A Twist in Perception: A Case of an Eight-Year-Old Female With Alice in Wonderland Syndrome.

The article aims to explore the challenges involved in diagnosing and managing Alice in Wonderland Syndrome (AIWS) in pediatric cases, focusing on an eight-year-old female with perceptual distortions affecting vision, hearing, and time perception. AIWS, a rare neurological phenomenon, manifests as distortions in the perception of the body and external stimuli. The lack of established diagnostic criteria, particularly in the pediatric population, complicates accurate identification. The presented case illustrates visual anomalies, auditory abnormalities, and tachysensia, emphasizing the multisensory nature of AIWS. The temporal association with underlying causes, such as migraines and viral infections, highlights the need for a comprehensive evaluation. The Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital management approach involves a systematic assessment, identification of underlying chronic conditions, and targeted treatment. Migraine prophylaxis, utilizing prescription drugs and a low-tyramine diet, plays a central role. The limited use of antipsychotics underscores the neurological origin of AIWS. The article contributes valuable insights into pediatric AIWS, advocating for further research and awareness. The article also aims to highlight the lack of established diagnostic criteria for AIWS, particularly in the pediatric population, and to present a systematic management approach based on a specific case study. The multidisciplinary collaboration, regular follow-ups, and patient education constitute a comprehensive approach to enhance understanding and alleviate symptoms in AIWS cases.

Efficacy of optometric phototherapy: a systematic review

PurposeTo analyse the scientific evidence about the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy for producing changes in visual function.Material and methodsA systematic review was performed to obtain studies on the effects of Syntonic phototherapy on vision. A search in health science databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO) for studies published between 1980 and 2022 was conducted in accordance with the principles of Cochrane approach. The search identified 197 articles. Only clinical studies which used the Syntonic phototherapy as a vision therapy for any visual condition were included. Clinical cases and case series were excluded. Following the inclusion criteria, 8 clinical studies met inclusion, 5 of them being pseudo-experimental studies with an equivalent control group and 3 pre-post pseudo-experimental studies. GRADE tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence of the studies. The GRADE evidence profile for the studies through the Soft table was made to analyse data.ResultsThe studies analysed seven outcomes: visual symptoms, functional visual fields, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, deviation (phoria/tropia), stereopsis and reading abilities. Finding table about results (Soft Table) showed that for all outcomes reviewed, all studies yielded very low certainty of evidence. Results revealed a lack of scientific evidence of the efficacy of Syntonic optometric phototherapy to produce changes in the visual function.ConclusionThis systematic review found no consistent evidence for the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy to cause changes in visual function. There is no scientific evidence to support its clinical use for treating any type of visual anomalies. (AU)

Efficacy of optometric phototherapy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To analyse the scientific evidence about the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy for producing changes in visual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed to obtain studies on the effects of Syntonic phototherapy on vision. A search in health science databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO) for studies published between 1980 and 2022 was conducted in accordance with the principles of Cochrane approach. The search identified 197 articles. Only clinical studies which used the Syntonic phototherapy as a vision therapy for any visual condition were included. Clinical cases and case series were excluded. Following the inclusion criteria, 8 clinical studies met inclusion, 5 of them being pseudo-experimental studies with an equivalent control group and 3 pre-post pseudo-experimental studies. GRADE tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence of the studies. The GRADE evidence profile for the studies through the Soft table was made to analyse data. RESULTS: The studies analysed seven outcomes: visual symptoms, functional visual fields, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, deviation (phoria/tropia), stereopsis and reading abilities. Finding table about results (Soft Table) showed that for all outcomes reviewed, all studies yielded very low certainty of evidence. Results revealed a lack of scientific evidence of the efficacy of Syntonic optometric phototherapy to produce changes in the visual function. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found no consistent evidence for the efficacy of Syntonic phototherapy to cause changes in visual function. There is no scientific evidence to support its clinical use for treating any type of visual anomalies.