Strategic behavior and entry deterrence by branded drug firms: the case of authorized generic drugs.

Pharmaceutical firms that market brand-name drugs lose substantial market share to generic manufacturers after patent expiration. As a response to the threat of generic competition, branded manufacturers pursue defensive strategies. One such strategy is the launch of authorized generic drugs. Authorized generic drugs are produced by branded manufacturers to compete against other generic drug entrants. Such competition may lower the expected profits of generic drug manufacturers and hence deter future generic drug entry. This paper models and empirically examines whether the introduction of authorized generic drugs changes the independent generic firms' decisions on entering the market. We use an instrumental variable approach to evaluate the effect of authorized generic drugs on the responses of generic manufacturers. The results show that the entry of authorized generic drugs deters and delays the entry of generic drugs.

Pricing dynamics of anti-seizure medications in the U.S.

BACKGROUND: The median cost of anti-seizure medications (ASM) in the United States (U.S.) nearly doubled per person between 2006 and 2021. This increase, combined with shifts in ASM usage and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on drug supply chains amid rising inflation, underscored the urgent need to scrutinize ASM pricing dynamics. This study aimed to analyze the complex dynamics of ASM pricing in the U.S. over the past decade (2013-2023); this included how the entry of generic ASMs influenced the pricing of brand-name counterparts and what impacted price variations across different ASM formulations (e.g., significant inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic). METHODS: This study utilized National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) data from November 2013 to July 2023. We adjusted ASM prices for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for Medicinal Drugs - Seasonally Adjusted (CPI-MDS). Statistical analyses included fixed effects regressions and multivariable regression analysis to evaluate the impact of inflation, the number of medication labelers, and the COVID-19 pandemic on ASM prices. RESULTS: Our study analyzed 23 ASMs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which encompassed 223 oral formulations:112 brand-name and 111 generics. From 2013-2016 to 2020-2023, accounting for standard deviations (SD), the average price of brand-name ASMs increased from $8.71 (SD 5.9) to $15.43 (SD 10.7), while generic ASMs saw a slight decrease from $1.39 (SD 1.8) to $1.26 (SD 1.6). Consequently, the price gap between brand-name and generic ASMs surged from 1452.39 % to 3399.26 %. The proportion of matched brand-name and generic ASMs with a price difference of 1000 %-9999 % increased from 32.88 % (2013-2016) to 41.43 % (2020-2023), while those exceeding 10,000 % rose from 16.44 % to 20 % in the same period. Generic immediate-release (IR) formulations were significantly less expensive than extended-release (ER) or delayed-release (DR) counterparts, with cost differences reaching up to 7751.20 %. The number of medication labelers was inversely related to generic ASM prices, which decreased by 5.45 % (p = 0.001) with each additional generic labeler, while brand-name ASM prices increased by 2.46 % (p < 0.001) with each additional generic labeler. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a 24.4 % increase in brand-name ASM prices and a 23.1 % decrease in generic ASM prices. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal an expanding price disparity between brand-name and generic oral ASMs. An inverse relationship was observed between the number of medication labelers and generic ASM prices, with additional labelers driving down generic prices. However, introducing more generic labelers led to a significant increase in brand-name ASM prices. Furthermore, following patent expirations, brand-name ASM prices rose-a trend explained by the "generics paradox," where, contrary to expectations, brand prices do not decrease and may even increase when generics enter the market. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions in drug pricing policies to manage the rising costs associated with epilepsy treatment. To ensure equitable access to ASMs, stakeholders must understand and address the factors driving these pricing dynamics.

