Enhancing Early Detection of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: The Role of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) Score.

Background There is great variation in the etiology, predisposing organisms, incidence, clinical characteristics, severity, and consequences of skin and/or subcutaneous tissue infections. Extensive necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues and fascia is a characteristic of necrotizing soft tissue infections, which are frequently deadly. To change the course of treatment, this study highlights the need to find a tool that can quickly and accurately identify patients with necrotizing fasciitis (NF) and assist in making an early treatment decision. Methodology A prospective evaluation of 30 individuals with soft tissue infections was conducted using the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC). The patients were classified as low, intermediate, and high risk for the start of NF based on their LRINEC score. To assess the importance of the LRINEC score in forecasting the start of NF and its clinical consequences, patients in each group underwent appropriate management and statistical analysis. Results This study included 28 males (93.3%) and two females (6.7%). The associated p-value, recorded as 0.039, signifies statistical significance in the observed area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The p-value in risk categorization was found to be 0.296, which suggests that LRINEC helps in risk categorization with 100% sensitivity when used as a screening tool. Conclusion The early detection of necrotizing soft tissue infections, such as NF, is vital. The LRINEC score, based on routine lab tests, accurately distinguishes these infections. With high sensitivity and significant p-values, it helps stratify patients, guiding timely interventions and saving lives.

The Efficacy of LRINEC Scoring in Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis and its Correlation with the Outcomes.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is an expeditiously escalating inflammatory infection of the fascia, with secondary necrosis of the subcutaneous tissues. To aid diagnosis, the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring system was devised to stratify the likelihood of infection in patients on presentation.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The study aimed to investigate and quantify the relationships between the LRINEC scoring system and the outcomes such as the need for amputation, length of hospital stay, and mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> A total number of 90 patients were admitted with a provisional diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. LRINEC score was calculated for each case based on six laboratory variables at the time of presentation. Enrolled patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the LRINEC score. The differences in mortality, length of hospitalization, number of debridement procedures, and need for amputation between these groups were compared.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Increasing age, male gender, and DM have a poor prognosis in necrotizing fasciitis patients. The amputation and mortality rates are better correlated with higher LRINEC scores.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The LRINEC score helps in stratifying the patients into three risk categories (low risk, moderate risk, and high risk) according to the severity in a much more organized way, and thus the appropriate management like surgical debridement can be introduced on time. LRINEC score is a robust index that is capable of detecting early cases of necrotizing fasciitis and is simple enough for routine use. It is a simplified bedside diagnostic tool for early diagnosis and prediction of outcomes in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.</br>.

Fournier's gangrene originating from the perianal region or the urogenital area: does it make a difference?

OBJECTIVE: Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare and serious disorder which is associated with high mortality. In the literature, there is no study evaluating clinician-, patient- and disease-related factors affecting disease outcomes according to aetiological variation in FG. In our study, laboratory results and Uludag Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (UFGSI) score, clinical characteristics and mortality rates were compared between FG originating from perianal or from urogenital regions. METHOD: Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and UFGSI risk scores were calculated in patients with FG at presentation to the emergency department. The patients were assigned to two groups according to FG aetiology. RESULTS: It was observed that the number of debridement interventions and the need for colostomy were significantly greater in the perianal FG group, while the need for flap or reconstruction was significantly (p=0.002) higher in the genitourinary FG group. No significant difference was detected in mortality between groups and the difference in aetiology had no significant effect on the results of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, LRINEC or UFGSI scores. CONCLUSION: Laboratory results and UFGSI score were helpful in assessing disease severity independently from aetiology. The higher number of debridement interventions to protect anal function in the perianal group and the greater need for reconstructive surgery in the urogenital group were identified as factors that prolonged length of hospital stay.

A Comparison of the Application of Two Different Scoring Systems in a Patient With Upper Limb Necrotizing Fasciitis.

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening soft-tissue infection that requires early recognition and surgical debridement to ensure the best outcome for patients. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score and the SIARI (Site other than lower limb, Immunosuppression, Age <60 years, Renal Impairment and Inflammatory markers) score are clinical predictor tools that can aid in the timely diagnosis of NF. This case report discusses a male patient who presented with a rash on his arm that was initially thought to be cellulitis. It examines how the application of scoring systems can be beneficial for earlier identification or when the diagnosis is uncertain.

A rare case of necrotizing fasciitis of the leg in an intravenous drug user caused by Prevotella denticola.

