Bearing-Related Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Fourth-Generation Ceramic-On-Ceramic Articulations: Does Articular Noise Increase Over Time?

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the mean 6-year outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulations. With extended observations, this study aimed to report the mean 12-year outcomes focusing on bearing-related complications of CoC THA. METHODS: We reviewed primary CoC THAs performed between May 2009 and April 2012 at a single institution. Of the 831 hips (739 patients), 716 hips (635 patients) that satisfied a minimum 10-year follow-up were included. The mean age at operation was 54 years (range, 16 to 83). The occurrence of bearing-specific complications, including ceramic fractures and noise generation, was evaluated. The mean follow-up duration was 12 years (range, 10 to 14). RESULTS: A total of 2 (0.3%) ceramic liner fractures occurred, as previously reported. No additional ceramic fractures were observed during the extended follow-up period. However, the cumulative incidence of audible noise increased from 6.4 (48 of 749) to 8.2% (59 of 716). Of the 59 hips with noise, 26 (44.1%) developed noise within 1 year, whereas 13 (22.0%) presented with noise more than 5 years after THA. The noise was described as clicking in 35 hips (4.9%) and as squeaking in 24 hips (3.4%). No revision surgeries were performed for noise, except in 2 cases of concomitant liner fractures. The implant survivorship free of any revision was 98.1% at 12 years. CONCLUSIONS: No additional ceramic fractures were identified in this extension study at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. However, the prevalence of articular noise has increased from 6.4 to 8.2% since the previous report. Possible late-onset noise should be considered when performing CoC THA in younger patients.

Ceramic fragmentation after total hip arthroplasty: two case reports and literature review.

Background: Ceramic fragmentation is a rare but serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed the PubMed literature from 1990 to 2023 and found only 31 case reports of ceramic fragmentation after THA. Our case reports help to expand understanding of this rare complication. We shared our surgical experience and identified an ideal material for revision surgery, which can serve as a useful reference for other orthopedic surgeons to perform ceramic fragmentation revision surgery in the future. We also analyzed the possible causes, diagnosis, and treatment opinions of ceramic fragmentation. Case presentation: This study presents two cases of ceramic fragmentation after THA. One patient had ceramic head fragmentation 10 years after the primary THA, and one patient had ceramic liner fragmentation 5 years after the primary THA. Both patients presented with pain, and one patient also reported a clicking sound in the hip. The two patients described here had BMIs of 23.7 and 23.1, respectively. Both patients' ceramic fragmentation were due to aseptic loosening, not periprosthetic joint infections, as confirmed by negative microbiological cultures. Radiographic examinations of both patients revealed radio-opaque wear debris around the hip joint prostheses and we describe the surgical protocols and intraoperative findings in both cases in detail. Conclusion: Our cases and the literature suggest that ceramic fragmentation can occur at any time after THA. The most immediate symptoms are pain and noise, but some patients may be asymptomatic. Ceramic on polyethylene bearings is recommended for revision surgery whenever possible; metal bearings should be avoided.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic or Metal-on-Polyethylene: The Bearing of Choice after Ceramic Component Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty along with Concise Follow-Up of the Previous Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We previously reported the questionable result of reoperation using metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearing after the fracture of the ceramic component. After the report, we abandoned the use of MoP; instead, we used ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing. This report aimed to present the outcome of reoperation to CoC bearing after ceramic component failures along with the longer-term outcome of the previously reported cohort with an MoP bearing. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of the MoP cohort was extended from 4.3 years to 8.8 years. Metallosis had occurred in three of nine patients of the previous cohort, which all required re-reoperations. Two hips from 11 patients with revision to CoC had re-reoperations due to ceramic liner fracture and non-union of the osteotomized fragment, respectively. No metallosis and wear occurred in the cohort revised with CoC articulation. Otherwise, there were no adverse changes in radiographs and no impairment in functions. METHODS: We conducted an extended prospective evaluation of a previous cohort consisting of six head fractures and three liner fractures. In this cohort, the patients underwent a bearing change to metal-on-polyethylene. Additionally, we retrospectively analyzed 11 cases of third-generation ceramic bearing fractures, comprising nine head fractures and two liner fractures. These cases were subsequently treated with a bearing change to fourth-generation CoC. We assessed clinical and radiological outcomes, including complication rates, in both groups. CONCLUSION: We recommend the latest CoC as the bearing of choice in reoperation after the fracture of ceramic components. In the case of an MoP bearing after the ceramic component fracture, the risk of metallosis seemed high in the early postoperative period.

