Excursiones de glucosa en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 tratados con vildagliptina más metformina Galvus Met®, versus glimepirida más metformina ­GLOBE­: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado / Glucose excursions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with vildagliptin plus metformin Galvus Met®, versus glimepiride plus metformin -GLOBE-: Randomized clinical trial

Resumen Objetivos. La hemoglobina glicada podría sub-representar las fluctuaciones diarias de la glucemia. Se han propuesto múltiples técnicas para estudiar la variabilidad glucémica con el fin de conocer más claramente el control metabólico de la enfermedad. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar la variabilidad glucémica medida por MAGE y CONGA en el grupo de intervención y control; Además, comparar los resultados de variabilidad glucémica obtenidos antes y 12 semanas después del inicio del tratamiento en ambos grupos. Métodos. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, multicéntrico, de etiqueta abierta, fase IV. Cuarenta sujetos aleatorizados para recibir vildagliptina más metformina1 o glimepirida más metformina por un periodo de 12 semanas. Se realizaron monitoreos continuos de glicemia antes y después del periodo de tratamiento utilizando dispositivos iPro2. Se compararon los resultados de variabilidad glucémica medida por MAGE, CONGA y DET. Se comparó el perfil de seguridad y tolerabilidad de las intervenciones. Resultados. El uso de GalvusMet® o glimepirida más metformina por 12 semanas en pacientes diabéticos con mal control glucémico se asoció con una reducción estadísticamente significativa de la variabilidad glucémica (Valor p Wilcoxon

AbstractObjectives. Glycosylated hemoglobin could under-represent daily fluctuations in bloodglucose. Multiple techniques have been proposed to study glycemic variability in order to better understand the metabolic control of the disease. The objective of this study is to compare the glycemic variability measured by MAGE and CONGA in the intervention and control group; In addition, compare the glycemic variability results obtained before and 12 weeks after the start of treatment in both groups. Methods. Phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial.Forty subjects were randomized to receive vildagliptine plus metformin1 or glimepiride plus metformin for a period of 12 weeks. Continuous blood glucose monitoring was performed before and after the treatment period using iPro2 devices. The results of glycemic variability measured by MAGE, CONGA and DET were compared. The safety and tolerability profile of the interventions was compared. Results. The use of GalvusMet®ï¸ or glimepiride plus metformin for 12 weeks in diabetic patients with poorglycemic control was associated with a statistically significant reduction in glycemic variability (Wilcoxon p-value <0.005) and HbA1c (Wilcoxon p-value <0.005) in both groups;however, insufficient evidence was found to determine the superiority of the treatments. No differences were detected in the safety or tolerability profile of the drugs. Conclusions.The results of the study suggest that the evaluated treatment regimens are equivalent. Additional studies are required to determine the clinical significance of the results.

Exploring early combination strategy in Latin American patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a sub-analysis of the VERIFY study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Latin American countries face challenges in access to healthcare, leading to under-diagnosis, under-achievement of glycemic target, and long-term complications. Early diagnosis and treatment initiation are of paramount importance in this population due to the high prevalence of risk factors such as obesity and metabolic syndrome. The VERIFY study in patients with newly diagnosed T2DM (across 34 countries), assessed the normoglycemic durability (5 years), with early combination (EC) therapy approach versus the traditional stepwise approach of initiating treatment with metformin monotherapy (MET). Here we present the results from the VERIFY study for participants from eight countries in Latin America. METHODS: Newly diagnosed adult patients with T2DM, HbA1c 6.5-7.5% and body-mass index (BMI) of 22-40 kg/m2 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was time to initial treatment failure (TF; HbA1c ≥ 7.0% at two consecutive scheduled visits 13 weeks apart). Time to second TF was evaluated when patients in both groups were receiving and failing on the vildagliptin combination. Safety and tolerability were also assessed for both treatment approaches during the study. RESULTS: A total of 537 eligible patients (female, 58.8%) were randomly assigned to receive either EC (n = 266) or MET (n = 271). EC significantly reduced the relative risk of time to initial TF by 47% versus MET [HR (95% CI) 0.53 (0.4, 0.7) p < 0.0001]. Overall, 46.4% versus 66.3% of patients achieved the primary endpoint in the EC and MET groups, with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] time to TF of 59.8 (27.5, not evaluable) and 33.4 (12.2, 60.1) months, respectively. The risk for time to second TF was 31% lower with EC (p < 0.0092). A higher proportion of patients receiving EC maintained durable HbA1c < 7.0%, < 6.5%, and < 6.0%. Both treatment approaches were well tolerated, and only 3.2% of participants discontinued the study due to adverse events. All hypoglycemic events (EC: n = 7 and MET: n = 3) were single, mild episodes and did not lead to study discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Similar to the global population, long-term clinical benefits were achieved more frequently and without tolerability issues with EC versus standard-of-care MET in this Latin American sub-population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01528254.