Background: Intravenous drug users (IDUs) have a high risk of developing skin and soft tissue infections such as erysipelas, abscesses, and less frequently necrotizing fasciitis (NF) or gas gangrene. Rarely, the cause of the infection is microorganisms residing in the oral cavity and can lead to life-threatening infections. Methods: We describe the case of a 43-year-old man intravenous drug user (IDU) who was admitted for intense leg pain following an injection of cocaine at that site. Results: A clinical and radiological diagnosis of NF was made, so the patient was started on empirical antibiotic therapy and underwent surgical fasciotomy (after 8 hours from admission). Prevotella denticola was isolated from multiple intraoperative specimens and was resistant to initial antimicrobial therapy. The man, suffering from periodontal disease, reported sucking the syringe several times to unblock it. Both fasciotomy surgery and adjustment of antimicrobial therapy enabled therapeutic success. Conclusions: In IDUs the risk of deep skin and soft tissue infections is high and may be aggravated by contamination with oral microorganisms. The choice of empirical antibiotic treatment should include agents active against oral cavity anaerobes, such as P. denticola.

Necrotizing Fasciitis Associated With Toxic Shock Syndrome.

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressing bacterial infection that affects the deep fascia and subcutaneous tissues, often resulting in tissue necrosis and systemic toxicity. This case involves a male in his late forties who initially sought emergency care for a minor rash on his right lower extremity and symptoms of a viral illness. Despite an initial diagnosis of hematoma, his symptoms rapidly escalated within 24 hours, prompting his return to the emergency room. During this subsequent visit, signs of septic shock emerged, accompanied by a worsening rash and blister formation. Admitted to the intensive care unit, our patient received urgent treatment, including broad-spectrum antibiotics and surgical debridement based on the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score for assessing necrotizing fasciitis severity. Further debridement and a fasciotomy were performed, leading to improved clinical conditions, stabilized vitals, and normalized laboratory results. This case underscores the critical importance of early clinical suspicion, prompt diagnosis, and a collaborative, team-based approach in successfully managing necrotizing fasciitis.

Understanding limb necrotizing infections: A comprehensive approach.

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) are increasing, posing a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Due to nonspecific symptoms, a high index of suspicion is crucial. Treatment involves a multidisciplinary approach, with broad-spectrum antibiotics, early surgical debridement, and life support. This study analyzes the characteristics, demographics, complications, and treatment of NSTI in a hospital in Madrid, Spain. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including all surgically treated NSTI patients at our center from January 2016 to December 2022, examining epidemiological and clinical data. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) was prospectively calculated for all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (16 men, 6 women, mean age 54.8) were included. Median time from symptom onset to emergency room visit was 3.5 days. All reported severe treatment-resistant pain; sixteen had fever exceeding 37.8°C (72.7%). Skin lesions occurred in twelve (54.5%), and thirteen had hypotension and tachycardia (59.1%). Treatment involved resuscitative support, antibiotherapy, and radical debridement. Median time to surgery was 8.25h. Intraoperative cultures were positive in twenty patients: twelve Streptococcus pyogenes, four Staphylococcus aureus, one Escherichia coli, and four polymicrobial infection. In-hospital mortality rate was 22.73%. CONCLUSIONS: We examined the correlation between our results, amputation rates and mortality with LRINEC score and time to surgery. However, we found no significant relationship unlike some other studies. Nevertheless, a multidisciplinary approach with radical debridement and antibiotic therapy remains the treatment cornerstone. Our hospital stays, outcomes and mortality rates align with our literature review, confirming high morbimortality despite early and appropriate intervention.

Severe skin and soft tissue infection in cohort patients admitted in a teaching hospital in Belgium: identification of risk factors for surgery.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are associated with significant mortality if not promptly diagnosed and surgically treated. AIM: This study aims to compare patients with severe skin and soft tissue infection treated with or without a surgical intervention and to identify risk factors that can predict the need for early surgery. METHODS: Demographics, clinical, laboratory, Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and imaging results were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: There were 91 non-NSTI (group 1), 26 NSTI who were operated (group 2) and eight suspected NSTI who were not operated (group 3). In the multivariate analysis, skin necrosis, tachycardia, CRP value and hyperglycemia were predictive for surgery. A performance analysis revealed AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.78) as to the LRINEC score for the use of surgery. The AUC for a predictive model associating four variables (heart rate, skin necrosis, CRP and glycemia at admission) was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.59-0.84). In terms of outcome, the median length of stay (LOS) was statistically higher in group 2 vs. group 1 (seven days (5-15) vs. 34 days (20-42), p < .001) and in group 2 vs. group 3 (34 days (20-42) vs. 14 days (11-19), p = .005). The overall in-hospital mortality at 30 days was 3.2% and did not statistically differ between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the LRINEC score performed well in predicting surgery, the AUC of a model combining four predictive variables (glycemia, skin necrosis, CRP and heart rate) was superior. Further research is needed to validate this model.

