A validation study to analyze the reliability of center of pressure data in static posturography in dogs.

Introduction: Center of pressure (COP) parameters are frequently assessed to analyze movement disorders in humans and animals. Methodological discrepancies are a major concern when evaluating conflicting study results. This study aimed to assess the inter-observer reliability and test-retest reliability of body COP parameters including mediolateral and craniocaudal sway, total length, average speed and support surface in healthy dogs during quiet standing on a pressure plate. Additionally, it sought to determine the minimum number of trials and the shortest duration necessary for accurate COP assessment. Materials and methods: Twelve clinically healthy dogs underwent three repeated trials, which were analyzed by three independent observers to evaluate inter-observer reliability. Test-retest reliability was assessed across the three trials per dog, each lasting 20 seconds (s). Selected 20 s measurements were analyzed in six different ways: 1 × 20 s, 1 × 15 s, 2 × 10 s, 4 × 5 s, 10 × 2 s, and 20 × 1 s. Results: Results demonstrated excellent inter-observer reliability (ICC ≥ 0.93) for all COP parameters. However, only 5 s, 10 s, and 15 s measurements achieved the reliability threshold (ICC ≥ 0.60) for all evaluated parameters. Discussion: The shortest repeatable durations were obtained from either two 5 s measurements or a single 10 s measurement. Most importantly, statistically significant differences were observed between the different measurement durations, which underlines the need to standardize measurement times in COP analysis. The results of this study aid scientists in implementing standardized methods, thereby easing comparisons across studies and enhancing the reliability and validity of research findings in veterinary medicine.

The Value of Computed Tomography-Based Planning in Shoulder Arthroplasty Compared to Intra-/Interobserver Reliability of X-ray Planning.

Background: Reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established surgery for many pathologies of the shoulder and the demand continues to rise with an aging population. Preoperative planning is mandatory to support the surgeon's understanding of the patient's individual anatomy and, therefore, is crucial for the patient's outcome. Methods: In this observational study, we identified 30 patients who underwent RTSA with two- and three-dimensional preoperative planning. Each patient underwent new two-dimensional planning from a medical student and an orthopedic resident as well as through a mid-volume and high-volume shoulder surgeon, which was repeated after a minimum of 4 weeks. The intra- and interobserver reliability was then analyzed and compared to the 3D planning and the implanted prosthesis. The evaluated parameters were the size of the pegged glenoid baseplate, glenosphere, and humeral short stem. Results: The inter-rater reliability showed higher deviations in all four raters compared to the 3D planning of the base plate, glenosphere, and shaft. The intra-rater reliability showed a better correlation in more experienced raters, especially in the planning of the shaft. Conclusions: Our study shows that 3D planning is more accurate than traditional planning on plain X-rays, despite experienced shoulder surgeons showing better results in 2D planning than inexperienced ones.

Inter-observer reliability of three feline pain scales used in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the inter-observer reliability of three feline pain scales commonly used in clinical practice. METHODS: Twenty cats undergoing elective neutering surgery were assessed both pre- and postoperatively by three independent assessors (a board-certified anaesthetist, a veterinary anaesthesia nurse and a final-year veterinary student) using three different pain scales: the Glasgow Feline Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS - Feline), the Colorado State University Feline Acute Pain Scale (CSU - FAPS) and the Feline Grimace Scale (FGS). Reliability statistics was used to evaluate the level of agreement between assessors. RESULTS: Twenty-seven groups of paired observations were evaluated, of which 16 (59%) showed fair agreement, eight (30%) showed none to slight agreement and the remaining three (11%) showed moderate agreement based on Cohen's weighted kappa statistics. Based on Cronbach's alpha statistics, 12 (44%) of the 27 groups of observations showed moderate reliability, 12 (44%) showed poor reliability and the remaining three (11%) showed good reliability. No scale was superior to the others in terms of inter-rater reliability (P = 0.179); however, the pair composed of the final-year veterinary student and anaesthesia nurse showed better agreement than the two other pairs of assessors, both of which included the board-certified anaesthetist (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite the usefulness of behavioural pain scales as clinical tools, their users should bear in mind their limitations, particularly the intrinsic subjectivity and potential variability of outcome between assessors with different backgrounds and level of expertise.

Reliability of Agreement between Insulin, Clonidine, and Glucagon Stimulation Tests for the Diagnosis of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is a rare disorder. The diagnosis of GHD requires a combination of two provocative GH tests. This study aimed to find agreement between commonly used medications to determine which combined tests have high reliability of agreement. This retrospective cohort included 201 children who underwent GH provocation testing from January 2012 to December 2022. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) with the clonidine stimulation test (CST) or glucagon stimulation test (GST) with the CST were performed. We calculated Cohen's kappa to determine the agreement between the test medications by considering the post-stimulation peak GH level with a cut-off value of 10 ng/mL as the primary outcome. A total of 151 patients underwent the two provocative tests and were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 119 underwent the ITT and CST and 54 (45.3%) were diagnosed with GHD. However, 32 patients underwent the GST and CST and 18 (56.2%) were diagnosed with GHD. The kappa value for ITT and CST was 0.258 (25.8%), indicating fair agreement between clonidine and insulin (p = 0.005). However, the kappa value for CST and GST was 0.178 (17.8%), representing slight agreement. The correlation coefficient revealed a very strong relationship between ITT and CST. Clonidine has fair agreement and a very strong correlation coefficient with ITT when used to diagnose GHD in children. Among the commonly used pharmacological tests for GH provocation in our unit, the CST was considered the best pharmacological test in terms of safety and reduced parental anxiety.

Analysis of the Intra- and Inter-observer Reliabilities of Delbet Classification: Is Simplification Required.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the intra- and inter-reliabilities of Delbet classification and whether simplifying the classification improves reliability. Method: The Radiographs of 58 patients under 16 years old diagnosed with pediatric hip fractures between January 2012 and January 2020 were evaluated. Two separate Microsoft® PowerPoint (PPT) presentations consisting of 58 slides for Delbet's classification and its simplified form were prepared in which the order of cases was randomized and blinded. Then five orthopedic surgeons with different years of experience (more than 15 years of surgical experience were accepted experienced group) in pediatric trauma surgery evaluated the presentations two times one month apart. Results: In the inter-observer reliability analysis, a moderate agreement for the classical Delbet classification and a substantial agreement for the simplified Delbet classification was found in both evaluations. As a result of the intra-observer reliability analysis, there was substantial agreement in four observers, moderate agreement in one observer for the classical Delbet classification and substantial agreement in two observers, very good agreement in three observers for the simplified Delbet classification. The experience was not effective on agreement levels in the intra-observer reliability analysis of the classical Delbet classification system. The inter-reliability values of the less experienced group in the simplified classification were much higher than the classical Delbet classification. Conclusion: The simplification of the Delbet classification provides a significant increase in inter-observer reliability levels, especially in less experienced orthopedics and traumatology specialists, and a significant increase in intra-observer reliability levels. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.

Intra-and inter-observer variability of point of care ultrasound measurements to evaluate hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool for assessing the hemodynamic status of acute patients. Even though POCUS often uses a qualitative approach, quantitative measurements have potential advantages in evaluating hemodynamic status. Several quantitative ultrasound parameters can be used to assess the hemodynamic status and cardiac function. However, only limited data on the feasibility and reliability of the quantitative hemodynamic measurements in the point-of-care setting are available. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer variability of PoCUS measurements of quantitative hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, three sonographers performed three repeated measurements of eight different hemodynamic parameters in healthy subjects. An expert panel of two experienced sonographers evaluated the images' quality. The repeatability (intra-observer variability) was determined by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) between the separate measurements for each observer. The reproducibility (inter-observer variability) was assessed by determining the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: 32 subjects were included in this study, on whom, in total, 1502 images were obtained for analysis. All parameters were in a normal physiological range. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and inferior vena cava diameter (IVC-D) showed high repeatability (CV under 10%) and substantial reproducibility (ICC 0.61-0.80). The other parameters had only moderate repeatability and reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated good inter-observer reproducibility and good intra-observer repeatability for CO, SV and IVC-D taken in healthy subjects by emergency care physicians.

Inter observer reliability for peritoneal carcinomatosis at computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is inter-observer reliability between radiologists for reporting peritoneal carcinomatosis and computed tomography peritoneal carcinomatosis index estimation. METHODS: The retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at Dow Institute of Radiology, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Ojha campus and comprised computed tomography scans done between December 1, 2019, to May 31, 2020, that were extracted from the institutional database searched using key words 'peritoneal carcinomatosis' and/or 'serosal deposits'. The first readers had 1-4 years of post-fellowship experience, while the 2nd readers were senior radiologists. Inter-observer reliability was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively for 15 peritoneal sites using, among other tolls, the Sugarbaker computed tomography peritoneal carcinomatosis index. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Out of 236 subjects with mean age 53.6±13.6 years, there were 173(73.3%) females and 63(26.7%) males. The most common primary cancer was ovarian 145(61.4%), followed by colon 26(11%). The size of peritoneal deposit was not reported in 75(31.8%) cases. Of the 15 sites analysed, good agreement was not found in 7(46.7%). There was an excellent intra-class correlation for measuring computed tomography peritoneal carcinomatosis index scores among the radiologists irrespective of the grade of the faculty (>0.90). CONCLUSIONS: The inter-observer reliability was low, but good agreement for computed tomography peritoneal carcinomatosis index would encourage radiologists to use it in peritoneal cancer reporting.

Classifying Bone Loss in Failed Stemmed Total Knee Arthroplasty: Determining Reliability.

BACKGROUND: Failed stemmed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components present with varying degrees of bone loss and technical challenges. A classification system has been proposed based upon metaphyseal bone loss and diaphyseal cortical integrity. A validation study was performed to determine interobserver and intraobserver reliability at multiple institutions and with different levels of training. METHODS: An online survey with digital anteroposterior and lateral radiographs was sent to 5 arthroplasty surgeons and 5 adult reconstruction fellows. The survey included 62 cases with stemmed femoral and tibial components, considered failures and pending revision, and scored by each reviewer independently using the classification system. Each case was scored in 2 separate sessions. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Interobserver grading for both the femur (0.69) and tibia (0.72) showed strong reliability among the attendings and fellows, with slightly stronger reliability in tibia cases. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for attendings and fellows was similar overall, demonstrating consistency of the grading regardless of training level. Intraobserver comparisons showed a strong ICC for attendings and fellows in femoral cases, while fellows had near-perfect ICC in tibia cases. Across all reviewers there was on average 93% agreement within 1 grade per case with the majority of the discrepancy occurring at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. CONCLUSION: This classification demonstrated overall strong interobserver and intraobserver reliability, with 93% agreement within 1 grade of bone loss. With further education, this classification system can ultimately be used to standardize the degree of bone loss in failed stemmed components and help with preoperative planning.

What is the angle of a banana? The difficulty in reliable assessment of hypospadias chordee.

INTRODUCTION: The degree of chordee associated with hypospadias impacts operative management. Unfortunately, poor inter-observer reliability in assessing chordee by multiple methods in vitro has been demonstrated. This variability may be related to the fact that chordee is not a discrete angle, but rather an arc-like curvature similar to that of a banana. On an attempt to improve this variability, we assessed the inter-rater reliability of a novel method of chordee measurement and compared it to measurements with a goniometer both in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro assessment of curvature was performed using 5 bananas. In vivo chordee measurement was performed during 43 hypospadias repairs. On in vitro and in vivo cases, chordee was assessed independently by faculty and resident physicians. Angle assessment was performed in a standard manner with a goniometer and with a smartphone app using ruler measurements of the length and width of the arc (Summary Figure). The proximal and distal aspect of the arc to be measured was marked on the bananas, whereas the penile measurements were taken from the penoscrotal to the sub-coronal junctions. RESULTS: In vitro banana assessment demonstrated strong intra- and inter-rater reliability for length (0.89 and 0.88, respectively) and width measurements (0.97 and 0.96). The calculated angle demonstrated an intra- and inter-rater reliability of 0.67 and 0.67. The banana goniometer/protractor measurements were weak with an intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of 0.33 and 0.21. With hypospadias chordee, the inter-rater reliability was strong for length and width measurements (0.95 and 0.94) and 0.48 for calculated angle. The inter-rater reliability of the goniometer angle was 0.96. Further assessment of inter-rater goniometer reliability was performed relative to degree of chordee as characterized by faculty. The inter-rater reliability for ≤15°, 16-30, and ≥30° was 0.68 (n = 20), 0.34 (n = 14), and 0.90 (n = 9), respectively. When the goniometer angle was classified as ≤15, 16-30, or ≥30° by one physician, it was classified outside of this range by the other physician 23%, 47%, and 25% of the time, respectively. DISCUSSION: Our data demonstrate significant limitations of the goniometer for assessing chordee in vitro and in vivo. We were unable to demonstrate significant improvement in chordee assessment using arc length and width measurements to calculate radians. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable and precise techniques for measuring hypospadias chordee remain elusive and draw into question the validity and usability of management algorithms employing discrete values.

What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hip dislocation after multiple revision total hip arthroplasty is a severe complication. Therefore, constrained acetabular liners (CL) have been used during salvage procedures. We report our experience of constrained liners in a re-revision setting with focus on re-dislocation. We also evaluated acetabular and femoral bone loss as potential risk factor. METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2016, 65 patients were treated in a single institution for revision and re-revision hip arthroplasty using CL. The indication for using a CL was a high risk of re-redislocation after multiple recurrent hip dislocation including failed Dual Mobility Cups (DMC). Compromising soft tissue defects as well as severe bone defect were therefore regarded as high risks. Thirty-eight patients (77.6%) underwent a minimum of three surgical procedures before the index revision procedure. Sixteen patients (24.6%) were excluded as they were lost to follow-up, expired before minimum follow-up or refused study participation, leaving 49 patients in the analysis (75.4%). The mean follow-up was 62 months (44-74; SD = 7.7). We assessed the following potential risk factors for revision or dislocation: type of surgical setting (septic/aseptic), BMI, cup inclination angle, size of liner used and acetabular and femoral bone loss according to Paprosky classification. The primary endpoints were dislocation or repeat revision for any reason. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients, we found an overall re-revision rate of 40.8% (20/49) and a dislocation rate of 30.6% (15/49). There were no significant differences among the surgical re-revision rate or dislocation rate as a factor of patient characteristics. In terms of bone loss, there was a trend towards higher revision rates for increasing acetabular and femoral bone loss, but without statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We found the use of a constrained liner in a re-revision setting still bears a high risk of re-revision and re-dislocation. Therefore we restrained from using constrained liners in favour of Dual mobility cups. In this study there was no significant higher dislocation rate in the subgroup of periprosthetic infection. Furthermore the rigid design of a constrained liner bears the known risk of structural failure of acetabular reconstruction implants. Severe acetabular or femoral bone defects seem to have an impact on the revision rate, but not on the dislocation rate with regards to the restored offset and center of the hip. Results have to be taken into context such that the study population inherently has a predisposition for poorer outcomes. Indications should be strongly filtered for patients at high risk for recurrent hip joint dislocation including failed DMCs with only limited bone loss and moderate soft tissue defects. Our modification to the existing classification with a high inter and intraobserver reliability will make future studies more comparable regarding revisions and bone stock loss. Still further research using objective and reproducible parameters is needed to better analyze data especially in the background of complex revision hip arthroplasty.

Interventions Employed By Licensed Nurses in Nursing Homes: Refinement and Validation of an Existing Omaha System Nursing Intervention Set.

Background and Purpose: Demands on long-term services and supports for older adults are growing, although geriatric workforce shortages have persisted for decades. Methods to define and quantify practice of licensed nurses in nursing homes are needed for work optimization within limited nurse resources available in nursing homes. This study aimed to refine and validate observable nursing interventions for nursing homes, using the Omaha System. Methods: Based on the existing corpus of Omaha System interventions for acute care nursing, this multi-phase, multi-method study included a mapping procedure of interviews from licensed nurses in nursing homes, the evaluation of content validity and coding of the interventions using a survey, and inter-observer reliability assessment using TimeCaT. Results: This study validated 57 observable interventions for nursing homes. Of the previously identified acute care nursing interventions, eight interventions were deemed out of scope. One additional intervention was identified. Refined intervention definitions were related to procedures common in acute care settings such as tracheal intubations/extubations and nasogastric tube insertion that were not performed in nursing homes. Expert agreement for content validity and coding of the interventions was high (S-CVI = 0.97), and inter-observer reliability levels (Cohen's κ value >0.4; proportion agreement >60%) were acceptable for all case studies. Implications for Practice: The validated observable Omaha System nursing interventions for nursing home practice have potential for use in future studies of nursing home practice to understand evidence-based practice, and gaps in care provided. The methodology may be extended to define observable interventions for other roles and settings.

Testing inter-observer error under a collaborative research framework for studying lithic shape variability.

Evaluating error that arises through the aggregation of data recorded by multiple observers is a key consideration in many metric and geometric morphometric analyses of stone tool shape. One of the most common approaches involves the convergence of observers for repeat trails on the same set of artefacts: however, this is logistically and financially challenging when collaborating internationally and/or at a large scale. We present and evaluate a unique alternative for testing inter-observer error, involving the development of 3D printed copies of a lithic reference collection for distribution among observers. With the aim of reducing error, clear protocols were developed for photographing and measuring the replicas, and inter-observer variability was assessed on the replicas in comparison with a corresponding data set recorded by a single observer. Our results demonstrate that, when the photography procedure is standardized and dimensions are clearly defined, the resulting metric and geometric morphometric data are minimally affected by inter-observer error, supporting this method as an effective solution for assessing error under collaborative research frameworks. Collaboration is becoming increasingly important within archaeological and anthropological sciences in order to increase the accessibility of samples, encourage dual-project development between foreign and local researchers and reduce the carbon footprint of collection-based research. This study offers a promising validation of a collaborative research design whereby researchers remotely work together to produce comparable data capturing lithic shape variability. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12520-022-01676-2.

A tagged visual analog scale is a reliable method to assess keel bone deviations in laying hens from radiographs.

Laying hens often suffer from keel bone damage (KBD) that includes pathologies with different etiologies, like diverse forms of fractures and deviations. Since KBD is a problem in all countries and housing systems, methods for the assessment of deviations are urgently needed. Comparisons between genetic lines and between studies are important to detect underlying mechanisms. Field researchers often use palpation as a low-cost and feasible technique for the assessment of KBD. In contrast to palpation, radiography is effective and highly precise at least in detecting keel bone fractures. The aim of this study was to: i) develop a scoring system to assess keel bone deviations from radiographs, ii) to assess inter- and intra-observer reliability of this scoring system, and iii) to investigate whether fractures and deviations of the keel are correlated. In total, 192 hens were used for the investigation. Digital radiographs were taken and evaluated for all hens after slaughter. We developed a tagged visual analog scale with two extreme images as anchors and four intermediate tags, resulting in six images representing the range from "no deviation" to "highly deviated" on a 10 cm line. Eleven participants scored 50 radiographs of keels with varying degree of severity, whereas five images were scored twice to assess intra-observer reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-observer reliability was 0.979 with a confidence interval of 0.968 < ICC < 0.987 (F49,268 = 54.2, p < 0.0001). Intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-observer reliability was 0.831 with a confidence interval of 0.727 < ICC < 0.898 (F54,55 = 10.8, p < 0.0001). Individual intra-observer reliability ranged from 0.6 to 0.949. The Spearman correlation showed a strong positive correlation of fractures and deviations (s roh= 0.803, p < 0.001). The tagged visual analog scale could be a reliable instrument for the scoring of keel bone deviations. Our results support the assumption that the majority of highly deviated keels suffer from fractures as well. Further research is needed to investigate the correlation of palpation scores with the evaluation on radiographs.

Novel Methods to Measure Height and Volume in Healthy and Degenerated Lumbar Discs in MRIs: A Reliability Assessment Study.

BACKGROUND: In the regeneration and therapy of degenerated intervertebral discs, the height, volume or categorizing assessments, such as Pfirrmann classification, are used to quantify the discs themselves and the effects of therapy. Here, the question of transferability, in the sense of reliability, of the results arises in the common exchange. METHODS: We have investigated two established and a newly developed (9-point measurement), easy to use methods for height measurement and volume measurement on degenerated and healthy lumbar intervertebral discs of 66 patients regarding inter- and intra-observer reliability. RESULTS: In overview, we found very different reliabilities. While the intra-observer reliability showed good to excellent agreement for both healthy and degenerated lumbar discs for the height and volume measurements, the inter-observer reliability was low or moderate in some cases. The 9-point method for height determination consistently showed better reliability for both healthy and degenerated discs, for both intra- and inter-observer reliability, compared to the two established methods. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend using the 9-point measurement as the method to communicate lumbar disc height, both for healthy and degenerated discs. Due to the partly low or moderate reliability, significant differences in the measured heights can already occur, which can lead to a worsened comparability.

Methodology for the nocturnal cardiac arrhythmia ancillary study of the ADVENT-HF trial in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sleep-disordered breathing.

Background: Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) may trigger nocturnal cardiac arrhythmias (NCA) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The NCA ancillary study of the ADVENT-HF trial will test whether, in HFrEF-patients with SDB, peak-flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation (ASVpf) reduces NCA. To this end, accurate scoring of NCA from polysomnography (PSG) is required. Objective: To develop a method to detect NCA accurately from a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded during PSG and assess inter-observer agreement for NCA detection. Methods: Quality assurance of ECG analysis included training of the investigators, development of standardized technical quality, guideline-conforming semi-automated NCA-scoring via Holter-ECG software and implementation of an arrhythmia adjudication committee. To assess inter-observer agreement, the ECG was analysed by two independent investigators and compared for agreement on premature ventricular complexes (PVC) /h, premature atrial complexes/h (PAC) as well as for other NCA in 62 patients from two centers of the ADVENT-HF trial. Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients for PVC/h and PAC/h were excellent: 0.99 (95%- confidence interval [CI]: 0.99-0.99) and 0.99 (95%-CI: 0.97-0.99), respectively. No clinically relevant difference in inter-observer classification of other NCA was found. The detection of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (18% versus 19%) and atrial fibrillation (10% versus 11%) was similar between the two investigators. No sustained ventricular tachycardia was detected. Conclusion: These findings indicate that our methods are very reliable for scoring NCAs and are adequate to apply for the entire PSG data set of the ADVENT-HF trial.

The applicability of the digit wrinkle scan to quantify sympathetic nerve function.

Objective: Stimulated skin wrinkling test (SSW) has been launched as a non-invasive diagnostic procedure. However, no normative age dependent values have been reported that can be applied in clinical practice. The objectives of the study were to (1) collect age-dependent normative values according to the 5-point scale assessment for the SSW, to (2) determine reliability scores for the obtained norm values, and to (3) introduce a new digital method for SSW assessment, the Digit Wrinkle Scan© (DWS©) for detection of wrinkles in a more quantitative manner. Methods: Firstly, 82 healthy participants were included, divided in 5 age groups. The participants underwent SSW using lidocaine and prilocaine topical cream. Secondly, 35 healthy participants were included to test whether the DWS© could be a novel manner to assess the grade of wrinkling quantitatively. We determined the inter-observer reliability of both methods. Also, the intra-observer reliability was calculated for the DWS©. Results: We found a decrease in normative values over age. The inter-observer reliability of assessment by the 5-point scale method was moderate after SSW (Cohen's k: 0.53). Results of the DWS© indicate that total wrinkle length per mm2 showed moderate to good agreement for the 4th and 5th digits after SSW, and a low agreement for the other digits. Conclusions: Age-dependent normative values were obtained according to the 5-point scale, but its clinical application is doubtful since we found a moderate inter-observer reliability. We introduced the DWS© as a possible new method in order to quantify the grade of wrinkling. Significance: We found unsatisfactory reliability scores, which hampers its usefulness for clinical practice.

Validity and Reliability of Intraoral and Plaster Models' Photographs in the Assessment of Little's Irregularity Index, Tooth Size-Arch Length Discrepancy, and Bolton's Analysis.

Background Dental impressions have been required to obtain proper study models. This procedure is time- and labor-consuming for the orthodontist and could be exhausting to the patient, especially when braces are fitted in the context of a research project. This study aimed to assess the accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of using intraoral photographs and plaster models' photographs in measuring Little's Irregularity Index (LII), tooth size-arch length discrepancy (TSALD), and Bolton's ratios. Methods A total of 52 dental arches of 26 patients were included in this study. Plaster models, occlusal intraoral photographs, and photographs of the collected plaster models were obtained for each patient. Then, LII, TSALD, and Bolton's ratios were measured using a manual caliper for plaster models' measurements and a software-based on-screen method for the photographs. Results The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of measurements made on intraoral photographs and photographs of plaster models were high (ranging from 0.90 to 0.99 and from 0.88 to 0.99, respectively), indicating a high level of agreement with the gold standard measurements. In addition, the differences were insignificant. The intra-/inter-examiner ICCs ranged from 0.90 to 0.99/0.92 to 0.99 and from 0.85 to 0.99/0.88 to 0.98 for plaster models and intraoral photographs of the dental arches, respectively. The analysis of reproducibility of capturing intraoral photographs of the dental arches on two different occasions showed high ICCs ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 with almost no significant differences between repeated measurements (P > 0.05). Conclusion LII, TSALD, and Bolton's overall and partial ratios can be measured from intraoral photographs of the dental arches with high accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility. Therefore, this methodology can be suggested for use in research projects when multiple records of the dental arches are required instead of depending on time- and labor-consuming procedures of ordinary dental impressions.

A novel radiological classification system of the distal femur.

INTRODUCTION: In our previous studies, we were able to identify anatomical differences as a predictor for aseptic loosening following primary and revision surgery with the use of rotating hinge prosthesis. This study was performed to answer following question: can a novel radiological classification system of the distal femur be identified? MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients who received standardized anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views of the knee joint were included in this study. On AP radiographs, we measured the distance between inner diameter of the femur at 20 cm proximally from the knee and at a point 2 cm proximally from the adductor tubercle. The ratio of the inner diameter of the femoral canal at 20 cm proximal of knee joint to the inner diameter of medullary canal at 2 cm proximal of adductor tubercle was used as a novel index ratio. Two observers blindly and independently reviewed the anteroposterior radiographs twice. RESULTS: Three groups of anatomical classification can be constructed for each sex according to the 25th and 75th percentiles. A higher distribution of Type C was found in female patients. The median intra-observer reliability for rater 1 was 0.995 (IQR 0.994-0.997). We had also a high inter-observer reliability with ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.996-0.998). CONCLUSIONS: The novel classification presents three different types of the knee joint for male and female patients. Type C has a wider inner diaphyseal diameter compared to Type A with a narrow inner diaphyseal diameter.

Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The Cobb angle method is used to determine the severity of scoliosis. Therapeutic decisions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are guided by the Cobb angle. Therefore, high reliability is crucial. The objective of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the digital Cobb angle measurements and the definition of end vertebrae in patients with AIS. Moreover, the influence of the observer's medical specialty and experience on Cobb angle measurement was evaluated. METHODS: Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the digital Cobb angle and end vertebrae is assessed in postero-anterior radiographs of 39 patients with AIS. Measurements were performed blinded and twice by six observers, with a two to 3 week interval. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was analysed by means of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Both intra- and inter-observer reliability analyses resulted in ICC's higher than 0.864 for the Cobb angle and definition of end vertebrae. In addition, for the observer's experience and medical specialty group the inter-observer ICC's were higher than 0.984. The average inter-observer variability for the Cobb angle were 3°, and 1.1-1.6 levels for the cranial and caudal end vertebrae selection. The variability in measured Cobb angle was 1° for the experience group and 2° for the medical specialty group. Cronbach's alpha varied from 0.990 to 0.996. Bland-Altman plots showed moderate variation with a few outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The digital Cobb angle measurement as well as the definition of end vertebrae show excellent reliability. According to our results, medical specialty and experience do not affect Cobb angle measurements and definition of end vertebrae.

A Pilot Study to Develop an Assessment Tool for Dogs Undergoing Trap-Neuter-Release (TNR) in Italy. An Overview on the National Implementation of TNR Programmes.

A descriptive analysis, inter-observer and test-retest reliability of the animal-based measures (ABMs) included in the protocol were performed. This study aimed at the development of a welfare assessment protocol for dogs recruited in the trap-neuter-release (TNR) programmes and the description of the implantation of these programmes in Italy. Nine Italian regions carried out TNR programmes. A varied scenario, along with some critical issues, emerged. Fifty dogs were recruited and assessed simultaneously by two assessors to determine the reliability of ABMs included in the protocol. A subsample of ten dogs were assessed three times to assess test-retest reliability. All females were neutered against 36% of males. Most dogs were adults (58%) and of a large size (68%). Vaccine prophylaxis and parasitic prevention were regular in 13% and 76% of dogs, respectively. Few dogs showed lameness, evidence of pain, other clinical problems, or thermal discomfort. Overall, 82% of dogs did not show fear or aggression to unfamiliar people. The level of agreement between the two assessors was quite high, ranging from substantial (0.61-0.80) to perfect (1) for the majority of measures. This study highlighted some critical issues in TNR implementation and the suitability of the protocol as a tool for animal welfare assessment.