Repurposing of antidiabetics as Serratia marcescens virulence inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Serratia marcescens becomes an apparent nosocomial pathogen and causes a variety of infections. S. marcescens possess various virulence factors that are regulated by intercellular communication system quorum sensing (QS). Targeting bacterial virulence is a proposed strategy to overcome bacterial resistance. Sitagliptin anti-QS activity has been demonstrated previously and we aimed in this study to investigate the effects of antidiabetic drugs vildagliptin and metformin compared to sitagliptin on S. marcescens pathogenesis. METHODS: We assessed the effects of tested drugs in subinhibitory concentrations phenotypically on the virulence factors and genotypically on the virulence encoding genes' expressions. The protection of tested drugs on S. marcescens pathogenesis was performed in vivo. Molecular docking study has been conducted to evaluate the interference capabilities of tested drugs to the SmaR QS receptor. RESULTS: Vildagliptin reduced the expression of virulence encoding genes but did not show in vitro or in vivo anti-virulence activities. Metformin reduced the expression of virulence encoding genes and inhibited bacterial virulence in vitro but did not show in vivo protection. Sitagliptin significantly inhibited virulence factors in vitro, reduced the expression of virulence factors and protected mice from S. marcescens. Docking study revealed that sitagliptin is more active than metformin and fully binds to SmaR receptor, whereas vildagliptin had single interaction to SmaR. CONCLUSION: The downregulation of virulence genes was not enough to show anti-virulence activities. Hindering of QS receptors may play a crucial role in diminishing bacterial virulence.

Reprotoxic activities of vildagliptin administration in male Wistar rats

Vildagliptin is an oral hypoglycemic agent used in the management of diabetes. Some oral antidiabetic drugs have been implicated in reproductive toxicity.The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of daily administration of vildagliptin at different dosages (0.35 mg/kg B.W., 0.70 mg/kg B.W. and 1.40 mg/kg B.W.) to male Wistar rats for 8 weeks. Sperm parameters, serum concentrations of testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone and the histology of the testis of the rats were assessed. Another set of rats were also treated for 8 weeks and allowed to recover and the same parameters were assessed in them. Fertility study was conducted by determining their litter size. The results showed that vildagliptin administration significantly reduced sperm count and motility of the treated rats. It also significantly increased the number of abnormal sperms. Serum level of testosterone was significantly decreased while luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone levels showed no significant change. The histoarchitecture of the testis of the treated rats appeared visibly normal. The litter size was also significantly reduced. Most of the changes observed were dose dependent. However, these parameters were restored towards normal in the recovery group. Our results suggest that vildagliptin adversely affected sperm parameters, affected litter size and disrupted the pituitary - gonadal axis. These changes were however reversed upon cessation of drug administration.

