Comparison of intramuscular haloperidol and other short-acting injectable antipsychotics for management of acute agitation in an adult inpatient psychiatry unit.

Introduction: There is no consensus on the optimal antipsychotic for acute agitation. Whereas haloperidol is frequently used and has proven efficacy, second generation antipsychotics show similar efficacy and improved safety and tolerability. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of short-acting intramuscular (IM) haloperidol versus other IM antipsychotics for acute agitation in adults admitted to an inpatient psychiatry unit. Methods: This was a retrospective medical record review of patients who received 1 or more doses of a short-acting IM antipsychotic, including chlorpromazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, or ziprasidone. The primary endpoint was the need for subsequent IM antipsychotic(s) or physical restraint within 2 hours of the initial IM antipsychotic. Secondary endpoints assessed outcomes at 24 hours and adverse events. Results: One hundred six patients were included. Four patients in the haloperidol group and 0 patients in the other antipsychotic group received an additional IM antipsychotic or required physical restraints within 2 hours (5.3% versus 0%, p = .319). More patients in the other antipsychotic group required an additional dose of IM antipsychotic within 24 hours compared with the haloperidol group (p = .0096). More adverse events were seen in patients who received haloperidol. Discussion: Haloperidol was used more frequently than other short-acting IM antipsychotics. Whereas the effectiveness at 2 hours was not significantly different between groups, patients who received haloperidol were more likely to experience adverse events and were more often subjected to polypharmacy with benzodiazepines and/or diphenhydramine. This study further supports the use of olanzapine and ziprasidone for acute agitation in patients hospitalized in inpatient psychiatry.

Tricyclic Antidepressant and Antipsychotic Toxicity: Clomipramine and Ziprasidone Overdose.

This case report details an intentional overdose attempt utilizing tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and atypical antipsychotics with significant neurologic, pulmonary, and cardiac toxicity. In conjunction with the local poison control center, progression of the clinical toxidrome was anticipated, aggressively managed, and successfully treated. This case highlights the dangers of significant TCA toxicity, peak onset of toxicity within six hours, and the amplification of clinical toxidromes with co-ingestions.

Atypical Presentation of Ziprasidone-Induced Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome: A Case Report.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a severe adverse reaction associated with neuroleptic or antipsychotic drugs. This case report discusses a 43-year-old man with a history of bipolar disorder and polysubstance abuse who presented with altered mental status, autonomic dysfunction, and muscular rigidity. The patient had recently started on ziprasidone, a second-generation antipsychotic, leading to an atypical presentation of NMS. Unlike classic findings associated with NMS induced by first-generation antipsychotics, this case lacked high fever, lead pipe rigidity, or elevated creatine kinase levels greater than 1000 on initial presentation. The delay in diagnosis was attributed to the milder symptoms and absence of typical findings, resulting in extensive diagnostic workup and interventions. The patient responded positively to treatment with lorazepam based on the Woodbury severity stage guidelines. This case underscores the complexity of diagnosing NMS induced by second-generation antipsychotics and highlights the need for awareness and tailored treatment approaches for atypical presentations.

Ziprasidone population pharmacokinetics and co-medication effects in Chinese patients.

Ziprasidone is widely used in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Despite its prevalence, there is a notable lack of population pharmacokinetics (PPK) studies on ziprasidone in serum, both domestically and internationally. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the various factors influencing the PPK characteristics of Ziprasidone, thereby providing a scientific basis for personalized treatment strategies in clinical settings. This is a retrospective study. A non-linear mixed-effects modeling method was used for data analysis, with the ziprasidone PPK model established using the Phoenix NLME 8.1 software. Model evaluation employed goodness-of-fit plots, visual predictive checks, and Bootstrap methods to ensure reliability and accuracy. To further validate the model's applicability, data from an additional 30 patients meeting the same inclusion criteria but not included in the final model were collected for external validation. Simulations were performed to explore the personalized dosage regimens. This retrospective analysis collected 547 drug concentration data points from 185 psychiatric disorder patients, along with related medical records. The data included detailed demographic information (such as age, gender, weight), dosing regimens, laboratory test results, and concomitant medication details. In the final model, Ka was fixed at 0.5 h-1 based on literature, and the population typical values for ziprasidone clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were 18.74 L/h and 110.24 L, respectively. Co-administration of lorazepam and valproic acid significantly influenced the clearance of ziprasidone. Moreover, the model evaluation indicated good stability and predictive accuracy. A simple to use dosage regimen table was derived based on the results of simulations. This study successfully established and validated a PPK model for ziprasidone in Chinese patients with psychiatric disorders. The model provides a scientific reference for individualized dosing of ziprasidone and holds the potential to optimize treatment strategies, thereby enhancing therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Cognitive Effects of Reducing First-Generation Antipsychotic Dose Compared to Switching to Ziprasidone in Long-Stay Patients with Schizophrenia.

