Normocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Following Influenza Vaccination: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Urticarial vasculitis is characterized by persistent urticarial lesions lasting over 24 h. Urticarial vasculitis is often triggered by medications, infections, and autoimmune disorders. However, vaccinations against viral and bacterial pathogens have recently been documented to induce urticarial vasculitis. We describe the case of a 67-year-old woman who was presented with an extensive erythematous and purpuric rash without systemic symptoms 3 days after an influenza vaccination. She was diagnosed with normocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis based on clinical findings, normal complement levels, and histopathological findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. After receiving oral histamines, she showed complete resolution 3 months after receiving the influenza vaccination. Although vaccination-associated vasculitis is common, urticarial vasculitis following vaccinations is rare. We reviewed 13 cases of urticarial vasculitis following a wide range of vaccines, including those against Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, serogroup B meningococcus, influenza, and coronavirus disease. We conducted a comprehensive review of various aspects, including age, sex, past medical history, type of vaccination, number of vaccinations, onset time, cutaneous symptoms, place of eruption, systemic symptoms, laboratory disorders, treatment period, and treatment of urticarial vasculitis. Two patients developed hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis after vaccination, and both experienced systemic symptoms such as arthralgia and fever. In this review, no significant differences were found in the data, which may be attributed to the small number of cases. The mechanisms underlying the induction of urticarial vasculitis by vaccines remain unknown; however, in addition to immune complex deposition and complement activation due to vaccine components, molecular mimicry may trigger urticarial vasculitis by producing vaccine-derived pathogenic antigen antibodies. This case study emphasizes the need for heightened awareness and further investigation of urticarial vasculitis as a rare adverse effect of vaccination.

Correlation Between Serum Markers and Midluteal Phase Doppler Assessment of Uterine Arterial Blood Flow in Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.

This study aimed to determine changes in uterine artery Doppler parameters in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (URPL) and to explore serum markers possibly associated with them. This retrospective case-control study included 107 URPL women and 107 control women. The mean pulsatility index (PI), resistive index (RI), and systolic-to-diastolic values for uterine arteries in URPL women were significantly higher than those in the controls (P < 0.05). The cutoff values of PI and RI differentiating the women with URPL from the controls were confirmed by ROC and Youden's index. Given a PI cutoff value of 2.6, the prevalence of URPL was significantly elevated in the high-PI group (74.58%) compared with that in the low-PI group (40.65%, P < 0.0001), with sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 69%, respectively. With an RI cutoff value of 0.86, the prevalence of URPL in the high-RI group (65.28%) was significantly elevated compared with that in the low-RI group (42.25%, P = 0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of 66% and 75%, respectively. The levels of serum D-dimers and anticardiolipin antibody (ACA)-IgM in URPL women were significantly higher than those in the controls. A positive correlation existed between the levels of ACA-IgM and uterine artery RI in URPL women (r = 0.43, P < 0.01). These results indicated that URPL women may be at a relatively high risk of a prothrombotic state, and the increased ACA-IgM deserves attention for its role in the elevated uterine artery Doppler parameters in URPL women.

