RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is an episodic condition of multifactorial origin, commonly manifesting as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. As an acute condition, it has the potential for recurrence and is associated with major consequences; this disease poses significant challenges to the healthcare system. VTE is a widespread concern in developed and developing countries; therefore, it is not limited to specific regions or populations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk factors associated with unprovoked PE in patients in a hospital center in Sincelejo, Colombia. METHODS: This is an observational, analytical cross-sectional study utilizing retrospective data. From 2010 to 2023, we reviewed 126 medical records of patients who experienced their first unprovoked VTE events and met the inclusion criteria. We performed data analysis using R software version 3.5.1. RESULTS: Of the patients, 36.5% (n = 46) were women; 63.5% (n = 80) were men, with a mean age of 62.22 years (SD = 10.62). About 53% of women presented with PE, compared to 47% of men. The coagulation factor VIII acted as a PE risk factor (p = 0.098). The best model to predict PE development obtained an Akaike information criterion (AIC) of 176.67, indicating that the A1 positive phenotype is the risk factor with the highest prediction for PE occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of coagulation factor VIII and an A1-positive phenotype are risk factors that may increase PE development. These findings suggest the need for preventive strategies in this risk setting to reduce the incidence and recurrence of PE.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), and examine the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the Pediatric Health Information Systems database to investigate patients admitted to a participating hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify VTE, AIS, and COVID-19. Pharmacy billing codes were used to investigate pharmacological thromboprophylaxis use. RESULTS: 1â759â701 unique patients underwent 2â234â135 inpatient admissions. Rate of VTE increased from 84 cases per 10â000 admissions in 2018-2019 to 108 cases per 10â000 admissions in 2020-2021, representing a 28.6% increase (P < .001). In contrast, the rate of AIS remained stable through the study period. When compared with 2018-2019, children diagnosed with VTE during 2020-2021 had longer hospitalizations and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit. When analysis was limited to 2020-2021, a diagnosis code of COVID-19 was associated with a 1.35-fold (95% CI: 1.24-1.45) increase in the odds of VTE diagnosis, but not AIS. Use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis increased from 1.5% of hospitalizations in 2018-2019 to 3.0% of hospitalizations in 2020-2021 (P < .001). When evaluating thromboprophylaxis during 2020-2021, a diagnosis code for COVID-19 was associated with an 11-fold (95% CI: 10.86-11.49; P < .001) increase in the utilization of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: This study found an increase in the rate of VTE among hospitalized children during the pandemic. A diagnosis of COVID-19 was associated with a modest increase in odds of VTE diagnosis, which occurred despite increased use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the diagnosis of Pediatric venous thromboembolism has dramatically increased in recent decades, this study aims to evaluate these patients, determining the incidence and describing their biological and clinical characteristics. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at a Brazilian quaternary hospital between January 2022 and February 2023. Under 18-year-old hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of venous thromboembolism were included, while those with arterial or chronic thrombosis were excluded. Data on biological and clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment were evaluated. A descriptive data analysis was performed and the incidence of hospital-associated thrombosis was calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-nine pediatric patients were evaluated. The incidence of hospital-associated thrombosis was 19.9 cases per 10,000 pediatric hospitalizations. Median age at diagnosis was four months (range: 12 days-17 years). Most of the patients (66.7%) were asymptomatic, with venous thromboembolism being diagnosed incidentally. In all cases, at least one risk factor was identified and in 74.6% of cases four or more factors were present. The principal risk factors were the presence of a central venous catheter (89.7%) and infection (89.7%). Thrombogenic comorbidities, particularly congenital heart disease, were present in 48.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of venous thromboembolism found in the present study was lower than rates reported in developed countries. The principal characteristics of this sample were a greater frequency of central venous catheter and infection as risk factors, and the fact that the cases consisted mainly of newborns and individuals with heart disease.