Efficacy of the posterior nasal nerve resection combined with hormone transnasal nebulization on difficult-to-treat rhinosinusitis: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis was performed to explore the clinical effect of the Posterior Nasal Nerve (PNN) resection combined with hormone transnasal nebulization on Difficult-to-Treat Rhinosinusitis (DTRS). METHODS: A total of 120 DTRS patients were selected and divided into a control group (n = 60) and a study group (n = 60) according to different treatments. The control group patients were treated via PNN resection, followed by normal saline transnasal nebulization; the study group patients were given PNN resection and then treated with budesonide suspension transnasal nebulization. Subsequently, the comparison was performed between the two groups in terms of (1) Clinical baseline characteristics; (2) Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 scores before treatment and after 3-months, 6-months and 12-months of treatment; (3) Lund-MacKay scores before treatment and after 10, 30, 90, and 180 days of treatment; (4) Incidence of adverse reactions during treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SNOT-22 or Lund-Kennedy scores between the two groups before treatment (p > 0.05). After treatment, the SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy scores of the control and the study groups were decreased, and compared with the control group, the SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy scores in the study group improved more significantly (p < 0.05). In addition, the study group and the control group presented with 1 and 4 cases of nasal adhesion, 2 and 3 cases of epistaxis, 1 and 4 cases of sinus orifice obstruction, 1 and 3 cases of lacrimal duct injuries, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (8.3% vs. 23.3%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: PNN resection combined with hormone transnasal nebulization treatment can improve the symptoms and quality of life of DTRS patients, with good clinical efficacy but few adverse reactions. Therefore, such combination treatment deserves a promotion and application clinically. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Doxofylline as a steroid-sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy of doxofylline as an ICS-sparing agent in the treatment of Mexican children with asthma. METHODS: 10-week, open-label, crossover, pilot study, we examined the steroid-sparing effect of doxofylline in Mexican children with asthma. Patients aged 6-16 years treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for at least 8 wk before enrollment were divided randomly into two groups at the baseline visit. Group A (n = 31) received doxofylline (18 mg/kg/day) plus standard-dose budesonide (D + SDB) for the first 4-week period followed by doxofylline plus reduced-dose budesonide (D + RDB) for the second 4-week period. Group B (n = 30) received D + RDB followed by D + SDB. Clinical outcomes assessed included lung function (forced expiratory volume; in 1 s, FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma control, number of exacerbations and use of rescue medication (salbutamol). RESULTS: It was shown that combined use of doxofylline and ICS may allow children with asthma to reduce their daily dose of ICS while maintaining lung function and improving asthma control (p = 0.008). There were few asthma exacerbations and only one patient required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. Rescue medication use decreased significantly in patients receiving D + SDB during the first 4-week period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that doxofylline may be a steroid-sparing treatment in asthma, but longer-term, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Bronchodilator responsiveness testing with inhaled budesonide/formoterol in asthma.

BACKGROUND: The choice of bronchodilators for responsiveness testing (BRT) is a clinical decision according to ATS/ERS. Since January 2019 we use budesonide/formoterol for BRT in asthma at our center in Argentina. The aim was to compare budesonide/formoterol with salbutamol for BRT in stable asthmatic patients that were followed up in a short-acting beta2 agonist (SABA)-free asthma center. METHODS: From the Hospital database, we found for the same patient at least one BRT using salbutamol 200 µg and another with budesonide/formoterol 320/9 µg. RESULTS: We found similar BRT between salbutamol and budesonide/formoterol in 101 asthmatic individuals (26 males) aged 38.14 ± 16.1 yrs (mean ± Standard deviation). The absolute response was 0.18 ± 0.21 L in FEV1 after salbutamol and 0.20 ± 0.22 L in FEV1 after budesonide/formoterol. Afterwards, we showed 202 patients tested with budesonide/formoterol; the mean absolute response was 0.21 ± 0.22 L in FEV1. There were no unexpected safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: In asthmatic patients, we demonstrated similar efficacy between Budesonide/formoterol and salbutamol for BRT.

