Opposing impact of hypertension/diabetes following hormone therapy initiation and preexisting statins on castration resistant progression of nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a multicenter study.

Hormone therapy, especially androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is effective against prostate cancer (PC), whereas long-term ADT is a risk for metabolic/cardiovascular disorders including diabetes (DM), hypertension (HT) and dyslipidemia (DL), and might result in progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We thus conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study to ask whether CRPC progression would be associated positively with HT, DM or DL and negatively with statins prescribed for treatment of DL. In this study, 1,112 nonmetastatic PC patients undergoing ADT were enrolled. Univariate statistical analyses clearly showed significant association of HT or DM developing after ADT onset, though not preexisting HT or DM, with early CRPC progression. On the other hand, preexisting DL or statin use, but not newly developed DL or started statin prescriptions following ADT, was negatively associated with CRPC progression. Multivariate analysis revealed significant independent association of the newly developed DM or HT, or preexisting statin use with CRPC progression [adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals): 3.85 (1.65-8.98), p = 0.002; 2.75 (1.36-5.59), p = 0.005; 0.25 (0.09-0.72), p = 0.010, respectively]. Together, ADT-related development of HT or DM and preexisting statin use are considered to have positive and negative impact on CRPC progression, respectively.

Systemic treatments in recurrent or metastatic salivary gland cancer: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Salivary gland cancers are infrequent and pose a challenge owing to their histological diversity and varied clinical behavior, making the selection of optimal systemic treatments for advanced or recurrent stages difficult. This systematic review aims to assess overall survival outcomes and systemic treatment responses across four types of salivary cancers. METHODS: A PubMed and Google Scholar search identified studies involving initially advanced or relapsed cases undergoing systemic treatment. Studies with clear, individualized data on treatment responses and outcomes were selected based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Of the 723 studies screened, 44 met our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 426 cases of recurrent/metastatic salivary gland cancer, mostly salivary duct carcinoma (SDC; n = 219) and adenoid cyst carcinoma (ACC; n = 167), were included. Histomolecular markers were heavily associated with histology, with HER2 overexpression and androgen receptor nuclear expression typically found in SDC and adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified cases and KIT overexpression only in ACC. The response rates were associated with specific receptor blockage, with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, and bicalutamide being the most effective (overall response rate 80% and 42.8%, respectively). Moreover, the response to treatment positively influenced overall survival (responders 38 versus non-responders 18.7 median months; P < 0.001). In this retrospective analysis of a particular cohort, survival outcomes per histology types showed that anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy was more effective for SDC, while chemotherapy was more effective for ACC. CONCLUSION: Systemic treatments contribute to the survival of patients with salivary gland cancer at relapsed or newly advanced stages. The response to treatment is heavily influenced by histological subtype and treatment specificity.

Influences on androgen deprivation therapy prescribing before surgery in high-risk prostate cancer.

Objectives: To understand how best to further reduce the inappropriate use of pre-surgical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), we investigated the determinants (influences) of ADT prescribing in urologists in two European countries using an established behavioural science approach. Additionally, we sought to understand how resource limitations caused by COVID-19 influenced this practice. Identification of key determinants, of undistributed and disrupted practice, will aid development of future strategies to reduce inappropriate ADT prescribing in current and future resource-limited settings. Participants and Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with urologists practicing in Italy and the UK from February to July 2022. Interviews focussed on undisrupted (usual) practice and disrupted practice (changes made during COVID-19 restrictions). Codes were generated inductively and were mapped to the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Relevant domains of influence were identified, and the similarities and differences between the UK and Italy were distinguished. Results: We identified 10 domains that were influential to ADT prescribing in the UK and eight in Italy. The role of guidance and evidence, the cancer care setting, the patients and the urologist's beliefs and experiences were identified as areas that were influential to ADT prescribing before surgery. Twenty-one similarities and 22 differences between the UK and Italy, for usual and COVID-19 practice, were identified across these 10 domains. Conclusion: Similarities and differences influencing ADT prescribing prior to surgery should be considered in behavioural strategy development and tailoring to reduce inappropriate ADT use. We gained an understanding of usual, undistributed care and resource-limited or disrupted care due to COVID-19 in two European countries. This gives an indication of how influences on ADT prescribing may change in future resource-limited circumstances and where efforts can be focused now and in future.

