The Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Compared With Hydroxyzine Pamoate for Preventing Infusion Reactions to the First Dose of Rituximab in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Protocol for a Phase II, Double-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, can cause infusion reactions (IRs), especially during the initial rituximab infusion therapy. Generally, patients are administered a histamine H1-receptor antagonist before the rituximab infusion, along with an antipyretic analgesic, to prevent or reduce IRs. Multiple retrospective case-control studies indicate that the second generation of histamine H1-receptor antagonists might be more effective than the first generation in suppressing IRs caused by the rituximab infusion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of first- and second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists for preventing IRs resulting from the initial infusion of rituximab in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: This is a phase II, double-blind, active-controlled randomized trial. It will be a multicenter study conducted across 3 facilities that aims to enroll a total of 40 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma who will receive their initial rituximab infusion. Participating patients will be administered hydroxyzine pamoate or bepotastine besilate, representing first- or second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists, respectively. This will be combined with 400-mg acetaminophen tablets taken approximately 30 minutes before the first infusion of rituximab. The primary end point of this trial is to assess severe IRs, equivalent to grade 2 or higher as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, that occur within a 4-hour period after the initiation of rituximab infusion. The secondary end points include assessing the severity of the initial IR, the maximum severity of the IR, and the duration between rituximab infusion initiation and the onset of the first IR within a 4-hour period. Additionally, the trial will evaluate histamine H1-receptor antagonist-induced drowsiness using the visual analogue scale, with each patient providing their individual response. RESULTS: This study began with patient recruitment in April 2023, with 17 participants enrolled as of November 12, 2023. The anticipated study completion is set for February 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of oral first- and second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists in preventing IRs induced by the initial administration of rituximab. The findings from this study hold the potential to establish the rationale for a phase III study aimed at determining the standard premedication protocol for rituximab infusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs051220169; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051220169. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54882.

Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate 1.5% Preservative-Free Eye Drops Vs Olopatadine Hydrochloride 0.2% Bak-Preserved Eye Drops in Patients with Allergic Conjunctivitis.

Purpose: To study the efficacy and toxic effects of bepotastine besilate 1.5% preservative-free (BB-PF) and olopatadine 0.2% BAK-preserved (OL-BAK) drops on the ocular surface of patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Patients and Methods: Ninety-seven patients with allergic conjunctivitis diagnosis participated in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients received either BB-PF (n=48) or OL-BAK (n=49), both administered once daily in the morning. The patients were followed for 60 days. Ocular itching was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included ocular symptoms, signs, and non-ocular symptoms associated with rhinoconjunctivitis. Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed to evaluate histopathological changes related to the toxic effects of preservatives. Results: BB-PF treatment was associated with a 1.30 more probability of diminished ocular itching than OL-BAK (odds ratio (OR)=1.30; 95% CI=(0.96-1.7); p=0.086). No statistically significant differences were found between treatments in the resolution of other ocular symptoms or signs, except for tearing, which was superior in the BB-PF (OR=1.37; 95% (1.26-1.47); p<0.0001). BB-PF was superior in terms of the resolution of rhinorrhea (p=0.040) and nasal itching (p=0.037). After 60 days of treatment, the BB-PF group exhibited 2.0 times higher probability of having a lower Nelson scale score compared to the OL-BAK group (OR=2.00; 95% CI=(1.19-3.34); p=0.010). Conclusion: Both medications presented a similar efficacy in terms of the resolution of ocular signs and symptoms associated with ocular conjunctivitis. BB-PF is superior in the resolution of non-ocular symptoms and safer for the ocular surface than OL-BAK.

Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of Alcaftadine 0.25%, Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% and Bepotastine besilate 1.5% in allergic conjunctivitis.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of Alcaftadine 0.25%, Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2%, and Bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic solutions in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Methods: This is a prospective, observer-masked, comparative study of 180 patients with mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis, randomized into three groups of 60 patients each. Each group was assigned to be treated with one of the three treatment options namely Alcaftadine 0.25%, Olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% and Bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic solutions. Patients were followed-up at regular intervals with relief and resolution of symptoms and signs noted using Total Ocular Scoring System (TOSS) and hyperaemia scale. Results: All three topical medications were effective in resolving symptoms of the patients with mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis. Baseline mean TOSS scores for Alcaftadine group, Olopatadine group and Bepotastine besilate group were (7.68±2.32), (7.65±2.32) and (7.45±2.27) respectively as compared to the corresponding TOSS scores on 14th Day (4th visit) which were (0.2 ± 0.43), (0.4 ± 0.56) and (0.1 ± 0.36) respectively. The resolution of symptoms in the Bepotastine and Alcaftadine groups was significantly profound as compared to the Olopatadine group (p = 0.008). Bepotastine and Alcaftadine groups significantly reduced allergic conjunctivitis symptoms compared to Olopatadine group (p = 0.008). Conclusion: All three topical ophthalmic medications used in the study are safe and effective in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. However, Bepotastine and Alcaftadine appear to outweigh Olopatadine in resolving the symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.