Use of budesonide associated with a pulmonary surfactant to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature newborns - A systematic review

Abstract Objective: Among the mechanisms proposed for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia is the increase in the pulmonary inflammatory process and oxidative stress. Thus, the control of this process may result in improvements in bronchopulmonary dysplasia-related outcomes. This study aims to analyze the current scientific evidence regarding the use of budesonide, a potent anti-inflammatory drug, associated with a pulmonary surfactant to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed on the Embase and MEDLINE platforms, and studies that compared budesonide with pulmonary surfactant versus pulmonary surfactant for treating respiratory distress syndrome were included. The primary outcome was a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. Results: Four randomized clinical trials and two observational studies were included in this systematic review. Three of the randomized clinical trials found a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death in the use of budesonide with the surfactant, all the other studies (1 clinical trial and 2 observational studies) found no statistical differences between the groups for the primary outcomes. The three main studies showed a reduction in the primary outcome; however, all studies showed great heterogeneity regarding the type of surfactant (poractant or beractant) and the method of administration. Conclusion: Robust clinical studies, in a heterogeneous population, using porcine surfactant associated with budesonide, with administration by a minimally invasive technique are necessary for there to be a recommendation based on scientific evidence for its widespread use.

Use of budesonide associated with a pulmonary surfactant to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature newborns - A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Among the mechanisms proposed for the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia is the increase in the pulmonary inflammatory process and oxidative stress. Thus, the control of this process may result in improvements in bronchopulmonary dysplasia-related outcomes. This study aims to analyze the current scientific evidence regarding the use of budesonide, a potent anti-inflammatory drug, associated with a pulmonary surfactant to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed on the Embase and MEDLINE platforms, and studies that compared budesonide with pulmonary surfactant versus pulmonary surfactant for treating respiratory distress syndrome were included. The primary outcome was a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death. RESULTS: Four randomized clinical trials and two observational studies were included in this systematic review. Three of the randomized clinical trials found a reduction in bronchopulmonary dysplasia or death in the use of budesonide with the surfactant, all the other studies (1 clinical trial and 2 observational studies) found no statistical differences between the groups for the primary outcomes. The three main studies showed a reduction in the primary outcome; however, all studies showed great heterogeneity regarding the type of surfactant (poractant or beractant) and the method of administration. CONCLUSION: Robust clinical studies, in a heterogeneous population, using porcine surfactant associated with budesonide, with administration by a minimally invasive technique are necessary for there to be a recommendation based on scientific evidence for its widespread use.

Comparison of three alternatives for the management of moderate asthma in children aged 6-11 years: a cost-utility analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent asthma guidelines for children 6-11 years with persistent asthma advocate three alternatives: SMART (budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 mcg qd plus additional doses as needed), fixed combination of budesonide/formoterol, and fixed-dose budesonide. Concerns have arisen as to which of the proposed alternatives has the best possible cost-effectiveness profile. This study aimed to assess the health and economic consequences of SMART, fixed combination, and fixed-dose budesonide therapy in children 6-11 years old with persistent asthma. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with persistent asthma. Total costs and QALYs of SMART, fixed combination, and fixed-dose budesonide therapy were calculated over a time horizon of 6 years. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The mean QALY per patient was 0.57 and 0.56 QALYs per patient per year of SMART and fixed combination and 0,52 with fixed-dose budesonide. The total mean of discounted costs per patient per cycle were US$111 for SMART, US$133 for fixed combination, and US$67 for fixed-dose budesonide. The net monetary benefit of SMART was US$12,549, US$12278 for fixed combination, and US$11,380 for fixed-dose budesonide. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that SMART was more cost-effective than fixed combination and fixed-dose budesonide. These findings complement and support the GINA 2021 and National Asthma Education and Prevention Program asthma guideline recommendations for use of inhaled corticosteroids-formoterol in children 6-11 years old with persistent asthma.

Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option? / Corticoides en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: ¿siguen siendo una opción terapéutica?

Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them.

