Identificación y caracterización de herramientas para evaluar la alergia a las penicilinas: Revisión estructurada / Identification and characterization of tools used to assess penicillin allergy: structured review

Introducción: Las reacciones alérgicas son uno de los problemas de seguridad más graves asociadas al uso de medicamentos, siendo la alergia a los antibióticos betalactámicos la más prevalente. Las pruebas de alergia a las penicilinas pueden ayudar a identificar pacientes hospitalizados y ambulatorios que podrían tolerar y usar de manera segura este grupo de antibióticos y evitar rótulos que limiten el uso de antibióticos betalactámicos por tiempo indefinido. Objetivo: Identificar las herramientas disponibles en la literatura para valorar el antecedente de alergia a las penicilinas y proponer una herramienta que consolide la información extraída. Metodología: Revisión estructurada en PubMed/MEDLINE entre 1 junio 2015 hasta 30 noviembre 2022, utilizando los términos MeSH: (((“skin tests”[MeSH Terms]) OR (“skin irritancy tests”[MeSH Terms])) AND (“penicillins”[All Fields])) AND (“drug hypersensitivity”[MeSH Terms]). Publicaciones en inglés y español con acceso a texto completo y estudios realizados en humanos, sobre herramientas disponibles para evaluar la alergia a penicilinas fueron incluidos. Resultados: Se identificaron201 artículos, de los cuales se incluyeron 108. Dentro de las herramientas para evaluar la alergia a las penicilinas se identificaron: a) pruebas in vivo: pruebas cutáneas, pruebas de provocación oral, pruebas del parche; y b) pruebas in vitro: pruebas de IgE específica, determinación de triptasa, histamina. De los 1181 pacientes reportados con alergia a las penicilinas, sólo el 2 % de ellos se confirmó la presencia de alergia. Conclusión: Las pruebas cutáneas y de provocación oral sumado a algunas combinaciones in vivo/in vitro, fueron las herramientas más utilizadas para evaluar la alergia a las penicilinas. (AU)

Introduction: Allergic reactions are one of the most serious safety problems associated with the use of medications, with allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics being the most prevalent. In fact, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) states that penicillin allergy testing can help identify inpatients and outpatients who could safely tolerate and use this group of antibiotics and avoid labels that limit the use of beta-lactam antibiotics indefinitely. Objective: To identify the tools available in the literature to assess the history of allergy to penicillins and propose a tool that consolidates the information extracted. Methodology: Structured review on PubMed/MEDLINE between June 1, 2015 until November 30, 2022; using the search terms MeSH: (((“skin tests”[MeSH Terms]) OR (“skin irritancy tests”[MeSH Terms])) AND (“penicillins”[All Fields])) AND (“drug hypersensitivity”[MeSH Terms]). Papers in English and Spanish with access to full text and human trials, regarding available tools used to evaluate penicillin allergies were included. Results: A total of 201 articles were identified, of which after an independent evaluation, 108 were included. Among the tools to evaluate penicillin allergy, in vivo tests were identified: skin tests, oral provocation tests, patch tests and in vitro tests: specific IgE tests, determination of tryptase, histamine, T lymphocytes and basophilic activation tests. Of the patients (1181) reported with penicillin allergy, 905 (77 %) had their allergy assessed with skin testing or oral challenge tests, and only 2 % of them had a confirmed allergic reaction. Conclusion: Skin tests and oral provocation tests added to some in vivo/in vitro combinations were the most used tools to evaluate penicillin allergy. (AU)

El farmacéutico clínico en el abordaje del paciente con sospecha de alergia a beta-lactámicos: una revisión sistemática / The role of clinical pharmacists in patients with suspected allergy to B-lactams: A systematic review

