Interaction of Terminal Oxidases with Amphipathic Molecules.

The review focuses on recent advances regarding the effects of natural and artificial amphipathic compounds on terminal oxidases. Terminal oxidases are fascinating biomolecular devices which couple the oxidation of respiratory substrates with generation of a proton motive force used by the cell for ATP production and other needs. The role of endogenous lipids in the enzyme structure and function is highlighted. The main regularities of the interaction between the most popular detergents and terminal oxidases of various types are described. A hypothesis about the physiological regulation of mitochondrial-type enzymes by lipid-soluble ligands is considered.

Interaction of Amphipathic Peptide from Influenza Virus M1 Protein with Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase.

The Bile Acid Binding Site (BABS) of cytochrome oxidase (CcO) binds numerous amphipathic ligands. To determine which of the BABS-lining residues are critical for interaction, we used the peptide P4 and its derivatives A1-A4. P4 is composed of two flexibly bound modified α-helices from the M1 protein of the influenza virus, each containing a cholesterol-recognizing CRAC motif. The effect of the peptides on the activity of CcO was studied in solution and in membranes. The secondary structure of the peptides was examined by molecular dynamics, circular dichroism spectroscopy, and testing the ability to form membrane pores. P4 was found to suppress the oxidase but not the peroxidase activity of solubilized CcO. The Ki(app) is linearly dependent on the dodecyl-maltoside (DM) concentration, indicating that DM and P4 compete in a 1:1 ratio. The true Ki is 3 µM. The deoxycholate-induced increase in Ki(app) points to a competition between P4 and deoxycholate. A1 and A4 inhibit solubilized CcO with Ki(app)~20 µM at 1 mM DM. A2 and A3 hardly inhibit CcO either in solution or in membranes. The mitochondrial membrane-bound CcO retains sensitivity to P4 and A4 but acquires resistance to A1. We associate the inhibitory effect of P4 with its binding to BABS and dysfunction of the proton channel K. Trp residue is critical for inhibition. The resistance of the membrane-bound enzyme to inhibition may be due to the disordered secondary structure of the inhibitory peptide.

Mechanism of Inhibition of Cytochrome c Oxidase by Triton X-100.

It is known that Triton X-100 (TX) reversibly inhibits activity of cytochrome c oxidase (CcO). The mechanism of inhibition is analyzed in this work. The action of TX is not directed to the reaction of CcO with cytochrome c, does not cause transition of the enzyme to the "slow" form, and is not associated with monomerization of the enzyme complex. TX completely suppresses oxygen reduction by CcO, but inhibition is prevented and partially reversed by dodecyl-ß-D-maltoside (DDM), a detergent used to maintain CcO in solution. A 1/1 stoichiometry competition is shown between DDM and TX for binding to CcO, with Ki = 0.3 mM and affinity of DDM for the enzyme of 1.2 mM. TX interaction with the oxidized enzyme induces spectral response with maximum at 421 nm and [TX]1/2 = 0.28 mM, presumably associated with heme a3. When CcO interacts with excess of H2O2 TX affects equilibrium of the oxygen intermediates of the catalytic center accelerating the FI-607 → FII-580 transition, inhibits generation of O2·- by the enzyme, and, to a lesser extent, suppresses the catalase partial activity. The observed effects can be explained by inhibition of the conversion of the intermediate FII-580 to the free oxidized state during the catalytic cycle. TX suppresses intraprotein electron transfer between hemes a and a3 during enzyme turnover. Partial peroxidase activity of CcO remains relatively resistant to TX under conditions that block oxidase reaction effectively. These features indicate an impairment of the K proton channel conductivity. We suggest that TX interacts with CcO at the Bile Acid Binding Site (BABS) that is located on the subunit I at the K-channel mouth and contacts with amphipathic regulators of CcO [Buhrow et al. (2013) Biochemistry, 52, 6995-7006]. Apparently, TX mimics the physiological ligand of BABS, whereas the DDM molecule mimics an endogenous phospholipid bound at the edge of BABS that controls effective affinity for the ligand.