The Rapidly Evolving Treatment Landscape of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

The management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has become increasingly complex with the tremendous progress that has been made in this space within the past few decades. In the early days of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), ADT monotherapy was the mainstay for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. However, novel hormone therapies in the form of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have emerged; vaccine therapy, chemotherapy with docetaxel and cabazitaxel, and radioactive ligands have shaped the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in the last decade. Following the initial approval of several drugs for use in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in combination with primary ADT, these agents were studied and subsequently approved for use in mCSPC. Therefore, ADT monotherapy no longer constitutes an optimal therapeutic option for otherwise fit patients who present with mCSPC. We focus on the treatment of first-line de novo mHSPC or mCSPC and explore frontline doublet and triplet therapy and the pivotal trials that led to their United States Food and Drug Administration approval.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and the Risk of Newly Developed Dry Eye Syndrome in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Nested Case-Control Study in the Republic of Korea.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the association between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and newly developed dry eye syndrome (DES) in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted. From the nationwide claims database of the Republic of Korea, 125,005 patients were included in the final analysis. Cases were defined as those newly diagnosed with DES during follow-up, and 12,654 patients were identified. The cases were matched with controls in a ratio of 1:4. Odds ratios (ORs) for newly developed DES associated with ADT were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Results: After matching, 7499 cases and 29,996 controls were selected. ADT was associated with a reduced risk of newly developed DES in patients with prostate cancer compared to no ADT (OR = 0.875; 95% confidence interval, 0.825-0.927; p < 0.0001). An accumulated dose of ADT < 1 year was associated with a reduced risk of incidental DES (OR = 0.811; 95% CI, 0.751-0.875; p < 0.0001), and a duration of 1-2 years was also associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.890; 95% CI, 0.802-0.986; p = 0.026). No association was observed with an ADT duration of ≥2 years. Conclusions: The use of ADT, especially for shorter durations (<2 years), was associated with a reduced risk of newly developed DES in S. Korean patients with prostate cancer.

Current Clinical Aspects of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review for Urologists and Medical Providers.

Prostate cancer (PCa) currently stands as the most common malignancy and the second most common cause of death in men worldwide. Dr. C. Huggins revolutionized the field of PCa treatment through his work investigating the therapeutic effects of androgen deprivation. These early surgical castration methods were expanded upon by integrating reversible pharmacologic castration via biologic agonists. Following this, intermittent ADT (iADT) became a medical substitute for its continuous counterpart. This data synthesis aims to highlight and assess the pertinent adverse effects of ADT, to compare mortality for PCa treatment plans, and consequently provide direction for clinicians in choosing the suitable systemic ADT approach. We performed a thorough systematic search across the PubMed database to identify prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing continuous and intermittent androgen deprivation therapy (cADT and iADT). Our qualitative analysis aimed to evaluate the potential of iADT as an alternative treatment approach, emphasizing recent clinical outcomes. The analysis of randomized control trials in the literature revealed no discernable statistical difference in PCa-specific mortality in comparison of iADT and cADT treatments. Further, in the analysis of mortality due to non-PCa causes, iADT patients fared more favorably compared to cADT. Due to iADT's characteristics of being more cost-efficient and less likely to cause undesirable side effects, urologic healthcare professionals should be made aware of these findings when counseling patients on the optimal form of ADT and consulting for future treatment guidelines.