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We developed a predictive model to assess the risk of major bleeding (MB) within 6 months of primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients receiving anticoagulant treatment. We also sought to describe the prevalence and incidence of VTE in cancer patients, and to describe clinical characteristics at baseline and bleeding events during follow-up in patients receiving anticoagulants. METHODS: This observational, retrospective, and multicenter study used natural language processing and machine learning (ML), to analyze unstructured clinical data from electronic health records from nine Spanish hospitals between 2014 and 2018. All adult cancer patients with VTE receiving anticoagulants were included. Both clinically- and ML-driven feature selection was performed to identify MB predictors. Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF) algorithms were used to train predictive models, which were validated in a hold-out dataset and compared to the previously developed CAT-BLEED score. RESULTS: Of the 2,893,108 cancer patients screened, in-hospital VTE prevalence was 5.8% and the annual incidence ranged from 2.7 to 3.9%. We identified 21,227 patients with active cancer and VTE receiving anticoagulants (53.9% men, median age of 70 years). MB events after VTE diagnosis occurred in 10.9% of patients within the first six months. MB predictors included: hemoglobin, metastasis, age, platelets, leukocytes, and serum creatinine. The LR, DT, and RF models had AUC-ROC (95% confidence interval) values of 0.60 (0.55, 0.65), 0.60 (0.55, 0.65), and 0.61 (0.56, 0.66), respectively. These models outperformed the CAT-BLEED score with values of 0.53 (0.48, 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows encouraging results in identifying anticoagulated patients with cancer-associated VTE who are at high risk of MB.
RESUMEN
Deep vein thrombosis is one of the main causes of inpatient and outpatient morbidity, both in medical and surgical patients, significantly impacting mortality statistics and requiring prompt diagnosis so that treatment can be initiated immediately. This document was prepared and reviewed by 11 specialists certified by the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, who searched the main databases for the best evidence on the diagnostic (physical examination, imaging) and therapeutic approaches (heparin, coumarins, direct oral anticoagulants, fibrinolytics) to the disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The decline in the mental well-being of young adults following an episode of venous thromboembolism may be related to the uncertainty of long-term health and fear of recurrence. In recent years, post-pulmonary embolism syndrome has gained acceptance, however, less attention has been given to the psychological impact on young patients after venous thromboembolism. This study explores the prevalence, type, and severity of psychological disorders of patients following venous thromboembolism. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was performed of over 18-year-old patients diagnosed with venous thromboembolism followed in the Vascular Medicine Service at Hospital Privado de Córdoba, Argentina from July 2020 to October 2021. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual interviews were conducted using two pre-established questionnaires administered by the same psychiatrist. The first questionnaire gathered personal data, clinical history, and mental health information, while the second, evaluated mood disorders using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Patients with a positive MINI score underwent further assessment using the Hamilton Scale. Patients were considered young if ≤45 years. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were assessed, 56 % were women, and 54 % were ≤45 years. Major depression was documented in 11 (22 %) patients, eight (72 %) in the younger group, and three (28 %) in the older group. Eight (16 %) patients had an anxiety disorder, four in the younger group, and ten (20 %) patients had post-traumatic stress disorder, seven (70 %) of the younger patients. Generalized anxiety disorder was identified in 20 (40 %) patients with similar proportions in both groups. CONCLUSION: Psychological and emotional symptoms are common following an episode of venous thromboembolism. Post-traumatic stress disorder and depression appear to be numerically more prevalent in the young.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of preventable deaths. Incidence of VTE and adequacy of thromboprophylaxis have rarely been reported in low-resourced countries. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of VTE and to evaluate the adequacy of thromboprophylaxis in acutely-ill medical hospitalized patients. METHODS: The PROFMiG is a prospective cohort study conducted in Brazil. We consecutively enrolled adult (> 18 years) acutely-ill hospitalized medical patients at admission. Risk assessment for VTE was evaluated by the IMPROVE7 (International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism). Outcomes were death and VTE events during hospital stay up to 90 days after discharge. All VTE and death events were adjudicated. We also evaluated pulmonary embolism-related death and adequacy of thromboprophylaxis. VTE incidence was estimated by competing risk methods. RESULTS: A total of 2380 participants was included. Median age was 70 years, 56.1 % women, median length of hospital stay was 10 days. A total of 2052 (86.3 %) patients were classified as low-risk for VTE, 30 (1.3 %) patients had objectively confirmed VTE, and 1449 (60.8 %) received inadequate thromboprophylaxis. The overall mortality rate was 14.0 %. Cumulative incidence of VTE was 2.0 % (95 % confidence interval 0.9 %-3.8 %) at 130 days after admission when considering death as competing risk. CONCLUSION: The cumulative incidence of VTE in this cohort corroborates with that reported in high-resourced countries. Despite recommendation, thromboprophylaxis was mostly inadequate. We suggest the adoption of competing risk analysis to estimate the cumulative incidence of VTE in hospitalized patients.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Incidencia , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Brasil/epidemiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of VTE and clinical outcomes in a cohort of cancer patients and COVID-19 infection, and to establish possible predictive factors of VTE. METHODS/PATIENTS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to determine the incidence of VTE and mortality in 118 cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March to August 2020. We calculated individual Khorana Risk and CATS-MICA scores in order to evaluate their utility to identify risk of VTE or death. Continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon or Student's T test, and categorical variables were compared using the Chi-Square or Fisher's exact text among patients with and without VTE. A Log-Rank test was performed to detect mortality differences between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included. VTE global incidence was 4.2% (n = 5), and mortality 25.4% (n = 30). Obesity (p = 0.05), recent chemotherapy (p = 0.049) and use of steroids (p = 0.006) were related to higher risk of VTE in the univariate analysis, although they were not confirmed in the multivariate analysis as independent risk factors. Statistically significant differences in all-cause, COVID-19-related and cancer-related mortality according to the Khorana risk score (KRS) were observed. CATS-MICA score (CMS) also showed statistically significant differences in mortality between low- and high-risk patients. Prediction of risk of VTE development with these scores showed a tendency towards significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, VTE incidence was similar to previously reported in the general population with SARS-CoV-2 infection. KRS was associated with overall and specific-cause mortality, and might be a useful prognostic tool in this setting.
RESUMEN
The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) last published clinical guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer in 2019, with a partial update in 2020. In this new update to the guidelines, SEOM seeks to incorporate recent evidence, based on a critical review of the literature, to provide practical current recommendations for the prophylactic and therapeutic management of VTE in patients with cancer. Special clinical situations whose management and/or choice of currently recommended therapeutic options (low-molecular-weight heparins [LMWHs] or direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs]) is controversial are included.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Oncología Médica/normas , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism disease (VTE) prevention strategy has to be constantly updated based on new evidence that is generated every year. Each institution must have a formal and active prevention policy against VTE and must develop guidelines or standards for thromboprophylaxis (TP) according to the local reality. During this process of adapting a guideline to the region and the generation of hospital recommendations, we must always consider the available local resources, the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk of the patients, even after discharge, and also their considerations and preferences. Adherence to local TP recommendations is one of the most important items evaluated by organizations that measure institutional quality. Individualized prophylaxis should consider personal and family history of VTE, the use of validated risk assessment models or RAMs for thrombosis and bleeding events, as well as the special characteristics of each patient. Ideally, each center's own statistics should be available for decision-making. Extrapolating guidelines from developed countries could have a negative impact, if we ignore our hospital's reality. In this document we will find practical tools for health institutions that will allow them to prepare recommendations or guidelines for adequate VTE prophylaxis.