Background: Cognitive impairment is a core symptom of schizophrenia and is associated with functional outcomes. Improving cognitive function is an important treatment goal. Studies have reported beneficial cognitive effects of the second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) ziprasidone. Reducing the dose of first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) might also improve cognitive function. This study compared the cognitive effects in long-stay patients who were randomized to groups who underwent FGA dose reduction or switched to ziprasidone. Methods: High-dose FGA was reduced to an equivalent of 5 mg of haloperidol in 10 patients (FGA-DR-condition), and 13 patients switched to ziprasidone 80 mg b.i.d. (ZIPRA condition). Five domains of cognitive function were assessed before dose reduction or switching (T0) and after 1 year (T1). This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Open Ankh (CCMO number 338) and registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (code 5864). Results: Non-significant deterioration was seen in all cognitive domains studied in the FGA-DR condition, whereas there was a non-significant improvement in all cognitive domains in the ZIPRA condition. The most robust difference between conditions, in favor of ziprasidone, was in executive function. Conclusions: In patients with severe chronic schizophrenia, ziprasidone had a non-significant and very modest beneficial effect on cognitive function compared with FGA dose reduction. Larger trials are needed to further investigate this effect.

[Psychopharmacotherapy of mixed affective states in bipolar disorder]. / Psikhofarmakoterapiya smeshannykh affektivnykh sostoyanii pri bipolyarnom rasstroistve.

On the example of a patient with a mixed affective episode within the framework of bipolar affective disorder, the clinical features of this psychopathological condition, the difficulties of diagnosis and selection of therapy in mixed states are presented. The use of the modern atypical antipsychotic ziprasidone in this category of patients is argued.

A Clinical Suspicion of Quetiapine-Induced Psychosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Quetiapine, a pharmacological agent within the class of atypical antipsychotics, is characterized by its efficacy in mood stabilization and its role in the modulation of serotonergic and dopaminergic pathways. Its therapeutic utility is broad, encompassing the management of acute psychotic episodes, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and treatment-resistant depressive states. Quetiapine's effectiveness extends to depressive disorders that do not exhibit classic psychotic features, with a side effect profile that is less burdensome than many alternative psychotropic medications. Its versatility in addressing a range of psychiatric conditions is useful in the psychopharmacological management of mood and thought disorders. However, like all drugs, quetiapine may have different effects relative to the individual. It is imperative to approach the administration of quetiapine carefully, ensuring any adverse effects are ameliorated for beneficial therapeutic outcomes. In this case report, we present a psychosis-naive 42-year-old male who developed psychotic symptoms after beginning a quetiapine regimen in order to manage major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation. Clinical suspicion of quetiapine-induced psychosis was a diagnosis considered due to symptom remission secondary to ziprasidone in the place of quetiapine. The determination of a suspected adverse drug reaction can utilize the Naranjo scale to demonstrate the likelihood of an adverse drug reaction. This patient scored a three on the Naranjo scale, indicating a possible adverse effect from quetiapine. Other potential etiologies of psychosis include medication-induced psychosis, major depressive disorder exacerbation, cocaine use/withdrawal, and brief psychotic disorder. Quetiapine-induced psychosis has not been described in the current literature, and therefore, this case report is solely based on clinical evaluation and is intended for educational purposes due to possible confounding factors and etiologies.

Development of Analytical Quality by Design Compliant Chaotropic Chromatography Method for Ziprasidone and Its Five Impurities Determination.

In this study, an AQbD-compliant chaotropic chromatography method for ziprasidone and the determination of its five impurities was developed. The influence of critical method parameters (initial and final methanol fraction in the mobile phase, gradient duration) on the set of selected critical method attributes (t_imp. V, t_imp. V - t_imp. I, S and ) was studied by Box-Behnken design. The errors resulting from the calculation of the model coefficients were propagated to the selected responses by Monte Carlo simulations, and their predictive distribution was obtained. The design space was computed (π ≥ 80%), and a working point was selected: initial methanol fraction 38.5%, final methanol fraction 77.5%, and gradient duration 16.25 min. Furthermore, the quantitative robustness of the developed method was tested using the Plackett-Burman design. P_imp II and P_imp V were found to be significantly affected, the first by mobile phase flow rate and the second by gradient duration. Finally, the method was validated, and its reliability for routine quality control in capsules was confirmed.

Evaluation of Brain Targeting and Antipsychotic Activity of Nasally Administrated Ziprasidone Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanocarriers.