A randomized phase II trial on the addition of dutasteride to combined androgen blockade therapy versus combined androgen blockade therapy alone in patients with advanced or metastatic salivary duct carcinoma - the DUCT study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, frequently associated with incurable recurrences and distant metastases (R/M). Proliferation of SDC relies on androgen receptor (AR) signalling, prompting the use of combined androgen blockade (CAB, i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and/or AR antagonists) to R/M SDC patients. However, only a subset of patients benefits from such treatments. We have shown that response to CAB is associated with steroid 5α-reductase 1 (SRD5A1) mRNA expression. SRD5A1 catalyses the intracellular conversion of testosterone into the more potent AR-agonist dihydrotestosterone. This conversion can be inhibited by dutasteride, a potent SRD5A1-inhibitor, which is currently prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We hypothesize that repurposing dutasteride to target AR signalling in SDC could enhance therapeutic response and clinical outcome in SDC patients. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, is designed to investigate whether dutasteride as an adjunct drug to CAB improves response rate and clinical outcome in patients with AR-positive R/M SDC. Patients are divided in two cohorts based on their prior systemic treatments. In cohort A, CAB-naïve patients (n = 74) will be randomly assigned to either a control arm (Arm 1) receiving CAB (goserelin 10.8 mg/3m and bicalutamide 50 mg/OD) or an experimental arm (Arm 2) where dutasteride (0.5 mg/OD) is added to the CAB regimen. In cohort B, patients with disease progression after adjuvant or first-line palliative CAB therapy (max. n = 24) will receive goserelin, bicalutamide, and dutasteride to assess whether the addition of dutasteride can overcome therapy resistance. The primary endpoints are the objective response rate and duration of response. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Translational research will be performed to explore molecular target expression differences and their correlation with clinical outcome. DISCUSSION: The DUCT study addresses an unmet medical need by investigating the repurposing of dutasteride to enhance treatment response and improve clinical outcome for patients with R/M SDC, especially those with limited alternative treatment options, such as HER2-negative cases. By repurposing a registered low-cost drug, this trial's findings could be readily applied into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05513365. Date of registration: August 24, 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: Current protocol version 4.0, February 21, 2024.

A Non-Randomized Comparison of Online and In-Person Formats of the Canadian Androgen Deprivation Therapy Educational Program: Impacts on Side Effects, Bother, and Self-Efficacy.

Although Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is effective in controlling prostate cancer (PCa) and increasing survival, it is associated with a myriad of side effects that cause significant morbidity. Previous research has shown that PCa patients starting on ADT are neither fully informed nor well-equipped to manage the breadth of ADT's side effects. The ADT Educational Program (a 1.5 h interactive class plus a book) was developed as an evidence-based resource for patients dealing with ADT. Our aim here was to compare the efficacy of an online version of the class with a previously assessed in-person version of the class. Using mixed MANOVAs within a non-randomized comparison design, we assessed: (1) changes in patients' experiences of self-efficacy to manage and bother associated with side effects approximately 10 weeks after attending a class, and (2) potential differences in these variables between online and in-person class formats. Side effect bother decreased from pre- to post-class but did not differ between in-person (n = 94) and online (n = 137) class cohorts. While self-efficacy to manage side effects was slightly higher post-class in both cohorts, the increase was not statistically significant. Average self-efficacy ratings were significantly higher among in-person versus online class participants (p < 0.05; ηp2 = 0.128). Both online and in-person classes are associated with a significant reduction in the severity of side effect bother reported by PCa patients, suggesting non-inferiority of online versus in-person formats. Online classes offer greater accessibility to the program for patients outside the reach of in-person classes, increasing the availability of the program to more PCa patients and family members across Canada.

Evaluating the Effects of Prostate Radiotherapy Intensified with Pelvic Nodal Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Myelosuppression: Single-Institution Experience.

