Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on provision and use of maternal health services in Allada, southern Benin: a local health system perspective.

Objective: To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision and use of maternal health services in southern Benin from a local health system perspective. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study from April to December 2021 in a health district in southern Benin. We interviewed health workers involved in antenatal, delivery, postnatal and family planning care provision, alternative and spiritual care providers, administrative staff of the district hospital, community health workers, adolescents and women who had given birth in the past six weeks in public health centers were interviewed. The World Health Organization health systems building blocks framework was used to guide the thematic analysis from a local health system perspective. Results: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the lines of command and the institutional arrangements in the local health systems leadership; it put the interpersonal relationships in the health care provision team under stress and reduced the overall revenues of the district hospital. The motivation of allopathic health workers was undermined. Communities underutilized maternal health services in the COVID-19 period. Plausible causes included negative patient perceptions of COVID-19 measures taken at the public health facility level as well as well as fear of being forcibly vaccinated against COVID-19 in the health facilities. Conclusion: In times of health crises, appropriate local health system governance that integrates providers' concerns into effective guidelines is critical to reach and maintain a sufficient level of work motivation to ensure quality maternal health services.

At the interface between the formal and informal, the actual and the real: a realist study protocol for governance and accountability practices in urban settings focusing on adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights.

BACKGROUND: This paper presents the protocol of a study that aims at exploring how different multi-level governance arrangements impact on sexual and reproductive health of adolescents living in informal settlements. The overall objective of this study is to contribute to a better understanding of the causal chains underlying accountability in sexual and reproductive health for adolescent girls and young women living in urban informal settlements in low-and middle-income countries. METHODS: The overarching methodology is realist evaluation. The study adopts a case study design, through which governance and accountability practices in Mumbai, Delhi, Cotonou and Kampala will be examined. Different social science methods to develop and test a programme theory will be used. Heuristic tools for the analysis of the accountability ecosystem and mapping of governance arrangements, drawing from contextual political analysis and critical realism, will be developed in order to identify the intervention-context-actor-mechanism-outcome configurations. DISCUSSION: The methodological approach is geared towards building robust case-based explanation with due attention to context and the roles of different actors. The combination of different social science methods will lead us to a better grasp of the inherently political nature of social accountability.

Structural and socio-cultural barriers to accessing mental healthcare among Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland.

Background: Due to their experiences of major stressful life events, including post-displacement stressors, refugees and asylum seekers are vulnerable to developing mental health problems. Yet, despite the availability of specialized mental health services in Western European host countries, refugees and asylum seekers display low mental healthcare utilization. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore structural and socio-cultural barriers to accessing mental healthcare among Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland. Method: In this qualitative study, key-informant (KI) interviews with Syrian refugees and asylum seekers, Swiss healthcare providers and other stakeholders (e.g. refugee coordinators or leaders) were conducted in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Participants were recruited using snowball sampling. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed, and then analysed using thematic analysis, combining deductive and inductive coding. Results: Findings show that Syrian refugees and asylum seekers face multiple structural and socio-cultural barriers, with socio-cultural barriers being perceived as more pronounced. Syrian key informants, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders identified language, gatekeeper-associated problems, lack of resources, lack of awareness, fear of stigma and a mismatch between the local health system and perceived needs of Syrian refugees and asylum seekers as key barriers to accessing care. Conclusions: The results show that for Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland several barriers exist. This is in line with previous findings. A possible solution for the current situation might be to increase the agility of the service system in general and to improve the willingness to embrace innovative paths, rather than adapting mental healthcare services regarding single barriers and needs of a new target population.

Revista Europea de PsicotraumatologíaAntecedentes: Debido a sus experiencias de eventos vitales estresantes mayores, incluidos los estresores posteriores al desplazamiento, los refugiados y solicitantes de asilo son vulnerables a desarrollar problemas de salud mental. Sin embargo, a pesar de la disponibilidad de servicios especializados de salud mental en los países hospedadores de Europa occidental, los refugiados y los solicitantes de asilo muestran una baja utilización de cuidados salud mental.Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue explorar las barreras estructurales y socioculturales para acceder a cuidados de salud mental para refugiados y solicitantes de asilo sirios, en Suiza.Método: En este estudio cualitativo, se realizaron entrevistas informante-clave (IC) con refugiados y solicitantes de asilo sirios, proveedores de cuidados de salud suizos y otros grupos de interes (por ejemplo, coordinadores o líderes de refugiados) en la parte de habla alemana de Suiza. Los participantes fueron reclutados mediante muestreo de bola de nieve. Las entrevistas fueron grabadas en audio y transcritas, y luego analizadas mediante análisis temático, combinando codificación deductiva e inductiva.Resultados: Los resultados muestran que los refugiados y solicitantes de asilo sirios, enfrentan múltiples barreras estructurales y socioculturales, siendo las socio-culturales percibidas como más pronunciadas. Los informantes-clave sirios, los proveedores de cuidados de salud y otras grupos de interes, identificaron el idioma, problemas asociados con la puerta de entrada a las instituciones, falta de recursos, falta de conciencia, miedo al estigma y discordancia entre el sistema de salud local y las necesidades percibidas de los sirios refugiados y solicitantes de asilo como barreras clave para acceder a la atención.Conclusiones: Los resultados muestran que para los refugiados y solicitantes de asilo sirios en Suiza existen varias barreras. Esto está en línea con hallazgos previos. Una posible solución para la situación actual podría ser aumentar la agilidad del sistema de servicios en general y mejorar la disposición a adoptar caminos innovadores, en lugar de adaptar los servicios de salud mental con respecto a las barreras y necesidades individuales de una nueva población objetivo.

