RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sensitization to Blomia tropicalis is associated with asthma in various tropical and subtropical countries; however, information about the specific molecular components associated with this disease is scarce. Using molecular diagnosis, we sought to identify B tropicalis allergens associated with asthma in Colombia. METHODS: Specific IgE (sIgE) to 8 B tropicalis recombinant allergens (Blo t 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 21) was determined using an in-house ELISA system in asthma patients (n=272) and controls (n=298) recruited in a national prevalence study performed in several Colombian cities (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, and San Andrés). The study sample included children and adults (mean [SD] age, 28 [17] years). Cross-reactivity between Blo t 5 and Blo t 21 was evaluated using ELISA-inhibition. RESULTS: Specific IgE (sIgE) to 8 B tropicalis recombinant allergens (Blo t 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 21) was determined using an in-house ELISA system in asthma patients (n=272) and controls (n=298) recruited in a national prevalence study performed in several Colombian cities (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, and San Andrés). The study sample included children and adults (mean [SD] age, 28 [17] years). Cross-reactivity between Blo t 5 and Blo t 21 was evaluated using ELISA-inhibition. CONCLUSION: Although Blo t 5 and Blo t 21 are considered common sensitizers, this is the first report of their association with asthma. Both components should be included in molecular panels for diagnosis of allergy in the tropics.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Asma , Inmunoglobulina E , Humanos , Asma/inmunología , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Adolescente , Colombia/epidemiología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Clima Tropical , Prevalencia , PreescolarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Blomia tropicalis sensitization is associated with asthma in different tropical and sub-tropical countries; however, information about the specific molecular components associated with this disease is scarce. Using molecular diagnosis, we sought to identify B. tropicalis allergens associated with asthma in Colombia. METHODS: Specific IgE (sIgE) to eight B. tropicalis recombinant allergens (Blo t 2/5/7/8/10/12/13 and 21) was determined using an in-house developed ELISA system in asthmatic patients (n=272) and control subjects (n=298) recruited in a national prevalencestudy performed in Colombian cities (Barranquilla, Bogotá, Medellín, Cali and San Andrés). Sample study included children and adults (mean age: 28±SD 17 years old). Cross-reactivity between Blot 5 and Blo t 21 was evaluated by ELISA-inhibition. RESULTS: Sensitization to Blo t 21 (aOR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2 - 2.9) and Blo t 5 (aOR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.1 - 2.5), but not Blo t 2, was associated with asthma. sIgE levels to Blo t 21 and to Blo t 5 were significantly higher in the disease group. Cross-reactivity between Blo t 21 and Blo t 5 is on average moderate; however, individual analysis indicates that may be high (>50%) in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although Blo t 5 and Blo t 21 has been described as common sensitizers, this is the first report of their association with asthma. Both components should be included in molecular panels for allergy diagnosis in the tropics.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To avoid unnecessary oral food challenges, which are time consuming, stressful, and risky, improved in vitro diagnostic methods for food allergy such as component resolved diagnostics are still under investigation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of whole peanut- and peanut-component (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 6 and Ara h 8)-specific IgE levels in the diagnostic procedure of peanut allergy as well as the diagnostic properties of peanut-specific IgG and IgG4. METHODS: Sixty-one children underwent oral peanut challenge tests for diagnostic purposes irrespective of their peanut-specific IgE levels. Peanut-specific serum IgE, IgG, and IgG4 levels were determined by ImmunoCAP FEIA and specific IgE against individual peanut proteins by Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 61 patients (56%) had a peanut allergy. No significant difference was observed for peanut-specific IgG or peanut-specific IgG4 levels between patients who were allergic and tolerant patients, whereas peanut-specific IgE was significant higher in patients who were allergic than in tolerant patients (P < .005). Twenty-five of 61 children had peanut-specific IgE above a previously proposed cutoff level of 15 kUA/L; however, 7 of these 25 children (28%) were clinically tolerant. Ara h 2-specific IgE was significantly lower in tolerant than in patients with allergies (P < .0001). Interestingly, 94% of the patients with peanut allergies showed IgE-binding to Ara h 2. Unfortunately, 26% of the sensitized but tolerant patients have shown IgE binding to Ara h 2 too. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the level of specific IgE to peanut nor to Ara h 2 was able to clearly distinguish patients with clinical relevant peanut allergy from those who were clinical tolerant in our population. As expected, peanut-specific IgG and IgG4 did not improve the diagnostic procedure.