La prevención de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) es motivo de continua actualización en función de nueva evidencia que se genera permanentemente. Cada institución debe contar con una estrategia activa de prevención contra la ETV y debe generar normas de tromboprofilaxis (TP) de acuerdo con la realidad local. Durante este proceso de adaptación de una guía a la región debemos siempre tener en cuenta los recursos locales disponibles, el riesgo tromboembólico y hemorrágico propio del paciente, de la enfermedad por la que se encuentra internado (ya sea clínica o quirúrgica) y las consideraciones o preferencias del paciente. La tasa de adherencia a recomendaciones locales de TP es uno de los indicadores de excelencia más importantes evaluados en organismos que califican la calidad de una institución de salud. Las medidas de profilaxis que propongamos para los centros de salud, deben ser individualizadas para cada paciente, tienen que considerar antecedentes personales y familiares del enfermo y utilizar modelos de evaluación de riesgo validados de trombosis y de sangrado. También deben incluir a la población con riesgo de trombosis persistente luego del alta. Lo ideal es tener estadísticas propias de cada nosocomio para la toma de decisiones de cómo implementar una correcta TP. Extrapolar guías de los países desarrollados a nuestro ámbito podría tener un impacto negativo, si no se conoce la propia realidad. En este documento encontraremos herramientas prácticas para las instituciones de salud de la región, que les permita orientarse al momento de confeccionar recomendaciones para una adecuada TP.
Asunto(s)
Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Medición de Riesgo , Adhesión a Directriz , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Fundamento: la trombofilia hereditaria se define como la tendencia genéticamente determinada al tromboembolismo venoso, entidad con una incidencia importante a nivel mundial. Desde el laboratorio pudieran explicarse un gran porcentaje de estos eventos de trombosis. Objetivo: caracterizar desde el punto de vista clínico humoral las trombofilias hereditarias e identificar la posible relación entre marcadores bioquímicos alterados de trombosis y su recurrencia. Método: se realizó un estudio descriptivo y transversal en el laboratorio de hemostasia del Hospital Provincial Docente Saturnino Lora de Santiago de Cuba, en el periodo de un año. Se tuvo como referencia 39 pacientes: 26 con eventos trombóticos egresados de los Servicios de Angiología, Cirugía Cardiovascular y Neurología, y 13 sin evento conocido, familiares de primera línea de aquellos pacientes que resultaron con marcadores de trombofilia positivos durante el estudio. Las variables clínicas analizadas fueron: edad, sexo, antecedentes personales y familiares de trombosis y número de eventos trombóticos en el paciente. Se calcularon media, desviación estándar y porcentajes. Resultados: el déficit de proteína S ocupó el primer lugar con 22 (56,4 %). La combinación de parámetros alterados que predominó fue el déficit de proteína C y S con 8 (20,5 %). En el 64,1 % se encontraron dos o más marcadores alterados; se muestran similares porcentajes en pacientes con 1, con 2 dos o más eventos de trombosis. Conclusión: la trombofilia se presentó como una enfermedad que afecta fundamentalmente a mujeres, en edades intermedias de la vida. En pacientes asintomáticos con antecedentes familiares de evento trombótico, sin aparente causa, los marcadores de laboratorio orientan el enfoque diagnóstico. La presencia de dos o más marcadores trombogénicos positivos inclina a la ocurrencia de eventos trombóticos en esta población.
Foundation: hereditary thrombophilia is defined as the genetically determined tendency to venous thromboembolism, an entity with a significant incidence worldwide. A large percentage of these thrombosis events could be explained from the laboratory. Objective: to characterize hereditary thrombophilias from a humoral clinical point of view and to identify the possible relationship between altered biochemical markers of thrombosis and its recurrence. Method: a descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out in the hemostasis laboratory of the Saturnino Lora Provincial Teaching Hospital of Santiago de Cuba, over a period of one year. 39 patients were used as a reference: 26 with thrombotic events discharged from the Angiology, Cardiovascular Surgery and Neurology Services, and 13 without a known event, first-line relatives of those patients who had positive thrombophilia markers during the study. The clinical variables analyzed were: age, sex, personal and family history of thrombosis and number of thrombotic events in the patient. Mean, standard deviation and percentages were calculated. Results: protein S deficiency ranked first with 22 (56.4 %). The combination of altered parameters that predominated was protein C and S deficiency with 8 (20.5 %). Two or more altered markers were found in 64.1 %; similar percentages are shown in patients with 1, 2 or more thrombosis events. Conclusion: thrombophilia was presented as a disease that mainly affects women, at intermediate ages of life. In asymptomatic patients with a family history of thrombotic event, without apparent cause, laboratory markers guide the diagnostic approach. The presence of two or more positive thrombogenic markers suggests the occurrence of thrombotic events in this population.
