Adherence to monitoring of patients treated with amiodarone: a nationwide study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to monitoring guidelines regarding amiodarone treatment. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of data recorded in Clalit Health Services, the largest healthcare organization in Israel. Included were individuals aged >18 years; who were prescribed amiodarone and had a documented purchase of this drug, for a minimum of 200 consecutive days; and who had less than a 100-day gap between two consecutive purchases during 2013-2021. Adherence was assessed to testing for thyroid, liver function, and electrolytes, as determined by the performance of a test every 6 months. Results: The study included 24,094 individuals (mean age: 75 years, 53% male). The median follow-up was 2.3 years (total 73,727 person-years). The proportions of patients who performed baseline tests were: 43.4% for thyroid function, 58.3% for electrolytes, 48.6% for liver function, 20.6% for chest X-rays, and 14.9% for electrocardiograms. Adherence rates to semiannual monitoring of thyroid function, liver function, and electrolyte tests were: 70.4%, 79.4%, and 88.3%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, the factors associated with higher adherence were male sex; older age; the presence of thyroid abnormalities, renal failure, and hypertension; and more frequent visits to the primary care physician. Conclusions: In our country, adherence is low to monitoring risk factors for adverse effects of amiodarone therapy, especially prior to treatment initiation. Patient and primary care physicians should be educated about the importance of monitoring, particularly prior to initiation of amiodarone treatment.

Flecainide Toxicity in a Patient with a Functioning Pacemaker.

Flecainide is a class Ic anti-arrhythmic that demonstrates use dependence, meaning the medication has an increased effect on the myocardium at high heart rates. Flecainide toxicity can be identified by wide QRS complexes on an electrocardiogram (ECG). We discuss a case of a 75-year-old patient with a pacemaker who presented with concern for flecainide toxicity. The patient had several risk factors known to increase the likelihood for toxicity, including structural heart disease and acute kidney injury. The initial ECG showed tachycardia with wide QRS complexes. The patient had a pacemaker set in a tracking mode (DDD) that resulted in rapid ventricular pacing with failure to mode switch. However, with modification to the VVI mode, the patient experienced tachycardia resolution with an improvement in QRS complexes. This case emphasizes the use dependence of flecainide and illustrates the utility of pacing mode in the management of flecainide toxicity in patients with pacemakers.

Longitudinal analysis of echocardiographic and cardiac biomarker variables in dogs with atrial fibrillation: The optimal rate control in dogs with atrial fibrillation II study.

BACKGROUND: Rate control (RC; meanHRHolter ≤ 125 bpm) increases survival in dogs with atrial fibrillation (AF). The mechanisms remain unclear. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Investigate echocardiographic and biomarker differences between RC and non-RC (NRC) dogs. Determine if changes post-anti-arrhythmic drugs (AAD) predict successful RC in subsequent Holter monitoring. Evaluate if early vs late RC affects survival. ANIMALS: Fifty-two dogs with AF. METHODS: Holter-derived mean heart rate, echocardiographic and biomarker variables from dogs receiving AAD were analyzed prospectively at each re-evaluation and grouped into RC or NRC. The primary endpoint was successful RC. Between group comparisons of absolute values, magnitude of change from admission to re-evaluations and end of study were performed using Mann-Whitney tests or unpaired t-tests. Logistic regression explored variables associated with inability to achieve RC at subsequent visits. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival time of early vs late RC. RESULTS: At visit 2, 11/52 dogs were RC; at visit 3, 14/52 were RC; and at visit 4, 4/52 were RC. At the end of study, 25/52 remained NRC. At visit 2, both groups had increased cardiac dimensions, but NRC dogs had larger dimensions; biomarkers did not differ. At the end of study, RC showed decreased cardiac dimensions and end-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) compared with NRC. No variables were useful at predicting RC success in subsequent visits. Survival analysis found no differences between early vs late RC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The RC dogs had decreased cardiac dimensions and NT-proBNP, suggesting HR-mediated reverse-remodeling might benefit survival, even with delayed RC achievement. Pursuit of RC is crucial despite initial failures.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Conventional Acupuncture and Pharmacological Approaches for Cardiac Arrhythmias: An Umbrella Review.