The (reverse) paradox of lupus anticoagulant: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is often associated with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which manifests as recurrent thrombotic events or obstetric complications in presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. Hereby we present a case of a child who presented with low grade fever, superficial thrombophlebitis with mucosal bleeding and was diagnosed as Lupus Anticoagulant Hypoprothrombonemia Syndrome (LAHS). CASE: A 7-year-old girl was hositalized with complaints of fever and spontaneous bleeding from gums and epistaxis. On examination, she had multiple small tender nodular lesions with greenish hue of overlying skin suggesting superficial thrombophlebitis and mild non-tender hepatosplenomegaly. Her coagulogram revealed normal platelet counts and deranged PT and APTT. ESR and CRP were raised. Serology for viral infections, blood and urine cultures were negative. Patient had persistent coagulopathy, mucosal bleeding and low-grade fever despite supportive treatment. She was tested for anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) in view of suspicion of autoimmune process. ANA was positive in high titer with speckled pattern on indirect immunofluorescence. Mixing studies showed correction of PT and non-correction of APTT. PT based factors were normal except for prothrombin (FII) which was low and remained low despite dilution. APTT based factors (FVIII and FIX) were low but corrected on dilution. This was suggestive of prothrombin deficiency and a presence of a nonspecific inhibitor of APTT pathway (likely lupus anticoagulant). Presence of antiprothrombin antibodies established the diagnosis of LAHS. ENA profile was positive for SmD1, Ro60 and Ku. Complement levels were low. Direct Coomb's test was positive but there was no evidence of hemolysis. Lupus anticoagulant by DRVVT and anti-cardiolipin antibodies by ELISA were positive. Patient was diagnosed as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with Lupus Anticoagulant Hypoprothrombinemia Syndrome. She was treated with IV methylprednisolone. Patient showed significant improvement in form of resolution of fever, mucosal bleeding, correction of deranged INR and reversal of hypocomplementemia. She was discharged on hydroxychloroquine, mycophenolate mofetil and tapering doses of prednisolone. On follow up, child was doing well and her prothrombin time and complement levels had normalized. Low dose aspirin was aspirin was added for thromboprophylaxis.

Antiphospholipid syndrome in children.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in children is a rare disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In comparison with APS in adults, pediatric APS has a more severe presentation with frequent recurrences of thrombotic events and a higher probability of life-threatening catastrophic APS. Nonthrombotic manifestations are also more common in the pediatric age group and can precede thrombosis. New classification criteria have been introduced recently and have not yet been assessed in pediatric patients with APS. In addition to anticoagulation drugs, other novel therapies have emerged including the use of B cell and complement inhibitors, especially in catastrophic APS. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of aPL-related clinical manifestations in pediatric patients based on the analysis of published cohorts and data from the international pediatric APS registry. We also aim to illustrate APS in infants caused by transplacentally transferred maternal aPL, which is very rarely associated with acute thrombotic events in the perinatal period and more frequently with long-term neurodevelopmental abnormalities.

Study of electrocardiographic corrected QT interval and QT dispersion abnormalities, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum uric acid in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease having a variety of clinical symptoms because of multiple organs being affected at once or progressively over time. Cardiovascular system (CVS) involvement is the third most frequent cause of death in SLE, among other factors. The prognosis can be determined by looking at QT interval measurements, which have shown an elevated risk of mortality from cardiovascular causes. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted on 80 patients (40 SLE patients and 40 controls) for a duration of 16 months. SLE patients and controls were identified from the general medicine and rheumatology outpatient department (OPD) based on the inclusion criteria. A thorough clinical examination was performed after obtaining a detailed clinical history. Baseline blood tests were then performed on the SLE patients and ECG was taken from both cases and controls. The serum uric acid level was measured using an automated analyzer, and the ESR was computed using Westergren's Method. The corrected QT interval (QTc) was estimated using Bazett's method. All the collected data were compared and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0. RESULTS: The majority of age distribution among SLE patients and controls was 21-25 years (37.5%) (Mean - 15.7 ± 14.9 years). Duration of SLE was predominantly reported between 1 and 12 months (62.5%). Very high (40%) and high (40%) lupus disease activity was recorded in the majority as per the SELENA-SLEDAI score. There was a significant difference between QTc values among SLE patients and controls (t- 8.117) (p-.0005). Upon correlating SLEDAI with the QTc, QTd, ESR, and Uric acid parameters among the SLE patients, ESR parameters were found to be moderately correlated (r-0.460) with the SLEDAI which was statistically significant (p- .003). CONCLUSION: QTc interval and ESR values can be a simple and potential method for early detection of cardiac involvement in SLE patients with active disease activity. This will not only facilitate early diagnosis of disease activity, but it will also provide an affordable and accessible avenue for low and middle-income countries to decrease the SLE burden.

Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing in a Maximum Care Hospital: Method-Dependent Differences.

Background: Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) testing is critical for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria recommend the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and specific thresholds for aPL positivity. Since non-ELISA methods are increasingly used, we compared and evaluated ELISA and non-ELISA aPL assays in a real-world maximum care hospital setting. Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2024, anticardiolipin (aCL; IgG and IgM) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI; IgG and IgM) antibodies were measured using ELISA (n = 5115) and a chemiluminescence-based automated immunoassay (CLIA) (n = 3820). Results of parallel testing were compared, and associations with clinical and laboratory characteristics were evaluated. Results: A total of 946 samples were tested using ELISA and CLIA in parallel. A total of 136 (14%) specimens were positive for at least one aPL, and 55 (6%) specimens were from patients diagnosed with APS. Among the latter, 47 (85%) and 41 (75%) patients were positive when ELISA- or CLIA-based aPL assays were used, respectively. After applying the >40 units threshold of the new classification criteria, the number of aPL-positive specimens was significantly lower. In the entire cohort, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable only for aß2GPI IgG; the results from the two methods did not agree for aCL IgG/IgM and aß2GPI IgM. In APS patients, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable for aß2GPI IgG and IgM but poor for aCL IgG and IgM. Antibody levels in APS patients were significantly higher using CLIA compared to ELISA. Conclusions: The method-dependent discrepancies between ELISA- and CLIA-based aPL assays regarding the quantitative and qualitative results are substantial. Both methods are suitable for APS classification, but the choice of aPL assay may influence the classification, and therefore, aPL results should be interpreted carefully in the clinical context.

Elucidating the Neuropsychiatric Phenomena of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in a 31-Year-Old Female.

We present an unusual case of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a 31-year-old female patient exhibiting neuropsychiatric manifestations, followed by a subsequent thromboembolic stroke. APS is characterized by antiphospholipid antibodies leading to a prothrombotic state and an increased risk of thrombotic events. While the neurological involvement in APS typically presents with thrombotic events, antiphospholipid antibodies may also directly interact with neural tissue, causing immediate pathogenic effects that disrupt normal function. Neuropsychiatric manifestations in APS are rare but have been documented previously, including cases of psychosis and hallucinations. The timely recognition of APS in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms is crucial for appropriate management and the prevention of further complications. The reported patient displayed aggressive, bizarre, and erratic behavior upon admission to the psychiatric unit, followed by the development of right-sided facial droop and weakness. Imaging studies revealed stenosis and partial occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA), and a repeat scan showed a known left MCA territory infarct with increasing hypodensity in specific brain regions. Notably, the patient exhibited multiple purpuric ecchymoses on bilateral upper extremities, raising suspicion of a hypercoagulable state. Laboratory investigations detected elevated levels of anticardiolipin IgG and beta-2 glycoprotein 1 IgG, along with a positive antinuclear antibody. The presence of a patent foramen ovale was also confirmed through echocardiography. This case emphasizes the importance of early APS recognition in patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms, facilitating appropriate intervention and improved outcomes. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms connecting APS to neuropsychiatric manifestations, enabling enhanced understanding and refined management of this intricate condition.

Hughes syndrome: The discovery of the antiphospholipid syndrome.

In the 40 years since the original detailed description of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), the condition has come to be regarded as one of the most common autoimmune diseases. The impact of the description has been enormous - for example, the recognition that some individuals with connective tissue diseases require anticoagulation rather than corticosteroids or anti-inflammatory treatment has bought about fundamental change in medical practice. In obstetrics, APS is now regarded as the most important prothrombotic cause of recurrent pregnancy loss - with pregnancy success improving from below 20% to current live birth rate over 80%. In neurology, APS may be associated with up to 20% of strokes in people under 40 - a striking figure not least in terms of medical economics, let alone in potentially preventable suffering. In vascular medicine, APS links immunology with thrombosis and vascular disease and may well provide insights into immunological factors in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: From guidelines to clinical management.