Fracture of a Metal-Backed Ceramic Liner After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure that has become increasingly prevalent in a younger patient population. With improvements in prostheses and materials, the survivorship of implants has increased. Historically, the excellent wear characteristics of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) implants made them an appealing choice compared to other bearing options. Yet, the potential benefits of the bearing longevity related to the wear characteristics have been combated by their unique causes of failure such as implant fracture and squeaking. Metal-backed ceramic liners were developed to minimize impingement-related chipping at the periphery of the implant that may propagate to catastrophic implant fracture. We report a case involving a fracture of a metal-backed ceramic liner that presented with months of pain and crepitus with no overt signs of fracture on imaging.

Preventing ceramic liner fracture after Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with use of Delta ceramic articulation were successful at medium term follow-up. The use of this newest ceramic has markedly reduced the incidence of ceramic head fractures, but not the incidence of ceramic liner fractures. We tested a hypothesis that the ceramic fractures are prevented by use of a metal shell with 18° inner taper angle and a stem design with a reduced neck geometry. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of cementless THA with use of 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, Exceed ABT metal shell and Taperloc stem. We evaluated ceramic fracture, noise, clinical results, radiological changes and survival rate at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: From April 2010 to February 2012, 246 patients (274 THAs) were enrolled. Among them, 224 patients (130 men and 94 women, 250 hips) were followed-up for 5-8 years (mean 6.0 years). Ceramic malseating or fracture did not occur in any patient. Eight patients (8 hips, 3.2%) reported noise. Mean Harris hip score was 84 points at the latest follow-up. All acetabular and femoral components had bone-ingrown stability. Two hips were revised due to recurrent dislocation and periprosthetic fracture. The survival rate was 99.6% at 8 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Ceramic fractures can be prevented by a use of (1) 32/36-mm Delta ceramic bearing, (2) metal shell with 18° taper angle, and (2) stem with a reduced neck geometry. However, noise remains a concern of the Delta ceramic bearing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II.

Fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic THA results in improvements in midterm outcomes compared to third-generation THA but does not resolve noise problems: a cohort study of a single-hip system.

BACKGROUND: Using data from the Korean Hip Registry, we aimed to investigate mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes, including the prevalence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), osteolysis, and component loosening or dislocation, and to analyze the incidence of bearing-related complications following modern ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a single cementless hip system. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-two patients (602 hips) who underwent Forte or Delta COC THAs with a single hip system and had a minimum 5-year follow-up were identified. The sample included 243 (50.4%) women and 239 (49.6%) men with a mean age of 50.6 years (range: 18-83 years). The Forte group comprised 310 hips, and the Delta group comprised 292 hips. The mean follow-up was 6.1 years (range: 5-10.2 years). RESULTS: Cup orientation did not differ between groups. No hip had a PJI or osteolysis in either group. All acetabular components and all but two femoral components (in the Delta group) were well fixed. Dislocations occurred in six (1.9%) hips in the Forte group and one (0.3%) hip in the Delta group (p = 0.124). A total of nine (1.5%) revisions were performed. The 5-year survival rates for all-cause revisions were 98.4 and 98.6%, respectively. One (0.3%) ceramic head fracture occurred in the Forte group. Sixteen (5%) hips exhibited clicking and 6 (2%) hips had squeaking in the Forte group; 16 (6%) hips exhibited clicking and 5 (2%) hips had squeaking in the Delta group. Multiple regression analysis revealed that noise generation was unassociated with any factor. CONCLUSIONS: From the Korean Hip Registry data, THA with modern ceramic bearings showed encouraging results, with lower risks of PJI, osteolysis, and component loosening. In particular, Delta COC THA resulted in no PJI or ceramic fracture and had a reduced dislocation risk. However, associated noise remains a concern.