Digital Epidemiology of Prescription Drug References on X (Formerly Twitter): Neural Network Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) can provide insights into the types of language that are used when discussing drug use. In past research using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), we found that tweets containing "street names" of prescription drugs were difficult to classify due to the similarity to other colloquialisms and lack of clarity over how the terms were used. Conversely, "brand name" references were more amenable to machine-driven categorization. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to use next-generation techniques (beyond LDA) from natural language processing to reprocess X data and automatically cluster groups of tweets into topics to differentiate between street- and brand-name data sets. We also aimed to analyze the differences in emotional valence between the 2 data sets to study the relationship between engagement on social media and sentiment. METHODS: We used the Twitter application programming interface to collect tweets that contained the street and brand name of a prescription drug within the tweet. Using BERTopic in combination with Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection and k-means, we generated topics for the street-name corpus (n=170,618) and brand-name corpus (n=245,145). Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) scores were used to classify whether tweets within the topics had positive, negative, or neutral sentiments. Two different logistic regression classifiers were used to predict the sentiment label within each corpus. The first model used a tweet's engagement metrics and topic ID to predict the label, while the second model used those features in addition to the top 5000 tweets with the largest term-frequency-inverse document frequency score. RESULTS: Using BERTopic, we identified 40 topics for the street-name data set and 5 topics for the brand-name data set, which we generalized into 8 and 5 topics of discussion, respectively. Four of the general themes of discussion in the brand-name corpus referenced drug use, while 2 themes of discussion in the street-name corpus referenced drug use. From the VADER scores, we found that both corpora were inclined toward positive sentiment. Adding the vectorized tweet text increased the accuracy of our models by around 40% compared with the models that did not incorporate the tweet text in both corpora. CONCLUSIONS: BERTopic was able to classify tweets well. As with LDA, the discussion using brand names was more similar between tweets than the discussion using street names. VADER scores could only be logically applied to the brand-name corpus because of the high prevalence of non-drug-related topics in the street-name data. Brand-name tweets either discussed drugs positively or negatively, with few posts having a neutral emotionality. From our machine learning models, engagement alone was not enough to predict the sentiment label; the added context from the tweets was needed to understand the emotionality of a tweet.

Differences in fluidity and viscosity of brand-name and generic injectable ointment.

Generic medications contain the identical active ingredient in the same concentration as their branded counterparts and are administered in the same manner, aiming to deliver comparable efficacy, dosage, and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, variations in additives and formulation processes, particularly noticeable in topical medications, can influence factors like ease of use and patient adherence. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the rheological attributes of branded and generic injectable ointments, assessing disparities in formulation performance and their impact on patient care. Posterisan® Forte and Hemoporison® ointments were used as the branded and generic versions, respectively, and their viscosity, ductility, and viscoelastic properties were evaluated. Posterisan® Forte showcased enhanced spread ability, maintaining uniform flow characteristics across varying temperatures, whereas Hemoporison® displayed pronounced thixotropic properties and stiffness, suggesting potential benefits for applications necessitating reversible viscosity adjustments and heightened rigidity. Despite sharing identical additives, observable differences in physical characteristics highlight the necessity of understanding formulation traits, which could influence ointment behavior. Alterations in fluidity and viscosity may affect how patients perceive and apply the medication, potentially influencing treatment outcomes and the occurrence of adverse effects.

Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Brand-Name and Generic Clozapine for Long-Term Maintenance Treatment Among Korean Patients With Schizophrenia: A Retrospective Naturalistic Mirror-Image Study.

OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is considered the most reliable drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In 2014, a generic formulation of clozapine (Clzapine) was introduced in Korea. This study was performed to provide clinical information regarding the use of clozapine and to compare efficacy and tolerability when converting from the brand-name formulation (Clozaril) to the generic formulation during longterm maintenance treatment among Korean patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This mirror-image study retrospectively investigated the electronic medical records of patients who had switched from Clozaril to Clzapine with a ≥1-year duration for each formulation. Clinical data were collected, including information regarding clozapine use, psychiatric hospitalization, co-medications, and blood test findings. Data before and after the switch were compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Among 332 patients, the mean 1-year dosages were 233.32±149.35 mg/day for Clozaril and 217.36±136.66 mg/day for Clzapine. The mean clozapine concentration-to-dose ratios were similar before and after the switch (Clozaril, 1.33±0.68; Clzapine, 1.26±0.80). Switching from Clozaril to Clzapine resulted in no significant differences in the hospitalization rate, hospitalization duration, or laboratory findings (liver function parameters, serum cholesterol level, and serum glucose level). Equivalent doses of co-prescribed antidepressants were decreased, but concomitant medications otherwise showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Clinical efficacy and tolerability appear comparable when switching to Clzapine during clozapine maintenance treatment. This study offers descriptive real-world clinical insights into clozapine maintenance treatment in Korea, thereby providing patients with more treatment options and contributing to the development of maintenance guidelines tailored to the Korean population.