Thrombotic manifestations, mainly venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke, are the most common and potentially life-threatening presentations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The management of APS requires the assessment of the antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) profile, of concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus or other systemic autoimmune diseases and the presence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and bleeding. Anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) remains the cornerstone of therapy for thrombotic APS. As platelets play a central role in APS, low-dose aspirin is the first option for primary thromboprophylaxis in asymptomatic aPL carriers, and also plays a role as combination therapy with VKAs in arterial thrombosis. Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) could be considered in certain low-risk situations, although they are not recommended in patients with arterial thrombosis or triple positive aPL. Adjuvant therapies such as hydroxychloroquine and statins may be useful in complex settings such as thrombotic recurrences or high risk of bleeding. In this article, we review the evidence and the recommendations of the guidelines for the treatment of APS, and provide a critical and practical approach of its management from our clinical perspective.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most frequent acquired thrombophilia of autoimmune basis. Pregnancy complications of APS may include recurrent miscarriage, and placental dysfunction presenting as fetal death, prematurity, intrauterine growth restriction and preeclampsia. For the management of obstetric APS, a coordinated medical-obstetric management is essential, and this should start for a preconceptional visit in order to estimate the individual risk for complications, adjust therapies and establish the indications for preconceptional and first-trimester therapy. The basis of APS therapy during pregnancy is low-dose aspirin, combined in certain clinical scenarios with low-molecular weight heparin. Induction of delivery should not be routinely indicated in the absence of maternal and/or fetal complications. Postpartum management should be warranted.

Antiphospholipid antibody testing.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a family of autoantibodies targeting phospholipid-binding proteins and are associated with several clinical settings, and most notably define the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These antibodies can be identified using a variety of laboratory tests, which include both solid-phase immunological assays and functional clotting assays that detect lupus anticoagulants (LA). aPLs are linked to a range of adverse medical conditions, such as thrombosis and complications affecting the placenta and fetus, potentially leading to morbidity and mortality. The specific aPL identified, along with the pattern of reactivity, correlates with the severity of these conditions. Therefore, laboratory testing for aPL is crucial for evaluating the risk of complications and for fulfilling certain classification criteria for APS, which are also applied as diagnostic markers in medical practice. This review provides an overview of the available laboratory tests currently for measuring aPL and discusses their clinical implications.

Establishment of ELISA-comparable moderate and high thresholds for anticardiolipin and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I chemiluminescent immunoassays according to the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria and evaluation of their diagnostic performance.

OBJECTIVES: Recently published 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria emphasize the importance of quantifying single-, double-, and triple-antiphospholipid antibody positivity, distinguishing between IgG and IgM isotypes, and delineating moderate/high levels of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-ß2 glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) antibodies. We aimed to establish clinically important moderate/high thresholds for aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA), in particular QUANTA Flash, comparable to our in-house ELISAs used for over two decades, and to evaluate their diagnostic performance. METHODS: QUANTA Flash CLIA and in-house ELISAs were used to measure aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM. Moderate thresholds for QUANTA Flash CLIA were determined using a non-parametric approach, calculating a 99th percentile on serum samples from 139 blood donors, and by mirroring the diagnostic performance of in-house ELISA on 159 patient samples. RESULTS: Thresholds for QUANTA Flash CLIA achieving diagnostic performance equivalent to in-house ELISAs were 40 CU for moderate and 80 CU for high levels for aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG and IgM. The assays showed good qualitative agreement, ranging from 76.10 to 91.19 %. When considering in-house ELISA results, 14 out of 80 (17.5 %) patients did not fulfill the new ACR/EULAR laboratory classification criteria, while 27 out of 80 (33.8 %) did not when considering QUANTA Flash CLIA results. CONCLUSIONS: We determined moderate and high thresholds for aCL and anti-ß2GPI IgG and IgM detected with QUANTA Flash CLIA, aligning with long-established in-house ELISA thresholds. These thresholds are crucial for seamlessly integrating of the new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria into future observational clinical studies and trials.

Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review.

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifests through venous or arterial thrombosis, with or without pregnancy complication alongside the continuous presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). APS classification relies on three aPL subtypes: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-ß2GPI), and lupus anticoagulants (LA) antibodies. Given that thrombosis and pregnancy issues are not unique to APS, the precise and reliable identification of aPL forms the basis for diagnosis. Semi-quantitative solid-phase assays identify two antibodies, aCL and anti-ß2GPI, while LA detection occurs through various phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays that are based on antibody behaviour. LA, specifically, is conclusively associated with thrombosis, prompting discussions around the serological criteria for APS. Despite advancements in LA detection, the standardisation of all aPL detection assays remains imperative. The combined presence of aCL and anti-ß2GPI with thrombosis inconsistently triggers concern. Initial presentations by APS patients commonly exhibit a heightened risk of stroke, miscarriages in the later stages of pregnancy, positive results of LA tests, and widespread thrombosis across multiple organs, often leading to adverse outcomes. Correctly diagnosing this condition is pivotal to avoid unnecessary long-term secondary thromboprophylaxis.

The relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies in obstetrics.

AIM AND METHODOLOGY: To provide a comprehensive review on new findings and current recommendations regarding antiphospholipid antibodies with particular emphasis on clinical impact on gestation. CONCLUSION: Antiphospholipid antibodies are an important risk factor for the development of a series of pregnancy-related complications. Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy can reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss and pregnancy-related complications.

Comparative assessment of the diagnostic performances of particle-based multianalyte technology and commercial ELISA for antiphospholipid autoantibody testing.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) relies heavily on laboratory findings, particularly the detection of specific antibodies like lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and/or IgM anti-cardiolipin (aCL), and IgG and/or IgM anti-ß2 glycoprotein 1 (aB2GP1). Although ELISA is widely used in the US for this purpose, standardization between different assay methodologies remains challenging, leading to significant variability across laboratories. Particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) offers a streamlined one-step detection for all six antiphospholipid (aPL) autoantibodies, covering aCL and aB2GP1 of IgA, IgG, and IgM isotypes. METHODS: In this study involving 224 subjects, including 34 clinically diagnosed with APS, alongside 160 non-APS patients and 30 healthy donors, PMAT's performance was evaluated against commercial ELISA in detecting aPL antibodies. RESULTS: At the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, PMAT exhibited sensitivity comparable to ELISA, albeit with a low to moderate decrease in specificity for certain antibodies. With anti-CL IgM alone, PMAT displayed a 17.7% decrease in sensitivity, accompanied by a corresponding 31.1% increase in specificity compared to ELISA. However, applying a stricter cutoff (88-90% specificity), IgA and IgM antibodies yielded 5.9-17.6% higher sensitivities with PMAT, and IgG antibodies displayed similar sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In this study cohort, PMAT demonstrated higher or comparable sensitivity to that of commercial ELISA for all six aPL antibodies at a specificity cutoff near 90%. Notably, PMAT demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity overall in detecting IgA aCL and aB2GP1 antibodies. This study highlights the potential of automated PMAT for detecting aPL antibodies in APS evaluation.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent pregnancy morbidity or thrombosis in combination with the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in plasma/serum. Antiphospholipid antibodies are a heterogeneous, overlapping group of autoantibodies, of which anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (aß2GPI), anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies and antibodies that prolong plasma clotting time in tests in vitro known as lupus anticoagulant (LAC) are included in the laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of APS. The presence of LAC antibodies in plasma is indirectly determined by measuring the length of coagulation in two tests - activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT). The concentration of aß2GPI and aCL (immunglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) isotypes) in serum is directly determined by solid-phase immunoassays, either by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), fluoroimmunoassay (FIA), immunochemiluminescence (CLIA) or multiplex flow immunoassay (MFIA). For patient safety, it is extremely important to control all three phases of laboratory testing, i.e. preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical phase. Specialists in laboratory medicine must be aware of interferences in all three phases of laboratory testing, in order to minimize these interferences. The aim of this review was to show the current pathophysiological aspects of APS, the importance of determining aPLs-a in plasma/serum, with an emphasis on possible interferences that should be taken into account when interpreting laboratory findings.

