Risk factors of uterine perforation when using contraceptive intrauterine devices.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most popular methods of contraception, and uterine perforation has been presented among the most significant potential complications of IUD use. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors of uterine perforation when using an IUD. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all 164 women who have referred to Al-Zahra hospital in Tabriz- Iran to remove the retained IUD from March 2018 to March 2021, were investigated in two groups. Patients in case group underwent surgery to remove the dislocated device and management of its complications. In control group, the devices were removed using a Novak or ring forceps with or without hysteroscopy with no uterine perforation. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. P-Value was obtained for qualitative data via Fisher's exact test and Chi-Squared test and for quantitative data via Mann-Whitney U test and independent T-test. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in the groups with or without uterine perforation was 30.57 and 36.78 years respectively (P = 0.01). The frequency of two or more parities among patients with uterine perforation was higher than other patients (P = 0.13). Ultrasound study before (p = 0.037) and after (p = 0.007) IUD insertion was higher among patients without uterine perforation. The less inexperience of healthcare providers (P = 0.013) and lack of scheduled follow-up visits after the IUD insertion (P < 0.001), are the other important factors affecting the uterine perforation. Abdominal pain was the most common compliant of uterine perforation (P < 0.001) and laparoscopy was the most used surgery to remove the misplaced device. CONCLUSION: Uterine perforation can be effectively prevented by hiring experienced health care providers and appropriate patient selection.

An Unusual Presentation of Intestinal Obstruction: Uterine Perforation and Bowel Herniation Following Manual Vacuum Aspiration.

Introduction: Uterine perforation following manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) of early pregnancy is an uncommon occurrence. It is even more unusual to be complicated by bowel herniation and intestinal obstruction. Proper evaluation and intervention are required to ameliorate the attendant morbidity. Case Report: We reported a case of a 39-year-old known retroviral disease P1+[1] nonalive who presented 2 weeks after MVA with clinical and radiological features of complete small bowel obstruction. She was resuscitated and had a laparotomy that revealed a herniated loop of small bowel through a uterine perforation. Resection and anastomosis were done; she made a full recovery and was subsequently discharged on the 7th postoperative day. Conclusion: Public enlightenment, safe sex practices, and public access to health care covered by health insurance would reduce the incidence of this uterine perforation.

Vesicovaginal fistula and bladder calculus formation secondary to long-term retention of an intrauterine device.

Introduction: Although uterine perforation is a rare but serious complication, intrauterine devices are globally popular and effective contraceptive methods. Case presentation: A 76-year-old female patient manifesting symptoms of vaginal leakage and lower abdominal discomfort was admitted to our hospital. Diagnostic imaging identified a vesicovaginal fistula and bladder calculi attributable to perforation of the bladder by an intrauterine device that had been inserted over four decades ago. The patient underwent open surgery for cystolith removal and vesicovaginal fistula repair. Conclusions: If a patient with an intrauterine device complains of bladder stones or ongoing lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder perforation caused by the device should be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Case report: Uterine perforation caused by migration of intrauterine devices.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are often considered a form of contraception by women of reproductive age because of their reversible, effective, safe, and convenient nature. However, its complications include bleeding, infection, displacement, and uterine perforation. As most patients do not exhibit any obvious symptoms, they ignore their complications and are unaware of the necessity of regular evaluation. Therefore, they are unable to implement timely interventions for the complications that can result in serious consequences. Although, three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound has demonstrated greater sensitivity in detecting subtle IUD malposition issues, particularly with side-arm embedment. Computed tomography (CT) scanning followed by multi-planar reformatting, maximum intensity projection, and volume rendering can precisely and intuitively display the morphology and location of the IUD, accurately exhibit the anatomical relationship between the IUD and the pelvis, and allow for a more accurate assessment of the degree of perforation and presence and absence of bowel perforation, thereby enabling us to select a more suitable surgical procedure with less damage to the patient. In this study, we reported an asymptomatic case of uterine perforation of the IUD into the serosal layer of the bladder, which developed 6 years post-IUD placement. A preoperative 3D reconstruction was made using the CT images of the IUD; then, the IUD was successfully removed with the assistance of a hysteroscope and laparoscope.

Perforation, Migration, and Omentum Embedding of a Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device: A Case Report.

The intrauterine device (IUD) is currently one of the most widely used methods due to its great effectiveness. Uterine perforation and migration of the device is one of its most serious complications, although rare. In most patients, it usually occurs at the time of placement and goes unnoticed; however, it can also occur late. The diagnosis is established by imaging studies, preferring abdominal ultrasound, and its treatment should be removal in all cases. We present the case of a 27-year-old woman, with a history of levonorgestrel IUD placement two years earlier, who presented with chronic pelvic pain. During a gynecological consultation, the IUD threads were not evident. An abdominal CT scan showed that the IUD was in the abdominal cavity, so open abdominal surgery was performed where the IUD was found embedded in the omentum and the segment of the omentum containing the IUD was resected. The patient evolved satisfactorily and was discharged 24 hours after surgery.

Postmenopausal Idiopathic Spontaneous Rupture of Pyometra with Tubo-ovarian Abscess: An Atypical Presentation.