Consultas a urgencia y valores espirométricos tras el reemplazo de salmeterol/fluticasona por budesonida/formoterol en pacientes con asma moderada a grave / Emergency consultations and spirometric values after replacement of salmeterol/fluticasone with budesonide/formoterol in patients with moderate to severe asthma

El asma se caracteriza por su impacto deletéreo que incluye gran coste económico para el sistema de salud. En pacientes con asma mal controlada a pesar del tratamiento, se propone un régimen de mantenimiento con corticoides inhalados y formoterol. El objetivo del presente estudio observacional retrospectivo fue evaluar las modificaciones espirométricas tras el cambio del medicamento controlador en pacientes con asma moderada a severa asistidos en el Hospital Clínico de Magallanes de Punta Arenas, así como también cuantificar la modificación en el número de exacerbaciones graves (consulta a un servicio de urgencia y/u hospitalización por asma). Participaron 61 adultos con asma moderada a severa (mediana de edad: 60 años [rango: 21-87], mujeres: 69,4%; comorbilidad atópica/alérgica: 79%; otras comorbilidades: 46,8%) en los que se cambió el tratamiento con fluticasona/salmeterol 250/25 μg por budesónida/formoterol 160/4,5 μg. No se observaron cambios significativos en los índices espirométricos tras el cambio. Con el tratamiento inicial, el 46,9% presentó ≥ 1 visita a urgencias (total: 50 consultas). Tras el cambio por budesonida/formoterol, el 21% requirió al menos una visita a urgencias (total: 14 consultas; p < 0,01). La proporción de pacientes con ≥ 2 consultas a urgencias fue de 19,7% con el tratamiento basal y de 1,6% tras el cambio a budesonida/formoterol (p < 0,01). No se observaron diferencias significativas en la cantidad de hospitalizaciones. En este estudio del mundo real de pacientes con asma moderada a grave, el cambio del tratamiento a budesonida/formoterol se asoció con reducción significativa de las consultas a urgencias, a pesar de no detectarse cambios de significación estadística en los índices espirométricos habituales.

Asthma is characterized by its deleterious impact, including a high cost to the healthcare system. In patients with poorly controlled asthma despite treatment, a maintenance regimen of inhaled corticosteroids and formoterol is proposed. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate the spirometric changes after switching the controller medication in patients with moderate to severe asthma attended in our institution ("Hospital Clínico de Magallanes"), as well as the variation in the number of severe exacerbations (consultation to an emergency department and/or hospitalization for asthma). Sixty-one adults with moderate to severe asthma (median age: 60 years-old [range: 21-87], women: 69.4%; atopic/allergic comorbidity: 79%; other comorbidities: 46.8%) in whom treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/25 μg was switched to budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg participated in our study. No significant changes in spirometric parameters were observed after the replacement treatment. With the initial treatment, 46.9% patients presented ≥ 1 visit to the emergency department (total: 50 visits). After the switch to budesonide/formoterol, 21% required at least one emergency department visit (total: 14 consultations; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients with ≥ 2 emergency department visits was 19.7% with baseline treatment and 1.6% after switching to budesonide/formoterol (p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the number of hospitalizations. In this real-world study of moderate to severe asthma patients, switching to budesonide/formoterol was associated with a significant reduction in emergency department visits, despite no statistically significant changes in the usual spirometric parameters.

Microscopic colitis: Case series and literature review / Colitis microscópica, serie de casos y revisión de la literatura

Abstract Introduction: Microscopic colitis is a benign and multifactorial disease characterized by watery diarrhea and histological alterations in the colonic mucosa. The incidence of this disease is increasing, being diagnosed more frequently. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, patients were examined employing colonoscopy and biopsy due to a diagnosis of chronic diarrhea in a gastroenterology unit throughout 22 months. Their diagnosis of colitis was confirmed by clinical picture and microscopic analysis. Results: In the study period, a total of 2849 colonoscopies were performed, 116 in patients with chronic diarrhea. We identified 15 patients with microscopic colitis, 12 were men (80 %), and only three were older than 60 (20 %). Conclusion: Unlike the world literature, this study found that microscopic colitis in our patients affects the male sex primarily (male/female ratio: 4/1) and occurs in young people, with an average age of 47.5 years (range: 21-82 years).

