An abysmal conundrum associated with a misplaced dialysis catheter.

A 25-year-old female patient with chronic glomerulonephritis, initiated on haemodialysis presented with high-grade fever, a dysfunctional catheter, low oxygen saturation and unstable blood pressure. Upon evaluation, the patient was febrile with elevated white blood cell counts. She was intubated, started on inotropes and transferred to the intensive care unit. Chest radiography showed that the tunnelled internal jugular dialysis catheter had migrated to the inferior vena cava. Echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography showed severe heart dysfunction with a large thrombus attached to the catheter, indicating catheter-related atrial thrombus (CRAT). CT pulmonary angiography revealed blockage of the segmental pulmonary arteries, suggesting pulmonary embolism. Blood and tracheal cultures revealed Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The patient was administered appropriate antibiotics and anticoagulants and underwent surgical removal of the thrombus and the catheter. This case demonstrates the risks associated with improper placement of dialysis catheters and highlights the brief management of CRAT.

Effect of puncture position on catheter patency rate during tunnelled dialysis catheter insertion from the right internal jugular vein.

Background: No recommendations have been made regarding the puncture position during tunnelled dialysis catheter (TDC) insertion from right internal jugular vein (RIJV). We investigated the effect of puncture positioning along with other characteristics and clinical factors associated with TDCs to determine their correlation with catheter patency rate. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed TDC insertion procedures performed between January 2018 and December 2020 at a single institution. Patients were monitored for at least 1 year or until TDC removal or replacement. The distance on the post-operative chest radiography were measured to determine the height of puncture position. End points were freedom from catheter dysfunction. Results: Total 949 catheters met the eligibility criteria. Catheter dysfunction occurred in 233 patients and catheter infection in 127 patients. By multivariate analysis, female sex [hazard ratio (HR) =1.497, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.119-2.002; P=0.007] and split-tip catheter (HR =1.453, 95% CI: 1.087-1.944; P=0.012) were associated with an increased rate of catheter dysfunction. Every 10-year increment in age (HR =1.243, 95% CI: 1.123-1.376; P<0.001) and every 1-cm increase in the height of the catheter insertion site (HR =1.270, 95% CI: 1.096-1.473; P=0.001) were also associated with an increased rate of catheter dysfunction. After classifying the height of puncture position into 3 groups, significant worse patency was observed in the catheter with puncture height more than 4 cm (P=0.025). No immediate complications were observed. Conclusions: TDC insertion at a high puncture site correlates with an increased risk of catheter dysfunction. Puncturing the RIJV close to the clavicle is safe and enhances catheter patency.

Suture passer combined with two-hole laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheterization in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic techniques are being widely applied for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter (PDC) placement. The suture passer is a novel fixation tool that aims to reduce catheter migration. We compared the clinical value of the suture passer combined with two-hole laparoscopic PDC placement to open surgical placement by evaluating preoperative and postoperative conditions, as well as the onset of complications in both groups. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted including 169 patients who underwent PDC placement surgery from January 2021 to May 2023. Based on the method employed, patients were divided into two groups: the suture passer combined with a two-hole laparoscopy group (SLG) and the open surgical group (SG). Comprehensive patient information, including general data, preoperative and postoperative indicators, peritoneal function after surgery, and the incidence rate of complications, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The SLG showed a statistically significant decrease in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and 6-month postoperative drift rate compared to the SG (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, primary disease, hospitalization time, hospitalization costs, preoperative and postoperative examination indicators, peritonitis, and omental wrapping. CONCLUSIONS: Suture passer combined with two-hole laparoscopic PDC placement, characterized by simplicity and facilitating secure catheter fixation, was deemed safe and effective for patients undergoing PD. It reduces the catheter migration rate and improved surgical comfort. Overall, this technique demonstrates favorable outcomes in clinical practice.

Optimal volume for the draw-and-return methods to enhance activated partial thromboplastin time ratio accuracy in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters.