Heart transplant secondary to cobalt toxicity after hip arthroplasty revision.

INTRODUCTION: Cobalt toxicity in patients with hip arthroplasty is a rare complication, but it should be considered in those patients who, after a ceramic fracture, were implanted with a metal-on-polyethylene prosthesis. The complete removal of ceramic particles during revision surgery can be complicated. If the bearing surface is replaced with a metal-on-polyethylene prosthesis, these residual ceramic particles may wear down the chrome-cobalt head, producing localised metallosis. This can trigger blood metal ion levels to rise, causing systemic toxicity. Visual and auditory alterations, cognitive deterioration, hypothyroidism, neuropathy, cardiomyopathy, anorexia, fatigue, diabetes, polycythemia, and respiratory and cutaneous symptoms are some of the clinical manifestations of prosthetic cobaltism. CASE DESCRIPTION: A young patient presented with multiorgan failure secondary to cobalt toxicity after a ceramic fracture and revision with a metal-on-polyethylene prosthesis; his serum cobalt and chromium levels were 652 µg/L and 270 µg/L, respectively. The patient needed a heart transplant after presenting with cobalt-induced cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS: In a patient with a ceramic fracture who is subjected to revision surgery with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing, it is necessary to rule out the possibility of cobalt intoxication. Serum cobalt levels > 20 µg/L are inadmissible; in these cases, surgical treatment should be considered in the short term. A wide synovectomy and replacement of components should be performed with hard friction options, preferably with a ceramic-on-ceramic prosthesis.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty after Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Patients Under 60-years Old; Mid-term Results.

PURPOSE: Although advances in technology have reduced the risk of ceramic implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty, these injuries do occur and their treatment remains challenging. There is a lack of studies reporting on the effectiveness of ceramic components in revision hip arthroplasty after ceramic bearing fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of revision surgery with ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic bearing fractures in young (i.e., under 60 years old) and active patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients who, from May 2004 to November 2011, underwent ceramic-on-ceramic revision surgery following a ceramic component fracture and had more than 6 years follow up were enrolled in this study. All eight patients were male with mean ages at first and revision surgeries of 39 years (range, 31-50 years) and 43.8 years (range, 33-60 years), respectively. There were 6 and 2 cases of ceramic liner and ceramic head fractures, respectively. The average time from the first operation to revision surgery was 54.3 months (range, 9-120 months), and the average follow up period was 9.7 years (range, 6-13.3 years). RESULTS: At the last follow up, all patients showed improvement in Harris hip score and pain relief and there were no cases of loosening or osteolysis. CONCLUSION: Revision total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic component fracture is a feasible and appropriate surgical option in young and active patients.

Acetabulum Protrusion Following Ceramic Liner Fracture: A Case Report.

Hip arthroplasty is an extremely satisfying treatment method for coxarthrosis which is in increasing use throughout the world. However, loosening of the prosthesis is a significant complication and to overcome this, ceramic liners are increasingly being selected. If the survival of ceramic surfaces is prolonged, there is a risk of fracture of the ceramic materials. New ceramic materials developed to overcome this problem are more resistant. The case presented here is of a patient in whom liner fracture developed following ceramic-ceramic hip arthroplasty. The ceramic femoral head was observed to have protruded into the defect created in the acetabular component. Acetabular revision was applied to the patient.

Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based all-ceramic single crowns: an up to 12-year retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the incidence of clinical complications with tooth-supported zirconia-based all-ceramic single crowns and identify pertinent risk parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (May 2004 to April 2016) utilizing clinical records of patients receiving yttrium-oxide-partially stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP)-based all-ceramic crowns placed at Tohoku University Hospital was performed. The length of time of treatment success (complication event-free) and restoration survival (including minor complication events and remaining clinically functional) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multilevel survival analysis was used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven crowns were evaluated (mean follow-up time, 7.0 years). A total of 21 crowns experienced at least one complication with fracture of veneering ceramic being the most common (16 crowns). Estimated success and survival rates at 5 years (96.9 and 98.5%, respectively) decreased at 10 years to 62.1 and 67.2%, respectively. The risk of complications was significantly higher for molar crowns compared to anterior crowns (p < 0.01). A significant association of complications with metal antagonist restorations was shown by univariate analysis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Given the study limitations, Y-TZP single crowns placed on anterior teeth demonstrated encouraging clinical results over a period of up to 10 years. However, there is a substantial risk of complications with posterior teeth within 10 years of restoration placement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment with zirconia-based all-ceramic crowns for molar teeth with metal antagonist occlusion should be undertaken with caution.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty after Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Patients Under 60-years Old; Mid-term Results / 대한고관절학회지