Resumen Introducción: la colitis microscópica es una enfermedad benigna y multifactorial caracterizada por la presencia de diarrea acuosa y alteraciones histológicas en la mucosa colónica. La incidencia de esta enfermedad viene en aumento y su diagnóstico se realiza cada vez con mayor frecuencia. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo en el que se revisaron los pacientes por medio de colonoscopia y biopsias por diagnóstico de diarrea crónica en un período de 22 meses en una unidad de gastroenterología, y en quienes mediante la clínica y el análisis histológico se confirmó el diagnóstico de colitis microscópica. Resultados: en el período de estudio se realizó un total de 2849 colonoscopias, 116 en pacientes con diarrea crónica. Se identificaron 15 pacientes con colitis microscópica, 12 fueron hombres (80 %) y solo hubo 3 mayores de 60 años (20 %). Conclusión: a diferencia de lo informado en la literatura mundial, en este estudio se encontró que la colitis microscópica en nuestros pacientes compromete especialmente al sexo masculino (relación hombre/mujer: 4/1) y se presenta en personas jóvenes, con un promedio de edad de 47,5 años (rango de 21 a 82 años).

SMART therapy in adolescent and adults patients with moderate persistent asthma: a cost-utility analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent asthma guidelines, recommends for persistent asthma as first alternative low dose inhaled budesonide-formoterol maintenance and reliever over fixed combination of low doses inhaled corticosteroids - long-acting beta-agonist, or fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Concerns arise as to which of the proposed alternatives has the best possible cost-effectiveness profile. This study aimed to assess the health and economic consequences of SMART, fixed combination, and fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroids in patients with moderate-severe persistent asthma. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with persistent asthma. Total costs and QALYs of SMART, fixed combination, and fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroids were calculated over a lifetime horizon. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay value of $19,000. RESULTS: The model suggests a potential gain of 1.27 and 1.34 QALYs per patient per year on SMART respect to fixed combination and fixed-dose ICS respectively. We observed a reduction of US$4 in total discounted cost per person-year on SMART with respect to fixed combination and US$0.1 respect to fixed-dose ICS. In the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, our base-case results were robust to variations of all assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSION: SMART therapy was found to be cost-effective regarding fixed combination and fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroids. This evidence supports the use of SMART therapy in Colombia and must to be replicated in others middle-income countries.

Grafting biomaterials associated to topical glucocorticoid: effects on pre-osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1)

Abstract The topical glucocorticoid budesonide has been prescribed before and after sinus lift surgery as adjuvant drug treatment for maxillary sinus membrane inflammation. However, there is no study on the effects of budesonide on the regenerative process of bone grafting biomaterials. We investigated the effect of the association of budesonide with some biomaterials on the growth and differentiation capacity of pre-osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1 subclone 4). Xenogeneic (Bio-Oss and Bio-Gen) and synthetic hydroxyapatites (Osteogen, Bonesynth, and HAP-91) were tested in conditioned medium (1% w/v). The conditioned medium was then supplemented with budesonide (0.5% v/v). Cell viability was assessed using the MTT assay (48, 96, and 144 h), and mineralized nodules were quantified after 14 days of culture using the Alizarin Red Staining. Alkaline phosphatase activity was assessed through the release of thymolphthalein at day seven. All biomaterials showed little or no cytotoxicity. The Bio-Gen allowed significantly less growth than the control group regardless of the experimental time. Regarding differentiation potential of MC3T3-E1, the HAP-91-conditioned medium showed remarkable osteoinductive properties. In osteodifferentiation, the addition of budesonide favored the formation of mineral nodules when cells were cultured in medium conditioned with synthetic materials, whereas it weakened the mineralization potential of cells cultured in xenogeneic medium. Regardless of whether budesonide was added or not, Osteogen and Bio-Oss showed higher alkaline phosphatase activity than the other groups. Budesonide may improve bone formation when associated with synthetic biomaterials. Conversely, the presence of this glucocorticoid weakens the mineralization potential of pre-osteoblastic cells cultured with xenogeneic hydroxyapatites.