Switch to generic formulation of temozolomide results in statistically significant increase in grade 3 and 4 bone marrow toxicity in glioma patients in the province of Alberta.

Background: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral, systemic chemotherapy used chiefly for treating high-grade glioma. Due to the rising costs of systemic chemotherapy, many jurisdictions have replaced brand name with generic formulations. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not there was difference in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity and median overall survival in patients treated with brand name versus generic TMZ in the province of Alberta, Canada. The province suspended the use of generic TMZ based on preliminary data pointing to excess toxicity. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included data from patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma that received treatment with TMZ in Alberta. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between grade 3 or 4 toxicity to generic versus brand name TMZ exposure, ECOG score, and age. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank testing were used to determine differences in overall survival between the brand name and generic TMZ cohorts, as well as the cytopenic versus non-cytopenic patients. Furthermore, a screening analysis for grade 3 or 4 bone marrow toxicity was conducted on all de novo glioma patients treated with brand name TMZ after Alberta preemptively stopped generic TMZ. Results: Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 15% and 19% of patients treated with generic TMZ (n = 156) as compared to 3% and 5% of patients (n = 100) treated with brand name TMZ-treated patients; P= .003 and .001. A trend toward increased median overall survival in glioblastoma patients treated with generic TMZ (13.7 months) versus brand name (15.8 months, P = .178.) was also observed through meeting statistical significance. Based on these results, the province stopped the use of generic TMZ and reverted to the Merck TMZ. An initial review of all new glioma patients (n = 89) treated with Merck TMZ since the province stopped the generic drug demonstrated 3.4% and 10.1% grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, respectively. Conclusions: The statistically significant difference in toxicity profile has prompted the province of Alberta to replace generic TMZ with brand name TMZ in high-grade glioma patients pending more detailed analysis. Our study provides evidence supporting the importance of conducting prospective studies on long-term safety for generic chemotherapies.

Generic selection criteria for safety and patient benefit [â «]: Comparing the physicochemical and pharmaceutical properties of brand-name and generic tulobuterol tape.

Physicochemical properties (drug release, peel strength, adhesion, and stiffness) of Hokunalin® Tape (Hokunalin) and 13 generic transdermal bronchodilator patches containing tulobuterol were characterized and evaluated for comparison. Drug-release studies evaluating sustained release behavior demonstrated better performance by the drug Hokunalin, than the generics MED, YP, Sawai, and Teikoku. Hokunalin yield a 16.2% release 1 hour after initiation, 30.1% at 3 hours, 50.0% at 8 hours. In comparison, the generics MED, YP, Sawai, and Teikoku showed an intermediate release behavior to that of Hokunalin, with more than 80% release after 8 hours. A 90-degree peel adhesion test for tape peel strength demonstrated that the generic MED (4.99 N), YP (3.26 N), Sawai (4.17 N), and Teikoku (4.37 N) tapes yielded significantly higher values compared to Hokunalin (2.66 N). Probe tack tests, evaluating adhesive strength, yielded significantly higher values for the generics HMT (4.89 N)and Towa (4.25 N) compared to Hokunalin (3.66 N). Furthermore, for the stiffness-softness test, a significantly higher value was obtained for each generic yielded compared to Hokunalin (3.7-degree). These factors are important components of product qualities that affect treatment efficacy, including "ease of application" and other usability factors.

Safety of brand name to generic substitution of lacosamide in patients with epilepsy - A prospective single-center observational study.

