Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancers: Perioperative and oncological outcomes from a multicentre case series.

BACKGROUND: Around 20% of rectal tumors are locally advanced with invasion into adjacent structures at presentation. These may require surgical resections beyond boundaries of total mesorectal excision (bTME) for radicality. Robotic bTME is under investigation. This study reports perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic bTME for locally advanced rectal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected robotic bTME resections (July 2015-November 2020). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated. RESULTS: One-hundred-sixty-eight patients (eight centres) were included. Median age and BMI were 60.0 (50.0-68.7) years and 24.0 (24.4-27.7) kg/m2. Female sex was prevalent (n = 95, 56.8%). Fifty patients (29.6%) were ASA III-IV. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was given to 125 (74.4%) patients. Median operative time was 314.0 (260.0-450.0) minutes. Median estimated blood loss was 150.0 (27.5-500.0) ml. Conversion to laparotomy was seen in 4.8%. Postoperative complications occurred in 77 (45.8%) patients; 27.3% and 3.9% were Clavien-Dindo III and IV, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% (n = 2). R0 rate was 92.9%. Adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to 72 (42.9%) patients. Median follow-up was 34.0 (10.0-65.7) months. Distant and local recurrences were seen in 35 (20.8%) and 15 patients (8.9%), respectively. Overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 91.7, 82.1, and 76.8%. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5-years was 84.0, 74.5, and 69.2%. CONCLUSION: Robotic bTME is technically safe with relatively low conversion rate, good OS, and acceptable DFS in the hands of experienced surgeons in high volume centres. In selected cases robotic approach allows for high R0 rates during bTME.

Reconsidering resectable oncological conditions in pancreatic tail cancer: A multicenter retrospective study on prognostic factors in pancreatic tail cancer after resection (HOPS Pt-01).

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic tail cancer (Pt-PC) is generally considered resectable when metastasis is absent, but doubts persist in clinical practice due to the variability in local tumor extent. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study to comprehensively identify prognostic factors associated with Pt-PC after resection. METHODS: We enrolled 100 patients that underwent distal pancreatectomy. The optimal combination of factors influencing relapse-free survival (RFS) was determined using the maximum likelihood method (MLM) and corrected Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (AICc and BIC). Prognostic elements were then validated to predict oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Therapeutic interventions included neoadjuvant treatment in 16 patients and concomitant visceral resection (CVR) in 37 patients; 89 patients achieved R0. Median RFS and OS after surgery were 23.1 and 37.1 months, respectively. AICc/BIC were minimized in the model with ASA-PS (≥2), CA19-9 (≥112 U/mL at baseline, non-normalized postoperatively), need for CVR, 6 pathological items (tumor diameter ≥19.5 mm, histology G1, invasion of the anterior pancreatic border, splenic vein invasion, splenic artery invasion, lymph node metastasis), and completed adjuvant treatment (cAT) for RFS. Regarding the predictive value of these 11 factors, area under the curve was 0.842 for 5-year RFS. Multivariate analysis of these 11 factors showed that predictors of RFS include CVR (hazard ratio, 2.13; 95 % confidence interval, 1.08-4.19; p = 0.028) and cAT (0.38, 0.19-0.76; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The MLM identified certain Pt-PC cases warranting consideration beyond resectable during clinical management. Particular attention should be paid to conditions requiring CVR, even though immortal time bias remains unresolved with adjuvant treatment.

Multi-visceral resection for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis from European countries.