Cost-utility of as-needed ICS-formoterol versus to maintenance ICS in mild to moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Recent asthma guidelines, such as the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), recommend in adult patients as-needed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol as an alternative to maintenance ICS in mild to moderate persistent asthma. The introduction of these recommendations concerns whether using as-needed budesonide-formoterol would be more cost-effective than to maintenance ICS. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of as-needed combination low-dose budesonide-formoterol compared to short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) reliever therapy in patients with mild asthma. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with mild asthma in Colombia. Total costs and QALYs of low-dose budesonide-formoterol compared to short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) were calculated over a lifetime horizon. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay value of $19,000. RESULTS: The model suggests a potential gain of 0.37 QALYs and per patient per year on as-needed ICS-formoterol and a reduction in the discounted cost per person-year, of as-needed ICS-formoterol to maintenance ICS, of US$40. This position of dominance of as-needed ICS-formoterol negates the need to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis, our base-case results were robust to variations in all assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSION: Low-dose budesonide-formoterol as a reliever was cost-effective when added to usual care in patients with mild asthma. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines and should be replicated to validate their results in other middle-income countries.

Cost-utility of as-needed combination low-dose budesonide-formoterol in adolescents mild asthma.

BACKGROUND: Previously evidence has demonstrated that as-needed combination low-dose budesonide-formoterol reduced the risk of severe exacerbations compared with short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) reliever therapy in an adolescent with mild asthma. Concerns as if the extra benefit offered by this drug outweighs the additional cost. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of as-needed combination low-dose budesonide-formoterol compared with short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) reliever therapy in adolescents with mild asthma in Colombia. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with mild asthma in Colombia. Total costs and QALYs of low-dose budesonide-formoterol compared with short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) were calculated over a lifetime horizon. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay value of $19,000. RESULTS: The model suggests a potential gain of 0.03 QALYs and per patient per year on low-dose budesonide-formoterol. The cost difference per person was US$-4 per patient per year in favor of budesonide- formoterol. The position of dominance negates the need to calculate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. In the one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, our base-case results were robust to variations of all assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, low-dose budesonide-formoterol as a reliever was found to be cost-effective when added to usual care in adolescents with mild asthma. This evidence should promote economic evaluations in developed and developing countries for the inclusion of new drugs in health insurance plans.

Refractory celiac disease type 2: how to diagnose and treat?

SUMMARY Refractory celiac disease is an uncommon condition which might be associated to poor prognosis. It is often treated with immunosuppressive medications, with poor results. It is divided in type 1 and type 2, the latter carrying a high risk for lymphoma and mortality. A case of a 41 year old female patient with refractory celiac disease type 2 is reported. She was treated with oral budesonide for six months, achieving histological remission.

Intranasal administration of budesonide-loaded nanocapsule microagglomerates as an innovative strategy for asthma treatment.

The co-existence with rhinitis limits the control of asthma. Compared with oral H1 receptor antagonists, intranasal corticosteroids have been demonstrated to provide greater relief of all symptoms of rhinitis and are recommended as first-line treatment for allergic rhinitis. Intrinsic limitations of nasal delivery, such as the presence of the protective mucous layer, the relentless mucociliary clearance, and the consequent reduced residence time of the formulation in the nasal cavity, limit budesonide efficacy to the treatment of local nasal symptoms. To overcome these limitations and to enable the treatment of asthma via nasal administration, we developed a budesonide-loaded lipid-core nanocapsule (BudNC) microagglomerate powder by spray-drying using a one-step innovative approach. BudNC was obtained, as a white powder, using L-leucine as adjuvant with 75 ± 6% yield. The powder showed a bimodal size distribution curve by laser diffraction with a principal peak just above 3 µm and a second one around 0.45 µm and a drug content determined by HPLC of 8.7 mg of budesonide per gram. In vivo after nasal administration, BudNC showed an improved efficacy in terms of reduction of immune cell influx; production of eotaxin-1, the main inflammatory chemokine; and arrest of airways remodeling when compared with a commercial budesonide product in both short- and long-term asthma models. In addition, data showed that the results in the long-term asthma model were more compelling than the results obtained in the short-term model. Graphical abstract.