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) management commonly involves the utilization of prostate radiotherapy (PRT), pelvic nodal radiotherapy (PNRT), and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the potential association of these treatment modalities with bone marrow (BM) suppression remains inadequately reported in the existing literature. This study is designed to comprehensively evaluate the risk of myelosuppression associated with PRT, shedding light on an aspect that has been underrepresented in prior research. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 600 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with prostate radiotherapy (PRT) at a single oncology center between 2007 and 2017. Patients were categorized into four cohorts: PRT alone (n = 149), PRT + ADT, (n = 91), PRT + PNRT (n = 39), and PRT + PNRT + ADT (n = 321). To assess the risk of myelosuppression, we scrutinized specific blood parameters, such as hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cells (WBCs), neutrophils (NEUT), lymphocytes (LYM), and platelets (PLT) at baseline, mid-treatment (mRT), immediately post-RT (pRT), 1 month post-RT (1M-pRT), and 1 year post-RT (1Y-pRT). The inter-cohort statistical significance was evaluated with further stratification based on the utilized RT technique {3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)}. RESULTS: Significant statistical differences at baseline were observed in HGB and LYM values among all cohorts (p < 0.05). Patients in the PRT + PNRT + ADT cohort had significantly lower HGB at baseline and 1M-pRT. In patients undergoing ADT, BMS had a significant impact at 1M-pRT {odds ratio (OR) 9.1; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.8-17.1} and at 1Y-pRT (OR 2.84; CI 1.14-7.08). The use of 3D-CRT was linked to reduced HGB levels in the PRT + PNRT + ADT group at 1 month pRT (p = 0.015). Similarly, PNRT significantly impacted BMS at 1M-pRT (OR 6.7; CI 2.6-17.2). PNRT increased the odds of decreased WBC counts at 1Y-pRT (OR 6.83; CI: 1.02-45.82). Treatment with any RT techniques (3D-CRT or IMRT), particularly in the PRT + PNRT and PRT + PNRT + ADT groups, significantly increased the odds of low LYM counts at all time points except immediately pRT (p < 0.05). Furthermore, NEUT counts were considerably lower at 1M-pRT (p < 0.05) in the PRT + PNRT + ADT group. PLT counts were significantly decreased by PRT + PNRT + ADT at mRT (OR 2.57; 95% CI: 1.42-4.66) but were not significantly impacted by the RT technique. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with PRT, ADT, PNRT, and 3D-CRT is associated with BMS. Despite this statistically significant risk, no patient required additional interventions to manage the outcome. While its clinical impact appears limited, its importance cannot be underestimated in the context of increased integration of novel systemic agents with myelosuppressive properties. Longer follow-up should be considered in future studies.

Novel Treatment Strategies for Low-Risk Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has changed significantly in recent years. Based on various guidelines, an upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) is the first choice, but in patients of Asian descent, including Japanese patients, there are a certain number of cases in which androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and CAB are more effective. If patients can be identified who show a marked response to ADT within 12 weeks after the initiation of ADT, which is the inclusion criterion for ARSI clinical trials targeting mCSPC, it would be valuable from an economic standpoint. METHODS: A total of 218 patients with pure prostate adenocarcinoma and treated with ADT at the Kanazawa University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2020 were included in this study. As a risk classification for mCSPC, in addition to the LATITUDE and CHAARTED criteria, we used the castration-sensitive prostate cancer classification proposed by Kanazawa University (Canazawa), developed by the Department of Urology of Kanazawa University. The Canazawa classification was based on three factors: Gleason pattern 5, bone scan index (BSI) ≥ 1.5, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 300 IU/L. It defined patients with one factor or less as low-risk and patients with two or three factors as high-risk. The overall survival (OS) and time to castration resistance (TTCR) were estimated retrospectively using the Kaplan-Meier method, and factors associated with TTCR were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 40.4 months, the median OS period was 85.2 months, and the median TTCR period was 16.4 months. The Canazawa risk classification provided the clearest distinction between the OS and TTCR in mCSPC patients. Multivariate analysis revealed a decrease in PSA levels of <95% at 12 weeks after ADT initiation and was a predictor of short TTCR in low-risk, low-volume patients across all risk classifications. CONCLUSION: The Canazawa classification differentiated the prognosis of mCSPC patients more clearly. A PSA reduction rate of <95% at 12 w after starting ADT in low-risk, low-volume patients of all risk classifications was significantly shorter than the TTCR. We propose a new treatment strategy, in which patients with low-risk mCSPC are treated with ADT and switched to ARSIs based on the rate of PSA reduction at 12 w.