BACKGROUND: Due to delayed diagnosis and a lower surgical indication rate, left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is often associated with a poor prognosis in comparison to pancreatic head tumors. Multi-visceral resections (MVR) associated with distal pancreatectomy could be proposed for patients presenting with locally infiltrating disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a multi-centric cohort of left-sided PDAC patients operated on from 2009 to 2020. Thirteen European high-volume HPB centers participated in this study. We analyzed patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) associated with MVR and compared them to standard DP patients. RESULTS: Among 258 patients treated curatively for PDAC of the body and tail, 28 patients successfully underwent MVR. A longer operative time was observed in the MVR group (295 min +/- 74 vs. 250 min +/- 96, p= 0.248). The post-operative complication rate was comparable between the two groups (46.4% in the MVR group vs. 62.2% in the control group, p= 0.108). The incidence of positive margin (R1) was similar between the two groups (28.6% vs. 26.6%; p=0.827). After a median follow-up of 25 (9-111) months, overall survival was comparable between the two groups (p= 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: Multi-visceral resection in left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible and should be considered in selected cases as it seems to provide acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes.

Outcomes following open versus laparoscopic multi-visceral resection for locally advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to compare morbidity, mortality, oncological safety, and survival outcomes after laparoscopic multi-visceral resection (MVR) of the locally advanced primary colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with open surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of multiple electronic data sources was conducted, and all studies comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with locally advanced CRC undergoing MVR were selected. The primary endpoints were peri-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints were R0 and R1 resection, local and distant disease recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. RevMan 5.3 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Ten comparative observational studies reporting a total of 936 patients undergoing laparoscopic MVR (n = 452) and open surgery (n = 484) were identified. Primary outcome analysis demonstrated a significantly longer operative time in laparoscopic surgery compared with open operations (P = 0.008). However, intra-operative blood loss (P<0.00001) and wound infection (P = 0.05) favoured laparoscopy. Anastomotic leak rate (P = 0.91), intra-abdominal abscess formation (P = 0.40), and mortality rates (P = 0.87) were comparable between the two groups. Moreover the total number of harvested lymph nodes, R0/R1 resections, local/distant disease recurrence, DFS, and OS rates were also comparable between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although inherent limitations exist with observational studies, the available evidence demonstrates that laparoscopic MVR in locally advanced CRC seems to be a feasible and oncologically safe surgical option in carefully selected cohorts.

Oligometastatic disease and visceral resections in advanced malignant melanoma: a propensity-matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Malignant melanoma is among the tumours with the highest increase in incidence of solid tumours in Germany. While most patients are diagnosed at an early stage and show a good prognosis, advanced stages of malignant melanoma are accompanied with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Comparable to other tumour entities, the resection of visceral metastases could lead to a better prognosis. Supplementary, the subgroup of oligometastatic patients might benefit from surgical therapy to a greater extent. METHODS: This retrospective study analysed 351 patients treated between 2006 and 2017 at the University Hospital of Cologne. A total of 121 patients showed visceral metastases, with which we compared patients with a diffuse tumour spread to patients in an oligometastatic state. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of visceral resection of oligometastatic, malignant melanoma. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that patients with an oligometastatic malignant melanoma had a significantly better prognosis than patients with a diffuse pattern of metastases, if they showed visceral metastases. Furthermore, the resection of visceral metastases leads to a significant gain in median overall survival time (13.6 vs. 34.2 months) and in progression-free survival (9.6 vs. 3.8 months). CONCLUSION: The resection of visceral metastases is a rational treatment option in advanced malignant melanoma. Although our study is limited by a small cohort of patients (n = 18), we believe that the resection of visceral metastases will be fundamental in the treatment of malignant melanoma. In particular, patients in an oligometastatic stage could be an eligible group for surgical treatment.

Does Aggressive Surgery Mean Worse Quality of Life and Functional Capacity in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients?-A Retrospective Study of 161 Patients from China.