Evaluation of Budesonide-Hydroxypropyl-ß-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex in Thermoreversible Gels for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: New formulations for topical treatment of ulcerative colitis with budesonide inclusion complex (BUDHP-ß-CD) and poloxamers (PL) were developed for future clinical use. AIMS: This study evaluated the efficacy of such novel formulations in a rat model of colitis. METHODS: The PL-BUDHP-ß-CD systems were prepared by direct dispersion of the complex (BUD concentration 0.5 mg mL-1) in solutions with PL407 or PL403. Male Wistar rats underwent TNBS-induced colitis and were treated for 5 days by a rectal route, as follows: BUD 1: BUDHP-ß-CD + PL407 (18%); BUD 2: BUDHP-ß-CD + PL407 (20%); BUD 3: BUDHP-ß-CD + PL407 (18%) + PL403 (2%); BUD 4: plain BUD; BUD 5: BUDHP-ß-CD; C1: HP-ß-CD + PL407 (18%); C2: HP-ß-CD + PL407 (20%); C3: HP-ß-CD + PL407 (18%) + PL403 (2%); C4: saline. A negative control group without colitis was also used. Colitis was assessed via myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, and macroscopic and microscopic damage score in colon tissues. Protein levels of TNF-α, IL-1ß, IL-10 and endogenous glucocorticoids were obtained using ELISA. RESULTS: BUDHP-ß-CD poloxamer formulations had similar MPO activity when compared with the negative control group. All formulations presented lower MPO activity than BUDHP-ß-CD and plain BUD (p < 0.001). BUD 2 produced lower microscopic score values than plain BUD and BUDHP-ß-CD (p < 0.01). All formulations with BUDHP-ß-CD poloxamers reduced TNF-α levels (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Novel budesonide inclusion complex formulations improved microscopic damage and reduced colonic MPO activity and TNF-α levels.

Eficacia de la budesonida/formoterol comparado con la fluticasona/salmeterol en la mejoría de la capacidad pulmonar de personas mayores con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica: revisión sistemática de literatura / Effectiveness of budesonide/formoterol compared to fluticasone / salmeterol in improving the lung capacity of older people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: systematic literature review / Eficiência da budesonida/formoterol comparado com fluticasona/salmeterol na melhora da capacidade pulmonar de idosos com Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica: revisão sistemática da literatura

Introducción. La Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica (EPOC) es una patología no transmisible, caracterizada por una limitación de flujo de aire en las vías respiratorias debido a una respuesta inmunológica anormal frente a partículas. Objetivo. Conocer la eficacia que tiene la budesonida/formoterol comparado con la fluticasona/salmeterol en la mejoría de la capacidad pulmonar en personas mayores de 40 años con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de documentos producidos entre el año 2000 y 2018 en distintas bases de datos, donde se incluyeron ensayos clínicos. Se identificaron cuatro artículos para el análisis final. Resultados. Durante la evaluación comparativa de budesonida con formoterol, los artículos muestran un total de 709 personas evaluadas, con un promedio de edad de 53,5 años. El 65,4 % eran varones, el 21 % manifestaba no haber consumido tabaco, todos con diagnóstico de Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica moderada-severa, según la escala GOLD (Global Initiative For Chronic Obstrutive Lung Disease). Los estudios determinaron que al administrar budesonida/formoterol de 400/12 mcg y 320/9 mcg, los pacientes tuvieron una leve mejoría en el Volumen Espiratorio Forzado del primer segundo (VEF1). Solo dos pacientes presentaron efectos adversos. No obstante, para los resultados mencionados anteriormente no se encontró diferencias significativas. Conclusiones. El uso de budesonida/formoterol es eficaz al mejorar la capacidad ventilatoria pulmonar, disminuye el número de exacerbaciones anuales y genera un adecuado control de los síntomas, sin embargo, es igual de efectivo a la fluticasona/salmeterol.

