Shuttle walk test categorization according to the qualifiers of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: proposal for use in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, a cross-sectional study.

AIM: To classify functional capacity of people with difficult-to-treat asthma based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients underwent the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) to assess functional capacity, in order to categorize them functionally we used the ICF qualifiers. To qualify ISWT results the individual's impairment (i.e. percentage of distance walked in relation to the percentage of predicted) was analyzed. Additionally, body mass index (BMI); physical activity level (IPAQ); and pulmonary function were evaluated. In order to analyze the difference between functional capacity levels, two groups were compared (i.e. mild/moderate vs. severe impairment); therefore, the participants were matched according to age and BMI and the unpaired Student t test was used. RESULTS: Among the fifty-seven included individuals, only one (1.8%) presented mild functional capacity limitation, 12 (21.1%) moderate limitation and 44 (77.2%) severe limitation. There was a significant difference between the ISWT distance between groups (F = 0.217, p < .001). The other variables did not present differences between the mild/moderate and severe groups. CONCLUSION: The ICF qualifiers were able to categorize the ISWT and classified the functional capacity limitation as mild, moderate and severe. Therefore, it has proved to be a useful clinical tool for evaluation, follow-up and clinical decision-making.

Difficult-to-Treat and Severe Asthma

Abstract Introduction: The purpose of this article is to describe the characteristics, comorbidities and phenotypes of patients with difficult-to-treat asthma (DTA) and severe asthma (SA). Materials and Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study of patients evaluated at the Difficult-to-Treat Asthma Clinic of the Hospital Británico within the period of one year. We registered the age, gender and anthropometric data, age of diagnosis, FEV1 at the beginning of follow-up and previous exacerbations. We evaluated symptom control with the Asthma Control Test and the Asthma Control Questionnaire. We registered the comorbidities and evaluated the inflammatory profile of patients according to blood biomarker measurements and induced sputum sample. Results: Forty patients, 20 DTA and 20 SA. There weren't any significant differences regarding age, BMI, age of onset of symptoms, symptom control or FEV1 at the beginning of follow-up. Crises were more common in SA patients. The most commonly found co morbidities were obesity, OSAHS and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Psychiatric disorders were more common in SA patients. The most commonly found phenotype was allergen-reactive TH2. Discussion and Conclusion: it is not easy to classify both groups, and many times there are overlapping characteristics. Comor bidities are frequent in both groups: obesity, OSAHS and reflux disease are the most common conditions. Being able to identify the asthma phenotype in order to target the treatment.

[The diagnostic approach to difficult-to-treat asthma and severe asthma]. / Abordaje diagnóstico del asma difícil de tratar y asma grave.

Difficult-to-treat asthma refers to asthma that is not controlled despite high or medium doses of inhaled steroids or in which high doses of treatment are required to maintain an adequate control of the symptoms and to reduce the risk of exacerbations. An inadequate technique to use the inhaler, poor adherence to treatment, smoking, comorbidities, or an incorrect diagnosis should be considered. In severe asthma, despite adherence to treatment with optimized maximum doses and the management of factors that could contribute, multiple medications in maximum doses are required to have an adequate therapeutic control or this is not achieved. The approach to these patients involves a meticulous process due to the multiple factors that can influence poor asthma control and that can lead to a misclassification of the disease when, in reality, the patient can be presenting different comorbidities whose treatment could decrease the severity of asthma symptoms and modify the prognosis. The objective of this document is to make the approach to patients with difficult-to-treat asthma and severe asthma known, as well as the most frequent comorbidities. A search was made in PubMed with the purpose of identifying the main pathologies that may be present in patients and, based on what is described in the literature, to propose a diagnostic approach. 100 studies were comprised in this review, including clinical guidelines such as GINA, GEMA, and ERS/ATS.

El asma difícil de tratar es la que no se controla a pesar de las dosis altas o medias de esteroides inhalados o la que requiere altas porciones para mantener un control adecuado de los síntomas y reducir el riesgo de exacerbaciones. Se deben tener en cuenta las fallas en la técnica del uso del inhalador, la pobre adherencia al tratamiento, el tabaquismo, las comorbilidades o el diagnóstico incorrecto. En el asma grave, a pesar de la adherencia al tratamiento con dosis optimizadas y el manejo de los factores contribuyentes, se requieren múltiples medicamentos en dosis máximas para tener un adecuado control, si no es así este no se logra. La dirección de estos pacientes implica un proceso minucioso, dados los múltiples factores que pueden influir en el mal control del asma y que pueden llevar a una inadecuada clasificación de la enfermedad, cuando en realidad puedan estar cursando con diferentes comorbilidades cuyo tratamiento puede disminuir la severidad de los síntomas del asma y modificar el pronóstico. El objetivo de esta investigación es dar a conocer el manejo de los pacientes con asma difícil de tratar y asma grave, así como las comorbilidades más frecuentes. Se realizó una búsqueda en Pubmed con el propósito de identificar las principales patologías que puedan estar presentes y, con base en la literatura, proponer un abordaje diagnóstico. Se incluyeron 100 estudios, incluidas las guías clínicas GINA, GEMA y ERS/ATS.