Dose modification in enzalutamide and abiraterone plus prednisolone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A subanalysis from the ENABLE study for PCa.

BACKGROUND: A head-to-head comparison between enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) revealed similar survival benefits for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in the ENABLE study for PCa. Considering that a dose reduction of ENZ and ABI has demonstrated sufficient inhibitory ability of androgen receptor (AR) signaling, we analyzed the efficacy of modified doses of these agents in the ENABLE study for PCa. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that was conducted in Japan analyzed the prespecified survival endpoints, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate ( ≥50% decline from baseline), and safety profile in patients treated with modified doses (ENZ ≤ 120 mg/day, ABI ≤ 750 mg/day) compared with those treated with a standard dose (ENZ 160 mg/day, ABI 1000 mg/day) as a starting dose. RESULTS: In total, 92 patients in each arm were treated and analyzed; 16 patients were treated with a modified dose in both the ENZ and ABI arms, respectively. Moreover, 32 patients treated with modified doses showed a significantly better time to PSA progression (TTPP) and overall survival (OS) compared with the 152 patients treated with a standard dose (HR 0.47, 95%CI 0.27-0.83, p = 0.0379, and HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.63, p = 0.0162). Despite a significantly longer TTPP in the modified ABI group than in the standard ABI group (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0.62, p = 0.0248), no significant difference was observed in the TTPP between the modified and standard ENZ groups (p = 0.5366). Furthermore, similar adverse event rates and grades were observed in each treatment dose group. CONCLUSIONS: The modified doses of ABI showed better TTPP than the standard dose of ABI and may be a potential treatment option for CRPC patients; however, its mechanism is still unclear, although its ability to suppress AR signaling is equivalent to that of a standard dose.

Testosterone Recovery Following Androgen Suppression and Prostate Radiotherapy (TRANSPORT): A Pooled Analysis of Five Randomized Trials from the Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials in Cancer of the Prostate (MARCAP) Consortium.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Time to testosterone recovery (TR) following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists varies widely. We evaluate TR kinetics and the oncological impact of an effective castration period in patients receiving definitive radiotherapy and ADT for prostate cancer. METHODS: We obtained individual patient data from randomized controlled trials of radiotherapy with ADT and prospectively collected serial testosterone data from the MARCAP Consortium. We estimated the times to noncastrate TR (>1.7 nmol/l) and nonhypogonadal TR (>8.0 nmol/l) were estimated for each prescribed ADT duration, and developed corresponding nomograms. The association between effective castration period and metastasis-free survival (MFS) for any given ADT duration was evaluated via multivariable Cox regression. We conducted cubic spline analyses to assess nonlinear associations. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We included 1444 men from five trials in the analysis, of whom 115 received 4 mo, 880 received 6 mo, 353 received 18 mo, 36 received 28 mo, and 60 received 36 mo of ADT. Times to noncastrate TR and to nonhypogonadal TR varied considerably by ADT duration. Higher baseline testosterone and lower age were associated with a higher likelihood of TR (p < 0.001 for both). Effective castration period was not linearly associated with MFS for any ADT duration on Cox regression. Cubic spline analysis revealed that the optimal effective castration period for an MFS benefit was 10.6 mo for men who received 6 mo of ADT and 18 mo for men who received 18 mo of ADT. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Time to TR varies according to the ADT duration, baseline testosterone, and age. The relationship between effective castration period and MFS may be nonlinear, with a longer effective castration period being helpful for men receiving 6 mo of ADT.

Temporal declines in bone mineral density and trabecular bone score during androgen deprivation therapy.