RESUMEN
Resumen La prevención de la enfermedad tromboembólica venosa (ETV) es motivo de continua actualización en función de nueva evidencia que se genera permanentemente. Cada institución debe contar con una estrategia activa de prevención contra la ETV y debe generar normas de tromboprofilaxis (TP) de acuerdo con la realidad local. Durante este proceso de adaptación de una guía a la región debemos siempre tener en cuenta los recursos locales disponibles, el riesgo tromboembólico y hemorrágico propio del paciente, de la enfermedad por la que se encuentra internado (ya sea clínica o quirúrgica) y las consideraciones o preferencias del paciente. La tasa de adherencia a recomendaciones locales de TP es uno de los indicadores de excelencia más importantes evaluados en organismos que califican la calidad de una institución de salud. Las medidas de profilaxis que propongamos para los centros de salud, deben ser individualizadas para cada paciente, tienen que considerar antecedentes personales y familiares del enfermo y utilizar modelos de evaluación de riesgo validados de trombosis y de sangrado. También deben incluir a la población con riesgo de trombosis persistente luego del alta. Lo ideal es tener estadísticas propias de cada nosocomio para la toma de decisiones de cómo implementar una correcta TP. Extrapolar guías de los países desarrollados a nuestro ámbito podría tener un impacto negativo, si no se conoce la propia realidad. En este documento encontraremos herramientas prácticas para las instituciones de salud de la región, que les permita orientarse al momento de confeccionar recomendaciones para una adecuada TP.
Abstract Venous thromboembolism disease (VTE) prevention strategy has to be constantly updated based on new evidence that is generated every year. Each institution must have a formal and active prevention policy against VTE and must develop guidelines or standards for thromboprophylaxis (TP) according to the local reality. During this process of adapting a guideline to the region and the generation of hospital recommendations, we must always consider the available local resources, the thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk of the patients, even after discharge, and also their considerations and preferences. Adherence to local TP recommendations is one of the most important items evaluated by organizations that measure institutional quality. Individualized prophylaxis should consider personal and family history of VTE, the use of validated risk assessment models or RAMs for thrombosis and bleeding events, as well as the special characteristics of each patient. Ideally, each center's own statistics should be available for decision-making. Extrapolating guidelines from developed countries could have a negative impact, if we ignore our hospital´s reality. In this document we will find practical tools for health institutions that will allow them to prepare recommendations or guidelines for adequate VTE prophylaxis.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may be the first sign of an undiagnosed cancer. The RIETE and SOME scores aim to identify patients with acute VTE at high risk of occult cancer. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of both scores. METHODS: The scores were evaluated in a retrospective cohort from two centers. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) evaluated the discriminatory performance. RESULTS: The RIETE score was applied to 815 patients with provoked and unprovoked VTE, of whom 56 (6.9%) were diagnosed with cancer. Of the 203 patients classified as high-risk, 18 were diagnosed with cancer, representing 32.1% (18/56) of the total cancer diagnoses. In the group of 612 low-risk patients, 67.9% of the cancer cases were diagnosed (38/56). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and AUC were 32%, 76%, 94%, 9%, and 0.430 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38â0.47), respectively. The SOME score could be calculated in 418 patients with unprovoked VTE, of whom 33 (7.9%) were diagnosed with cancer. Of the 45 patients classified as high-risk, three were diagnosed with cancer, representing 9.1% (3/33) of the total cancer diagnoses. In the group of 373 low-risk patients, 90.9% of the cancer cases were diagnosed (30/33). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and AUC were 33%, 88%, 94%, 20%, and 0.351 (95% CI, 0.27â0.43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of both scores was poor. Our results highlight the need to develop new models to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from an extensive cancer screening strategy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Curva ROC , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Área Bajo la Curva , Adulto , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in adults aged 75 and over undergoing acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and the CENTRAL were searched up to 25 December 2023. The incidence of VTE recurrence and bleeding events was assessed. Employing a frequentist network meta-analysis approach, interventions not directly compared could be indirectly assessed through the 95% confidence interval (CI), enhancing the interpretability of the search results. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) was utilized to generate the relative ranking probabilities for each group. RESULTS: Our study, analysing 6 randomised controlled trials with 3665 patients, compares direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in adults aged 75 and over with acute venous thromboembolism. Edoxaban reduces VTE recurrence risk compared with VKAs (risk ratio [RR] .50, 95% CI 0.27 - .95), while apixaban significantly decreases bleeding risk compared with VKAs (RR .23, 95% CI 0.08 - .69), edoxaban (RR .28, 95% CI 0.09 - .86) and rivaroxaban (RR .28, 95% CI 0.09 - .86). Despite low overall evidence quality, apixaban consistently ranks highest for both efficacy and safety. Findings underscore the nuanced efficacy-safety balance in this population, emphasizing cautious interpretation due to evidence limitations. CONCLUSION: Apixaban emerges as a favourable choice for acute VTE treatment in the elderly, displaying reduced bleeding risk compared to other treatments while maintaining comparable efficacy. Future studies should explore diverse anticoagulants efficacy and safety in older populations. Additionally, clinical prediction models tailored to geriatric cohorts are crucial for guiding treatment duration decisions.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Hemorragia , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangre , Anciano , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Administración Oral , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medición de Riesgo , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad AgudaRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), represents a substantial healthcare challenge. Provoked and unprovoked DVT cases carry distinct risks and treatment considerations. Recognizing the limitations of this classification, molecular markers may enhance diagnostic precision and guide anticoagulation therapy duration relying on patient history and risk factors. This preliminary, open-label, prospective cohort study was conducted including 15 patients (10 provoked DVT and 5 unprovoked DVT) and a control group of healthy plasmatic subjects. Plasma levels of 9 biomarkers were measured at diagnosis (baseline, day 0, and D0) and after 30 days (day 30-D30). Patient demographics, clinical data, and biomarker concentrations were analyzed. Serum concentrations of D-dimer, von Willebrand factor, C-reactive protein, and Anti-Xa were elevated in DVT groups at D0 compared to controls. No significant differences were observed between the provoked and unprovoked groups on the day of diagnosis and 30 days later. Over 30 days, the provoked group exhibited significant biomarker changes related to temporal assessment. No significant differences were noted in the biomarker profile between provoked and unprovoked DVT groups. This study is indicative of the concept of individualized thrombosis assessment and subsequent treatment for VTE. Larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings and further define the most appropriate use of the molecular markers.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Biomarcadores , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
Objectives: To compare the occurrence of death, bleeding, and recurrence according to inpatient or outpatient management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Materials and methods: . Retrospective cohort that included a consecutive sampling of VTE consultations between 2016 and 2019 diagnosed in the Emergency Center of a private hospital in Argentina. Results: There were 1202 cases, 908 with isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 205 with isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), and 89 cases of combined DVT - PE. 66% were women, with a median age of 77 years; 72% of cases were managed on an outpatient basis (n= 862). Comorbidities associated with hospitalization were obesity (p=0.03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p=0.01), heart failure (CHF) (p=0.01), chronic renal failure (CKD) (p=0.01), and cancer (p=0.01). At 90 days, the cumulative incidence of bleeding was 2.6% in inpatient compared to 2.9% in outpatient management (p=0.81); recurrence was 0% versus 0.9% (p=0.07), and mortality was 42.9% versus 18.9%, respectively (p=0.01). The HR for 90-day mortality in hospitalized patients adjusted for confounders (sex, age, type of VTE, obesity, CKD, CHF, COPD, and cancer) was 1.99 (95% CI 1.49-2.64; p=0.01). Conclusions: In this elderly, and predominantly female Argentine population, the 90-day mortality in patients hospitalized for VTE was higher than mortality in patients with outpatient management, without differences in recurrence or major bleeding.