Objetivo analizar el papel desempeñado por el farmacéutico clínico y su impacto en el ámbito de los programas de optimización de antimicrobianos ante la sospecha de alergia a antibióticos beta-lactámicos.Método se realizaron 2 búsquedas bibliográficas independientes. Se encontraron un total de 35 artículos incluyéndose 12. Se analizaron los artículos incluidos y se recogieron variables de eficacia, seguridad y aplicabilidad de herramientas de evaluación a pacientes con sospecha de alergia a beta-lactámicos. Además, se analizó la variación en el consumo y en el perfil de prescripción de antibióticos alternativos. Resultados los estudios seleccionados analizaron cuestionarios, desetiquetado, test intradérmicos y pruebas de provocación oral realizados por farmacéuticos. Se hallaron diferencias significativas en la variable principal de eficacia en 4 estudios incluidos a favor de la intervención farmacéutica. En un estudio cuasi experimental, la utilización de cefazolina aumentó tras la intervención farmacéutica (65 vs. 28%; p < 0,01). En otro estudio cuasi experimental, la dosis diaria definida media de aztreonam y la media de días de terapéutica por 1.000 pacientes/día disminuyeron (21,23 vs. 9,05; p < 0,01) y (8,79–4,24; p = 0,016), pre y postintervención, respectivamente, aumentando las desescaladas antibióticas (p ≤ 0,01). En otro estudio, disminuyó la prescripción de antibióticos de uso restringido (42,5 vs. 17,9%; p < 0,01) y en otro, la utilización de antibióticos profilácticos prequirúrgicos alternativos a cefazolina (81,9 vs. 55,9%; p < 0,01). En otro estudio, el tiempo medio por entrevista fue de 5,2 minutos por paciente. No se reportaron eventos adversos en ningún estudio. Conclusiones la intervención del farmacéutico en la evaluación del paciente con sospecha de alergia a beta-lactámicos resulta eficaz, segura y aplicable a la práctica clínica (AU)

Objective To analyze the role played by the clinical pharmacist and its impact in antibiotic stewardship facing suspected allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics. Method We performed two different independent bibliographic searches. A total of 35 articles were found, and the final number included in the study was 12. We analysed the articles and collected variables of efficacy, safety and applicability of evaluation tools applied to patients with suspected allergy to beta-lactams. Also, the variation in the consumption and prescription profile of alternative antibiotics was analyzed. Results The selected studies analysed questionnaires, allergy delabeling, intradermal tests and oral challenge tests performed by pharmacists. Significant differences in the efficacy endpoint were found in 4 studies in favour of pharmaceutical intervention. In the study of Kwiatkowski et al, cefazolin use increased in surgical patients after pharmacist intervention (65 vs. 28%; p < 0.01). In a quasi-experimental study, the mean defined daily dose of aztreonam and the mean days of therapy per 1000 patients/day decreased (21.23 vs 9.05, p <0.01) and (8.79–4.24, p = 0.016), pre and post-intervention, respectively, increasing antibiotic de-escalations (p ≤ 0.01). In another quasi-experimental study, the prescription of restricted-use antibiotics decreased (42.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.01) and the use of pre-surgical prophylactic antibiotics alternative to cefazolin (81.9% vs 55.9%, p<0.01) in another study. Other study showed that the mean time per interview was 5.2 minutes per patient. No adverse events were reported in any study. Conclusion The pharmacist intervention in the evaluation of the patient with suspected allergy to beta-lactams is effective, safe and feasible to implement on daily clinical practice (AU)