With a global incidence of approximately 3.4% and an annual mortality rate of 3.7 million, cardiac arrhythmias (CAs) are a pressing global health issue. Their increasing prevalence, especially among older people, is intensifying the challenge for health care systems worldwide. This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of acupuncture and pharmacological treatments for CAs, addressing critical gaps in understanding optimal therapeutic approaches. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews was performed to identify data compiled through September 2023 for this umbrella review. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the foundation for meta-analyses and peer-reviewed systematic reviews were the primary focus of the literature search. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method was used to assess the overall certainty of the evidence, whereas AMSTAR 2 and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to evaluate the quality of the included reviews. Following a comprehensive review, three systematic analyses of 27 RCTs were integrated. Acupuncture led to a slightly greater reduction in the recurrence rate of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) compared to standard pharmaceutical therapy (risk ratio [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.27; I2 = 56%; P = .55), although the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, acupuncture significantly outperformed pharmacological treatment in the context of ventricular premature beats (VPBs) (RR, 1.16; 95 CI, 1.08-1.25; I2 = 0%; P < .0001). The reduction in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter was increased with acupuncture, albeit without statistical significance (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.88-1.42; I2 = 0%; P = .36). Acupuncture also led to a greater reduction in heart rate (HR) compared to pharmaceutical treatment despite notable heterogeneity and a lack of statistical significance (mean difference, -1.55; 95% CI, -41.37 to 38.28; I2 = 99%; P = .94). Adverse events were effectively managed, affirming the favorable safety profile of acupuncture. Our study suggests that acupuncture leads to a greater reduction in the recurrence rates of VPBs, AF, and atrial flutter but not significantly so in paroxysmal SVT or post-treatment HR. While promising for specific arrhythmias, the varying effectiveness of acupuncture underscores the need for further research and clinical assessment to determine its precise role and suitability in managing particular cardiac conditions.

The ion channel basis of pharmacological effects of amiodarone on myocardial electrophysiological properties, a comprehensive review.

Amiodarone is a benzofuran-based class III antiarrhythmic agent frequently used for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The primary target of class III antiarrhythmic drugs is the cardiac human ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) encoded channel, KCNH2, commonly known as HERG, that conducts the rapidly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr). Like other class III antiarrhythmic drugs, amiodarone exerts its physiologic effects mainly through IKr blockade, delaying the repolarization phase of the action potential and extending the effective refractory period. However, while many class III antiarrhythmics, including sotalol and dofetilide, can cause long QT syndrome (LQTS) that can progress to torsade de pointes, amiodarone displays less risk of inducing this fatal arrhythmia. This review article discusses the arrhythmogenesis in LQTS from the aspects of the development of early afterdepolarizations (EADs) associated with Ca2+ current, transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), as well as reverse use dependence associated with class III antiarrhythmic drugs to highlight electropharmacological effects of amiodarone on the myocardium.

Impacts of gene variants on drug effects-the foundation of genotype-guided pharmacologic therapy for long QT syndrome and short QT syndrome.

The clinical significance of optimal pharmacotherapy for inherited arrhythmias such as short QT syndrome (SQTS) and long QT syndrome (LQTS) has been increasingly recognised. The advancement of gene technology has opened up new possibilities for identifying genetic variations and investigating the pathophysiological roles and mechanisms of genetic arrhythmias. Numerous variants in various genes have been proven to be causative in genetic arrhythmias. Studies have demonstrated that the effectiveness of certain drugs is specific to the patient or genotype, indicating the important role of gene-variants in drug response. This review aims to summarize the reported data on the impact of different gene-variants on drug response in SQTS and LQTS, as well as discuss the potential mechanisms by which gene-variants alter drug response. These findings may provide valuable information for future studies on the influence of gene variants on drug efficacy and the development of genotype-guided or precision treatment for these diseases.

Atrial fibrillation symptom reduction and improved quality of life following the hybrid convergent procedure: a CONVERGE trial subanalysis.

Background: CONVERGE was a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that evaluated the safety of Hybrid Atrial Fibrillation Convergent (HC) and compared its effectiveness to endocardial catheter ablation (CA) for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) and longstanding PersAF (LSPAF). In 2020, we reported that CONVERGE met its primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. The primary objective of the present study is to report CONVERGE trial results for quality of life (QOL) and Class I/III anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) utilization following HC. Methods: Eligible patients had drug-refractory symptomatic PersAF or LSPAF and a left atrium diameter ≤6.0 cm. Enrolled patients were randomized 2:1 to receive HC or CA. Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were assessed at baseline and 12 months; statistical comparison was performed using paired t-tests. AAD utilization at baseline through 12 and 18 months post-procedure was evaluated; statistical comparison was performed using McNemar's tests. Results: A total of 153 patients were treated with either HC (n=102) or CA (n=51). Of the 102 HC patients, 38 had LSPAF. AFSS and SF-36 Mental and Physical Component scores were significantly improved at 12 months versus baseline with HC overall and for the subset of LSPAF patients treated with either HC or CA. The proportion of HC patients (n=102) who used Class I /III AADs at 12 and 18 months was significantly less (33.3% and 36.3%, respectively) than baseline (84.3%; P<0.001). In LSPAF patients who underwent HC (n=38), AADs use was 29.0% through 18 months follow-up versus 71.1% at baseline (P<0.001). Conclusions: HC reduced AF symptoms, significantly improved QOL, and reduced AAD use in patients with PersAF and LSPAF. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT01984346.