INTRODUCTION: The trabecular bone score (TBS) has emerged as a convenient measure for assessing the microstructure of trabecular bone in the second through fourth lumbar vertebrae (L2-4) and can be conducted concurrently with bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. This study was performed to evaluate changes in BMD and the TBS during ADT for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who had prostate cancer without bone metastases at Kobe University Hospital were studied from March 2020 to December 2021. BMD and TBS were measured every 6 months from the start of treatment using Hologic Horizon devices (Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were followed for 2 years. Significant declines in BMD (-3.8% for femoral neck, -4.2% for total hip, and -6.1% for lumbar spine) and TBS (-16.6%) were noted after 2 years of ADT. Correlation analyses revealed a weak correlation between lumbar spine BMD and TBS at ADT initiation, but this correlation strengthened after 2 years. The multiple regression analysis results suggested that the rate of BMD loss may be slower in patients with a preserved pretreatment TBS. CONCLUSION: In patients without bone metastases undergoing ADT for prostate cancer, notable decreases were found in both BMD and TBS over a 2-year treatment period. Factors influencing the TBS decline remain unclear; however, patients with a lower pretreatment TBS exhibited a more rapid decline in BMD.

Comparative Cardiovascular Safety of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonists and Agonists Among Patients Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Evidence Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists are cornerstone treatments in prostate cancer. However, evidence regarding the comparative cardiovascular safety of these drugs from clinical trials is inconclusive. The objective of this study was to systematically assess the risk of adverse cardiovascular events of GnRH antagonists compared with GnRH agonists across real-world evidence studies. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science (2008-2023). We included real-world evidence studies comparing the risk of cardiovascular outcomes of GnRH antagonists with those of GnRH agonists among patients with prostate cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of effect estimates across studies at a low or moderate risk of bias, assessed via the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, using random-effect models. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among ten included studies, four were classified as having a moderate and six as having a serious risk of bias. Across three studies at a moderate risk of bias in the primary analysis, degarelix was associated with an increased risk (pooled relative risk [RR]: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.51) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). An augmented risk was observed in two studies among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (pooled RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.56) compared with one study among patients without a history of cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.83-1.59). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Real-world evidence studies indicate that degarelix, compared with GnRH agonists, is associated with a modest increased risk of MACEs, particularly among patients with a history of cardiovascular disease. However, residual confounding due to the treatment of high-risk patients with degarelix may account for these findings. Additional large studies with detailed data on tumor characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors are needed to confirm these findings. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this systematic evaluation of evidence among patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in routine care, degarelix was associated with higher cardiovascular adverse outcomes than gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

The m6A regulators in prostate cancer: molecular basis and clinical perspective.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men in western countries. Evidence has indicated the significant role of the androgen receptor (AR) as the main driving factor in controlling the development of PCa, making androgen receptor inhibition (ARI) therapy a pivotal management approach. In addition, AR independent signaling pathways also contribute to PCa progression. One such signaling pathway that has garnered our attention is N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) signaling, which refers to a chemical modification on RNA with crucial roles in RNA metabolism and disease progression, including PCa. It is important to comprehensively summarize the role of each individual m6A regulator in PCa development and understand its interaction with AR signaling. This review aims to provide a thorough summary of the involvement of m6A regulators in PCa development, shedding light on their upstream and downstream signaling pathways. This summary sets the stage for a comprehensive review that would benefit the scientific community and clinical practice by enhancing our understanding of the biology of m6A regulators in the context of PCa.