Acute Effects of Metformin and Vildagliptin after a Lipid-Rich Meal on Postprandial Microvascular Reactivity in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity are both related to endothelial dysfunction. Postprandial lipemia is a cardiovascular risk. Notably, it is known that a high-fat diet may elicit microvascular dysfunction, even in healthy subjects. Since anti-diabetic drugs have different mechanisms of action and also distinct vascular benefits, we aimed to compare the results of two anti-diabetic drugs after the intake of a lipid-rich meal on microcirculation in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. In parallel, we also investigated the metabolic profile, oxidative stress, inflammation, plasma viscosity, and some gastrointestinal peptides. SUBJECTS/METHODS: We included 38 drug-naïve patients, all women aged between 19 and 50 years, with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. We performed endothelial measurements and collected samples before (fasting) and after the intake of a lipid-rich meal at 30, 60, 120, and 180 min. Patients were randomized to metformin or vildagliptin, given orally just before the meal. Endothelial function was assessed by videocapillaroscopy and laser-Doppler flowmetry to investigate microvascular reactivity. Besides, we also investigated plasma viscosity, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, gastrointestinal peptides, and metabolic profile in all time points. RESULTS: No differences at baseline were noted between groups. Vildagliptin increased glucagon-like peptide-1 compared to metformin. Paired comparisons showed that, during the postprandial period, vildagliptin significantly changed levels of insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1, and also the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 activity, while metformin had effects on plasma glucose solely. Metformin use during the test meal promoted an increase in functional capillary density, while vildagliptin kept non-nutritive microvascular blood flow and vasomotion unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: After the intake of a lipid-rich meal, the use of vildagliptin preserved postprandial non-nutritive microflow and vasomotion, while metformin increased capillary recruitment, suggesting protective and different mechanisms of action on microcirculation.

Short-term renal and metabolic effects of low dose vildagliptin treatment added-on insulin therapy in non-proteinuric patients with type 2 diabetes: open-label randomized prospective study

ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this randomized comparative study was to assess renal and metabolic effects of vildagliptin in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients without overt chronic kidney disease. Subjects and methods We randomized 47 insulin-treated non-proteinuric patients with satisfactory controlled T2DM and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 either to continue insulin therapy (control) or to receive combined insulin-vildagliptin treatment (VIG group). We assessed eGFR using serum creatinine (eGFRcreat), cystatin C (eGFRcys), and both (eGFRcreat-cys), and urinary creatinine-adjusted excretion of albumin (UACR), type IV collagen (uCol IV/Cr), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL/Cr) at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Results Study groups were comparable in terms of age and sex (60.1 ± 6.1 years and 42.9% men in control group vs. 60.8 ± 5.2 years and 39.1% in VIG group). After 6 months of treatment, there were no significant changes in main assessed parameters in control group. VIG group demonstrated significant decrease in HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure, frequency of hypoglycemia, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level as compared to the changes in control group. While eGFRcreat, UACR, and uNGAL/Cr showed no significant changes after vildagliptin addition, eGFRcys, eGFRcreat-cys, and uCol IV/Cr changed significantly in comparison with control group (+7.0% [3.7;13.3]; +5.1% [1.4;8.5]; -32,8% [-55.8;-24.4], respectively, p < 0.01 each). Correlation and regression analysis revealed glucose-independent pattern of these changes. Conclusion Addition of vildagliptin to ongoing insulin therapy in patients with T2DM was associated with a reduction in uCol IV/Cr and an increase in eGFRcys and eGFRcreat-cys, independent of T2DM control parameters.

In vitro toxic evaluation of two gliptins and their main impurities of synthesis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of impurities in some drugs may compromise the safety and efficacy of the patient's treatment. Therefore, establishing of the biological safety of the impurities is essential. Diabetic patients are predisposed to tissue damage due to an increased oxidative stress process; and drug impurities may contribute to these toxic effects. In this context, the aim of this work was to study the toxicity, in 3 T3 cells, of the antidiabetic agents sitagliptin, vildagliptin, and their two main impurities of synthesis (S1 and S2; V1 and V2, respectively). METHODS: MTT reduction and neutral red uptake assays were performed in cytotoxicity tests. In addition, DNA damage (measured by comet assay), intracellular free radicals (by DCF), NO production, and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔψM) were evaluated. RESULTS: Cytotoxicity was observed for impurity V2. Free radicals generation was found at 1000 µM of sitagliptin and 10 µM of both vildagliptin impurities (V1 and V2). A decrease in NO production was observed for all vildagliptin concentrations. No alterations were observed in ΔψM or DNA damage at the tested concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the presence of impurities might increase the cytotoxicity and oxidative stress of the pharmaceutical formulations at the concentrations studied.

A randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of sulphonylurea gliclazide MR (modified release) and the DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on glycemic variability and control measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in Brazilian women with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a difference between the effects of vildagliptin and gliclazide MR (modified release) on glycemic variability (GV) in women with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) as evaluated by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). METHODS: An open-label, randomized study was conducted in T2DM women on steady-dose metformin monotherapy which were treated with 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily or 60-120 mg of gliclazide MR once daily. CGM and GV indices calculation were performed at baseline and after 24 weeks. RESULTS: In total, 42 patients (age: 61.9 ±â€¯5.9 years, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c): 7.3 ±â€¯0.56) were selected and 37 completed the 24-week protocol. Vildagliptin and gliclazide MR reduced GV, as measured by the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE, p = 0.007 and 0.034, respectively). The difference between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Vildagliptin also significantly decreased the standard deviation of the mean glucose (SD) and the mean of the daily differences (MODD) (p = 0.007 and 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Vildagliptin and gliclazide MR similarly reduced the MAGE in women with T2DM after 24 weeks of treatment. Further studies are required to attest differences between vildagliptin and gliclazide MR regarding glycemic variability.

Cost-effectiveness of vildagliptin for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Brazil; findings and implications.

INTRODUCTION: Vildagliptin is an inhibitor of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4, indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, combined or not with metformin. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vildagliptin in the Brazilian context. Areas covered: Using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Lilacs and CRD, six studies were selected for the economic models. This study utilised cost data in the Brazilian health system to provide the context. Expert commentary: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an epidemic disease and represents a challenge for all health care systems. Although guidelines clearly define first-line treatment, there are several other promising treatments. Vildagliptin is one of them, resulting in a mean lifetime increase of 0.31 years compared to metformin alone and 1.19 more life years compared to other metformin combinations. Considering observational data, life years with dual vildagliptin-containing treatments were 0.37 more compared to other dual treatments. However, its high cost versus generic metformin and its unclear safety profile weakens its subsequent cost-effectiveness. Consequently, the incorporation of vildagliptin or its combination with metformin is currently not recommended for the Brazilian Health Care System. This may change as more data becomes available.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibition Exerts Renoprotective Effects in Rats with Established Heart Failure.

Circulating dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) activity is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes in humans and experimental heart failure (HF) models, suggesting that DPPIV may play a role in the pathophysiology of this syndrome. Renal dysfunction is one of the key features of HF, but it remains to be determined whether DPPIV inhibitors are capable of improving cardiorenal function after the onset of HF. Therefore, the present study aimed to test the hypothesis that DPPIV inhibition by vildagliptin improves renal water and salt handling and exerts anti-proteinuric effects in rats with established HF. To this end, male Wistar rats were subjected to left ventricle (LV) radiofrequency ablation or sham operation. Six weeks after surgery, radiofrequency-ablated rats who developed HF were randomly divided into two groups and treated for 4 weeks with vildagliptin (120 mg/kg/day) or vehicle by oral gavage. Echocardiography was performed before (pretreatment) and at the end of treatment (post-treatment) to evaluate cardiac function. The fractional area change (FAC) increased (34 ± 5 vs. 45 ± 3%, p < 0.05), and the isovolumic relaxation time decreased (33 ± 2 vs. 27 ± 1 ms; p < 0.05) in HF rats treated with vildagliptin (post-treatment vs. pretreatment). On the other hand, cardiac dysfunction deteriorated further in vehicle-treated HF rats. Renal function was impaired in vehicle-treated HF rats as evidenced by fluid retention, low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and high levels of urinary protein excretion. Vildagliptin treatment restored urinary flow, GFR, urinary sodium and urinary protein excretion to sham levels. Restoration of renal function in HF rats by DPPIV inhibition was associated with increased active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) serum concentration, reduced DPPIV activity and increased activity of protein kinase A in the renal cortex. Furthermore, the anti-proteinuric effect of vildagliptin treatment in rats with established HF was associated with upregulation of the apical proximal tubule endocytic receptor megalin and of the podocyte main slit diaphragm proteins nephrin and podocin. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that DPPIV inhibition exerts renoprotective effects and ameliorates cardiorenal function in rats with established HF. Long-term studies with DPPIV inhibitors are needed to ascertain whether these effects ultimately translate into improved clinical outcomes.