The feasibility of using lipid-polymer hybrid (LPH) nanocarriers as a potential platform for the intranasal delivery of ziprasidone (ZP), a second-generation antipsychotic, was explored. Different ZP-loaded LPH composed of a PLGA core and cholesterol-lecithin lipid coat were prepared using a single step nano-precipitation self-assembly technique. Modulation of polymer, lipid and drug amounts, as well as stirring-speed-optimized LPH with a particle size of 97.56 ± 4.55 nm and a ZP entrapment efficiency (EE%) of 97.98 ± 1.22%. The brain deposition and pharmacokinetics studies proved the efficiency of LPH to traverse the blood-brain barrier (BBB) following intranasal delivery with a 3.9-fold increase in targeting efficiency compared to the intravenous (IV) ZP solution with a direct nose-to-brain transport percentage (DTP) of 74.68%. The ZP-LPH showed enhanced antipsychotic activity in terms of animals' hypermobility over an IV drug solution in schizophrenic rats. The obtained results showed that the fabricated LPH was able to improve ZP brain uptake and proved its antipsychotic efficiency.

Human Hemoglobin and Antipsychotics Clozapine, Ziprasidone and Sertindole: Friends or Foes?

Packed with hemoglobin, an essential protein for oxygen transport, human erythrocytes are a suitable model system for testing the pleiotropic effects of lipophilic drugs. Our study investigated the interaction between antipsychotic drugs clozapine, ziprasidone, sertindole, and human hemoglobin under simulated physiological conditions. Analysis of protein fluorescence quenching at different temperatures and data obtained from the van't Hoff diagram and molecular docking indicate that the interactions are static and that the tetrameric human hemoglobin has one binding site for all drugs in the central cavity near αß interfaces and is dominantly mediated through hydrophobic forces. The association constants were lower-moderate strength (~104 M-1), the highest observed for clozapine (2.2 × 104 M-1 at 25 °C). The clozapine binding showed "friendly" effects: increased α-helical content, a higher melting point, and protein protection from free radical-mediated oxidation. On the other hand, bound ziprasidone and sertindole had a slightly pro-oxidative effect, increasing ferrihemoglobin content, a possible "foe". Since the interaction of proteins with drugs plays a vital role in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, the physiological significance of the obtained findings is briefly discussed.

Narrative review of the advances in the pharmacotherapeutic management of juvenile-onset schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: Schizophrenia usually begins with prodromal symptoms in adolescence. In 39% of patients, onset of psychotic symptoms occurs prior to age 19. Advances in the treatment of psychosis with medications over the last decade are reviewed in this paper. AREAS COVERED: Understanding how to prescribe antipsychotics early in schizophrenia requires an understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. The current structure of the dopamine hypothesis is reviewed. Risperidone, paliperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole have become established treatments prior to 2012. Since 2012, lurasidone (2017) and brexpiprazole (2022) have also been approved. Lurasidone was approved based on placebo-controlled studies, but brexpiprazole has been approved on the bases of open safety trials. In comparative trials, aripiprazole was better tolerated and less likely to cause hyperprolactinemia and metabolic abnormalities. EXPERT OPINION: Antipsychotics can induce adaptive changes in the brain that predispose patients to future problems such as tardive dyskinesia and supersensitivity psychosis. When pathophysiology of schizophrenia, and a clear understanding of the pharmacology of existing antipsychotics are included in the evidence-based analysis, use of partial agonists, which are less likely to induce adaptive changes in the brain and less likely to induce metabolic and prolactin side effects, become the preferred agents.

The safety and efficacy of sequential intramuscular/oral ziprasidone treatment of acute episode in patients with schizophrenia: a multicenter, open-labeled study.

BACKGROUND: Ziprasidone mesylate injection is an atypical antipsychotic drug which is recently approved in China. In combination with its oral formulation, sequential therapy with ziprasidone brings new interventions to patients with agitation in the acute phase of schizophrenia. The purpose of this 7-day multicenter study conducted in China was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone sequential treatment through intramuscular/oral routes in agitated patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: A total of 95 patients were enrolled from three centers in this study. The study duration was 7 days. In the first 3 days, subjects were administered an intramuscular injection of ziprasidone 10-40 mg daily and started sequentially with oral ziprasidone 40-80 mg at dinner (or lunch) from the day of the last intramuscular injection. In the following 4 days, according to the severity of the symptoms and the drug response, 120-160 mg of ziprasidone was orally administered daily. In total, six visits were scheduled to assess the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale (BARS), the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S), and Improvement (CGI-I) scores throughout the procedure. Lastly, adverse events were recorded during treatment. RESULTS: Out of the 95 patients that were enrolled, 83 cases were effectively completed. Visits 3, 4, 6, PANSS, and PANSS-excited component (PANSS-EC) subscale points, and Visit 2-Visit 6 viewpoints, BARS scale points, and baseline scores denote a progressive downward trend (P < 0.001). In this study, 62 adverse events were reported. The most common adverse events were extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) (23 cases) and excessive sedation(10 cases), and 13 cases of prolonged QTc interval were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone IM demonstrated significant and rapid reduction in agitation, and sequential oral formulation keep stability and continuation of the treatment can further ensure efficacy. Ziprasidone sequential therapy may provide a new approach to acute agitation in schizophrenic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Chinese Clinical Trials Registry; URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn : ChiCTR-OIC-16007970.