Background: Significant errors of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio were frequently observed in blood sampling from central venous dialysis catheter (CVC) of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Following the draw-and-return methods, initial blood withdrawal from the catheter before sampling can reduce the error, but the optimal withdrawal volume remains undetermined. Aim: The objective of this study is to determine the optimal blood withdrawal volume for the draw-and-return methods to improve aPTT ratio accuracy in hemodialysis patients with CVC. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in patients receiving HD via CVC. Four blood samples were collected from each patient, involving a peripheral venipuncture and three draw-and-return samples (10 ml, 20 ml and 25 ml groups). The aPTT ratio of a peripheral sample was used as a reference to determine the aPTT ratio accuracy for each draw-and-return group. Subsequently, the agreement was illustrated using modified Bland-Altman plot. Results: A total of 1,000 samples were obtained from 250 patients. The patients had a mean age of 59.6 ± 15.4 years, with 17.2% using citrate as the CVC's locking agent. The adjusted accuracies of the aPTT ratio varied significantly among the three withdrawal volumes (p-value <0.001). The 25 ml group demonstrated the highest accuracy (43.2%; 95%CI, 38.0-48.4), followed by the 20 ml group (30.0%; 95%CI, 24.9-35.2), and the 10 ml group (18.0%; 95%CI, 12.8-23.2). Additionally, using citrate as a locking agent provided more than 80.0% aPTT ratio accuracy, whereas heparin demonstrated inferior accuracy even in the 25 ml withdrawal group. Conclusion: The optimal blood withdraw volume for the draw-and-return methods concluded at 20 ml for citrate locked-CVC and 25 ml for heparin which significantly improved aPTT ratio accuracies. Applying citrate as a locking agent provides clear benefits for aPTT ratio monitoring, while peripheral venipuncture is recommended in cases of heparin-locked CVC.

An Improvised Cost-Effective Repair Technique for Management of Broken Luer Connections of Tunneled Dialysis Catheter and Salvage Existing Catheter.

Mechanical problems like break or crack in Luer connectors or hubs, clamps, and tubings are common non-infectious complications of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC), which may lead to other TDC complications and the need to insert a new catheter. These can be tackled using TDC repair kits or spare parts, which are often not available, resulting in the insertion of a new TDC that increases morbidity, TDC-related procedures, and healthcare costs. We discuss two cases of broken Luer connections of TDC, which were managed by exchanging the broken Luer connector of TDC with the similar Luer connector of a temporary dialysis catheter. Both the repaired TDCs are thereafter functioning well. This improvised technique provides an easy, effective, long-lasting option that salvages the existing TDC and reduces the cost factor.

Numerical modelling of the interaction between dialysis catheter, vascular vessel and blood considering elastic structural deformation.

The dialysis catheter indwelling in human bodies has a high risk of inducing thrombus and stenosis. Biomechanical research showed that such physiological complications are triggered by the wall shear stress of the vascular vessel. This study aimed to assess the impact of CVC implantation on central venous haemodynamics and the potential alterations in the haemodynamic environment related to thrombus development. The SVC structure was built from the images from computed tomography. The blood flow was calculated using the Carreau model, and the fluid domain was determined by CFD. The vascular wall and the CVC were computed using FEA. The elastic interaction between the vessel wall and the flow field was considered using FSI simulation. With consideration of the effect of coupling, it was shown that the catheter vibrated in the vascular systems due to the periodic variation of blood pressure, with an amplitude of up to 10% of the vessel width. Spiral flow was observed along the catheter after CVC indwelling, and recirculation flow appeared near the catheter tip. High OSI and WSS regions occurred at the catheter tip and the vascular junction. The arterial lumen tip had a larger effect on the WSS and OSI values on the vascular wall. Considering FSI simulation, the movement of the catheter inside the blood flow was simulated in the deformable vessel. After CVC indwelling, spiral flow and recirculation flow were observed near the regions with high WSS and OSI values.