Comparative effectiveness of vildagliptin in combination with other oral anti-diabetes agents in usual-care conditions: the EDGE-Latin America study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of patients on vildagliptin add-on dual therapy who respond to treatment over a 12 month follow-up, relative to comparator oral anti-diabetes dual therapy, in a usual care setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) aged 18 years and older from 311 centers in Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico and Venezuela. Patients were taking monotherapy with an oral anti-diabetes drug (OAD), and were prescribed a new add-on OAD based on the judgment of their personal physician. According to this choice, patients were assigned to one of the two cohorts: vildagliptin or comparator OADs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an A1c drop >0.3% without edema, hypoglycemia, weight gain or discontinuation due to gastrointestinal (GI) events. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with baseline A1c ≥7% who reached the goal of an A1c <7% without hypoglycemia or weight gain. RESULTS: The per-protocol population (a subset of the intention-to-treat population that excluded patients with pre-specified protocol deviations) comprised 3773 patients, 3002 in the vildagliptin cohort and 771 in the comparator cohort. The proportion of patients reaching the primary endpoint was higher in the vildagliptin cohort (60.3%) than the comparator cohort (50.7%), OR 1.48 (95% CI: 1.25-1.73). The same was observed for the secondary endpoint (44.8 versus 33.1%) OR 1.64 (95% CI: 1.37-1.98). The incidence of adverse events was low and similar between treatment cohorts. CONCLUSION: In a usual care setting, patients treated with a vildagliptin combination succeeded in lowering A1c to <7%, without weight gain, hypoglycemia or peripheral edema more often than patients treated with comparator combinations, without increased risk of adverse events. Key limitations are the observational nature of the study and its relatively limited 12 month timeframe.

Validation of LC-MS/MS method applied to evaluation of free tissue concentrations of vildagliptin in diabetic rats by microdialysis.

A novel LC-MS/MS method was developed for the quantification of vildagliptin in an aqueous matrix. The method was successfully validated, meeting all the requisites of US Food and Drug Administration guide for a bioanalytical method. The developed method presented a limit of quantification of 10 ng/mL and the range of concentration achieved was 10-1875 ng/mL. The injection volume necessary was only 10 µL, and retention time was 4.60 min. The mobile phase employed was methanol-ammonium acetate 5 mm (95:5). The stability of the drug was evaluated in the different conditions through which the samples passed. A pharmacokinetic experiment was conducted with diabetic male Wistar rats, and the concentration of drug in liver was evaluated through a microdialysis technique. The perfusion fluid employed was ultrapure water. The dose administrated was 50 mg/kg and the method allowed the quantification of vildagliptin for more than three half lives, successfully characterizing the pharmacokinetic profile when the developed method was applied. This is the first report on the tissue pharmacokinetics of a DPP-4 inhibitor and could contribute to drug dosage optimization in the future.

Efecto de la combinación fija de Vildagliptina/Metformina o Sitagliptina/Metformina sobre la lipemia postprandial en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2

Objetivo: evaluar el efecto de la combinación fija de vildagliptina o sitagliptina con metformina sobre la lipemia postprandial (PP) en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) previamente tratados solo con metformina. Métodos: cincuenta y siete pacientes con DM2 tratados con metformina y dieta, con valores de HbA1c entre 6,5-8,5% participaron en estudio aleatorizado, doble ciego de 8 semanas. Los participantes recibieron una carga oral de grasa antes y después de 8 semanas de la administración aleatorizada de combinación fija vildagliptina/metformina(grupo 1; n=29) o sitagliptina/metformina (grupo2; n = 28). Muestras de sangre se tomaron basalmente y a intervalos de 2 horas durante 8 horas después de la ingestión de la carga grasa. Resultados: la respuesta PP integrada de triglicéridos (AUC-TG) disminuyó en el 76% de los pacientes del grupo 1 y en el 64% del grupo 2. El perfil lipídico en ayunas no mostró cambios significativos post tratamiento. La glucosa en ayunas y 2h PP y la HbA1c disminuyeron significativamente en ambos grupos (p<0,01) acompañado de una disminución del IMC y la presión arterial (p<0,01). No se observaron efectos adversos. Conclusiones: además de mejorar el control glucémico, el tratamiento con combinación fija de vildagliptina/metformina o sitagliptina/metformina tiene un efecto beneficioso similar sobre la lipemia PP, lo cual es importante para mejorar el riesgo cardiometabólico de los pacientes con DM2.