Introduction. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a not transmissible disease, characterized by a limitation of airflow in the respiratory tract, due to an abnormal immune response to particles. Objective. This article aims to show that the application of budesonide / formoterol improves lung capacity in people over 40 years with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Materials and methods. A systematic review was conducted in the period between 2000 and 2018 in different databases where clinical trials were included. Four articles were identified for the final analysis. Results. During the comparative evaluation of budesonide with formoterol, a total of 709 people were evaluated, with an average age of 53.5 years, 65.4% were male, 21% reported not having used tobacco, all with a diagnosis of moderate-severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease according to the GOLD scale (Global Initiative For Chronic Obstrutive Lung Disease). The studies determined that when budesonide / formoterol of 400/12 mcg and 320/9 mcg was administered, the patients had a slight improvement in the Forced Expiratory Volume of the first second (FEV1). Only two patients presented adverse effects. However, for the results mentioned above no significant differences were found. Conclusions. The use of budesonide / formoterol is effective in improving pulmonary ventilatory capacity, decreases the number of annual exacerbations and generates adequate control of symptoms, however, it is equally effective in fluticasone / salmeterol.

Introdução. A Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica (DPOC) é uma patologia não transmissível, caraterizada por uma limitação do fluxo de ar nas vias aéreas devido a uma resposta imune anormal contra partículas. Objetivo. Conhecer a eficiência que apresenta a budesonida/formoterol comparado com fluticasona/salmeterol na melhora da capacidade pulmonar em pessoas com mais de 40 anos com Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica. Materiais e métodos. Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática dos documentos produzidos entre 2000 e 2018 em diferentes bancos de dados, onde foram incluídos ensaios clínicos. Quatro artigos foram identificados para a análise final. Resultados. Durante a avaliação comparativa de budesonida com formoterol, os artículos mostram um total de 709 pessoas avaliadas, com uma idade média de 53,5 anos. O 65,4 % eram do sexo masculino, o 21 % disseram que não usavam tabaco, todos diagnosticados com Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica moderada a grave, de acordo com a escala GOLD (Global Initiative For Chronic Obstrutive Lung Disease). Os estudos determinaram que administrar budesonida/formoterol de 400/12 mcg e 320/9 mcg, os pacientes apresentaram uma leve melhora no Volume Expiratório Forçado no primeiro segundo (VEF1). Apenas dois pacientes tiveram efeitos adversos. No entanto, não foram encontradas diferenças significativas para os resultados mencionados acima. Conclusões. O uso de budesonida/formoterol é eficaz na melhora da capacidade ventilatória pulmonar, diminui o numero de exacerbações anuais e gera controle adequado dos sintomas, no entanto, é igualmente eficaz para a fluticasona/salmeterol.

Estudio aleatorizado abierto de niños con exacerbación aguda del asma tratados con esteroides inhalados / Open randomized study of children with acute exacerbation of asthma and treated with inhaled steroids

Introducción: la terapia primaria en la crisis de asma aguda, incluye administración de oxígeno, uso de ß2-agonistas por vía inhalada y la administración de esteroides sistémicos. Las ventajas que se citan sobre el uso de los esteroides inhalados serían, su rápido inicio de acción y su buen perfil de seguridad, en contraposición a los esteroides sistémicos. Objetivo: evaluar la utilidad de los corticoides inhalados en el tratamiento de la crisis de asma aguda en niños mayores de 2 años. Métodos: se realizó un estudio prospectivo, transversal, experimental, aleatorizado, de eficacia clínica; la selección se realizó por medio de una tabla de números aleatorios, y se incluyeron tres grupos: el I recibió terapia estándar, el II la sustitución del esteroide sistémico por el inhalado y el III combinó a la terapia estándar el esteroide inhalado. El análisis estadístico se realizó por medio de ANOVA y chi cuadrado con una p< 0,05 como significativa. Resultados: se estudiaron 165 pacientes, los tres grupos de tratamiento mejoraron la escala de severidad inicial. Los pacientes que recibieron esteroides inhalados adicionados a la terapia estándar, tuvieron 73 por ciento de posibilidades de no ser hospitalizados, 27 por ciento de posibilidades de reducir el riesgo de hospitalizaciones y de cada 100 pacientes tratados con la combinación, se pudieran prevenir 8 hospitalizaciones(AU)

Budesonide-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin inclusion complex in binary poloxamer 407/403 system for ulcerative colitis treatment: A physico-chemical study from micelles to hydrogels.