Comparison of different peritoneal dialysis catheters on complication and catheter survival: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the clinical advantage of four commonly used peritoneal dialysis catheters (PDCs) including the Swan neck segment with straight tip (Swan neck + S), Tenckhoff segment with straight tip (Tenckhoff + S), Swan neck segment with coiled tip (Swan neck + C) and Tenckhoff segment with coiled tip (Tenckhoff + C). METHODS: Randomised clinical trials were searched from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Register of clinical trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and ChinaInfo from their inception until July 31, 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.0 and RevMan 5.3.5 software to evaluate the four commonly used PDCs. RESULTS: Seventeen studies involved 1578 participants were included. NMA showed that compared with Swan neck + C, Swan neck + S significantly reduced catheter tip migration (OR 0.47 95% CI 0.22-0.99). Tenckhoff + S was more effective in reducing catheter dysfunction (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.79), catheter tip migration with dysfunction (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.78) and catheter removal (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.93) which were consistent with the pairwise meta-analysis. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Swan neck + S emerged as the best PDC in the reduction of catheter tip migration (83.3%), followed by Tenckhoff + S (79.4%). Moreover, Tenckhoff + S (86.5%, 76.3%) and Swan neck + S (72.3, 86.9%) ranked as the first and second PDC for 1 and 2-year technique survival which was significantly higher than those of the other two PDCs. CONCLUSION: Our NMA showed Swan neck + S and Tenckhoff + S tended to be more efficacious than Swan neck + C and Tenckhoff + C in lowering the mechanical dysfunction and prolonging the technique survival, which may contribute to better clinical decisions. More randomised controlled trials with larger scales and higher quality are needed in order to obtain more credible evidence.

A case of thoracic central venous obstruction treated by the innominate-to-right-atrial bypass grafting technique under extracorporeal circulation.

A 46-year-old woman with stage 5 chronic kidney disease was unable to undergo hemodialysis treatment due to thoracic central venous obstruction (TCVO) and blockage of the tunneled cuffed catheter. This patient also presented with symptoms of TCVO. When percutaneous procedure was not possible, we resolved the obstruction with the innominate-to-right-atrial bypass grafting technique under extracorporeal circulation. There are few reports on this surgical approach. In terms of patient prognosis, this may be an effective solution to this problem.

Dialysis for older adults: why should the targets be different?

The number of patients aged > 75-years treated by dialysis continues to increase, particularly in developed countries. Haemodialysis is a well-established treatment with national and international clinical guidelines designed to provide patients with optimal treatment. However, these were developed when the dialysis population was younger, and less co-morbid. This change in patient demographics questions whether these guideline targets still apply to older patients. More patients now start dialysis with residual kidney function and could benefit from a less frequent dialysis schedule. Older patients have a lower thirst drive, so lower interdialytic gains, reduced appetite, muscle mass and physical activity would potentially allow starting dialysis with less frequent sessions a practical option. Similarly, patients with residual kidney function and lower metabolic activity may not need to meet current dialyser Kt/Vurea clearance targets to remain healthy. Instead, some elderly patients may be at risk of malnutrition and might need liberalisation of the low salt, potassium and phosphate dietary restrictions, or even additional supplements to ensure adequate protein intake. Although a fistula is the preferred vascular access, a forearm fistula may not be an option due to vascular disease, while a brachial fistula can potentially compromise cardiovascular reserve, so a dialysis catheter becomes the de facto access, especially in patients with limited life expectancy. Thus, clinical guideline targets designed for a younger less co-morbid dialysis population may not be equally applicable to the older patient initiating dialysis, and so a more individualised approach to dialysis prescription and vascular access is required.

Alternative dialysis access strategies: A case report of a patient with transrenal hemodialysis catheter due to exhausted traditional routes and review of literature.

Vascular access is the primary lifeline for patients with end-stage renal disease. While arteriovenous fistulas and grafts are the conventionally favored methods for dialysis therapy, certain patients may deplete these traditional vascular access options due to various reasons. In the quest for alternatives, unconventional vascular pathways could be considered, including transhepatic, trans-lumbar and trans-renal approaches. We present a case of a 61-year-old male who exhausted all the traditional vascular access options, therefore trans-renal hemodialysis catheter placement was performed. Overall, this case highlights the challenges of securing a reliable vascular access to perform dialysis therapy and implementing unconventional methods whenever regular means are exhausted.

Tunneled dialysis catheter utilization and patency: A retrospectiveprospective study from a tertiary care hospital in Karachi Pakistan.