The mainstay of treatment for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is surgery. However, whether multiple visceral resection (MVR) affects patients' quality of life compared with simple tumor resection has not been reported. Patients with primary RPS who underwent radical resection between 2009 and 2021 were included. Patients who were alive at the last follow-up were asked to complete the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The primary endpoint of the study was the global health (GH) score. A total of 161 patients were included, including 77 in the MVR group and 84 in the non-MVR group. When comparing EORTC scores on functional domains and symptom scales between MVR and non-MVR groups, only constipation scores differed (p = 0.011). Comparing GH scores within 6 months after surgery between the two groups, GH was better in non-MVR patients (58.3 vs. 76.4, p = 0.082). However, patients with longer postoperative intervals in the MVR group had higher scores (p < 0.001), and patients with postoperative intervals of more than one year scored similar to those in the non-MVR group (64.7 vs. 59.2, p = 0.522). As the postoperative interval increased, there was an improvement in all indicators in MVR patients, while there was no significant improvement in non-MVR patients. Aggressive surgical approaches impair quality of life within 6 months postoperatively, but the long-term quality of life is similar to that of patients undergoing simple tumor resection. This should be factored into RPS treatment decisions.

The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection - A Retrospective Study.

Background: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection. Methods: All patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred. Results: Thirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value < 0.001). Conclusions: Resection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection.

Implementación de un centro de referencia regional en cirugía pancreática. Experiencia tras 631 procedimientos / Implementation of a regional reference center in pancreatic surgery. Experience after 631 procedures

Introducción: El objetivo principal de este estudio es determinar si la Unidad de Cirugía Hepato-Bilio-Pancreática y Trasplante Hepático del Hospital Universitario de Badajoz cumple los estándares de calidad exigidos por la comunidad científica a los centros de referencia de cirugía pancreática (CP) en términos de resultados perioperatorios. Los objetivos secundarios consisten en comparar las diferentes técnicas de CP realizadas en función de la morbimortalidad postoperatoria precoz y analizar el impacto de las resecciones extendidas en dichos términos. Método: Estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y unicéntrico, correspondiente al periodo 2006-2019. Se compararon los resultados obtenidos con los estándares de calidad propuestos por Bassi et al. y Sabater et al., exigidos a los centros de referencia en cirugía pancreática. La muestra se dividió según técnica quirúrgica y se compararon en términos de morbimortalidad postoperatoria precoz, estudiando el impacto de las resecciones vasculares y viscerales extendidas. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes sometidos a cirugía pancreática en nuestra unidad por patología pancreática, maligna y benigna, desde que ésta se implementó como centro de referencia. Se excluyeron las realizadas de urgencia. Resultados: Se analizaron 631 pacientes. Los valores obtenidos en los estándares de calidad se encuentran en rango. La cirugía más frecuente fue duodenopancreatectomía cefálica, la cual asoció mayor tasa de morbimortalidad perioperatoria (p ≤ 0,05). Las resecciones vasculares añadidas impactaron en el grupo de duodenopancreatectomía cefálica asociando mayor estancia media (p = 0,01) y mayor tasa de reintervención (p = 0,02). Conclusiones: La experiencia acumulada permite cumplir con los estándares de calidad exigidos, así como realizar resecciones extendidas a la pancreatectomía con buenos resultados en términos de morbimortalidad postoperatoria. (AU)

Introduction: The main objective of this study is to determine if our unit meets the quality standards required by the scientific community from the reference centers for pancreatic surgery in terms of peri-operative results. The secondary objectives are to compare the different pancreatic surgery techniques performed in terms of early post-operative morbidity and mortality and to analyze the impact of the resections added in these terms. Method: Descriptive, retrospective and single-center study, corresponding to the period 2006-2019. The results obtained were compared with the proposed quality standards, by Bassi et al. and Sabater et al., required from the reference centers in pancreatic surgery. The sample was divided according to surgical technique and compared in terms of early post-operative morbidity and mortality, studying the impact of extended vascular and visceral resections. All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery in our unit due to pancreatic, malignant and benign pathology were included, since it was implemented as a reference center. Emergency procedures were excluded. Results: 631 patients were analyzed. The values ??obtained in the quality standards are in range. The most frequent surgery was cephalic duodenopancreatectomy, which associated higher peri-operative morbidity and mortality rates (p ≤ 0.05). The extended vascular resections impacted the cephalic duodenopancreatectomy group, associating a longer mean stay (p = 0.01) and a higher rate of re-interventions (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The experience accumulated allows to meet the required quality standards, as well as perform extended resections to pancreatectomy with good results in terms of post-operative morbi-mortality.

