RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tolerance enables bacteria to survive intermittent antibiotic exposure without an increase in antimicrobial susceptibility. In this study, we investigated the presence of tolerance to three antimicrobials, ceftriaxone, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin, in clinical isolates and the WHO (World Health Organization) reference panel of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. METHODS: We used the modified tolerance disk (TD test) to assess for tolerance to ceftriaxone, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin in 14 WHO reference strains and 62 N. gonorrhoeae clinical isolates-evenly divided between anorectal and urogenital infections. The isolates underwent a three-step incubation process wherein the isolates were exposed to an antibiotic disk for 20 h of incubation (Step I), followed by the replacement of the antibiotic disk with a nutrient disk for overnight incubation (Step II) and additional overnight incubation with extra nutrients (Step III). RESULTS: A total of 4 of the 62 clinical anorectal isolates and none of the urogenital isolates exhibited tolerance to azithromycin (p = 0.033). Tolerance to ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin was observed in eight and four isolates, respectively, with no difference between infection sites. Tolerance was also detected in 8 (K, M, N, O, P, U, V, W) out of the 14 WHO reference strains, with varying patterns of tolerance to ceftriaxone (n = 8), ciprofloxacin (n = 2) and azithromycin (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified ceftriaxone, azithromycin and ciprofloxacin tolerance in clinical and WHO reference N. gonorrhoeae isolates. Azithromycin tolerance was more common in anorectal than urogenital infections.
RESUMEN
The objective of this article is to describe the epidemiology of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) and non-LGV Chlamydia trachomatis anorectal infections in France and to examine the characteristics of the affected populations via a voluntary sentinel surveillance system for LGV between 2010 and 2015. Anorectal samples positive for C. trachomatis (CT) were sent by the participating laboratories to the National Reference Center for CT for LGV identification. Biological and clinical data were collected by biologists and clinicians. There were 1740 LGV episodes and 2248 non-LGV episodes. Continuous monitoring highlighted a sharp increase in the number of LGV and non-LGV anorectal infections, which were 2.3-fold and 6.5-fold, respectively. Most of the infections occurred in men who have sex with men. LGV patients were older than non-LGV patients and were more frequently human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive compared to non-LGV patients. Anorectal LGV was significantly associated with residence in Paris, HIV co-infection, concurrent syphilis and bloody anal discharge. Undocumented patient characteristics were strongly associated with anorectal LGV. The anorectal LGV epidemic is poorly controlled in France. Early detection and prompt treatment of patients and their sexual partners are required to prevent transmission in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recto/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Infecciones por Chlamydia/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Heterosexualidad , Homosexualidad Masculina , Humanos , Linfogranuloma Venéreo/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Enfermedades del Recto/epidemiología , Vigilancia de Guardia , Parejas Sexuales , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Anorectal abscess and fistula are among the most common diseases encountered in adults. Abscess and fistula should be considered the acute and chronic phase of the same anorectal infection. Abscesses are thought to begin as an infection in the anal glands spreading into adjacent spaces and resulting in fistulas in ~40% of cases. The treatment of an anorectal abscess is early, adequate, dependent drainage. The treatment of a fistula, although surgical in all cases, is more complex due to the possibility of fecal incontinence as a result of sphincterotomy. Primary fistulotomy and cutting setons have the same incidence of fecal incontinence depending on the complexity of the fistula. So even though the aim of a surgical procedure is to cure a fistula, conservative management short of major sphincterotomy is warranted to preserve fecal incontinence. However, trading radical surgery for conservative (nonsphincter cutting) procedures such as a draining seton, fibrin sealant, anal fistula plug, endorectal advancement flap, dermal island flap, anoplasty, and LIFT (ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract) procedure all result in more recurrence/persistence requiring repeated operations in many cases. A surgeon dealing with fistulas on a regular basis must tailor various operations to the needs of the patient depending on the complexity of the fistula encountered.