[Translated article] The role of clinical pharmacists in patients with suspected allergy to ß-lactams: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role played by the clinical pharmacist and its impact in antibiotic stewardship facing suspected allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics. METHOD: We performed 2 different independent bibliographic searches. A total of 35 articles were found, and the final number included in the study was 12. We analyzed the articles and collected variables of efficacy, safety, and applicability of evaluation tools applied to patients with suspected allergy to beta-lactams. Also, the variation in the consumption and prescription profile of alternative antibiotics was analyzed. RESULTS: The selected studies analyzed questionnaires, allergy delabeling, intradermal tests, and oral challenge tests performed by pharmacists. Significant differences in the efficacy endpoint were found in 4 studies in favor of pharmaceutical intervention. In the study of Kwiatkowski et al., cefazolin use increased in surgical patients after pharmacist intervention (65% vs 28%; P < .01). In a quasi-experimental study, the mean defined daily dose of aztreonam and the mean days of therapy per 1000 patients/day decreased (21.23 vs 9.05, P <.01) and (8.79-4.24, P = .016), pre- and post-intervention, respectively, increasing antibiotic de-escalations (P = < .01). In another quasi-experimental study, the prescription of restricted use antibiotics decreased (42.5% vs 17.9%, P < .01)and the use of pre-surgical prophylactic antibiotics alternative to cefazolin (81.9% vs 55.9%, P < .01)in another study. Other study showed that the mean time per interview was 5.2 min per patient. No adverse events were reported in any study. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist intervention in the evaluation of the patient with suspected allergy to beta-lactams is effective, safe, and feasible to implement on daily clinical practice. The standardization of protocols to clarify the history of allergies and development of evaluation tools represent simple screenings to perform delabeling or refer to the Immunoallergology service, improving penicilins use and reducing the need for second-line antibiotics. More studies are needed to standardize the desensitization tests made by pharmacists. However, despite these results, the involvement and leadership of the pharmacist in this area is limited and constitutes a future challenge for the profession.

The role of clinical pharmacists in patients with suspected allergy to ß-lactams: A systematic review. / El farmacéutico clínico en el abordaje del paciente con sospecha de alergia a beta-lactámicos: una revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role played by the clinical pharmacist and its impact in antibiotic stewardship facing suspected allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics. METHOD: We performed two different independent bibliographic searches. A total of 35 articles were found, and the final number included in the study was 12. We analysed the articles and collected variables of efficacy, safety and applicability of evaluation tools applied to patients with suspected allergy to beta-lactams. Also, the variation in the consumption and prescription profile of alternative antibiotics was analyzed. RESULTS: The selected studies analysed questionnaires, allergy delabeling, intradermal tests and oral challenge tests performed by pharmacists. Significant differences in the efficacy endpoint were found in 4 studies in favour of pharmaceutical intervention. In the study of Kwiatkowski et al, cefazolin use increased in surgical patients after pharmacist intervention (65 vs. 28%; p < 0.01). In a quasi-experimental study, the mean defined daily dose of aztreonam and the mean days of therapy per 1000 patients/day decreased (21.23 vs 9.05, p <0.01) and (8.79-4.24, p = 0.016), pre and post-intervention, respectively, increasing antibiotic de-escalations (p ≤ 0.01). In another quasi-experimental study, the prescription of restricted-use antibiotics decreased (42.5% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.01) and the use of pre-surgical prophylactic antibiotics alternative to cefazolin (81.9% vs 55.9%, p<0.01) in another study. Other study showed that the mean time per interview was 5.2 minutes per patient. No adverse events were reported in any study. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist intervention in the evaluation of the patient with suspected allergy to beta-lactams is effective, safe and feasible to implement on daily clinical practice. The standardization of protocols to clarify the history of allergies and development of evaluation tools represent simple screenings to perform delabelling or refer to the Immunoallergology service, improving penicilins use and reducing the need for second line antibiotics. More studies are needed to standardize the desensitization tests made by pharmacists. However, despite these results, the involvement and leadership of the pharmacist in this area is limited and constitutes a future challenge for the profession.

Ceftriaxone-induced Kounis syndrome: A case report and review of the literature.

Kounis syndrome is defined as cardiovascular symptoms that occur secondary to allergic or hypersensitivity insults, and is also called allergic angina and allergic myocardial infarction. We report a case of pre-operative ceftriaxone-induced Kounis syndrome with no evident dermatological manifestation, and describe our diagnostic dilemma. The patient was symptomatically managed and discharged in stable condition with a warning against future use of ceftriaxone.