Are antiarrhythmic agents indicated in premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy and when?

INTRODUCTION: Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are the most common ventricular arrhythmia that are encountered in the clinical practice. Recent data suggests that high PVC burden may lead to the development of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy (PVC-CM) even in patients without structural heart disease. Treatment for effective suppression of PVCs, can reverse PVC-CM. Both antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) and catheter ablation (CA) are recognized treatment modalities for any cardiac arrhythmias. However, with increasing preference of CA, the role of AADs needs further defining regarding their efficacy, safety, indications and patient selection to treat PVC-CM. METHODS: To ascertain the role of AADs to treat PVC-CM; whether they are indicated to treat PVC-CM, and if so, when, we interrogated PubMed and other search engines for English language publications with key words premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), cardiomyopathy, anti-arrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and pharmacological agents. All publications were carefully reviewed and scrutinized by the authors for their inclusion in the review paper. For illustration of cases, ethical standard was observed as per the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, and the patient was treated as per the prevailing standard of care. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for conducting the ablation procedure. RESULTS: Our literature search specifically the pharmacological treatment of PVC-CM with AADs revealed significant paradigm shift in treatment approach for PVCs and PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. No major large, randomized control trials of AADs versus CA for PVC-CM were found. We found that beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are particularly effective in the treatment of PVCs originating from right ventricular outflow tract. For Class Ic AADs - flecainide and propafenone, small clinical studies showed Class Ic AADs to be effective in PVC suppression, but their usage was not recommended in patients with significant coronary artery disease. Mexiletine was found to have modest effect on PVC suppression. Studies showed sotalol to significantly reduce PVCs frequency in patients receiving both low and high doses. Studies also showed amiodarone to have higher successful PVC suppression, but not recommended as a first-line treatment for patients with idiopathic PVCs in the absence of symptoms and left ventricular dysfunction. For dronedarone, no major clinical data were available. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available data in the literature, we conclude that AADs play important role in the treatment of PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. However, appropriate patient selection criteria are vitally important, and in general terms AADs are indicated or polymorphic PVCs, epicardial PVCs; and when CA procedure is contraindicated, or not feasible or failed.

Wound incidence and outcomes in atrial fibrillation: Comparing catheter ablation and anti-arrhythmic drug therapy.

The most prevalent form of cardiac arrhythmia is atrial fibrillation (AF), which is typically managed through catheter ablation or anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. We compared the incidence and outcomes of wound complications in patients with atrial fibrillation who were treated with catheter ablation as opposed to anti-arrhythmic drug therapy. From May to November 2023, 240 adult AF patients who were treated with catheter ablation or anti-arrhythmic medications participated in a 6-month retrospective cohort study at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital in Hangzhou, China. An observation was made regarding 29 wound complications out of 240 patients. In comparison to drug therapy group, incidence of minor (8 vs. 11) and total complications (18 vs. 11) was greater in catheter ablation group. Significant adverse events occurred at higher rate in the catheter ablation group (6 versus 1) (p < 0.05). However, despite these patterns, there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of complications (total: p = 0.245; minor: p = 0.217; major: p = 0.128). Comparable treatment efficacy was observed across groups. In contrast to drug therapy, catheter ablation was associated with decreased probability of complications (odds ratio: 0.86), as determined by logistic regression; cardiac failure was a significant predictor of adverse outcomes. The study concluded that the risks of wound complications associated with catheter ablation and anti-arrhythmic drug therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation are comparable. Notwithstanding an elevated propensity for complications in ablation group, the statistical analysis indicated comparable safety profiles.