PURPOSE: Lacosamide is a widely used third-generation antiseizure medication. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety of substituting brand-name lacosamide with its generic version. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes associated with switching from the brand-name to the generic form of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: This prospective observational study involved patients undergoing treatment with LCM at the university epilepsy clinic. In 2018, the price of the brand-name LCM in Poland increased up to 110-fold compared to generic products. Anticipating that most patients would opt to switch to the generic formulations due to financial constraints, we chose to follow up them prospectively to assess the safety of transitioning from the brand-name to the generic form of LCM. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients, aged 18-62 years, diagnosed with focal epilepsy and undergoing LCM treatment at our institution, decided to switch from the brand-name (Vimpat) to generic variations (Lacosamide TEVA, Lacosamide Glenmark, and Lacosamide Accord). Following the switch, no significant difference was observed in terms of seizure frequency before and after (p = 0.55, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Subsequently, adverse events were recorded in four patients (4.9%) during the initial follow-up visit post-switch, including somnolence (2 patients) and dizziness (2 patients). Notably, all adverse events resolved by the second follow-up visit without necessitating treatment modification. Importantly, no patient switched back to brand-name medication CONCLUSION: The generic substitution of lacosamide was found to be generally safe in our study. Nonetheless, to confirm our findings, larger prospective studies are required.

Identification of Confusing Medicine Proprietary Names: Toward Safe Medicine Use-A Cross-Sectional Study in Sri Lanka.

BACKGROUND: Look-alike sound-alike (LASA) medications have similar pronunciation (phonetic) and/or manifestation (orthographic), which could create confusion among users and challenge the safe use of medicines. The availability of foreign products in local markets aggravates the situation. This study was designed to examine the registered medicine proprietary names in Sri Lanka to discern the presence of similar medicine names in the industry. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on the registered drug proprietary names in Sri Lanka. Using the RAND and RANK functions in Microsoft® excel® 365, a random sample of 385 proprietary names was selected. Two evaluators independently evaluated each proprietary name in the sample against the other registered proprietary names following a stepwise text filtering method. After each filter, the resulting proprietary names were manually examined for identical, similar-looking, and similar-sounding proprietary names to the name under evaluation. The observations were matched, categorized, and collated into ten groups. RESULTS: Among the 385 names evaluated, 138 (35.84%) proprietary names had no similarity to existing other registered proprietary names. The rest of the names (n = 247, 64.15%) were found to be either identical (n = 03 pairs), look-alike (n = 91 pairs), or sound-alike (n = 80 pairs) to the registered proprietary names. CONCLUSION: The findings revealed the presence of equal and similar proprietary names in the system. A multifactorial strategy led by the National Medicine Regulatory Authority (NMRA) is recommended to minimize the confusing names entering the system. Primarily the NMRA's call for action should include adequate industry guidance with specific guidelines, a significant pre-submission assessment process, and denying approval of LASA proprietary names.

Effects of the pharmaceutical formulation of topical medications on corneal epithelial healing after phototherapeutic keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of the formulation of topical medications on the healing of corneal epithelial cells after phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We studied 271 eyes of 189 consecutive patients (aged 67.6 ± 11.8 years) who had undergone PTK for granular corneal dystrophy (n = 140), band keratopathy (n = 47), or lattice corneal dystrophy (n = 2). Postoperatively, generic or brand-named levofloxacin, 0.1% betamethasone, or 0.1% bromfenac sodium hydrate was applied topically. Patients were examined on postoperative days 1, 2, and 5 and weekly thereafter. The time to re-epithelialization was assessed by use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: The time to re-epithelialization was significantly longer with generic 0.5% levofloxacin, at 8.2 ± 3.5 days, than with 0.5% Cravit (levofloxacin), at 6.7 ± 3.5 days (P = 0.018), or with 1.5% Cravit, at 6.3 ± 2.6 days (P = 0.000). In addition, the time to re-epithelialization was significantly longer with generic 0.1% betamethasone (Sanbetason), at 7.3 ± 3.4 days, than with brand-name 0.1% betamethasone (Rinderon), at 6.1 ± 2.5 days (P = 0.0002). The Cox proportional hazards model indicated that the use of generic formulations for levofloxacin eye drops and 0.1% betamethasone was a significant factor that delayed corneal re-epithelialization (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, P = 0.002 and HR = 0.77, P = 0.006, after adjustment for age). Re-epithelialization was significantly shorter in band keratopathy than in corneal dystrophy (HR = 1.56, P = 0.004). No other factors, including age, bandage contact lens, and diabetes mellitus, were significantly associated with time to re-epithelialization. CONCLUSION: Corneal epithelial healing can be significantly affected by different antibacterial or steroid eye drops. Clinicians need to be aware that a generic formulation may affect corneal epithelial healing.