Implementation of a regional reference center in pancreatic surgery. Experience after 631 procedures.

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this study is to determine whether our unit meets the quality standards required by the scientific community from the reference centers for pancreatic surgery in terms of peri-operative results. The secondary objectives are to compare the different pancreatic surgery techniques performed in terms of early post-operative morbidity and mortality and to analyze the impact of the resections added in these terms. METHOD: Descriptive, retrospective and single-center study, corresponding to the period 2006-2019. The results obtained were compared with the proposed quality standards, by Bassi et al. and Sabater et al., required from the reference centers in pancreatic surgery. The sample was divided according to surgical technique and compared in terms of early post-operative morbidity and mortality, studying the impact of extended vascular and visceral resections. All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery in our unit due to pancreatic, malignant and benign pathology were included, since it was implemented as a reference center. Emergency procedures were excluded. RESULTS: 631 patients were analyzed. The values ​​obtained in the quality standards are in range. The most frequent surgery was pancreaticoduodenectomy, which associated higher peri-operative morbidity and mortality rates (P ≤ .05). The extended vascular resections impacted the pancreaticoduodenectomy group, associating a longer mean stay (P = .01) and a higher rate of re-interventions (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The experience accumulated allows to meet the required quality standards, as well as perform extended resections to pancreatectomy with good results in terms of post-operative morbidity and mortality.

Implementation of a regional reference center in pancreatic surgery. Experience after 631 procedures. / Implementación de un centro de referencia regional en cirugía pancreática. Experiencia tras 631 procedimientos.

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this study is to determine if our unit meets the quality standards required by the scientific community from the reference centers for pancreatic surgery in terms of peri-operative results. The secondary objectives are to compare the different pancreatic surgery techniques performed in terms of early post-operative morbidity and mortality and to analyze the impact of the resections added in these terms. METHOD: Descriptive, retrospective and single-center study, corresponding to the period 2006-2019. The results obtained were compared with the proposed quality standards, by Bassi et al. and Sabater et al., required from the reference centers in pancreatic surgery. The sample was divided according to surgical technique and compared in terms of early post-operative morbidity and mortality, studying the impact of extended vascular and visceral resections. All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery in our unit due to pancreatic, malignant and benign pathology were included, since it was implemented as a reference center. Emergency procedures were excluded. RESULTS: 631 patients were analyzed. The values ??obtained in the quality standards are in range. The most frequent surgery was cephalic duodenopancreatectomy, which associated higher peri-operative morbidity and mortality rates (p ≤ 0.05). The extended vascular resections impacted the cephalic duodenopancreatectomy group, associating a longer mean stay (p = 0.01) and a higher rate of re-interventions (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The experience accumulated allows to meet the required quality standards, as well as perform extended resections to pancreatectomy with good results in terms of post-operative morbi-mortality.

Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic colon cancer resection for T4 lesions: a case-control analysis of 7-years' experience.

BACKGROUND: According to many Societies' guidelines, patients presenting with clinical T4 colorectal cancer should conventionally be approached by a laparotomy. Results of emerging series are questioning this attitude. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the oncologic outcomes of 147 patients operated on between June 2008 and September 2015 for histologically proven pT4 colon cancers. All patients were treated with curative intent, either by a laparoscopic or open "en bloc" resection. RESULTS: Median operative time, blood loss and hospital length of stay were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative surgical complication rate and 30-day mortality did not significantly differ between the two groups ( p = 0.09 and p = 0.99, respectively). R1 resection rate and lymph nodes harvest, as well, did not remarkably differ when comparing the two groups. In the laparoscopic group, conversion rate was 19%. Long-term outcomes were not affected in patients who had undergone conversion. Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival did not significantly differ between the two groups (44.6% and 40.3% vs. 39.4% and 38.9%). Locally advanced stages (IIIB-IIIC) and R1 resections were detected as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach might be safe and acceptable for locally advanced colon cancer and does not jeopardize the oncologic results. Conversion to open surgery should be a part of a strategy as it does not seem to adversely affect perioperative and long-term outcomes. We consider laparoscopy, in expert hands, the last diagnostic tool and the first therapeutic approach for well-selected locally advanced colon cancers. Larger prospective studies are needed to widely assess this issue.