In vitro degradation of ziprasidone in human whole blood.

A systematic study was performed into the degradation of ziprasidone in simulated postmortem blood. Fifteen potential degradation products not previously reported in the literature were observed. Four resulted from degradation in human blood, whereas the remaining products resulted from reaction with solvents: four from alkaline degradation, four from reaction with acetaldehyde, and three from reaction with acetone. To identify possible degradation products, a liquid chromatograph-diode array detector (LC-DAD) and liquid chromatograph quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LC-QTOF-MS) operating in auto-MS/MS mode were used. It was indicated from red-shifted UV-Vis spectra, accurate mass data, mass fragmentation data, and a deuteration experiment that the site of ziprasidone degradation, in the in vitro blood experiments, was the methylene carbon of the oxindole moiety. The major in vitro blood degradation products were proposed to be E/Z isomers of 3-ethylidene-ziprasidone. Further, another in vitro degradation product in microbially inoculated blood specimens was proposed to be 3-ethyl-ziprasidone. 3-Ethylidene-ziprasidone was hypothesized to form from the reaction of ziprasidone with acetaldehyde derived from the ethanol used to spike ziprasidone into the in vitro blood experiments. Data from two postmortem investigations were available for retrospective reanalysis. Attempts were made to detect degradation products of ziprasidone, but none were found.

Acne caused by ziprasidone in a young patient with bipolar disorder: A case report.

Background: Ziprasidone is a second-generation antipsychotic drug commonly used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Acne is a common inflammatory disease of sebaceous glands in adolescents that is often co-morbid with anxiety and depression, which may reduce treatment compliance. Through unknown mechanisms, ziprasidone may cause a range of inflammatory responses. Whether ziprasidone can cause acne in young patients with bipolar disorder has not been reported. Case summary: We report a 23-year-old woman with a 5-year history of bipolar disorder who experienced acne during use of ziprasidone. She was admitted to our hospital during 1-month aggravation of her symptoms and was diagnosed with bipolar I disorder (current or most recent episode of depression) with psychotic features. She was given ziprasidone and soon developed acne, which she never had before; the rash worsened substantially when the ziprasidone dose was increased. At the same time, levels of inflammatory factors increased. The rash resolved after ziprasidone therapy was stopped. Conclusion: When prescribing ziprasidone to young people with bipolar disorder, clinicians should consider the potential for adverse skin reactions. It may be useful to assay levels of inflammatory markers during ziprasidone therapy and adjust the dose if necessary in order to ensure treatment compliance.

26-Week Open-Label Extension Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Flexible Doses of Oral Ziprasidone in Children and Adolescents with Bipolar I Disorder (Most Recent Episode Manic).