Objectives: To assess the patency of tunnel dialysis catheters and their results in patients in a tertiary care setting. METHODS: The retrospective-prospective, observational study was conducted at the Department of Interventional Radiology, Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi, from September 2021 to February 2022, and comprised records of patients who underwent tunnel dialysis catheters placement from July 2019 to December 2020. Data regarding age, gender, residence, comorbidity, catheter placement site, use of antibiotics before catheter insertion, reasons for catheter removal, and total catheter days was retrieved from the medical record. Data was analysed using STATA 14. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients, 74(56.9%) were males and 56(43.1) were females. The overall median age was 65 years (interquartile range: 56.75-70.25 years). Catheters were electively removed in 97(72.4%) patients, while in 19(14.2%), 16(11.9%) and 2(1.5%) cases, catheters were removed due to infections, blockage and physical damage, respectively. Mortality due to catheter-related complications was not found. Incidence per 10,000 catheter days of overall infection, bacteraemia and other infections during one year was 8.4, 5.3 and 3.1, respectively. Overall infection-free survival rate was seen for 19 patients (survival rate=67.6%). Survival rate from catheter removal was seen in 36 patients (survival rate=53.2%). CONCLUSIONS: When all precautions were followed to circumvent catheter-related issues, tunnel dialysis catheters were found to be a viable option for haemodialysis until permanent access for dialysis is gained or a kidney transplant is performed.

End-stage renal disease in a critical patient with superior vena cava syndrome with central vein catheters inserted via the superficial femoral vein: A case study.

Superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) is caused by obstruction to the blood flow through this vein. Indwelling central venous devices, such as cardiac pacemakers and haemodialysis catheters have emerged as the most common benign aetiology of SVCS. SVCS is particularly severe in patients with end-stage renal disease who require continuous renal replacement therapy plus infusion therapy. The presence of SVCS results in a reduction of available venous access for affected patients. Therefore, venous access plays a crucial role in the management of these patients. The importance of dealing with vascular access (VA) in critical patients with these conditions cannot be overstated. This case describes an 81-year-old man with respiratory failure who had end-stage renal disease complicated with SVCS. Using ultrasound-guided puncture, we inserted a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) into the superficial femoral vein to meet his infusion requirements in intensive care. After successful placement, the catheter tip position was adjusted using imaging to position the tip relative to the haemodialysis catheter. Whenever patients with severe renal dysfunction are treated, central veins should be preserved. Safe PICC access is possible via the superficial femoral vein to protect the last central VA for rational use. This meets urgent needs for infusion and deserves promotion.

Resuming peritoneal dialysis after secondary embedding of the peritoneal dialysis catheter in the end-of-life period: A case report.

Secondary embedding of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter has been performed for patients whose kidney function has improved enough to stop dialysis but recovery is not expected to be long term. In addition, we have also performed the procedure for patients who have poor general condition due to severe cerebrovascular and/or cardiac disease or who wish to have PD again at the end of life. Here, we report the case of the first terminal haemodialysis (HD) patient who resumed PD using a secondarily embedded catheter as an end-of-life choice. The patient had undergone secondary embedding of a PD catheter and had been transferred to HD, during which time multiple pulmonary metastases of thyroid cancer were observed. She hoped to resume PD in the end-of-life period, and the catheter was subsequently externalised. The catheter was used immediately, and the patient has continued on PD over the past 1 month without infectious or mechanical complications. For elderly end-stage kidney disease patients with progressive disease and cancer, secondary embedding of the PD catheter may be an option to permit them to live the remainder of their lives at home.

Recent evaluation by nephrologists is associated with decreased incidence of tunneled dialysis catheter being used at the time of first arteriovenous access creation.