Rediscover the predictive capacity of B-type natriuretic peptide applied to neonatal supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is one of the most common non-benign arrhythmias in neonates, potentially leading to cardiac decompensation. This study investigated the early risk factors of acute heart failure (AHF) secondary to SVT in neonates, and explored their value in guiding the selection of effective anti-arrhythmic treatment. METHODS: A total of 43 newborns diagnosed with and treated for SVT between January 2017 and December 2022 were analyzed. According to the presence of AHF after restoring sinus rhythm in newborns with SVT, they were divided into SVT with AHF group and SVT without AHF group. Clinical data and anti-arrhythmic therapies were analyzed. Risk factors of AHF secondary to SVT in neonates were determined using logistic regression. The cut-off value for predictors of AHF secondary to SVT and demanding of a second-line anti-arrhythmic treatment was determined through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Time to initial control of tachycardia > 24 h, hyperkalemia, anemia, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were identified as risk factors of AHF secondary to SVT in neonates. BNP exhibited AUC of 0.80 in predicting AHF, and BNP > 2460.5pg/ml (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.27 ~ 45.39, P = 0.03) was an independent predictor, yielding sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 84.6%. Neonates with BNP > 2460.5pg/ml (37.5% versus 7.4%, P = 0.04) had a higher demand for a second line anti-arrhythmic treatment to terminate SVT, with sensitivity and specificity for BNP in predicting at 75.0%, 71.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BNP could be used to predict an incident of AHF secondary to SVT and a demand of second-line anti-arrhythmic treatment to promptly terminate SVT and prevent decompensation in neonates.

Atrial Fibrillation: Rate Versus Rhythm Control.

Description Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is expected to affect approximately 12 million individuals in the United States alone by 2030. Thromboembolic events remain a feared complication of AF and should be treated and risk-stratified utilizing the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system. Other complications of AF span a wide spectrum from impaired quality of life (QoL) to an increase in all-cause mortality. Rate control strategies consist of controlling the ventricular rate and have been shown to be a safe and effective strategy for asymptomatic AF patients. In patients who are plagued with symptoms leading to impaired QoL or a decrease in exercise capacity, rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation may be suitable options. Mortality benefits when comparing rate versus rhythm control remain equivocal when comparing multiple studies over the past decade.

Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, Stroke, Quality of Life, All-Cause Mortality, Sinus Rhythm Maintenance, and Hospitalization Rates as Compared to Medical Therapy.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of heart failure (HF) accounts for a significant proportion of mortality. AF can be managed either with rate control or rhythm control strategies. Rate control involves the use of beta blockers or calcium channel blockers. Rhythm control methods use antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation (CA) to abolish the rhythm. Articles from PubMed and Google Scholar were chosen for review. The literature was reviewed for data from the last 10 years to be chosen for interpretation. Clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic analysis were included in this study. Various health parameters such as all-cause mortality, hospitalization rates, sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance, quality of life improvement, stroke risk, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement, and healthcare costs were analyzed. We demonstrated that CA was superior to medical therapy in reducing all-cause mortality and hospitalization. It leads to significant improvement in LVEF as SR was maintained consistently. Overall, quality of life improved in those who underwent ablation as compared to those who did not. Stroke risk reduction was seen in observational studies only. We recommend CA as first-line therapy for treating patients with AF in the setting of HF. More clinical trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of ablation in reducing stroke risk.

High-Dose Oral Amiodarone for Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: A Case Report.

With the rising prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it has become a global health problem with increasing complications and high medical costs. Here, we describe the case of a 52-year-old woman with chest discomfort and frequent palpitations for the last few months. A careful clinical and instrumental examination showed that the patient had AF. Sinus rhythm was restored by cardioversion using high-dose oral amiodarone therapy. Although this medication can be an alternative with several advantages over electrical cardioversion in the future, further studies are needed to establish its efficacy and safety profile.

Bayesian analysis of the Substrate Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bayesian analyses can provide additional insights into the results of clinical trials, aiding in the decision-making process. We analysed the Substrate Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia (SURVIVE-VT) trial using Bayesian survival models. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SURVIVE-VT trial randomized patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) to catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) as a first-line strategy. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, unplanned heart failure hospitalizations, or severe treatment-related complications. We used informative, skeptical, and non-informative priors with different probabilities of large effects to compute the posterior distributions using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. We calculated the probabilities of hazard ratios (HR) being <1, <0.9, and <0.75, as well as 2-year survival estimates. Of the 144 randomized patients, 71 underwent catheter ablation and 73 received AAD. Regardless of the prior, catheter ablation had a >98% probability of reducing the primary outcome (HR < 1) and a >96% probability of achieving a reduction of >10% (HR < 0.9). The probability of a >25% (HR < 0.75) reduction of treatment-related complications was >90%. Catheter ablation had a high probability (>93%) of reducing incessant/slow undetected VT/electric storm, unplanned hospitalizations for ventricular arrhythmias, and overall cardiovascular admissions > 25%, with absolute differences of 15.2%, 21.2%, and 20.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and VT, catheter ablation as a first-line therapy resulted in a high probability of reducing several clinical outcomes compared to AAD. Our study highlights the value of Bayesian analysis in clinical trials and its potential for guiding treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03734562.