Effect of Excipients on the Quality of Drug Formulation and Immediate Release of Generic Metformin HCl Tablets.

Generic medications are bioequivalent to brand-name medications, but the quality and purity of generic medications are still debatable. The aim of this study was to compare the generic product of metformin (MET) to its branded counterpart using pure MET powder as a reference. Quality control tablet assessment and in vitro evaluation of drug release were carried out in various pH media. Additionally, several analytical methods and thermal techniques were used, namely differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR), and confocal Raman microscopy. The results showed a significant difference between the two products. In terms of friability assessment, mean resistance force, and tablet disintegration, the generic MET product showed significant weight loss, higher mean resistance force, longer disintegration time, and a slower rate of drug release. In addition, DSC and TGA showed that the generic product had the lowest melting point and the least weight loss compared to the branded product and pure powder. XRD and SEM demonstrated some changes in the crystallinity structure of the molecule particles for the generic product. Additionally, FTIR and confocal Raman revealed the same peaks and band shifts in all samples, but with differences in the intensity for the generic tablet only. The observed differences could be due to the use of different excipients in the generic product. The possibility of forming a eutectic mixture between the polymeric excipient and metformin in the generic tablet was presumed, which might be attributed to alterations in the physicochemical properties of the drug molecule in the generic product. In conclusion, using different excipients might have a significant effect on the physicochemical properties of drugs in generic formulations, leading to significant changes in drug release behavior.

Generic Lenalidomide Rivelime Versus Brand-name Revlimid® in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Single-center Experience on Efficacy, Safety and Survival Outcome.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare use of original brand-name lenalidomide (Revlimid®) vs. generic equivalent (Rivelime®) in terms of efficacy, safety and survival outcome in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 184 patients RRMM (median age: 62 years, 60.9% were males) who received singlet, doublet or triplet lenalidomide-containing regimens including either Revlimid® (n=74) or Rivelime® (n=110) were included in this study. Treatment response was based on evaluation of objective response to treatment (ORR) including the sum of patients who achieved partial response (PR), very good partial responses (VGPR) or complete response (CR) to therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety data were also recorded. RESULTS: Revlimid® and Rivelime® groups were similar in terms of ORR (54.1 vs. 60.0%), CR (22.5 vs. 28.8%), VGPR (55.0 vs. 50.0%) and PR (22.5 vs. 21.2%) rates. Median (SE) PFS time were similar between Rivelime® vs. Revlimid® treated patients who were in the 2nd line (30.3(3.8) vs. 22.7(7.0) months, p=0.827) or 3rd line of therapy (38.1(12.1) vs. 20.1(0.9) months, p=0.147) at lenalidomide initiation. Two groups also had similar OS rate (83.8 vs. 73.6%) and OS time (mean 122.3 vs. 123.5 months). Side effects were manageable in both groups. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, replacing Revlimid® with its generic version Rivelime® in singlet, doublet or triplet lenalidomide containing RRMM regimens seems not to compromise the efficacy of treatment, and to yield a similarly improved response rates and survival outcome and no additional toxic effects, enabling a long-term therapy.

Influence of Healthy Brand and Diagnosticity of Brand Name on Subjective Ratings of High- and Low-Calorie Food.

Brand names on food packaging and the diagnosticity of brand names have notable effects on consumer preferences. However, their effects on healthy food consumption are not clear. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of healthy brands and the diagnosticity of brand names on consumers' subjective ratings of different calorie foods. In two studies, participants viewed 32 pictures of high- and low-calorie food product packaging from healthy and unhealthy brands and rated their feelings and willingness to pay online. Study 1 used real brand names, and Study 2 used fictional brand names and added press releases to manipulate diagnosticity. The present study demonstrated that participants perceived foods from healthy brands as healthier but less delicious and were more willing to buy low-calorie foods from healthy brands. Moreover, only when the brand name was of high diagnosticity were high-calorie foods rated as more likable, and did the willingness to pay for low-calorie foods increase. Collectively, these findings highlight the influence of the healthy brand on consumers' subjective ratings of food. It is also inspiring for healthy food marketing.

More cost-sharing, less cost? Evidence on reference price drugs.

This paper evaluates the causal effects of changes in reference prices (RP) on prices, copayments, and overall expenditures for off-patent pharmaceuticals. With reference pricing, firms set prices freely and the health plan covers the expenses only up to a certain threshold. We use quarterly data of the German market for anti-epileptics at the package level and at the active substance level and exploit that the RP has been adjusted in some of the active substances but not in others in a difference-in-differences framework. At the product level, we find that a lower RP reduces prices for both brand-name drugs and generics, but leads to higher copayments, especially for brand-name drugs. At the aggregate level, we find that a lower RP leads to savings for the public health insurer since revenues decrease substantially for brand-name firms and, to a lesser extent, also for generic firms. Overall expenditures (payments by the health insurer and the patients) for brand-name drugs decrease in proportion to the decrease in the RP, while the adjustment does not significantly influence overall expenditures for generics.

Do generic drugs cause hypersensitivity?

Generic drugs may differ from brand-name drugs in nature and quantity of excipients. Hypersensitivity to generic drugs is a subject of growing importance given their key role in healthcare spending policies, however, a review of published data highlighted that relevant data is sparse. No scientific rationale has emerged for labelling patients allergic to all generic drugs, and hypersensitivity to generic drugs may rather be explored on a case-by-case basis. In the case of hypersensitivity without any change in medication, it is advisable to check for a switch from a brand-name to a generic drug, and if hypersensitivity to a generic drug is suspected, its composition must be checked.

Generic selection criteria for safety and patient benefit [XI]: Usability scores of brand-name and generic tapes containing sodium diclofenac by questionnaire survey.

The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and usability scores of different tape treatments and examine the scores in relation to the mechanical characteristics of the tape formulation. A questionnaire for the assessment of comfort level and satisfaction with two brand-name (Naboal, Voltaren) and four generic tapes (Yutoku, Teikoku, Rakool, Towa) containing sodium diclofenac was developed and then applied to 12 healthy volunteers. Results showed that Voltaren was difficult to apply to the skin and easier to peel off the skin than Naboal (p < 0.01). Moreover, Rakool was easier to peel than Naboal (p < 0.05). The mechanically measured peeling force was associated with pain during peeling off (r = -0.65), and the measured value of bending rigidity was associated with ease of peeling off (r = -0.97). The knowledge obtained regarding the influence of pharmaceutical properties on the degree of satisfaction with and usability of different tape formulations may be useful for supporting the selection of generic tapes tailored to individual needs or pharmacist preferences, and thus improve treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.

The magnitude of prescribing medicines by brand names in a tertiary hospital, Mwanza, Tanzania.

Background: Globally, one of the most common causes of irrational use of medicines is brand-name prescribing. The consequence of prescribing medicines using brand names is an economic burden on patients and society. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the magnitude of prescribing medicines by brand names in a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2020 and March 2021 at the Bugando Medical Centre. Data were collected from electronic prescriptions (outpatients) and medical files (inpatients). The data were analyzed using STATA version 14. A Chi-square test was conducted to examine the relationship between different categorical variables. p-Values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Of 851 prescriptions analyzed, 416 (48.9%) contained medicines prescribed using brand names. Compared to outpatient units, the proportion of prescriptions with medicines prescribed by brand names in inpatient units was significantly higher (58.5% vs 39.1%), p < 0.001. The most frequently prescribed medicines by brand names were Ampiclox (ampicillin + cloxacillin), 35.2%, Buscopan (hyoscine butylbromide), 8.7%, and Amoxyclav (amoxicillin + clavulanic acid), 7.7%. Conclusion: Prescriptions written with brand names were found to be common, especially among fixed-dose combinations (FDCs), according to the current study. Governments, institutions, and other stakeholders should support and encourage the use of generic names in prescription writing because it saves money for patients and health care systems. This calls for Tanzania's government to prioritize the development and implementation of generic prescribing policies.