Budesonide (BUD) is a glucocorticoid widely used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. In this work, we propose the study of the system BUD-HP-ß-CD inclusion complex incorporated into PL 407 and PL407-PL403 thermoreversible hydrogels, considering physico-chemical and pharmaceutical aspects. Complexation between BUD and HP-ß-CD was confirmed by phase solubility studies (1:1 stoichiometry, Kc=8662.8 M(-1)), DSC, FTIR and microscopy analyzes. BUD solubility in simulated upper and lower colon fluids was improved in a dependence of HP-ß-CD and PL 407 or PL407-PL403 association. Micellar hydrodynamic diameter studies showed the interaction between HP-ß-CD and PL blocks, as well as the reorganization of the micellar system in the presence of BUD and its inclusion complex. Micellization temperature (Tm) was not shifted, but sol-gel phase transition studies showed that in the presence of BUD, HP-ß-CD or BUD:HP-ß-CD complex, the association PL407-PL403 favored the gel formation close to the physiological temperature. Physico-chemical and in vitro release assays studies revealed no competitive displacement of BUD from the HP-ß-CD cavity evoked by PL407 or PL407-PL403 addition. These findings point out the BUD-HP-ß-CD in PL-based hydrogels as strategies for future investigations on development of new pharmaceutical formulations for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Impacto da atenção farmacêutica na função pulmonar de pacientes com asma grave / Impact of pharmaceutical care on lung function in patients with severe asthma

O estudo avaliou a influência do serviço de Atenção Farmacêutica na otimização dos resultados terapêuticos de pacientes com asma grave não controlada, em uso de formoterol associado à budesonida. Utilizou-se o Método Dáder de Seguimento Farmacoterapêutico e o Teste do Controle de Asma (ACT™) para avaliação de resultados, assim como a espirometria. Foram acompanhados 26 pacientes por um período não inferior a seis meses, cuja média de idade foi 55 ± 11 anos, destes, 22 (84%) foram do gênero feminino. Na pesquisa verificou-se que 22 (84,6%) pacientes apresentaram mais de uma enfermidade associada à asma grave e 24 (92%) faziam uso de dois ou mais fármacos. Foram detectados 58 resultados negativos associados aos medicamentos (RNM), com incidência de 2,2 ± 0,99 RNM por usuário. O RNM mais frequente foi insegurança não quantitativa identificada em 11 usuários (43%), sendo 31% desses devido às reações adversas ao medicamento. Foram realizadas 65 intervenções farmacêuticas para resolver os RNM, com média de 2,5 ± 1,2 por paciente, das quais 85% ocorreram na farmácia sem a necessidade de voltar ao médico. Dos resultados clínicos, após as intervenções farmacêuticas, todos os usuários tiveram melhora significativa da asma (p<0,05), porém 2 deles (7,6%) ainda apresentaram asma não controlada. Assim, o estudo sinalizou a necessidade do acompanhamento farmacoterapêutico aos usuários com asma grave não controlada para otimização dos resultados clínicos.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the influence of pharmaceutical care on the optimization of therapeutic results in patients with severe asthma using formoterol combined with budesonide. Evaluations were performed with spirometry, the Dáder Pharmacotherapeutic Follow Up method and Asthma Control Test (ACT™). Twenty-six patients (mean age: 55 ± 11 years; 22 females) were monitored for not less than six months. Twenty-two patients (84.6%) had more than one health condition associated with severe asthma and 24 (92%) made use of two or more drugs. The research identified 58 negative results associated with medication (NRM), corresponding to an individual incidence of 2.2 ± 0.99 NRMs per patient. The most frequent NRM was a non-quantitative uncertainty identified in 11 patients (43%), with 31% of cases due to adverse reactions to the drug. Sixty-five pharmaceutical interventions were carried out to resolve the NRMs, with a mean of 2.5 ± 1.2 per patient, 85% of which occurred in the pharmacy without the need to see a doctor. Subsequently to medical treatment following pharmaceutical intervention, all patients experienced a clear improvement in symptoms (p < 0.05). However, two subjects (7.6%) continued to experience uncontrolled asthma. The present findings reveal a need for the pharmacotherapeutic monitoring of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in order to optimize clinical outcomes.