Anti-arrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation: tailor-made treatments.

During the last decades, many improvements have been made regarding the treatment of atrial fibrillation in terms of risk prevention, anti-coagulation strategies, and gain in quality of life. Among those, anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) have progressively fallen behind and overtaken by technological aspects as devices as procedures are now the standards of care for many patients. But is this it? Are AADs doomed to be relegated to an obscure and rarely read paragraph of the European recommendations? Or could they be still employed safely and effectively? In the present paper, we will discuss contemporary evidence in order to define where AADs still play a pivotal role, how should AADs be used, and whether a tailored approach can be the way to propose the right treatment to the right patient.

Comparison of landiolol and amiodarone for the treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery (FAAC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF) after cardiac surgery has a high incidence of 30%, but its management is controversial. Two strategies are recommended without evidence of a superiority of one against the other: rate control with beta-blocker or rhythm control with amiodarone. Landiolol is a new-generation beta-blocker with fast onset and short half-life. One retrospective, single-center study compared landiolol to amiodarone for PoAF after cardiac surgery with a better hemodynamic stability and a higher rate of reduction to sinus rhythm with landiolol, justifying the need for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Our aim is to compare landiolol to amiodarone in the setting of PoAF after cardiac surgery with the hypothesis of a higher rate of reduction to sinus rhythm with landiolol during the 48 h after the first episode of POAF. METHODS: The FAAC trial is a multicenter single-blind two parallel-arm randomized study, which planned to include 350 patients with a first episode of PoAF following cardiac surgery. The duration of the study is 2 years. The patients are randomized in two arms: a landiolol group and an amiodarone group. Randomization (Ennov Clinical®) is performed by the anesthesiologist in charge of the patient if PoAF is persistent for at least 30 min after correction of hypovolemia, dyskalemia, and absence of pericardial effusion on a transthoracic echocardiography done at bedside. Our hypothesis is an increase of the percentage of patients in sinus rhythm from 70 to 85% with landiolol in less than 48 h after onset of PoAF (alpha risk = 5%, power = 90%, bilateral test). DISCUSSION: The FAAC trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of EST III with approval number 19.05.08. The FAAC trial is the first randomized controlled trial comparing landiolol to amiodarone for PoAF after cardiac surgery. In case of higher rate of reduction with landiolol, this beta-blocker could be the drug of choice used in this context as to reduce the need for anticoagulant therapy and reduce the risk of complications of anticoagulant therapy for patients with a first episode of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04223739. Registered on January 10, 2020.

Pharmacotherapy in Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular ectopy is observed in most of the population ranging from isolated premature ventricular contractions to rapid hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachyarrhythmias like ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. Multiple mechanisms exist for ventricular arrhythmias such as triggered activity, reentry, and automaticity. Scar-based reentry forms the basis of most malignant VA that can lead to sudden cardiac death. Many antiarrhythmic drugs have been utilized for the suppression of ventricular arrhythmia. They are commonly classified using the Vaughan Williams Singh classification which distinguishes them based on the predominant action on different phases of the cardiac action potential. Class Ic agents are widely used in premature ventricular contraction suppression but are contraindicated in patients with prior myocardial infarction or ischemic scar and heart failure. ß-Blockers continue to be a mainstay in the treatment of most symptomatic VA and are well tolerated, relatively safe, and have additional benefits in symptomatic coronary heart disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Amiodarone continues to be used for the management of most cases of serious VA especially in the acute setting when accompanied by hemodynamic perturbations but has the disadvantage of having a poor toxicity profile for long-term use. SUMMARY: Historically used for long-term ventricular arrhythmia suppression and prevention of sudden cardiac death, antiarrhythmics are now used to reduce implantable defibrillator shocks and symptoms. They still have a role in premature ventricular complex suppression in patients with failed catheter ablation or those who are not candidates for invasive therapy. Newer concepts in cardiac imaging and the use of artificial intelligence may help further delineate sudden cardiac risk and identify patients that may benefit from pharmacological management. KEY MESSAGE: Anti-arrhythmic agents continue to perform an important role in the suppression of ventricular arrhythmias especially channelopathies, polymorphic VT, and idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Judicious use of these agents while recognizing side effects can help reduce the long-term effects of ventricular arrhythmias on cardiac function.