Critical Appraisal of Drug Promotional Literature in Accordance With WHO Guidelines.

Background Drug promotional literature (DPL) is used as a marketing tactic to publicize the introduction of new medications. As drug companies are promoting the literature for their brand products, bias is possible. Various studies have demonstrated that printed DPLs disseminated by pharmaceutical companies are typically skewed. Material and method A prospective, observational study was carried out in the outpatient departments of a tertiary care hospital to analyze the DPL of different pharmaceutical companies using WHO criteria for "Ethical criteria for medicinal drug promotion, 1988". Results Out of 192 DPLs analyzed, information regarding the generic name, brand name, amount of active ingredient, and manufacturer name was found in all the DPLs (100%). Though therapeutic uses were mentioned in 91% of DPLs, dosage schedule (regimen) was mentioned only in 60%. Drug safety information such as the side effects and significant adverse drug reactions, precautions and warnings, contraindications, and major drug interactions were present in 24%, 36%, and 20%, respectively. Address of the manufacturer and reference to scientific literature were present only in 63% and 53% of DPLs, respectively. References mainly were from journals, present in 71% of DPLs. Most of the claims made in DPLs were regarding efficacy (73%), followed by safety (34%).  Conclusion In our study, not a single DPL fulfilled all the nine WHO criteria. A doctor should rigorously evaluate study findings before prescribing because misleading and incorrect information is now frequently found in this literature.

Clinical effectiveness of branded versus generic piperacillin-tazobactam for treating severe community-acquired pneumonia.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of branded versus generic piperacillin-tazobactam for treating severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients with severe CAP who received piperacillin-tazobactam based on a nine-center registry database. Furthermore, we classified the patients in three hospitals, which used only branded piperacillin-tazobactam as the study group, and the patients in six other hospitals, which used both branded and generic products as the control group. RESULTS: A total of 472 patients (n = 263 in the study group and n = 209 in the control group) with severe CAP were included. The study group using branded piperacillin-tazobactam had higher odds of clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.77, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.93-7.37) and lower odds of treatment failure (adjusted OR = 0.28, 95 % CI, 0.13-0.58) than the control group receiving either branded or generic piperacillin-tazobactam. In addition, the study group was associated with higher odds of clinical effectiveness (adjusted OR = 2.95, 95 % CI, 1.46-6.11), less odds of clinical ineffectiveness (adjusted OR = 0.39, 95 % CI, 0.18-0.81), and lower risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR = 0.39, 95 % CI, 0.21-0.73). CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the present study using indirect comparison, the clinical effectiveness of generic piperacillin-tazobactam for treating patients with severe CAP might not be as good as that of brand-name products.

Direct and indirect savings from parallel imports in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The aim was: i) to quantify the direct and indirect savings from parallel imports in Sweden during a period when sellers were forbidden from giving discounts to pharmacies, and ii) to study if the effects of competition from parallel imports on list prices became smaller in absolute size when sellers were allowed to give discounts to pharmacies. METHODS: We analyzed the monthly prices for 3068 products during 61 months when discounts were forbidden and for 2504 products during 84 months when discounts were allowed. The price effects were estimated using dynamic models that rendered lagged numbers of competitors into valid and strong instruments for the current values. RESULTS: When discounts were forbidden, parallel imports had a market share of 16% and were on average 9% cheaper than locally sourced drugs, which yielded a direct saving of 231 million Swedish kronor (SEK) (24 million EUR) per year. Also, parallel imports reduced the prices of products with the same substance by, on average, 6% in the long-term, which yielded indirect savings of 421 million SEK (44 million EUR) per year. In total, parallel imports reduced the cost for on-patent pharmaceuticals by 4%. When discounts were allowed, the average gap in list price between parallel imports and locally sourced products was reduced to 0.8%, and the list prices of locally sourced products were no longer significantly affected by competition from parallel imports. CONCLUSION: When discounts were allowed, the savings of parallel imports through lower list prices were replaced by savings of pharmacies through secret discounts.