The risk of fragility fractures in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) increases long-term fracture risk in prostate cancer. Our study showed a higher fracture risk within six months of ADT use, and current use was associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures. Attention is needed for the prevention of fragility fractures at the start of ADT. PURPOSE: Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is known to increase long-term fracture risk in men with prostate cancer (PCa), although the risk of fragility fractures remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the risk of fragility and malignancy-related fractures in men with PCa treated with ADT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of men with PCa. Follow-up time was divided into 30-day intervals and exposure (current, past, or no-ADT use). Current ADT use was stratified by duration of ADT use (≤ 182 days, 183-730 days, and > 730 days). Cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of fractures. RESULTS: We included 471 patients (mean age 70.5 (± 8.3) years). The mean follow-up time was 5.0 (± 1.7) years in patients who never started ADT, 3.4 (± 2.3) years and 4.1 (± 2.0) years in patients who started ADT at baseline and during follow-up, respectively. In total, 60 patients had a fracture, 48 (80%) fragility, and 12 (20%) malignancy-related fractures. Current ADT use was associated with a higher risk of all fractures (HR 5.10, 95% CI 2.34-11.13) and fragility fractures (HR 3.61, 95% CI 1.57-8.30). The association with malignancy-related fractures could not be studied due to no events during no-ADT use. There was an increased risk of all fractures with longer duration of ADT use. CONCLUSIONS: Current ADT use was associated with a higher risk of fragility fractures than no-ADT use. A higher fracture risk was observed within the first six months of ADT use and persisted for longer durations.

Patient Preferences for Attributes of Androgen Deprivation Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Latent Class Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) options have expanded for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). Historically, ADT was primarily available in long-acting injectable formulations. In 2020, the first oral formulation was US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with advanced PC. This study's aim was to assess patient preferences for attributes of medical ADT, including mode of administration, side effects, impact on sexual interest, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, and to segment respondents into distinct groups based on their treatment choice patterns. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among US residents aged > 40 years with PC, employing a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for ADT attributes. For each choice task, respondents were asked to select the hypothetical treatment profile that they preferred out of two presented. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to estimate attribute-level preference weights and calculate attribute relative importance for groups of respondents with similar treatment preferences. RESULTS: A total of 304 respondents completed the survey (mean age 64.4 years). LCA identified four preference groups, named according to the attribute each group considered most important: Sexual interest, Cost-sensitive, Favors daily pill, and Favors injection. Most respondents in the Sexual interest group were < 65 years, while the Cost-sensitive group was mostly ≥ 65 years. Favors daily pill had the highest proportion of ADT-naïve individuals. On average, respondents in these groups preferred an oral medication. Favors injection, which had the highest proportion of ADT-experienced individuals, preferred infrequent intramuscular injections, lower chance of post-ADT testosterone recovery, and lower OOP cost. CONCLUSION: Respondents differed in their preferences regarding ADT attributes, highlighting the need for patient involvement in their treatment decisions. Effective communication between healthcare providers and patients about the benefits and risks of available therapies should be encouraged to ensure that patients receive the PC treatment that best meets their needs.

Prostate cancers often depend on the male sex hormone, testosterone, to grow. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used to lower testosterone levels in patients with advanced prostate cancer. ADT options available to patients have different characteristics, including how they are taken (injection or pill), side effects, impact on sexual interest, and costs. Researchers wanted to understand which ADT characteristics were most important to groups of patients with similar preferences. To do this, they gave 304 patients a series of two hypothetical (meaning not real) examples of ADT options with different characteristics and asked them to choose the option that they preferred most. Researchers found that patients could be separated into four different groups based on their preferences for ADT characteristics. One group preferred an ADT that had the least impact on their interest in sex. These patients were mainly younger than 65 years old. A second group preferred a lower cost ADT. These patients were mainly 65 years or older. A third group preferred a pill that could be taken once a day by mouth. Most of these patients did not take ADT in the past. A fourth group preferred an ADT that was given in a physician's office as an injection every 6 months. These patients mainly had taken ADT in the past. This study shows that patients have different preferences for ADT treatment characteristics. It is important for doctors to discuss the different ADT options with patients to find the treatment that best meets their needs.

[Urogeriatric thinking using the example of antiandrogen therapy for prostate cancer]. / Urogeriatrisches Denken am Beispiel der antiandrogenen Therapie des Prostatakarzinoms.