Spontaneous perforations in pyometra occur rarely. Incidence is only 0.01%-0.5% in gynecological patients. Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is seen less in postmenopausal women amounting the 6%-18% of the total cases of TOA reported. A 52-year-old P3L3 postmenopausal woman with abdominal pain was admitted to hospital. Emergency laparotomy was performed in view of pyoperitoneum. Intraoperatively, 1000 cc of foul-smelling pus was suctioned out from the peritoneal cavity a 2 cm × 2 cm sized perforation was seen at the right fundal region of the uterus and a right sided TOA was seen extending to the uterine cavity, left sided ovary was normal. A total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. The patient got discharged on the 36th postoperative hospitalization day. Histopathological study revealed uterine purulent inflammation with no evidence of malignancy. The diagnosis of spontaneous perforation of pyometra is rarely made preoperatively and the possibility of a perforated pyometra should, therefore, be considered when elderly women suffer from acute abdominal pain. Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be the best choice procedure in these patients. There is probably a new trend in the epidemiology of TOA, occurring in older women who do not present the traditional risk factors for pelvic inflammatory disease and TOA.

Intrauterine device (IUD) migration to the fallopian tube: a rare location for a translocated IUD with no visceral injury.

BACKGROUND: Loss of Intra Uterine Device (IUD) following silent perforation of the uterus either during or after IUD insertion is an uncommon finding due to a lack of immediate follow-up. We report a rare case in which uterine perforation following the migration of IUD to the right fallopian tube without visceral injury. The patient presented with lower abdominal pain and pain during sex for one year since IUD insertion. On examination, we noted tenderness on the right suprapubic region and on speculum examination, no IUD thread was seen. A radiological pelvic examination showed an empty uterus without an IUD. Laparotomy and retrieval of migrated IUD was done followed by repair of perforated uterus. CONCLUSION: Migrated IUD with silent uterine perforation without visceral injury is a distressing clinical condition both to the patient and the clinician. This case is reported to increase awareness in doing immediate vaginal examination and pelvic ultrasound post-IUD insertion.

Case report: Peritonitis secondary to traumatic bowel perforation during second-trimester surgical abortion.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Uterine perforation and bowel injury are rare but potentially life-threatening complications of surgical abortion. Early diagnosis results in easier management and better prognosis. We report here a case of a 39-year-old presented with peritonitis secondary to traumatic bowel perforation after second-trimester surgical abortion. CASE PRESENTATION: A 39-year-old Gravida 3 Para 2 presented with acute abdominal pain two days after second trimester induced abortion. On physical examination, the patient was febrile and hypotensive with diffuse abdominal tenderness. Emergency abdomino-pelvic-CT showed generalized peritonitis with pneumoperitoneum. The patient underwent an emergency laparotomy. Per operative exploration revealed a perforation of the fundus of the uterus and the sigmoid portion of the large intestine, resulting in stercoral peritonitis. We proceeded with thorough cleansing of the abdominal cavity with physiological serum, followed by partial colectomy including the perforated sigmoid and a Hartmann's procedure. The patient was admitted to the post-operative intensive care unit for 18 days and discharged on day 27 after the surgery. Intestinal continuity restoration was performed six months after the surgery. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Given the severity of second trimester pregnancy termination complications, efforts should be made to promote contraception and medical first-trimester pregnancy termination. Any unusual symptom after surgical induced abortion should lead to suspect uterine perforation. CONCLUSION: Uterine perforation during induced abortion is usually asymptomatic and can generally be managed conservatively. However, bowel injury may result in peritonitis, requiring immediate laparotomy and resection of perforated bowel. CT-scans can help diagnose this rare complication.

Combined uterine injury and high rectal perforation complicating abdominal ectopic pregnancy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Abdominal pregnancy is a rare and potentially fatal variant of ectopic pregnancy, presenting unique clinical challenges. This report discusses an unusual case of abdominal pregnancy associated with uterine and high rectal perforations, complications that are rarely reported in clinical practice. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case involving a 31-year-old woman from a rural area, with a psychiatric history, presenting severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. Initial investigations revealed a hemopneumoperitoneum and a fetal skeleton in the pelvic area by CT, leading to a diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy. Surgical findings included a nonviable fetus, approximately 5 months gestational age, and perforations in both the rectum and the posterior uterine wall. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The patient underwent extensive surgery, including placental dissection, anterior rectal resection, Hartmann's colostomy, hysterorrhaphy, and drainage of the peritoneal cavity. The complexity of managing abdominal pregnancy, especially with additional complications such as organ perforations, poses significant surgical challenges. This case emphasizes the need to consider abdominal pregnancy in differential diagnoses of abdominal pain in women, due to the risk of misdiagnosis and complex surgical requirements. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the critical importance of prompt diagnosis and comprehensive care in managing rare and life-threatening presentations of abdominal pregnancy. It underscores the need to increase awareness among clinicians for timely intervention and provides information on the complexities of surgical management in cases with additional organ perforations.

Contraceptive complication: Emergence of a bladder stone - A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Bladder stones, although rare in a healthy bladder, can emerge due to various factors, including obstructions in urinary flow, recurrent infections, and foreign bodies. Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are known for their potential to migrate from the uterine cavity, leading to unusual complications such as bladder stone formation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 52-year-old woman, previously treated for a complicated urinary tract infection, presented with intermittent lower abdominal pain, dysuria, and hematuria. She had a history of an IUCD insertion 15 years earlier, which was later documented as missing. Diagnostic imaging revealed a large bladder stone, encasing the previously inserted IUCD. An open vesicolithotomy was performed, during which a stone measuring 6 × 5 cm was removed, revealing the IUCD within. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery with no further urinary tract infections at a 6-month follow-up. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The migration of an IUCD can lead to various complications, depending on its final location. The formation of bladder stones around a migrated IUCD is a rare but significant complication, necessitating a thorough diagnostic approach. Radiography and ultrasonography proved sufficient for diagnosing the intravesical migration in this case. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the importance of considering a migrated IUCD in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with urinary symptoms, especially those with a history of a missing IUCD. Timely diagnosis and management are crucial in preventing further complications.