PURPOSE: Although advances in technology have reduced the risk of ceramic implant fractures in total hip arthroplasty, these injuries do occur and their treatment remains challenging. There is a lack of studies reporting on the effectiveness of ceramic components in revision hip arthroplasty after ceramic bearing fracture. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of revision surgery with ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic bearing fractures in young (i.e., under 60 years old) and active patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients who, from May 2004 to November 2011, underwent ceramic-on-ceramic revision surgery following a ceramic component fracture and had more than 6 years follow up were enrolled in this study. All eight patients were male with mean ages at first and revision surgeries of 39 years (range, 31–50 years) and 43.8 years (range, 33–60 years), respectively. There were 6 and 2 cases of ceramic liner and ceramic head fractures, respectively. The average time from the first operation to revision surgery was 54.3 months (range, 9–120 months), and the average follow up period was 9.7 years (range, 6–13.3 years). RESULTS: At the last follow up, all patients showed improvement in Harris hip score and pain relief and there were no cases of loosening or osteolysis. CONCLUSION: Revision total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic components after ceramic component fracture is a feasible and appropriate surgical option in young and active patients.

ADM guidance-ceramics: Fatigue principles and testing.

BACKGROUND: Clinical failure of dental ceramics is usually reported as partial fracture of the restoration (chipping) or as catastrophic fracture of the whole structure. In contrast to metals, ceramics are linear-elastic, brittle materials exhibiting extremely low damage tolerance to failure. Well documented clinical and lab reports have shown this fracture event often occurs at loads far below their fracture strength due to intrinsic fatigue degradation via slow crack growth or cyclic fatigue mechanisms. The presence and development of surface flaws have a dominant role in damage accumulation and lifetime reduction of ceramic structures. AIMS: This ADM guidance document aims to summarize the aspects related to fatigue degradation of dental ceramics, reviewing the concepts of fatigue testing and furthermore aims to provide practical guidance to young scientists entering into fatigue related research. The description of fatigue strength is always accompanied by a clear understanding of the underlying fracture mechanisms.

[Partial exchange in total hip arthroplasty : What can we combine?] / Gelenkteilwechsel in der Hüftarthroplastik : Was dürfen wir kombinieren?

BACKGROUND: In case of hip revision arthroplasty, one component (cup/stem) is often well fixed and does not need to be exchanged. The newly implanted component needs to be compatible with the well-fixed implant. The combination of implants from different companies leads to "mix and match" or even mismatch between the implants. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The objective of this work was to describe possible combinations including their specifications that need to be considered in partial exchange of hip prostheses. For this purpose the literature, surgical techniques of companies and judgements concerning this topic were analysed and our own results and experiences were included. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Partial revision arthroplasty can be challenging and needs to be planned in detail. In case of isolated cup or inlay revision with exchange of a modular head the cone of the stem needs to be identified. A ceramic head may be used in revision with a titanium sleeve even from a different company as long as they are compatible. Patients however need to give their informed consent for this mix and match procedure. This procedure is done frequently and good study results support this, however from a juristic point of view a definite recommendation cannot be given. If the inlay of a cup is replaced, the original inlay should be used. If this is not available anymore, it can be manufactured as a special product in many cases. If this is also not possible, an inlay can also be cemented into a well-fixed cup. Biomechanical and clinical studies support this off-label technique. In case of an isolated exchange of the stem with a ceramic inlay that is retained in a well-fixed cup, the revision stem and ceramic head need to be from the same company as the cup. In case of ceramic fracture, a ceramic head with a titanium sleeve should be combined with a PE or ceramic inlay, a metal head or inlay should never be used.

