation were automatically escalated to the provider. RESULTS: PHQ-9 completion improved, while provider burden for collecting surveys was greatly reduced; however, depending largely upon initial provider-patient 'training', overall compliance could still be significantly improved. CONCLUSION: This workflow gave providers additional information compared to the typical telemedicine environment, and in fact, improved data collection rates over our in-person environment. However, when patients did not complete measures on their own, the burden on providers increased.

Considerações acerca da dimensão traumática no trabalho da Justiça Restaurativa: por um diálogo com Sándor Ferenczi / Considerations on the traumatic dimension in the work of Restorative Justice: towards a dialogue with Sándor Ferenczi / Consideraciones sobre la dimensión traumática en el trabajo de Justicia Restaurativa: hacia un diálogo con Sándor Ferenczi

Trata-se de trabalho teórico que busca aproximar a clínica do traumático de Ferenczi (psicanálise) das práticas de Justiça Restaurativa (JR). Através da exposição de algumas das proposições ferenczianas acerca da etiologia do trauma e de suas consequências para o psiquismo, pretendeu-se demonstrar que a condução dos círculos, conferências e encontros restaurativos podem levar a que os sujeitos (inclusive os facilitadores) tomem contato com experiências traumáticas que demandarão a construção de algum sentido e uma ética do cuidado que garanta ambiente hospitaleiro, evite retraumatismos e leve em conta a complexidade dos conflitos que se apresentam. Ao final, concluiu-se que o diálogo com a clínica do traumático de Ferenczi pode ser profícuo para aprimorar as metodologias restaurativas, sobretudo ao reclamar uma ética das intervenções de JR, apontar alguns limites e convocar outros saberes.

On this theoretical paper we seek to bring Ferenczi's clinic of trauma closer to Restorative Justice (JR) practices. Through the exposition of some Ferenczian propositions about the etiology of trauma and its consequences for the psychism, we intend to demonstrate that the conduction of so called circles, conferences and restorative meetings can lead the subjects (including facilitators) to get in touch with traumatic experiences. These experiences are in search for meaning and require an ethic of care. Such ethic aims at ensuring a hospitable environment, avoiding retraumatizations and taking into account the complexity of the conflicts that emerge. We concluded that the dialogue with Ferenczi's clinic of trauma can be fruitful to improve restorative methodologies (especially with regard to the ethics of JR interventions) point out some limits and summon other knowledges into the debate.

En este trabajo teórico, pretendemos acercar la clínica de lo traumático (psicoanálisis) de Ferenczi a la práctica de la Justicia Restaurativa (JR). A través de la exposición de algunas de las proposiciones ferenczianas sobre la etiología del trauma y sus consecuencias para el psiquismo, se pretendió demostrar que la conducción de círculos, conferencias y encuentros restaurativos puede llevar a los sujetos (incluyendo a los facilitadores) a entrar en contacto con experiencias traumáticas que exigirán la construcción de algún significado y una ética del cuidado que garantice un ambiente hospitalario, evite retraumatismos y tenga en cuenta la complejidad de los conflictos que se presentan. Al final, concluimos que el diálogo con la clínica del traumático de Ferenczi puede ser útil para el perfeccionamiento de las metodologías restaurativas, especialmente a la hora de reivindicar una ética de las intervenciones de JR, señalando algunos límites y convocando otros saberes.

Lost in Follow-Up: Predictors of Patient No-Shows to Clinic Follow-Up After Abdominal Injury.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors for non-attendance to post-discharge, hospital follow-up appointments for traumatically injured patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy for traumatic abdominal injury at an urban, Midwestern, level I trauma center with clinic follow-up scheduled after discharge. Clinically, relevant demographic characteristics, patients' distance from hospital, and the presence of staples, sutures, and drains requiring removal were collected. Descriptive statistics of categorical variables were calculated as totals and percentages and compared with a chi-squared test or Fisher's exact when appropriate. RESULTS: The sample included 183 patients who were largely assaultive trauma survivors (68%), male (80%), and black (53%) with a mean age of 35.4 ± 14.9 years. Overall, 18.5% no-showed for their follow-up appointment. On multivariate analysis for clinic no-show; length of stay (odds ratio = 0.92 [0.84-0.99], P = 0.04) and the need for suture, staple, or drain removal were protective for clinic attendance (odds ratio = 5.59 [1.07-7.01], P = 0.04). Overall, 12 patients (6.4%) were readmitted. Forty patients (18.3%) had their follow-up in the emergency department (ED). On multivariate regression of risk factors for ED visits, the only statistically significant factors (P < 0.05) were clinic appointment no-show (OR = 2.81) and self-pay insurance (OR = 4.78). CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal trauma patients are at high risk of no-show for follow-up appointments and no-show visits are associated with ED visits. Future work is needed evaluating interventions to improve follow-up.