Characterization of Photodegradation Products of Bepotastine Besilate and In Silico Evaluation of Their Physicochemical, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicity Properties.

Bepotastine (BPT) is a H1-receptor antagonist. It is used as a besilate salt in ophthalmic solution for allergic conjunctivitis and orally for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria/pruritus. Its systematic forced degradation study is unreported. The same was carried out in different conditions prescribed by International Conference on Harmonisation. The stressed solutions were subjected to reversed phase liquid chromatographic analysis, and BPT was observed to be labile under photobasic condition only, yielding 5 photodegradation products. The structures of the latter were elucidated from data generated by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and multistage mass spectrometry. Of the 5, 4 products were further isolated and subjected to nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to justify the proposed structures. Two of them, with similar accurate mass, were additionally and unambiguously characterized from their heteronuclear multiple bond correlation data, hydrogen deuterium exchange mass data, and quantum chemical analysis using density functional theory calculations. One degradation product had a structure that could only be explained by unusual rearrangement involving conversions of N-oxide into hydroxylamine, similar to Meisenheimer rearrangement. The physicochemical, as well as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties of BPT and its characterized photodegradation products were evaluated in silico by ADMET Predictor™ software.

Bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution 1.5% for alleviating nasal symptoms in patients with allergic conjunctivitis.

BACKGROUND: Bepotastine besilate ophthalmic solution (BBOS) 1.5% is a topical antihistamine for the treatment of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis (AC). Allergic rhinitis and AC are common comorbid conditions. We explored the efficacy of BBOS 1.5% in alleviating nasal symptoms in an integrated analysis of two Phase III conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) studies and a Phase IV environmental allergen study. METHODS: In the Phase III trials, a CAC was performed 15 minutes, 8 hours, and 16 hours following ocular instillation of BBOS 1.5% (n=78) or placebo (n=79), and subjects evaluated nasal symptoms. In the environmental study, subjects instilled BBOS 1.5% (n=123) or placebo (n=122) twice daily and nasal symptoms were evaluated over 2 weeks. RESULTS: In the Phase III trials, BBOS 1.5% had reduced CAC-induced nasal congestion and pruritus at 15 minutes and 8 hours postdosing and rhinorrhea and a non-ocular composite-symptom score (sum of nasal scores plus ear or palate pruritus) at all time points postdosing (all P≤0.01 vs placebo). In the Phase IV environmental study, BBOS 1.5% reduced sneezing and nasal pruritus over 2 weeks and median number of days to improvement of nasal pruritus and total nasal symptom score (sum for rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal pruritus, and nasal congestion; P≤0.04 vs placebo). Additionally, investigator-reported improvement in overall ocular (pruritus, hyperemia, tearing) and nasal symptoms was greater with BBOS 1.5% vs placebo (P≤0.03). CONCLUSION: Results of these exploratory analyses indicate that topical ocular BBOS 1.5% reduced nasal symptoms, supporting its use for alleviating rhinitis symptoms associated with AC.

Preparation and Quality Evaluation of Bepotastine Besilate Film-coated Tablets / 中国药师

Objective: To prepare bepotastine besilate film-coated tablets, determine the dissolution rate by HPLC, and evaluate the similarity of dissolution curves for self-made tablets and the original tablets. Methods: Bepotastine besilate tablets were prepared by using microcrystalline cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, mannitol, aspartame and magnesium stearate as the accessories. Bepotas-tine besilate film-coated tablets were prepared by using OpadryⅡpremixed spray-coating liquid. The formulation was screened with the angle of repose, disintegration time, content uniformity and dissolution rate as the indices. The coating material amount was screened with the dissolution rate as the index. Results: The optimal formulation of bepotastine besilate film-coated tablet contained bepotastine besilate 5 mg,mannitol 43 mg,microcrystalline cellulose 21. 5mg,aspartame 0. 5 mg,magnesium stearate 0. 5 mg and hydroxypropyl cellulose 15 mg. The optimal weight of coating material was 5% . The self-made tablets and the original tablets had similar dissolution behavior in 4 media including water, hydrochloric acid(pH 1. 2), acetate buffer solution(pH 4. 5) and phosphate buffer solution(pH 6. 8). Conclusion:The self-made tablets have similar dissolution behavior in vitro with the original tablets, and their quality is similar.