Cobalt toxicity after revision total hip replacement due to fracture of a ceramic head. / Toxicidad por cobalto después de la revisión a una artroplastia total de cadera posterior a fractura de cabeza cerámica.

Symptomatic cobalt toxicity from a failed total hip replacement is a rare, but devastating complication. Potential clinical findings include cardiomyopathy, hypothyroidism, skin rash, visual and hearing impairment, polycythaemia, weakness, fatigue, cognitive impairment, and neuropathy. The case is presented of a 74year-old man in whom, after a ceramic-ceramic replacement and two episodes of prosthetic dislocation, it was decided to replace it with a polyethylene-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA). At 6months after the revision he developed symptoms of cobalt toxicity, confirmed by analytical determination (serum cobalt level=651.2µg/L). After removal of the prosthesis, the levels of chromium and cobalt in blood and urine returned to normal, with the patient currently being asymptomatic. It is recommended to use a new ceramic on ceramic bearing at revision, in order to minimise the risk of wear-related cobalt toxicity following breakage of ceramic components.

Alumina Delta-on-Alumina Delta Bearing in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged <50 Years.

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of alumina delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results, prevalence of osteolysis, squeaking, and fracture of ceramic material associated with the use of the alumina delta ceramic-on-alumina delta ceramic bearing in cementless THA in patients aged <50 years. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 277 patients (334 hips) who underwent a cementless THA using alumina delta ceramic-on-alumina delta ceramic when they were 50 years or younger at the time of surgery. Demographic data; Harris Hip Score; Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were recorded. Radiographic and computerized tomographic evaluations were used to evaluate implant fixation and osteolysis. Squeaking sound and ceramic fracture were documented. The mean follow-up was 7.8 years (range, 6-9). RESULTS: The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 93 points, 15 points, and 8.6 points, respectively. Two patients had thigh pain (grade 7 points). All acetabular components and all but 2 femoral components were well fixed. Thirty-three hips (10%) exhibited clicking sound, and 2 hips (0.6%) exhibited squeaking sound. No hip had osteolysis or ceramic head or liner fracture. CONCLUSION: Our minimum 6-year follow-up results with the use of alumina delta ceramic-on-alumina delta ceramic bearings in patients aged <50 years suggest that cementless THA provides a high rate of survivorship without evidence of osteolysis or fracture of ceramic material.

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Fourth-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic: Analysis of Complications in 939 Consecutive Cases Followed for 2-10 Years.

BACKGROUND: Delta ceramics may be the bearing of choice for younger and active patients due to its improved toughness and wear characteristics, provided there is no risk of fracture. However, ceramic fracture is the most serious complication related to this type of bearing. Although millions of Delta ceramics have been implanted worldwide, short to midterm results have been scarcely reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to report the complication rate at short to midterm follow-up associated with the bearing surface used in a series of primary total hip arthroplasties with Delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearings performed in a single institution. METHODS: A total of 939 cases (880 patients) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty with fourth-generation Delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were retrospectively reviewed. They were followed for an average of 5.3 years (2-10 years). RESULTS: One hip experienced a liner fracture, 2 cups presented early loosening due to friction between the acetabular screw and the backside of the liner, one femoral ball head had a fracture; one case of squeaking was reported, which is impending revision. Considering revision or impending revision in relationship with the bearing surface as the end point, the mean survival rate was 99.3% (confidence interval 95%, 98.3%-99.7%) at 2-10 years. CONCLUSION: This study showed a low rate of ceramic fracture compared with others; however, it was much higher than the complication rate presented by the manufacturers. The complications observed were directly related to technical errors that surgeons should avoid when using this type of surface.

Fifteen-year survival of anterior all-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses.