Extensive Multi-visceral Resection for a Malignant Retroperitoneal Tumour.

Complete surgical resection is the best treatment option for retroperitoneal sarcomas even if it entails a multi-visceral resection. The extent of surgery is determined not only by the aggressiveness of the tumour but also by its location. This report presents a challenging case of retroperitoneal sarcoma and describes the planning and decision-making that resulted in the success of such an extensive surgical procedure.

Analysis of prognostic factors and the related factors on subtype transformation of ret-roperitoneal liposarcoma / 中国肿瘤临床

Objective:To retrospectively analyze related factors of subtype transformation and to identify prognostic factors for pa-tients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS). Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 92 patients with RPLS, which were confirmed by postoperative pathology from July 1997 to October 2014 in Henan Provincial Tumor Hospital. Related studies were reviewed, and the prognoses were followed up. The factors may affect subtype transformation or prognoses were applied to the statistical analysis. Results:A total of 74 patients with RPLS were included according to the recruiting standard. The 5-year survival rate was 48.65%. Lobulated tumors (P=0.013) were the correlative factors that influenced subtype transformation. The Log-rank test showed that the age at diagnosis (P=0.045), multi-visceral resection (P=0.042), tumor necrosis (P<0.001), subtype transformation (P<0.001), and malignant level of pathological subtypes of the first operation (P<0.001) influenced overall survival. Multivariate Cox re-gression analysis showed that tumor necrosis and the malignant level of the initial histological grade were independent factors of over-all survival. Conclusion:Lobulated tumors are likely to transform the subtype. The prognosis of patients with RPLS is correlated with multi-visceral resection, tumors necrosis, subtype transformation, and the malignant level of pathological subtypes of the first opera-tion. Multi-visceral resection could not improve the 5-year survival rate of RPLS, and adjuvant therapy could not improve the prognosis.

Laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer directly invading the urinary bladder: A case report of low anterior resection with en bloc cystectomy for sphincter preservation.

Laparoscopic multi-visceral resection in patients with T4 colorectal cancer remains controversial. A 73-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for rectosigmoid cancer directly invading the urinary bladder trigone without distant metastasis. We successfully performed complete resection by laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration while preserving the anus. After laparoscopic mobilization of the rectum, urinary bladder, and prostate, the urethra and urethral catheter were dissected to reveal the lower rectum. By pulling the urethral catheter toward the head, the prostate was excised retrogradely from the lower rectum anterior wall. The lower rectum was resected and anastomosed by the double stapling technique with a safe distal margin from the tumor. Pathological findings of the resected specimen indicated no residual tumor in the surgical margin. There was no evidence of recurrence 34 months after surgery. En bloc, R0, laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for T4 rectal cancer is feasible. However, further studies with long-term follow-up are required to resolve oncological outcomes.

Multiple visceral resection for giant non-secretory adrenocortical carcinoma in an elderly patient: a case report.

Adrenocortical carcinomas are rare tumors in adults. They can be hormonally active and detected by a hormonal excess, or be non-secretory tumors. In the latter case, they become symptomatic after a long period of growth, usually after they have already invaded the surrounding tissues. In these cases, multiple visceral resections are sometimes required in order to obtain a complete R0 resection. We present the case of a 65-year-old patient who was addressed to our service for a giant abdominal tumor with compression phenomena in whom we performed a complete resection en bloc with left nephrectomy and adrenalectomy, distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, left colectomy and para-aortic lymph node dissection. The early postoperative course was uneventful, the patient was discharged eight days after surgery. The histopathological findings revealed an adrenocortical carcinoma with no lymph node metastases.