[The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Care of Abused Children and Adolescents]. / Die diagnostische und therapeutische Versorgung von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Gewalterfahrungen.

The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Care of Abused Children and Adolescents In the following article, an overview of the current German health care situation concerning child abuse, neglect and maltreatment is provided. Interdisciplinary institutions of child protection are important initial contact points for families and professionals wishing to receive help. Furthermore, trauma clinics, victim support organizations and specialized counselling centers are indispensable to meet the complex needs of victims. Overall, the availability and accessibility of the support system in Germany is still insufficient and the number of unknown and untreated cases remains high. An improvement of the current situation should be of high governmental priority.

[Level of personality functioning (OPD-2) and the symptom severity of posttraumatic stress disorder - a cohort study]. / Steht das strukturelle Integrationsniveau nach OPD-2 in Zusammenhang mit der Symptomschwere einer Posttraumatischen Belastungsstörung (PTBS)? ­ Eine Kohortenstudie bei Patienten einer Trauma-Ambulanz.

Level of personality functioning (OPD-2) and the symptom severity of posttraumatic stress disorder - a cohort study Objectives: To investigate the affirmed correlation between the level of personality functioning (OPD-2, Axis IV "Structure") and the symptom severity of posttraumatic stress disorder based on clinical routine data was the main goal of this study. Method: Cross-sectional data was acquired between 2013 and 2016 using random samples of standardized questionnaires in the trauma outpatient clinic of the Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University Hospital in Münster, Germany. The German version of the PDS (Ehlers et al. 1996) measured the symptoms and the severity of PTSD, level of personality functioning was assessed by the OPD-SFK (Ehrenthal et al. 2015) Results: Level of personality functioning in OPD-SFK and the severity of posttraumatic symptoms are significantly correlated to each other. The less the functioning of the psychic structure the more the symptom severity shows up. The results were confirmed with different sets of predictors in our statistical models. Conclusions: The level of the personality functioning (OPD-2) is related to the severity of posttraumatic symptoms. Whether a low-level personality functioning is a disposal for PTSD or more likely a result of a traumatic life event, should be discussed.

Outpatient follow-up does not prevent emergency department utilization by trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Although most trauma centers have a regularly scheduled trauma clinic, research demonstrates that trauma patients do not consistently attend follow-up appointments and often use the emergency department (ED) for outpatient care. METHODS: A retrospective review of outpatient follow-up of adult patients admitted to the trauma service (January 2014-December 2014) at an urban level I trauma center was conducted (n = 2134). RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (10%) were evaluated in trauma clinic after discharge from the hospital. Twenty-one percent of patients seen in trauma clinic visited the ED within 30 d compared with 12% of those not seen in clinic (P < 0.001). A total of 104 patients were readmitted within 30 d of discharge; no difference existed in the rate of hospital readmission between patients seen in clinic and those not seen in clinic (P = 0.25). Stepwise logistic regression showed that clinic follow-up was not a significant predictor of decreased ED utilization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.16 [95% confidence interval 0.78-1.72], P = 0.461) and also showed that while ED use was a significant predictor of readmission (adjusted OR 216 [93-500], P < 0.001), clinic visits were not (adjusted OR 0.74 [0.33-1.69], P = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient follow-up in the trauma clinic does not decrease ED utilization or hospital readmissions indicating that interventions aimed at improving access to a conventional outpatient clinic will not impact ED utilization rates. Further study is necessary to determine the best system for providing clinically appropriate and cost-effective outpatient follow-up for trauma patients.