OBJECTIVE: Late primary care provider (PCP) or nephrologist evaluation of patients with progressive kidney disease may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Among patients undergoing initial arteriovenous (AV) access creation, we aimed to study the relationship of recent PCP and nephrologist evaluations with perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients from 2014 to 2022 who underwent initial AV access creation at an urban, safety-net hospital. Univariable and multivariable analyses identified associations of PCP and nephrologist evaluations <1 year and <3 months before surgery, respectively, with hemodialysis initiation via tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs), 90-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 558 patients receiving initial AV access, mean age was 59.7 ± 14 years, 59% were female gender, and 60.6% were Black race. Recent PCP and nephrology evaluations occurred in 386 (69%) and 362 (65%) patients, respectively. On multivariable analysis, unemployed and uninsured statuses were associated with decreased likelihood of PCP evaluation (unemployment: odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.77; uninsured status: OR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.45) and nephrologist evaluation (unemployment: OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.91; uninsured status: OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83) (all P < .05). Social support was associated with increased likelihood of PCP evaluation (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.07-3.08) (all P < .05). Hemodialysis was initiated with TDCs in 304 patients (55%). Older age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), obesity (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58), and nephrologist evaluation (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.08-0.19) were independently associated with decreased hemodialysis initiation with TDCs in patients receiving an initial AV access (all P < .05). Ninety-day readmission occurred in 270 cases (48%). Cirrhosis (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.03-6.03; P = .04), coronary artery disease (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.5-3.57), prosthetic AV access (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04-3.26), and impaired ambulation (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.15-2.66) were independently associated with increased readmission (all P < .05). Older age (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99), prior TDC (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94), and unemployment (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.86) were associated with decreased readmission (all P < .05). Ninety-day mortality occurred in 1.6% of patients. Neither PCP nor nephrologist evaluation was associated with readmission or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Recent nephrology evaluation was associated with reduced hemodialysis initiation with TDCs among patients undergoing initial AV access creation. Unemployed and uninsured statuses posed barriers to accessing nephrology care.

Comparison of supraclavicular brachiocephalic and femoral vein approaches for tunneled dialysis catheter placement in patients with thrombosed internal jugular veins.

INTRODUCTION: There is still debate on the best access route in case of bilateral internal jugular vein thrombosis. We aimed to compare the safety, effectiveness, and outcomes of tunneled dialysis catheter placement via supraclavicular brachiocephalic and femoral vein approaches in patients with bilateral internal jugular vein thrombosis. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2021, data of the patients in whom tunneled dialysis catheters were placed via the supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein (n = 42) and femoral vein (n = 57) approaches were extracted. Patient demographics, technical and clinical success rates, complications, and outcomes were noted. The Likert scale was used to assess patient satisfaction. FINDINGS: Forty two (42.4%) patients were men, and the mean age was 61.9 (range, 12-93) years. The technical and clinical success rate was 100% for both groups. No major complication was encountered. The mean follow-up period was 497.5 (range, 32-1698) catheter days. Thirty-day patency was similar for the brachiocephalic vein and femoral vein group (40 [95.2%] vs. 55 [96.5%], p = 0.754). Also, primary and cumulative patency rates were comparable (p = 0.158; p = 0.660). The infection rate was 2.6 and 4.1 per 1000 catheter days for the brachiocephalic vein and femoral vein group. The infection-free survival was significantly higher in the brachiocephalic vein group (71.9% vs. 35.3% at 12 months, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in the brachiocephalic vein group (median satisfaction, 5 vs. 4, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Both supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein and femoral vein approaches have high technical and clinical success with comparable patency rates. However, low infection rate and high patient satisfaction make the supraclavicular brachiocephalic vein approach a reasonable alternative before proceeding to the femoral vein access.

Sodium bicarbonate is a potential alternative to classic heparin as a lock solution for non-tunneled dialysis catheters: a result from the prospective randomized BicarbLock trial.