Cuts without conflict: The use of political strategy in local health system retrenchment in Sweden.

Disinvestment in health services is seen as challenging by decision-makers as the public usually reacts strongly to rationing and retrenchments. Drawing on the literature on welfare state retrenchment - the reduction of public expenditure by cutting costs or spending - this article explores the development and implementation of a comprehensive retrenchment programme in one local health system in Sweden (a so-called region). According to theory, retrenchments are both electorally risky and institutionally difficult. Nonetheless, they take place and in the local health system we investigate, without too extensive public protest and without decision-makers having to resign. The main question in this qualitative study is: why and how was it possible to make such comprehensive retrenchments despite being unpopular and facing many political and institutional barriers? Interviews with 18 local politicians and public servants were carried out between January 18 and April 3, 2017, and analysed from the perspective of political strategy. They showed that the serious budget deficit, and a shared understanding of what the region's problems were, are important explanations for why the retrenchment programme was possible to develop and implement. Based on a thorough internal review of the health system, a crisis discourse developed which partly depoliticized the retrenchment programme. Justification and framing are keys to how it was possible. The retrenchment programme was justified by arguing that current service provision exceeded that in comparable regions, and framed as necessary saving the local health system and enhancing quality. Important strategies were thus to redefine the retrenchments and to blame-share, the latter through politicians and public servants claiming responsibility together after involving the clinic managers. In sum, our study shows that the retrenchment literature and theories on political strategy may be fruitfully applied to the health-care sector as well. By studying the local level, our findings contribute to the retrenchment literature, indicating that political strategy at the local level is more about justification and blame sharing, than blame avoidance.

Does level of minority presence and hospital reimbursement policy influence hospital referral region health rankings in the United States.

The shift from a fee-for-service payment to a value-based payment scheme, sparked by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, introduced pay-for-performance programs such Hospital Value Based Purchasing. Previous inquiry has not considered how local community factors may affect hospital system performance. This study investigated the association between local health performance and minority population in a hospital referral region (HRR). The primary objective was to ascertain whether community diversity levels are significantly associated to local health performance guided by the ecological model. Secondary data analysis collected from the 2016 American Hospital Association, Area Health Resource File, Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Local Health System Performance, and the Dartmouth Atlas HRR dataset was used. Our primary findings show that the more diverse a HRR is, the more likely it is to be associated with lower ranking for access and affordability prevention and treatment avoidable hospital use and cost as well as healthy lives. Total performance score was significantly related to a better health ranking on prevention and treatment, hospital use, and cost, as well as healthy lives. This research supports the assertion that communities, particularly minorities in those communities, affect local health care performance in a variety of ways.

Considerações entre conceito e ação no campo da promoção da saúde: estudo de caso em uma unidade local de saúde em Portugal / Considerations between concept and action in the field of health promotion: a case study at a local health unit in Portugal

Objetivos: analisar as concepções dos profissionais de saúde (médicos, enfermeiros) que dirigem as práticas de promoção da saúde na Unidade Local de Saúde de Castelo Branco, no centro interior de Portugal. Métodos: estudo exploratório-descritivo, de abordagem qualitativa, realizado com recurso a entrevista semiestruturada gravada aplicada a 60 profissionais. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre março e agosto de 2017, sendo utilizada para a análise a técnica da análise de conteúdo. Resultados: a maioria dos profissionais entrevistados tem um conceito ampliado de promoção da saúde, mas na prática não se verifica, existindo necessidade de reflexão sobre as atividades a desenvolver nesse campo. Conclusões: os profissionais desconhecem os programas nacionais existentes e suas principais linhas de ação. Porém, identificam a educação como um modo de promoção da saúde, reconhecendo o importante papel que poderão ter junto da população.

Objectives: To analyze the conceptions of health professionals (doctors and nurses) who direct health promotion practices in a "local system", this is the Local Health Unit of Castelo Branco, from the interior center region in Portugal. Methods: an exploratory-descriptive study, with a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews applied to 60 professionals. Data collection took place between March and August 2017, and the Content Analysis technique was used for the analysis. Results: most professionals interviewed have an expanded concept of health promotion, but in practice there is no corresponding action, and there is a need to think about management and professional development in this field. Conclusions: professionals are unaware of existing national programs and their main lines of action; however, they identify education as a way of promoting health, recognizing the important role they can play in the population.

Performance-Based Financing to Strengthen the Health System in Benin: Challenging the Mainstream Approach.

BACKGROUND: Performance-based financing (PBF) is often proposed as a way to improve health system performance. In Benin, PBF was launched in 2012 through a World Bank-supported project. The Belgian Development Agency (BTC) followed suit through a health system strengthening (HSS) project. This paper analyses and draws lessons from the experience of BTC-supported PBF alternative approach - especially with regards to institutional aspects, the role of demand-side actors, ownership, and cost-effectiveness - and explores the mechanisms at stake so as to better understand how the "PBF package" functions and produces effects. METHODS: An exploratory, theory-driven evaluation approach was adopted. Causal mechanisms through which PBF is hypothesised to impact on results were singled out and explored. This paper stems from the co-authors' capitalisation of experiences; mixed methods were used to collect, triangulate and analyse information. Results are structured along Witter et al framework. RESULTS: Influence of context is strong over PBF in Benin; the policy is donor-driven. BTC did not adopt the World Bank's mainstream PBF model, but developed an alternative approach in line with its HSS support programme, which is grounded on existing domestic institutions. The main features of this approach are described (decentralised governance, peer review verification, counter-verification entrusted to health service users' platforms), as well as its adaptive process. PBF has contributed to strengthen various aspects of the health system and led to modest progress in utilisation of health services, but noticeable improvements in healthcare quality. Three mechanisms explaining observed outcomes within the context are described: comprehensive HSS at district level; acting on health workers' motivation through a complex package of incentives; and increased accountability by reinforcing dialogue with demand-side actors. Cost-effectiveness and sustainability issues are also discussed. CONCLUSION: BTC's alternative PBF approach is both promising in terms of effects, ownership and sustainability, and less resource consuming. This experience testifies that PBF is not a uniform or rigid model, and opens the policy ground for recipient governments to put their own emphasis and priorities and design ad hoc models adapted to their context specificities. However, integrating PBF within the normal functioning of local health systems, in line with other reforms, is a big challenge.

Does hospital ownership influence hospital referral region health rankings in the United States.

Extensive evidence demonstrates that a hospital's organizational ownership structure impacts its overall performance, but little is known concerning the influence of hospital structure on the health of its community. This paper explores the association between US hospital referral region (HRR) health rankings and hospital ownership and performance. Data from the 2016 Commonwealth Fund Scorecard on Local Health System Performance, the American Hospital Association dataset, and the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing dataset are utilized to conduct a cross-sectional analysis of 36 quality measures across 306 HRRs. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate the association among hospital ownership, system performance measures-access and affordability, prevention and treatment, avoidable hospital use and cost, and healthy lives-and performance as measured by value-based purchasing total performance scores. We found that indicators of access and affordability, as well as prevention and treatment, were significantly associated across all 3 hospitals' organizational structures. Hospital referral regions with a greater number of not-for-profit hospitals demonstrated greater indications of access and affordability, as well as better prevention and treatment rankings than for-profit and government hospitals. Hospital referral regions with a greater number of government, nonfederal hospitals had worse scores for healthy lives. Furthermore, the greater the total performance scores score, the better the HRR score on prevention and treatment rankings. The greater the per capita income, the better the score across all 4 dimensions. As such, this inquiry supports the assertion that performance of a local health system is dependent on its community's resources of health care delivery entities and their structure.

Evaluation of capacity-building program of district health managers in India: a contextualized theoretical framework.

Performance of local health services managers at district level is crucial to ensure that health services are of good quality and cater to the health needs of the population in the area. In many low- and middle-income countries, health services managers are poorly equipped with public health management capacities needed for planning and managing their local health system. In the south Indian Tumkur district, a consortium of five non-governmental organizations partnered with the state government to organize a capacity-building program for health managers. The program consisted of a mix of periodic contact classes, mentoring and assignments and was spread over 30 months. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework in the form of a refined program theory to understand how such a capacity-building program could bring about organizational change. A well-formulated program theory enables an understanding of how interventions could bring about improvements and an evaluation of the intervention. In the refined program theory of the intervention, we identified various factors at individual, institutional, and environmental levels that could interact with the hypothesized mechanisms of organizational change, such as staff's perceived self-efficacy and commitment to their organizations. Based on this program theory, we formulated context-mechanism-outcome configurations that can be used to evaluate the intervention and, more specifically, to understand what worked, for whom and under what conditions. We discuss the application of program theory development in conducting a realist evaluation. Realist evaluation embraces principles of systems thinking by providing a method for understanding how elements of the system interact with one another in producing a given outcome.