Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HIV Res Clin Pract ; 25(1): 2359791, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The global shift in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic led to challenges in the care of people living with HIV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that aimed to delineate sociodemographic, clinical characteristics and outcomes, of people living with HIV diagnosed with ocular syphilis. RESULTS: Fifty-three people living with HIV were identified with ocular syphilis. Thirty-eight (71.6%) presented ocular symptoms. Twenty-three (43.3%) underwent lumbar puncture, 5 (9.4%) were positive for neurosyphilis. Forty-seven (88.6%) received treatment, 32 (68%) received standard treatment with aqueous crystalline penicillin G, and 15 (31.9%) were treated with alternative regimens due to the impossibility of hospitalization. Six (11.3%) individuals were lost to follow-up and/or did not receive treatment. Eighteen (56.2%) out of 32 individuals in the aqueous crystalline penicillin G group experienced serological response, 5 (15.6%) experienced treatment failure, and 9 (28.1%) were lost to follow-up. In the alternative therapy group, 12 out of 15 individuals (80%) experienced serological response. One (6.7%) experienced treatment failure, and 2 (13.3%) were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 health emergency in Mexico, alternative treatments for ocular syphilis demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes amid challenges in accessing hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Sífilis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis/complicaciones , Sífilis/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neurosífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Neurosífilis/complicaciones , Neurosífilis/epidemiología , Penicilina G/uso terapéutico
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(6): 1192-1200, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32441638

RESUMEN

We conducted a nationwide retrospective study in Japan to evaluate the effectiveness of oral amoxicillin or ampicillin as alternatives to injectable benzathine penicillin G for treating pregnant women with syphilis and preventing congenital syphilis (CS). We investigated 80 pregnant women with active syphilis treated with amoxicillin or ampicillin during 2010-2018. Overall, 21% (15/71) had pregnancies resulting in CS cases, and 3.8% (3/80) changed therapies because of side effects. Among 26 patients with early syphilis, no CS cases occurred, but among 45 with late syphilis, 15 (33%) CS cases occurred. Among 57 patients who started treatment >60 days before delivery, 8 (14%) had CS pregnancy outcomes. We found oral amoxicillin potentially ineffective for preventing CS cases among pregnant women with late syphilis but potentially effective in those with early syphilis. Prospective studies are needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy of amoxicillin for the treatment of pregnant women with syphilis to prevent CS.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Sífilis , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sífilis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sífilis/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...