PURPOSE: The aim of this follow-up study was to report the long-term outcome of all-ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 16 patients (mean age of 33.3±17.5years) 22 RBFDPs made from a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic (In-Ceram) were inserted with a phosphate monomer containing luting agent after air-abrasion of the retainer wings. The abutment preparation included a shallow groove on the cingulum and a small proximal box. The restorations replacing 16 maxillary and 6 mandibular incisors were followed over a mean observation time of 188.7 months. RESULTS: No restoration debonded. Two RBFDPs fractured and were lost 48 and 214 months after insertion, respectively. The 10-year and 15-year survival rates were both 95.4% and dropped to 81.8% after 18 years. CONCLUSION: Anterior all-ceramic cantilever RBFDPs exhibited an excellent clinical longevity.

Analysis of reasons for failure of chair-side CAD/CAM ceramic restorations / 口腔疾病防治

Objective@#To investigate the failure reasons of all-ceramic restorations fabricated with chair-side CAD-CAM technology (CEREC®) and to improve the clinical survival of all-ceramic restorations. @*Methods @#All-ceramic single-tooth restorations of CEREC® in stomatology hospital of Jiangsu province between 2013 and 2016 were summarized. By clinical examination and CEREC Biogeneric surveying, the failure reasons and related restoration types were evaluated. These results were analyzed with Chi-square test and Spearman correlation analysis. @*Results@#A total of 61 cases with restoration types of 11 inlays, 38 onlays, 2 endocrowns, and 11 all-crowns, resulted in a failure rate of 5.4% in all-ceramic single-tooth restorations in 1-4 years follow-up. The reasons for failure included ceramic fracture (n=33), debonding (n=13), tooth fracture (n=15), which attributed to thin ceramic thickness (n=27), acute line angle (n=6), insufficient enamel bulk (n=3), insufficient retention type (n=10), insufficient resistance type (n=15).@*Conclusion @# The most common reason for failure in CEREC® restorations was insufficient preparation space in occlusal surface.

Long-Term Results of Third-Generation Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: The results of third-generation of alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing in a large number of patient cohorts are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical and radiologic outcome, prevalence of osteolysis detected with radiographs and computerized tomographic scan, and survivorship of a cementless total hip arthroplasty using a third-generation of alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearing in a large number of active patients aged younger than 65 years. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 871 patients (1131 hips) who underwent a cementless total hip arthroplasty when they were aged 65 years or younger at the time of surgery. The most common diagnoses were osteonecrosis (53%) and osteoarthritis (20%). Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores were recorded. Radiographic and computerized tomographic evaluations were used to evaluate implant fixation and osteolysis. The mean follow-up interval was 18.8 years (range, 15-20 years). RESULTS: At the time of final follow-up, the mean Harris hip score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 90 points, 15 points, and 8 points, respectively. All the femoral stem and acetabular components were well-fixed at the time of final follow-up. No hip had aseptic loosening or osteolysis or fracture of ceramic material at the time of the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The current results with the use of the third-generation of alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in young patients suggest that cementless acetabular and femoral components provide outstanding long-term fixation and provide a high rate of survivorship without evidence of osteolysis.

Alumina Delta-on-Alumina Delta Bearing in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Aged <50 Years.

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of alumina delta ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results, prevalence of osteolysis, squeaking, and fracture of ceramic material associated with the use of the alumina delta ceramic-on-alumina delta ceramic bearing in cementless THA in patients aged <50 years. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 277 patients (334 hips) who underwent a cementless THA using alumina delta ceramic-on-alumina delta ceramic when they were 50 years or younger at the time of surgery. Demographic data; Harris Hip Score; Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; and University of California, Los Angeles activity score were recorded. Radiographic and computerized tomographic evaluations were used to evaluate implant fixation and osteolysis. Squeaking sound and ceramic fracture were documented. The mean follow-up was 13.1 years (range, 10-14). RESULTS: The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, University of California, Los Angeles activity score were 93 points, 15 points, and 8.6 points, respectively. Two patients had thigh pain (grade 7 points). All acetabular components and all but 2 femoral components were well fixed. Thirty-three hips (10%) exhibited clicking sound, and 2 hips (0.6%) exhibited squeaking sound. No hip had osteolysis or ceramic head or liner fracture. CONCLUSION: Our minimum 10-year follow-up results with the use of alumina delta ceramic-on-alumina delta ceramic bearings in patients aged <50 years suggest that cementless THA provides a high rate of survivorship without evidence of osteolysis or fracture of ceramic material.