The Multiple Trajectories of the Allergic March

The allergic march comprises the sequential appearance of a series of allergic comorbidities. However, variability in the onset and progression of allergic diseases generates a heterogeneous scenario that does not follow a linear and single trajectory. Almost half of the pediatric population presents at least 1 allergy symptom. However, only 4%-6% present multimorbidity, with several allergic diseases co-occurring. It has recently been shown that although they share etiological mechanisms and risk factors, allergic diseases arise independently. In most cases, progression is not consecutive, or at least not the same in all patients. TH2-mediated inflammation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and genetic predisposition play a fundamental role in the etiology of allergic diseases, on which the interaction with the exposome acts decisively. Therefore, studying diseases from an omics point of view is essential when attempting to describe the various trajectories of allergic progression and to propose effective interventions to prevent multimorbidity. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the current perception of the allergic march, including clinical observations, omics data, risk factors, and measures aimed at modifying its course or even preventing its onset. (AU)

La marcha alérgica ha dado respuesta durante mucho tiempo a un escenario de aparición secuencial de diferentes comorbilidades alérgicas. Sin embargo, la variabilidad en la aparición y progresión de las diferentes enfermedades alérgicas dibuja un escenario heterogéneo que no responde a una trayectoria lineal y única. Aunque en la actualidad casi la mitad de la población infantil presenta al menos un síntoma de alergia, tan solo un 4-6% presenta multimorbilidad, coexistiendo varias entidades alérgicas. Recientemente se ha demostrado que, aunque compartiendo mecanismos etiológicos y factores de riesgo, estas enfermedades alérgicas surgen de manera independiente y que, en la mayoría de los casos, no se observa una progresión consecutiva, o al menos, no la misma en todos los pacientes. La inflamación mediada por células T helper de tipo 2 (Th2), la disfunción de la barrera epitelial y la predisposición genética juegan un papel fundamental en la etiología de estas enfermedades, sobre los que actúan de manera determinante la interacción con el exposoma. Por ello, el estudio de las enfermedades, desde un punto de vista de las ómicas, es fundamental para describir las diferentes trayectorias de la marcha alérgica y proponer intervenciones eficaces para evitar escenarios de multimorbilidad. En esta revisión narrativa se incluye una descripción general de la percepción actual de la marcha alérgica, incluidas observaciones clínicas, datos ómicos, factores de riesgo y medidas preventivas propuestas para modificar su curso o incluso prevenir su aparición. (AU)

Characterization of Relevant Bovine DanderAllergen Components

Background: Diagnostic tests in occupational allergic diseases are highly dependent on the quality of available allergen extracts and specific IgE tests. To enhance diagnostic testing in cattle-related occupational rhinitis, asthma, and urticaria, we produced an in- house cow dander extract, assessed its allergen profile and performance in clinical tests, and compared it with commercial bovine dander extracts. Methods: One hundred patients with a suspected cattle-related occupational disease underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with in-house and 1 or 2 commercial bovine dander extracts. Nasal allergen provocation tests were performed on 31 patients with suspected occupational rhinitis. We used Western blot to study the specific IgE-protein reactions from the sera of the patients with positive provocation test results and identified allergens from immunoblot bands using tandem mass spectrometry. Results: The odorant-binding protein Bos d OBP, bovine serum albumin (Bos d 6), and the lipocalin (Bos d 2) were identified as the major allergens. We found a total of 24 bovine dander allergens, of which several were formerly unknown. The sensitivity and specificity of the in-house extract in SPTs were 100% and 94%, respectively, in 87 patients. The SPT results were negative in 20 healthy controls. Nasal allergen provocation tests with in-house extract detected occupational rhinitis with 100% sensitivity in 21 patients. The provocation results remained negative in 5 healthy controls. Conclusions: Three major and several minor allergens in bovine dander caused occupational rhinitis. Diagnosis of bovine allergen–related occupational diseases requires a sufficient concentration and variety of tested allergens (AU)

