Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urologia ; 89(2): 268-273, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832381

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: (1) Assess risk factors associated with urethral stricture recurrence (USR). (2) Assess urethral stricture recurrence after end-to-end urethroplasty (EE) and buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty (BMG). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 29 males with urethral stricture who underwent either an end-to-end urethroplasty or a buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty were included in this study and followed for 18 months. The association between risk factors and stricture recurrence was assessed. RESULTS: Overall mean patient age was 51.69 ± 14.22 years, time to recurrence was 3 months (IQR: 1-6.25), and stricture length was 2.57 ± 1.30 cm. Important risk factors for USR were stricture length ⩾ 2 cm (p = 0.024), older age (p = 0.042), BMI > 25 kg/m2 (p = 0.021), Qmax after catheter removal <15 ml/s (χ2 = 14.87 p ⩽ <0.001) and previous urethral procedures adjusted for re-do BMG urethroplasty (χ2 = 6.10, p = 0.021). End-to-end urethroplasty showed less USR than BMG, however, these differences were not statistically significant (41.6% vs 22.2%, respectively, p ⩾ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Stricture length, age, BMI, and previous urethral procedures predict USR, furthermore, an initial Qmax after catheter removal is an objective measure predictive of USR. There's no difference in USR rate between BMG and EE urethroplasties.


Asunto(s)
Estrechez Uretral , Adulto , Anciano , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/etiología , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
2.
World J Urol ; 38(12): 3047-3054, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31542825

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Female urethral stricture (FUS) is an infrequent entity, but may cause significant morbidity. Despite a rising interest in recent years, there is still scarce published information. In this article, we review FUS with a special attention to the use of dorsal buccal mucosa grafts (DBMG). METHODS: A literature search was conducted summarizing information about etiology, anatomy, diagnosis, and management. A detailed description of our technique for DBMG urethroplasty is given, with a summary report of our experience and results. RESULTS: FUS accounts for about 1% of all women consulting for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Diagnosis is suspected in front of persistent LUTS suggestive of obstruction. Confirmatory tests are uroflowmetry, endoscopy, and urethrography; true anatomic strictures must be differentiated from functional or physiological obstructions. Initial management may include dilations, but recurrence is frequent. On the contrary, reconstructive surgery is highly efficient, with overall curative rates around 90%. For reconstruction, DBMG has gained popularity, because it would maintain intact the ventro-lateral urethral supporting structures, important for continence. The pathology of female strictures is unknown and neither the pre nor the intraoperative assessment allows determining the precise location and extent or the urethral damage; therefore, we advise extensive grafting of the entire urethra. Collected success of DBMG is 86% at a mean follow-up of 21 months. Morbidity is very low and de novo stress incontinence has not been reported. CONCLUSIONS: Because of its many advantages, DMBG currently represents a prime choice for FUS reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Mucosa Bucal/trasplante , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA