Frequency of Hepatic Metastatic Disease in Patients with Stage IV Breast Cancer Is Similar for Steatotic and Non-Steatotic Livers.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease; diagnosis at an early stage renders it potentially curable, whereas advanced metastatic disease carries a worse prognosis. Objectives: To investigate whether hepatic steatosis (HS) is associated with liver metastases in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV female breast cancer patients (either de novo metastatic breast cancer or recurrent metastatic breast cancer) using non-contrast computed tomography (CT) as a marker of HS. Design: Retrospective analysis. Methods: We retrospectively identified 168 patients with stage IV breast cancer with suitable imaging from a prospectively maintained oncologic database. Three radiologists manually defined hepatic regions of interest on non-contrast CT images, and attenuation data were extracted. HS was defined as a mean attenuation <48 Hounsfield units. The frequency of hepatic metastatic disease was calculated for patient with and without HS. Relationships between HS and various patient (age, body mass index, race) and tumor (hormone receptor status, HER2 status, tumor grade) characteristics were also analyzed. Results: There were 4 patients with liver metastasis in the HS group (41 patients) versus 20 patients with liver metastases in the non-HS group (127 patients). The difference in frequencies of liver metastases among patients with (9.8%) versus without (15.7%) hepatic steatosis (odds ratio = 1.72 [0.53-7.39]) was not statistically significant (P = .45). Body mass index was significantly higher (P = .01) among patients with hepatic steatosis (32.2 ± 7.3 vs 28.8 ± 7.1 kg/m2). Otherwise, there were no significant differences between patients with versus without HS with respect to regarding age, race, hormone receptor status, HER2 status, or tumor grade. Conclusion: The frequency of hepatic metastatic disease in patients with stage IV breast cancer is similar for steatotic and non-steatotic livers.

Choice of imaging modality for pre-treatment staging of head and neck cancer impacts TNM staging.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to determine whether there is a difference in the sensitivity of chest computed tomography (CT) versus 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with low-dose nonenhanced CT (18F-FDG PET/CT or PET/CT) in the detection of distant metastases in head and neck cancer, within a tertiary care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with head and neck cancer, and known distant metastases, who underwent both 18F-FDG PET/CT with integrated low-dose nonenhanced CT and diagnostic chest CT prior to initiation of therapy from 2008 to 2017 were included. Two head and neck radiologists, blinded to all patient information and to each other's readings, reviewed the PET/CT or CT chest images for each patient and identified whether distant metastases were present. No radiologist read both modalities for a single patient. Concordance between imaging modalities was quantitatively analyzed using McNemar's test. RESULTS: 27 patients were included. McNemar's mid p-value analysis showed no significant difference in the detection of distant metastases (p = .6875). However, PET/CT detected distant metastases in three patients that chest CT did not, while chest CT identified distant metastatic disease in two patients that were negative on PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS: While this study did not identify a statistically significant difference in sensitivity, five patients had distant metastases identified on only one of the two modalities. Use of a single modality would have resulted in inaccurate staging in 7-11% of patients in our study. The use of both modalities offers the greatest accuracy when providing stage-adapted oncologic treatment.

Sociodemographic correlates of head and neck cancer survival among patients with metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: To describe sociodemographic factors associated with head and neck cancer (HNC) survival among patients with distant metastatic disease. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed national data for 2889 adult patients with metastatic HNC (2007-2015). We used Fine and Gray competing risks proportional hazard models, stratified by oropharyngeal cancer status, controlled for sociodemographic factors (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, and insurance status), and accounted for multiple testing. RESULTS: Median survival time was 11 months (15 months for patients married/partnered; 13 months for patients with non-Medicaid insurance; P < .01). Among patients with oropharyngeal cancer, being married/partnered was associated with lower mortality hazard (sdHRdivorced/separated = 1.37, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07, 1.75; and sdHRnever married = 1.43, 97.5% CI = 1.14, 1.80), as was having non-Medicaid insurance (sdHRuninsured = 1.44, 97.5% CI = 1.02, 2.04). CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance and marital status are sociodemographic factors associated with survival among HNC patients with distant metastatic disease, especially in oropharyngeal cases.