Temporal Construal Effects Are Independent of Episodic Future Thought.

Human thought is prone to biases. Some biases serve as beneficial heuristics to free up limited cognitive resources or improve well-being, but their neurocognitive basis is unclear. One such bias is a tendency to construe events in the distant future in abstract, general terms and events in the near future in concrete, detailed terms. Temporal construal may rely on our capacity to orient toward and/or imagine context-rich future events. We tested 21 individuals with impaired episodic future thinking resulting from lesions to the hippocampus or ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and 57 control participants (aged 45-76 years) from Canada and Italy on measures sensitive to temporal construal. We found that temporal construal persisted in most patients, even those with impaired episodic future thinking, but was abolished in some vmPFC cases, possibly in relation to difficulties forming and maintaining future intentions. The results confirm the fractionation of future thinking and that parts of vmPFC might critically support our ability to flexibly conceive and orient ourselves toward future events.

Combined lesion-deficit and fMRI approaches in single-case studies: Unique contributions to cognitive neuroscience.

Although lesion-deficit case studies are foundational in cognitive neuroscience, published papers presenting single lesion cases are declining. In this review, we argue that there is a valuable place for single-case lesion-deficit research, especially when combined with functional neuroimaging methods, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To support this, we present a summary of notable findings from single-case combined lesion-deficit and fMRI studies published in recent years (2017-2020). These studies show the unique value that this combined approach brings to the understanding of complex functions, brain-level connectivity, and plasticity and recovery. We encourage researchers to consider combining lesion-deficit and functional imaging methods in the analysis of single cases, as this approach affords unique opportunities to address challenging unanswered questions about brain-behavior relationships.

Multivariate Lesion-Behavior Mapping of General Cognitive Ability and Its Psychometric Constituents.

General cognitive ability, or general intelligence (g), is central to cognitive science, yet the processes that constitute it remain unknown, in good part because most prior work has relied on correlational methods. Large-scale behavioral and neuroanatomical data from neurologic patients with focal brain lesions can be leveraged to advance our understanding of the key mechanisms of g, as this approach allows inference on the independence of cognitive processes along with elucidation of their respective neuroanatomical substrates. We analyzed behavioral and neuroanatomical data from 402 humans (212 males; 190 females) with chronic, focal brain lesions. Structural equation models (SEMs) demonstrated a psychometric isomorphism between g and working memory in our sample (which we refer to as g/Gwm), but not between g and other cognitive abilities. Multivariate lesion-behavior mapping analyses indicated that g and working memory localize most critically to a site of converging white matter tracts deep to the left temporo-parietal junction. Tractography analyses demonstrated that the regions in the lesion-behavior map of g/Gwm were primarily associated with the arcuate fasciculus. The anatomic findings were validated in an independent cohort of acute stroke patients (n = 101) using model-based predictions of cognitive deficits generated from the Iowa cohort lesion-behavior maps. The neuroanatomical localization of g/Gwm provided the strongest prediction of observed g in the new cohort (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), supporting the anatomic specificity of our findings. These results provide converging behavioral and anatomic evidence that working memory is a key mechanism contributing to domain-general cognition.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT General cognitive ability (g) is thought to play an important role in individual differences in adaptive behavior, yet its core processes remain unknown, in large part because of difficulties in making causal inferences from correlated data. Using data from patients with focal brain damage, we demonstrate that there is a strong psychometric correspondence between g and working memory - the ability to maintain and control mental information, and that the critical neuroanatomical substrates of g and working memory include the arcuate fasciculus. This work provides converging behavioral and neuroanatomical evidence that working memory is a key mechanism contributing to domain-general cognition.

The functions of the frontal lobes: Evidence from patients with focal brain damage.

Patients with focal frontal lobe damage have long been a crucial source of information about the role of this region in human behavior. This method remains the only means to provide inferentially powerful loss-of-function evidence for many regions within the human frontal lobes. This chapter demonstrates modern focal lesion research methods, focusing on specific subregions within prefrontal cortex, and their contributions to widely studied aspects of executive function and decision-making. Examples of such studies are reviewed in detail, to demonstrate the strengths, limitations, and logic of lesion methods. The evidence provided by such studies is considered in relation to converging evidence from other cognitive neuroscience methods. The tensions between modular and network views of prefrontal function are also addressed. Lesion studies straddle fundamental and clinical neuroscience, allowing basic advances in this area to be readily translated to psychiatric and neurologic disorders. This unique position, as well as the ability to test causal claims, explains the staying power of this classic approach to understanding the brain basis of behavior.

'Emotional Intelligence': Lessons from Lesions.

'Emotional intelligence' (EI) is one of the most highly used psychological terms in popular nomenclature, yet its construct, divergent, and predictive validities are contentiously debated. Despite this debate, the EI construct is composed of a set of emotional abilities - recognizing emotional states in the self and others, using emotions to guide thought and behavior, understanding how emotions shape behavior, and emotion regulation - that undoubtedly influence important social and personal outcomes. In this review, evidence from human lesion studies is reviewed in order to provide insight into the necessary brain regions for each of these core emotional abilities. Critically, we consider how this neuropsychological evidence might help to guide efforts to define and measure EI.