Analysis Method of Isomer in Bepotastine Besilate Eye Drops / 中国药学杂志

OBJECTIVE: To establish a method for isomer analysis of bepotastine besilate eye drops and test the stability of isomer in the preparation. METHODS: The analysis was performed on an ULTRON ES-CD chiral column (6.0 mm×150 mm, 5 μm). The mobile phase was 0.02 mol·L-1 potassium phosphate monobasic-acetonitrile(75∶25) at the flow of 0.8 mL·min-1. The column temperature was maintained at 35℃ and the detection wavelength was set at 225 nm. The injection volume was 10 μL. RESULTS: The limit of detection and limit of quantification of bepotastine besilate R-isomer were 12 and 48 ng, respectively. The linear range of bepotastine besilate R-isomer was 0.01-0.1 mg·mL-1 and the repeatability was good at high, medium and low concentrations. CONCLUSION: The method is simple and accurate, which can be used for isomer separation of bepotastine besilate and testing the stability of isomer in bepotastine besilate eye drops.

Comparative efficacy of bepotastine besilate 1.5% ophthalmic solution versus olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% ophthalmic solution evaluated by patient preference.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare patient-perceived relief of ocular itch, nasal symptoms, and eye drop comfort when allergic conjunctivitis was treated with bepotastine besilate 1.5% versus olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2%. METHODS: This randomized, observer-masked, single-center, crossover study included 30 patients with ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis accompanied by nasal symptoms. Patients were treated with bepotastine besilate 1.5% twice daily (7 am and 4 pm) or olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% once daily (7 am) for 14 days. Following a 7-day washout period during which only preservative-free artificial tears were used twice daily, patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment for 14 days. Parameters evaluated by twice-daily patient diaries included each treatment's ability to relieve ocular itch, ability to relieve itchy/runny nose, ability to relieve ocular allergy symptoms, and eye drop comfort. At the conclusion of the study, patients were also asked to identify which agent provided better all-day relief of ocular itching, better all-day relief of itchy/runny nose, superior comfort, and for which treatment they would prefer a prescription. RESULTS: According to the mean daily diary responses, bepotastine besilate 1.5% provided significantly better relief of evening ocular itch, relief of morning and evening itchy/runny nose, and relief of morning and evening ocular allergy symptoms. At study end, 63.3% and 66.7% of patients preferred bepotastine besilate 1.5% for all-day relief of ocular itching and all-day relief of itchy/runny nose, respectively. At study end, there was no significant difference in the number of patients preferring one treatment over the other for comfort. Overall, 66.7% of patients stated that they would prefer to treat their allergic conjunctivitis with bepotastine besilate 1.5% over olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2%. CONCLUSION: Based on their evaluation of therapeutic performance, patients preferred bepotastine besilate 1.5% over olopatadine hydrochloride 0.2% by two-to-one for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

Bepotastine besilate for the treatment of chronic urticaria: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized,parallel-controlled study / 中华皮肤科杂志

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of bepotastine besilate in the treatment of chronic urticaria.MethodsA randomized,double-blind,parallel-controlled clinical study was conducted in 5 centers.Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups to be treated with bepotastine besilate 20 mg or loratadine 10 mg once a day,respectively,for 4 weeks.Visits were scheduled before and after 1,2 and 4 weeks of treatment.Itching degree,number of wheals and diameter of the largest wheal were recorded for efficacy evaluation.ResultsTotally,240 patients were enrolled and 227 patients completed the study.The response rate was 74.6％ and 77.9％ respectively in bepotastine besilate- and loratadine-treated patients,respectively(P ＞0.05).No significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse reactions between bepotastine besilate- and loratadine-treated patients(12.8％ vs.17.9％,P ＞ 0.05).The main side effects were mild to moderate drowsiness,dry mouth,dizziness.ConclusionBepotastine besilate is effective and safe for the treatment of chronic urticaria,with an efficacy and safety profile similar to that of loratadine.