Management of Cardiovascular Complications in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Narrative Review with a Focus on Older Adults.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes syndrome, is an acquired autoimmune and procoagulant condition that predisposes individuals to recurrent thrombotic events and obstetric complications. Central is the role of three types of antiphospholipid antibodies that target phospholipid-binding proteins: lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (ß2-GPI-Ab), and anti-cardiolipin (aCL). Together with clinical data, these antibodies are the diagnostic standard. However, the diagnosis of APS in older adults may be challenging and, in the diagnostic workup of thromboembolic complications, it is an underestimated etiology. The therapeutic management of APS requires distinguishing two groups with differential risks of thromboembolic complications. The standard therapy is based on low-dose aspirin in the low-risk group and vitamin K antagonists in the high-risk group. The value of direct oral anticoagulants is currently controversial. The potential role of monoclonal antibodies is investigated. For example, rituximab is currently recommended in catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Research is ongoing on other monoclonal antibodies, such as daratumumab and obinutuzumab. This narrative review illustrates the pathophysiological mechanisms of APS, with a particular emphasis on cardiovascular complications and their impact in older adults. This article also highlights advancements in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of APS.

Acute Coxiella burnetii Infection: A 10-Year Clinical Experience at a Tertiary Care Center in the United States.

Background: Identifying and treating patients with acute Q fever who are at an increased risk of progressing to persistent disease is crucial for preventing future complications. In this study, we share our decade-long clinical experience with acute Q fever, highlighting the challenges that clinicians encounter from making an initial diagnosis and performing risk stratification to determining the appropriate prophylaxis regimen and duration. Methods: We retrieved records of adult Mayo Clinic patients (≥18 years) with positive Coxiella burnetii serology results between 1 January 2012 and 31 March 2022. Patients with Q fever anti-phase II immunoglobulin G ≥1:256 by indirect immunofluorescence were further analyzed. Results: Thirty-one patients were included. Their median age was 58 years (IQR, 50-64), and the majority were men (84%). Acute hepatitis (29%), flu-like illness (25.8%), and pneumonia (16%) were the most common presentations. Thirteen patients (42%) received antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent disease progression, with significant variation in the indications and duration across physicians. The combination of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine was the preferred regimen. Prophylaxis was administered for a median 333 days (IQR, 168-414). Four patients (13%) progressed to Q fever native valve infective endocarditis, with elevated anticardiolipin immunoglobulin G levels being the sole risk factor in 2 cases. The small sample size precluded drawing conclusions on the impact of prophylaxis in preventing disease progression. Conclusions: Management of acute Q fever is complicated by the lack of comprehensive clinical guidelines leading to varied clinical practices. There is a critical need for randomized trials to establish robust evidence-based protocols for management.

Beta-2 Glycoprotein I IgA Isotype: An Important Consideration in Secondary Hypertension.

Anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies are an important player in hypercoagulable states, including those that lead to antiphospholipid syndrome. Traditionally, assays have only detected IgG and IgM isotypes of this antibody. However, newer assays also detect the IgA isotype. The problem lies in the largely unknown significance of this IgA isotype. This paper describes a middle-aged male who presented with hypertensive emergency and was later found to have IgA anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies. He was treated with multiple anti-hypertensives, aspirin, and statin therapy. In addition to the case, we discuss the implications of this IgA isotype and how it may relate to antiphospholipid syndrome, despite not currently being included in the laboratory diagnostic criteria for the disease.