Antecedentes : las pruebas de diagnóstico en enfermedades alérgicas profesionales dependen en gran medida de la calidad de los extractos de alérgenos disponibles y de las pruebas de IgE específicas. Para mejorar las pruebas de diagnóstico en rinitis, asma y urticaria ocupacional relacionadas con el ganado, produjimos un extracto de caspa de vaca internamente, evaluamos su perfil de alérgenos y su desempeño en pruebas clínicas, y lo comparamos con extractos de caspa bovina comerciales. Métodos : Cien pacientes con sospecha de enfermedad profesional relacionada con el ganado se sometieron a pruebas cutáneas (SPT) con extractos de caspa bovina internos y 1 o 2 comerciales. Se realizaron pruebas de provocación con alérgenos nasales a 31 pacientes con sospecha de rinitis ocupacional. Utilizamos Western blot para estudiar las reacciones específicas de la proteína IgE de los sueros de los pacientes con resultados positivos en la prueba de provocación e identificamos alérgenos a partir de bandas de inmunotransferencia mediante espectrometría de masas en tándem.Resultados : La proteína fijadora de olores Bos d OBP, la albúmina sérica bovina (Bos d 6) y la lipocalina (Bos d 2) se identificaron como los principales alérgenos. Encontramos un total de 24 alérgenos de la caspa bovina, de los cuales varios eran desconocidos hasta el momento. La sensibilidad y especificidad del extracto interno en los SPT fueron del 100% y 94%, respectivamente, en 87 pacientes. Los resultados del SPT fueron negativos en 20 controles sanos. Las pruebas de provocación de alérgenos nasales con extracto interno detectaron rinitis ocupacional con una sensibilidad del 100% en 21 pacientes. Los resultados de la provocación siguieron siendo negativos en 5 controles sanos(AU)

Cosensitization to the 3 Nonhomologous Major Cashew Allergens Ana o 1, Ana o 2, and Ana o 3 Is Caused by IgE Cross-reactivity

Background: Cashew nuts often cause strong allergic reactions, which are even more severe than those of peanuts. Ana o 1 (vicilin), Ana o 2 (legumin), and Ana o 3 (2S albumin) are major cashew allergens. Cosensitization to all 3 nonhomologous cashew nut allergens has been observed. We hypothesize that this might be due to IgE cross-reactivity. Methods: IgE cross-inhibitions were performed with Ana o 1-3 using serum samples from cashew nut–allergic patients. The related hazelnut allergens Cor a 11, 9, and 14 were used as controls. For comparison, IgE cross-reactivity between the hazelnut allergens was investigated using serum samples from hazelnut-allergic patients. Results: The median percentages of cross-inhibition between Ana o 1, 2, and 3 were 84%-99%. In comparison, the median cross- inhibition values between hazelnut allergens were 33%-62%. The IC50 values revealed the highest IgE affinity to be to Ana o 3 and Cor a 14. Hazelnut legumin Cor a 9 inhibited IgE binding to Ana o 1, 2, and 3, with median percentages of 75%, 56%, and 48%, respectively. No cross-reactivity was observed between allergenic vicilins or between 2S albumins from cashew and hazelnut. Potentially cross-reactive peptides of Ana o 3 identified in silico overlapped with previously reported IgE epitopes of all 3 allergens. Conclusion: IgE with high affinity to Ana o 3 that cross-reacts with the other 2 major nonhomologous cashew nut allergens might be responsible for the high allergenic potency of cashew nut. These cross-reactive IgE types comprise the major fraction of specific IgE in cashew-allergic patients and might be responsible for cross-reactivity between unrelated tree nuts (AU)