Objective: To describe the longer-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of open-label ziprasidone in children and adolescents with bipolar I disorder (BD-I). Methods: A subset of 23 participants aged 10-17 years, who were previously treated in a multi-site, 4-week randomized controlled trial received open-label ziprasidone (20-80 mg twice a day) for up to 26 weeks. Results: The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (30%), somnolence (17%), and nausea (13%). Effects on weight, body mass index, and metabolic parameters (glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides) were minimal. No participant had a Fridericia-corrected QT interval ≥ 460 msec or a change from baseline of ≥60 msec, and there were no cardiac-related AEs. Both the participants who continued ziprasidone and those who initiated ziprasidone in the open-label extension showed improvements in their symptoms of mania. Conclusions: The overall findings of the study are consistent with the accumulating knowledge on the safety profile of ziprasidone in the acute and long-term treatment of children and adolescents with BD-I, in the midst of a manic episode. ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT03768726.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Low-Dose Ziprasidone in Combination With Sertraline and Ziprasidone Monotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Patients With Acute Exacerbation Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) is a prevalent clinical problem with heterogeneous presentations. However, the clinical trial designs for new treatments are still lacking. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of ziprasidone plus sertraline in TRS patients as compared to ziprasidone monotherapy. We conducted a 24 weeks, randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical research trial. 62 treatment-resistant patients with acute exacerbation SZ were randomly allocated to receive a usual dose of ziprasidone (120-160 mg/d) monotherapy (Control group) and 53 TRS inpatients were to receive a low dose of ziprasidone (60-80 mg/d) in combination with sertraline (ZS group). Treatment outcomes were measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), CGI-Severity (CGI-S) and Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) at baseline, week 4, 8, 12, and 24. Relative to control group, the patients in ZS group showed greater reductions in the following: PANSS positive symptom, negative symptom, total score, and HAMD total score. Additionally, the patients in ZS group had a greater increase in PSP total score. Notably, the reduction in HAMD was positively correlated with the reduction in PANSS total score. The reduction in CGI-S was a predictor for the improvement of psychosocial functioning in patients. Furthermore, the ZS group had a lower rate of side effects compared to the control group. Our findings suggest that a low dose of ziprasidone in combination with sertraline is an effective therapy for the clinical symptoms as compared to a usual dose of ziprasidone in the treatment-resistant patients with acute exacerbation SZ. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04076371.

Low-Dose Ziprasidone in Combination with Sertraline for First-Episode Drug-Naïve Patients with Schizophrenia: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Many patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) discontinue antipsychotics, frequently due to dose-related multiple and severe adverse effects. We hypothesized that a low-dose ziprasidone plus sertraline would reduce serious side effects without affecting treatment efficacy. Therefore, this clinical trial was designed to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adding sertraline to ziprasidone in order to substantially reduce ziprasidone dose and potential side effects in first-episode and drug-naive (FEDN) patients with SCZ. This 24-week randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial randomly allocated 452 FEDN SCZ patients to receive a usual dose of ziprasidone (control group) or half the dose of ziprasidone in combination with sertraline (ZS group). Treatment outcome included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), CGI-Severity (CGI-S) and the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24. Repeated measures ANCOVA showed significant treatment by time interactions on the PANSS general psychopathology and total scores, as well as CGI-S, HAMD, and PSP scores (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, the ZS group had greater reductions in PANSS general psychopathology, total scores, HAMD, and CGI-S (all p < 0.05) and greater increases in the PSP total score (p < 0.01) than the control group. Importantly, adverse effects were lower in the ZS than control group. The reduction in PANSS, CGI-S, or HAMD scores was not correlated with the increase in PSP. Sex and duration of disease predicted PSP improvement from baseline to week 24 in the ZS group. Our FEDN patients with SCZ were effectively treated for their psychotic and depressive symptoms while experiencing significantly fewer adverse effects using half the usual ziprasidone dose when combined with sertraline. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04076371.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Flexibly Dosed Ziprasidone in Children and Adolescents with Mania in Bipolar I Disorder: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Replication Study.

Objective: To evaluate the acute efficacy, safety, and tolerability of flexibly dosed ziprasidone in children and adolescents with Bipolar I Disorder (BD-I). Methods: Participants, 10-17 years of age, meeting The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition criteria, were randomized 1:1 in a 4-week double-blind (DB) study, to receive ziprasidone (20-80 mg/twice a day) or placebo. Some were then enrolled in a 26-week open-label extension (OLE) study. The primary efficacy measure was the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score. Results: A total of 171 participants entered this randomized DB study and 23 continued into the OLE study. The mean (SD) age of the combined sample was 13.4 (2.1) years, 44.4% were male, and 66.7% were white. The demographic characteristics of participants who received ziprasidone (n = 86) or placebo (n = 85) were similar. The primary objective was met: the mean difference for ziprasidone versus placebo in the YMRS total score was -4.23 (95% confidence interval: -7.14 to -1.32; p = 0.005) indicating an effect size of 0.58. The most common adverse events (AEs) in the ziprasidone group were somnolence (31.4%), fatigue (22.1%), and nausea (14%). The mean Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) intervals in the ziprasidone group were moderately prolonged relative to the placebo group at all study visits. No participants had QTcF intervals ≥480 msec or an increase from baseline ≥60 msec. No AEs indicative of QT prolongation occurred. Weight, body mass index (BMI), and BMI z-scores, and metabolic measures were similar in both treatment groups. The data from the OLE study will be reported separately. Conclusions: Ziprasidone was effective in children and adolescents with BD-I in a manic episode, replicating the results of a previous study with a similar design (Findling et al. 2013). Overall, ziprasidone was safe and well tolerated with no meaningful effects on weight or metabolic parameters. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02075047 and NCT03768726.