OBJECTIVE: Temporary vascular access is mandatory for acute hemodialysis. Heparin lock solution is the standard of care worldwide. Many lock solutions were studied in terms of thrombosis and catheter-related infection prevention, but none replaced heparin as a standard measure. Our main aim is to investigate the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), a ubiquitous and cheap option as a catheter lock solution, in comparison with traditionally used heparin in non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters. METHODS: We conducted our prospective study between March 2021 and March 2022. Our study included 441 patients > 18 years old who needed either femoral or jugular non-tunneled dialysis catheters. Patients were assigned to either heparin (5000 IU/ml) or 8.4% sodium bicarbonate on a consecutive basis. Basic characteristics and information regarding catheters, dialysis sessions, and complications were recorded. We divided patients according to the catheter insertion site as well as the lock solution. RESULTS: We analyzed 426 patients divided into four groups: jugular heparin (n = 113), jugular bicarbonate (n = 113), femoral heparin (n = 113), and femoral bicarbonate (n = 100). Basal characteristics were similar for all groups. The mean time to last effective dialysis in our institution was 10.7 ± 12.1 days for heparin vs 11.5 ± 10.8 days for the bicarbonate group. 25 (5.9%) patients had some kind of blood flow problems (13 in the heparin and 12 in the bicarbonate group). There was no significant difference in terms of catheter malfunction among groups (p = 0.50). Out of these 25 cases, only 12 (7 in heparin and 5 in the bicarbonate arm) had catheter dysfunction (p = 0.386). Sixty-four patients (28%) with jugular catheters were discharged with patent catheters and continued their dialysis in other facilities. CONCLUSION: Sodium bicarbonate is as effective as classic unfractionated heparin in preventing catheter lumen thrombosis with a comparable incidence of catheter-related complications. Furthermore, it is a cost-effective option that can be used confidently, especially when heparin is contraindicated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04772209 (26.02.2021).

Nephroscope-assisted single trocar peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion improves catheter survival compared with laparoscopic technique: Ten-year experience of a single-center.

BACKGROUND: An ideal technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion should provide a long-term functioning catheter until permanent renal replacement therapy becomes available. We developed a technique using the nephroscope-assisted single-trocar approach in 2011. In this study, we report the outcomes, learning curve analysis and cost-effectiveness analysisof the nephroscopic approach compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach. METHOD: Between January 2005 and December 2020, we retrospectively reviewed 511 patients who received PD catheter insertions using the laparoscopic or nephroscopic approach. We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients, surgical outcomes, and complications of the two groups. We further analyzed the nephroscopic group to determine the cost-effectiveness analysis, learning curve and the complication frequency between the learning and mastery periods of the nephroscopic approach. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients underwent laparoscopic PD catheter insertion, whereas 303 patients received nephroscopic surgery. The median catheter survival in the nephroscopic group is significantly longer (43.1 vs. 60.5 months, p = 0.019). The incidence of peritonitis (29.3% vs.20.8%, p = 0.035) and exit site infection (12.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.019) were significantly lower in the nephroscopic group. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed a medical expense reduction of 16000 USD annually by using the nephroscopic technique. There was no difference in the frequency of surgical complications between the learning and mastery phases when examining the learning curve analysis for the nephroscopic technique. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach, the nephroscopic technique effectively prolonged catheter survival and reduces health care cost by reducing infectious complications. The low complication rate during the learning phase of surgery makes the procedure safe for patients and surgeons.

SAGES peritoneal dialysis access guideline update 2023.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has been used for both de novo insertion and salvage of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters. Advanced laparoscopic, basic laparoscopic, open, and image-guided techniques have evolved as the most popular techniques. The aim of this guideline was to develop evidence-based guidelines that support surgeons, patients, and other physicians in decisions on minimally invasive peritoneal dialysis access and the salvage of malfunctioning catheters in both adults and children. METHODS: A guidelines committee panel of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons reviewed the literature since the prior guideline was published in 2014 and developed seven key questions in adults and four in children. After a systematic review of the literature, by the panel, evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS: After systematic review, data extraction, and evidence to decision meetings, the panel agreed on twelve recommendations for the peri-operative performance of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis access surgery and management of catheter dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: In the adult population, conditional recommendations were made in favor of: staged hernia repair followed by PD catheter insertion over simultaneous and traditional start over urgent start of PD when medically possible. Furthermore, the panel suggested advanced laparoscopic insertion techniques rather than basic laparoscopic techniques or open insertion. Conditional recommendations were made for either advanced laparoscopic or image-guided percutaneous insertion and for either nonoperative or operative salvage. A recommendation could not be made regarding concomitant clean-contaminated surgery in adults. In the pediatric population, conditional recommendations were made for either traditional or urgent start of PD, concomitant clean or clean-contaminated surgery and PD catheter placement rather than staged, and advanced laparoscopic placement rather than basic or open insertion.