Antecedentes: Los anacardos suelen provocar fuertes reacciones alérgicas, que son incluso más graves que las del maní. Ana o 1 (vicilina), Ana o 2 (legumina) y Ana o 3 (albúmina 2S) son los principales alérgenos del anacardo. Se ha observado cosensibilización a los 3 alérgenos no homólogos del anacardo. Nuestra hipótesis es que esto podría deberse a la reactividad cruzada de la IgE. Métodos : Se realizaron inhibiciones cruzadas de IgE con Ana o 1-3 utilizando muestras de suero de pacientes alérgicos al anacardo. Como controles se utilizaron los alérgenos de avellana relacionados Cor a 11, 9 y 14. A modo de comparación, se investigó la reactividad cruzada de IgE entre los alérgenos de la avellana utilizando muestras de suero de pacientes alérgicos a la avellana. Resultados : Los porcentajes medios de inhibición cruzada entre Ana o 1, 2 y 3 fueron del 84% al 99%. En comparación, los valores medios de inhibición cruzada entre alérgenos de avellana fueron del 33% al 62%. Los valores de IC50 revelaron que la mayor afinidad de IgE era Ana o 3 y Cor a 14. La legumina de avellana Cor a 9 inhibió la unión de IgE a Ana o 1, 2 y 3, con porcentajes medios de 75%, 56% y 48%. , respectivamente. No se observó reactividad cruzada entre vicilinas alergénicas ni entre albúminas 2S de anacardo y avellana. Los péptidos potencialmente de reacción cruzada de Ana o 3 identificados in silico se superpusieron con epítopos de IgE previamente informados de los 3 alérgenos. Conclusión : La IgE con alta afinidad por Ana o 3 que reacciona de forma cruzada con los otros 2 alérgenos principales no homólogos del anacardo podría ser responsable de la alta potencia alergénica del anacardo. Estos tipos de IgE de reacción cruzada comprenden la fracción principal de IgE específica en pacientes alérgicos al anacardo y podrían ser responsables de la reactividad cruzada entre frutos secos no relacionados (AU)

Apuntes para la historia de la alergología en Matanzas. 1961-2022

Introducción: La especialidad de alergología compite entre las más caras de la práctica médica en los países desarrollados, donde se promueve el criterio de que la alergia es una enfermedad de ricos y que los pobres no la padecen, cuando en realidad se trata de un problema de posibilidades de acceso a ese servicio. En Cuba, la alergología tiene una organización social diferente, comparada con otros países. Objetivo: Desarrollar un bosquejo histórico de la especialidad de alergología en la provincia de Matanzas. Materiales y métodos: Fueron utilizados los métodos teóricos histórico-lógico y analítico-sintético, y los empíricos entrevista y análisis documental. Resultados: Se describe el comienzo de la especialidad de alergología en Matanzas en 1961, enfatizando en la figura del Dr. Gonzalo Álvarez Rodríguez como el primer alergólogo de la provincia. Se evidencia el desarrollo y salto cualitativo del servicio, y se recogen apuntes relacionados con su origen, formación de especialistas, progreso científico, condiciones de trabajo y ampliación de la cobertura a la población en estos años. Conclusiones: Con este trabajo se inició un recuento del origen y desarrollo de la alergología en Matanzas, que enriqueció la historia de la especialidad, como parte de los servicios de salud en la provincia.

Introduction: The specialty of Allergology competes among the most expensive in medical practice in developed countries, where the criterion is promoted that allergy is a disease of the rich and that the poor do not suffer from it, when in fact it is a problem of access possibilities to that service. In Cuba, the allergy specialty has a different social organization compared with other countries. Objective: To elaborate a historical outline of allergology in the province of Matanzas. Materials and methods: Historical-logical and analytical-synthetic theoretical methods were used, as well as interview and documentary analysis empirical ones. Results: The beginning of the specialty of Allergology is described, emphasizing the role of Dr. Gonzalo Álvarez Rodríguez as the first allergist in the province. The development and qualitative leap of the service was evidenced, and notes are collected related to its origin, training of specialists, scientific progress, working conditions and expansion of coverage to the population in these years. Conclusions: With this work, an account of the origin and development of allergology in Matanzas began, which enriched the history of the specialty as part of the health services in the province.