The geriatric patient is defined by an age of over 75 years and multimorbidity or by an age of over 80 years. These patients exhibit a particular vulnerability, which, in the incidence of side effects or complications, leads to a loss of autonomy. Treatment sequalae, once they have arisen, can no longer be compensated. It is important to recognize and document treatment requirements among geriatric patients with the help of screening instruments such as the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) and Geriatric 8 (G8) scores. If a treatment requirement is identified, oncologic treatment should not be commenced uncritically but rather a focus placed on identification of functional deficits relevant to treatment, ideally using a geriatric assessment but at least based on a detailed medical history. These deficits can then be presented in a structured, examiner-independent, and forensically validated manner using special assessments. A planned treatment requires not only consideration of survival gains, but also knowledge of specific side effects and, in geriatric patients in particular, their impact on everyday life. These considerations should be compared with the patient's individual risk profile in order to prevent side effects from negating the effect of the treatment, for example by worsening the patient's self-help status. With regard to androgen deprivation in prostate cancer-which often is used uncritically-it is important to consider possible side effects such as osteoporosis, sarcopenia, anemia, and cognitive impairment in terms of a possible fall risk; an increase in cardiovascular mortality and the triggering of a metabolic syndrome on the basis of preexisting cardiac diseases or risk constellations; and to carry out a careful risk-benefit analysis.

Treatment Intensification in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of Real-World Practice Patterns from the CancerLinQ Database.

BACKGROUND: In metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), androgen deprivation therapy and standard of care treatment intensification with docetaxel and/or an androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) are associated with improved survival outcomes for appropriate patients. METHODS: This retrospective study selected patients with de novo mHSPC diagnosed between 2014 and 2023 from CancerLinQ Discovery®, a United States (US)-based, de-identified clinical database. Patient-level data, including clinical characteristics, treatments, and demographics, were collected from CancerLinQ. Treatment intensification was defined as the use of docetaxel, abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide, or docetaxel plus abiraterone or darolutamide. Patient characteristics and treatment intensification data were analyzed descriptively and using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 3,684 patients with mHSPC, the overall rate of treatment intensification was 58.4% but increased from 32.5% in 2014 to 67.5% in 2023. A relative decline in docetaxel use was accompanied by an increase in ARSI use. Black patients with mHSPC were less likely to receive treatment identification (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.95, P = 0.013). Treatment intensification was also less likely for patients of older age and increased ECOG performance status. Despite increasing treatment intensification for Black patients with mHSPC over time, rates of docetaxel use are disproportionately declining relative to White patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment intensification rates are increasing to include the majority of patients with mHSPC. However, treatment disparities exist for Black patients, who are less likely to receive intensification. These findings illustrate the importance of promoting treatment intensification in appropriate patients and addressing racial treatment disparities.

Prostate cancer genotyping for risk stratification and precision treatment.

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men. It is heterogeneous, as is evident from the wide spectrum of therapeutic approaches. Most patients with PC are initially responsive to androgen deprivation therapy; however, the majority of cases are either hormone-sensitive PC or castration-resistant PC. Current therapeutic protocols follow the evolution of PC, a continuously progressive process involving a combination of widespread genomic alterations. These genomic alterations are either hereditary germline mutations, such as mutations in BRCA2, or specific only to tumor cells (somatic). Tumor-specific genomic spectra include genomic structural rearrangements, canonical androgen response genes, and many other specific genes such as TMPRSS2-ERG fusion, SPOP/FOXA1, TP53/RB1/PTEN, and BRCA2. New evidence indicates the involvement of signaling pathways including PI3K, WNT/ß-catenin, SRC, and IL-6/STAT, which have been shown to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition cancer stem cell-like features/stemness, and neuroendocrine differentiation in PC. Over the last decade, our understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationships has been enhanced considerably. The genetic background of PC related to canonical genetic alterations and signaling pathway activation genes has shed more insight into the molecular subtype and disease landscape, resulting in a more flexible role of individual therapies targeting diverse genotypes and phenotypes.