RESUMEN
Our main objective was to identify the male and female parameters associated with total fertilization failure (TFF) in IVF with nonmasculine indications. The present work, IRB equivalent INS 63209, is a case-control study that evaluated all cases with TFF after conventional IVF at the Center for Human Reproduction from January 2010 to December 2019 (n = 154). As a control group, we analyzed all patients who did not experience fertilization failure after conventional IVF in the same period (n = 475). We evaluated various parameters, both male and female, assessed during infertility treatment, and only cases without masculine etiology (normal seminal parameters) were included. Ages (female and male) were not different between the groups. Moreover, AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone), semen volume, preprocessing concentration and preprocessing motility were not significantly different (P > 0.05). However, the number of collected oocytes (study versus control groups, median [25-75 interquartile]: 2 [1-5] and 5 [3-8]); MII (2 [1-4] and 5 [2-7]); and postprocessing motility (85 [70-90] and 90 [80-95]) were significantly different between both groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, a logistic regression analysis including all significant data demonstrated that the number of collected oocytes was significantly related to IVF failure. Patients with fewer than 5 oocytes had an OR of - 1.37 (- 0.938 to - 1.827) for TFF after conventional IVF. Our results showed that a lower follicular response to controlled ovarian stimulation, evidenced by a decreased number of collected oocytes, was the most important parameter associated with IVF failure in nonmasculine infertility.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Infertilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Embarazo , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infertilidad/terapia , Oocitos , Hormona Antimülleriana , Fertilización/fisiología , Índice de EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the genetic and clinical outcomes of blastocysts derived from 0PN oocytes after IVF/ICSI. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included patients aged 40 years or younger submitted to IVF/ICSI with their own oocytes and with blastocysts derived from 0PN oocytes between January 2015 and April 2018. The clinical outcomes of 0PN blastocyst transfers were analyzed. Genetic tests were performed on biopsied 0PN blastocysts with Next Generation Sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 27 0PN blastocysts were transferred, yielding an implantation rate of 48.0% and an ongoing pregnancy rate of 50.0%. The transfers resulted in 13 live births (59.0% live birth rate). Genetic test results revealed that four of the 17 0PN blastocysts biopsied were 46XX; three were 46XY; and 10 were aneuploid embryos, awarding a diploid rate to 76.4% (13/17). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the 0PN blastocysts implanted (48.0%) and 13 healthy babies were born. More than three quarters (76.4%) of the 0PN blastocysts were diploid, thus ruling out the possibility of parthenogenetic activation. Our study indicated that the transfer of 0PN blastocysts is a safe, worthy option when the number of normal 2PN embryos is insufficient.
Asunto(s)
Blastocisto/fisiología , Transferencia de Embrión , Oocitos , Resultado del Embarazo , Adulto , Diploidia , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Humanos , Oocitos/patología , Oocitos/fisiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Does the use of ICSI offer any outcome advantage over IVF in patients with non-male factor infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: We did not find any outcome improvement that justifies the routine use of ICSI over IVF in non-male factor ART cycles. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN: Since its introduction in Latin America, the use of ICSI has increased substantially, even among patients without male factor infertility. However, it is not clear whether ICSI provides an advantage over IVF in non-male factor infertility. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: A retrospective cohort study of fresh cycles performed in 155 ART clinics located in 15 Latin American countries between 2012 and 2014. Records were assessed for 49,813 ART cycles (39,564 ICSI and 10,249 IVF) performed in infertile couples who did not have male factor infertility. Student's t-test was used to analyze normally distributed data, Wilcoxon test to analyze non-normally distributed data, and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Logistic regression was used to quantify the effect of ICSI on delivery rate, adjusting for age of female partner, number of oocytes inseminated, number of embryos transferred, and transfer at blastocyst stage as possible confounding factors. Poisson regression analysis was used to quantify the effect of ICSI on fertilization rate, adjusting for age of female partner. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHOD: Cycles with the diagnosis of male factor and use of cryopreserved semen and with a freeze-all strategy were excluded. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After correcting for age of female partner, number of oocytes inseminated, number of embryos transferred and transfer at blastocyst stage, we found that the use of ICSI was associated with a significant decrease in the odds of delivery compared to IVF (odds ratio 0.88, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93; P < 0.0001). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: An important limitation of this study is the lack of randomization owing to its retrospective nature. This could result in selection bias, i.e. couples with the worst prognosis undergoing ICSI, or patients with a history of fertilization failure in IVF cycles undergoing ICSI. More than one cycle from the same couple may be included in the study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The lack of an outcome benefit-and, indeed, a reduced likelihood of delivery-following ICSI in non-male factor infertile couples suggests that ICSI may not be the most appropriate clinical approach in these patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: None.