RESUMEN
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular death and the main cause of preventable in-hospital death in the world. The PERT® (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team) concept involves multidisciplinary diagnosis and immediate treatment. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is the initial cause of most cases of PE and is responsible for complications such as chronic thromboembolic recurrence, postthrombotic syndrome, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. An aggressive approach to severe cases of iliofemoral DVT similar to the PERT® system can not only reduce the immediate risk of PE and death but can also reduce later sequelae. New percutaneous techniques and mechanical thrombectomy devices for venous thromboembolism (VTE) have shown encouraging clinical results. We propose the development of an expanded concept of rapid response to VTE, which involves not only PE (PERT®) but also severe cases of DVT: the Venous Thromboembolism Response Team (VTERT®).
RESUMEN
Abstract Introduction As 30 to 50% of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) cases remain idiopathic, an increased focus on hematologic variables may therefore reveal novel correlates of DVT. Very few studies have investigated the association of hematological parameters with DVT and the causal relationship between them is still to be elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between serial values of hematologic variables and DVT. Methods Complete blood count parameters were serially measured at baseline and then at approximately 3-month intervals for 12 months in 152 adults with the first episode of DVT and 152 age- and sex-matched controls. The odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated as a measure of association between hematological parameters and DVT. Results The red cell distribution width (RDW) was the only hematologic variable which showed an independent and consistent association with DVT at all time points (multivariable-adjusted OR [95%CI] 3.38 [1.28 - 8.91] at baseline, 2.24 [0.85 - 5.92] at 3 months and 2.12 [0.81 - 5.55] at 12 months for RDW > 14.0%). This association was higher for provoked DVT than unprovoked DVT and for DVT plus pulmonary embolism than DVT alone. No significant correlation was found between the high RDW and classical thrombotic risk factors, except malignancy. Conclusions We demonstrated an independent and consistent association of the high RDW with the first episode of DVT in adult patients. The study was probably underpowered to evaluate the association between the high RDW and recurrent DVT. Further large studies with long follow-up are needed to confirm this association.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis de la Vena , Asociación , Índices de Eritrocitos , Tromboembolia VenosaRESUMEN
Resumo Trombose venosa profunda é uma das principais causas de morbidade hospitalar e ambulatorial, seja em pacientes clínicos, seja em pacientes cirúrgicos, impactando significativamente nas estatísticas de mortalidade, exigindo um diagnóstico rápido para que se institua de forma imediata o tratamento. O presente documento foi preparado e revisado por onze especialistas certificados pela Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, que buscaram nas principais bases de dados as melhores evidências referentes à abordagem diagnóstica (exame físico, exames de imagem) e terapêutica (heparina, cumarínicos, anticoagulantes orais de ação direita, fibrinolíticos) da doença.
Abstract Deep vein thrombosis is one of the main causes of inpatient and outpatient morbidity, both in medical and surgical patients, significantly impacting mortality statistics and requiring prompt diagnosis so that treatment can be initiated immediately. This document was prepared and reviewed by 11 specialists certified by the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, who searched the main databases for the best evidence on the diagnostic (physical examination, imaging) and therapeutic approaches (heparin, coumarins, direct oral anticoagulants, fibrinolytics) to the disease.