Objective: to assess the effect of fixed combination of vildagiptin/metformin and sitagliptina/ metformin on postprandiallipemia (PP) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Methods: fifty-seven patients with DM2 previously treated with metformin and diet and HbA1c between 6,5-8,5% participated in a 8 weeks randomized, double blind study. An oral fat load was performed at baseline and 8 weeks after treatment with fixed combination of vildagliptin/metformin (grupo 1; n=29) or sitagliptin/metformin (group 2; n=28) twice a day. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 2 hours interval during 8 hours after oral fat load. Results: integrated postprandial triglyceride response (AUC-TG) decreased in 76% of patients of group 1 and 64% of group 2. Fasting lipoprotein profile did not show significant changes post treatment. Both fasting and 2h postprandial glucose and HbA1c showed a significant decrease in both groups, in association with a decrease of body mass index and blood pressure (p<0,001). No adverse effects were observed. Conclusions: besides improving glucose control, fixed combination of vildagliptin/metformina or sitagliptina/metformin treatment has a beneficial effect postprandial lipemia which is important to improve the cardiometabolic risk of type 2 patients.

Effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of diabetic patients nonresponsive to the combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea / Eficácia da adição de vildagliptina ao tratamento de pacientes diabéticos não responsivos à combinação de metformina e uma sulfonilureia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding vildagliptin to the treatment of patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with a combination of metformin and a sulphonylurea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 37 T2DM patients with HbA1c ranging from 7.7 percent to 12.4 percent (mean of 9.30 ± 1.38), despite the use of metformin in combination with a sulphonylurea, were additionally treated with vildagliptin (100 mg/day) for at least 6 months. RESULTS: During triple oral therapy (TOT) HbA1c levels < 7 percent were achieved in 11 patients (29.7 percent), whereas levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 120 mg/dL were observed in 12 patients (32.4 percent). Both findings were observed in 10 patients (27.0 percent). Compared to nonresponsive subjects, lower mean baseline HbA1c and FPG levels were seen in responsive patients, but the difference was only statistically significant for fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Moreover, there was considerable overlap between the two groups. CONLUSION: Our preliminary results suggest that TOT with metformin, a sulphonylurea and vildagliptin may be useful for some T2DM patients nonresponsive to combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia da adição de vildagliptina ao tratamento de pacientes com diabetes melito tipo 2 (DM2) inadequadamente controlados com a terapia de combinação com metformina e sulfonilureia. SUJEITOS E MÉTODOS: 37 pacientes com DM2 e HbA1c variando entre 7,7 por cento e 12,4 por cento (média, 9,30 ± 1,38), apesar do uso de metformina associada a uma sulfonilureia, foram adicionalmente tratados com vildagliptina (100 mg/dia) durante, pelo menos, 6 meses. RESULTADOS: Durante a terapia oral tripla TOT), níveis de HbA1c < 7 por cento foram alcançados em 11 pacientes (27,9 por cento), enquanto a glicemia de jejum (GJ) < 120 mg/dL foi observada em 12 pacientes (32,4.1 por cento). Ambos os resultados foram descritos em 10 pacientes (27,0 por cento). Em comparação com indivíduos não responsivos, os pacientes responsivos tinham níveis basais mais baixos de HbA1c e GJ, mas a diferença foi estatisticamente significativa somente para glicemia de jejum. Além disso, houve grande sobre-posição entre os dois grupos. CONSLUSÃO: Nossos resultados preliminares sugerem que a TOT com metformina, uma sulfonilureia e vildagliptina pode ser útil para alguns pacientes com DM2 não responsivos à combinação com metformina e uma sulfonilureia.