Evaluation of laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score as an early diagnostic tool for necrotizing fasciitis: a prospective observational study.

Introduction: From its historical identification to modern times with advancements in management modalities globally, the mortality of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is high ranging from 19 to 30% for all affected sites. Although many diagnostic adjuncts have been developed to assist with the prompt and accurate diagnosis of NF, the primary diagnosis is still based on high clinical suspicion. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was developed as a tool for distinguishing NF from other soft tissue infections. The main objective of this study is to evaluate LRINEC as a tool for early diagnosis of NF and differentiating it from other soft tissue infections like cellulitis. Methods: This is a single-centered, prospective observational study. Patients presenting with soft tissue infections of the limbs to the emergency department from November 2020 to October 2021 were included in this study. The clinical findings and blood parameters for the LRINEC score were collected and the score was calculated. Based on clinical suspicion of NF, patients underwent debridement and had a tissue biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. The data obtained was analyzed using SPSS version 24 and MS Excel. The AUC curve was used to calculate a cutoff, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for the LRINEC score based on our study. Results: Forty-five patients with 28 males and 17 females were included. The average age was 53.667 years within a range of 19-79 years. Among them 44.4% of the patients had NF and 66.6% had other minor forms of soft tissue infections. The ROC curve obtained a cutoff value of greater than or equal to 6, with an AUC of 0.751. At this cut of value study showed a sensitivity of 85% with a specificity of 52%. Similarly, positive predictive value was found to be 58.62%, negative predictive values of 81.25%, and overall accuracy of 66.67% in early diagnosis of NF. Conclusion: In conclusion, our study showed that the LRINEC score can be a reliable tool for the early diagnosis of NF in an ED setting. This scoring system is best to be used to rule out NF.

Necrotizing fasciitis due to mycobacterium tuberculosis: A case report.

We admitted a patient with extensive and rapidly progressing necrotizing fasciitis, pulmonary tuberculosis, cutaneous tuberculosis, and bacterial infections because of late diagnosis and treatment. Early diagnosis is necessary for both cutaneous tuberculosis and necrotizing fasciitis. However, these are rare clinical manifestations and are difficult to detect. Despite surgical and pharmacologic treatment, the patient had poor outcomes. We discussed the next-generation sequencing test for early tuberculosis diagnosis, especially for atypical ones. The modified and typical laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score was used for diagnosing and identifying patients at high risk for necrotizing fasciitis. Subcutaneous effusions and gas accumulations observed through imaging were useful in assessing necrotizing fasciitis progression. Debridement or tuberculosis treatment should be initiated as early as possible in managing patients with both necrotizing fasciitis and cutaneous tuberculosis. Clinicians should be alert in identifying the condition, whether Mycobacteria tuberculosis is the independent cause of necrotizing fasciitis, and treating the condition. The choice of rapid microbial diagnostic tools should be of concern. Debridement or tuberculosis treatment should be initiated as early as possible in managing patients with both necrotizing fasciitis and cutaneous tuberculosis. Multidisciplinary cooperation should be considered.

Is the LRINEC score useful for predicting necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of MRONJ?

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing fasciitis as a complication of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), which we named "ONJ-NF", has been sometimes reported. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score for predicting ONJ-NF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with acute MRONJ who required hospitalization at a single institution from April 2013 to June 2022. They were divided into two groups: patients with ONJ-NF and those with severe cellulitis as a complication of MRONJ, which we named "ONJ-SC." LRINEC scores were compared between the groups and the cut-off value of the score was set by creating a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Eight patients with ONJ-NF and 22 patients with ONJ-SC were included. The LRINEC score was significantly higher in patients with ONJ-NF (median: 8.0 points, range 6-10 points) than in those with ONJ-SC (median: 2.5 points, range 0-6 points). A LRINEC score of ≥ 6 points had a sensitivity of 100.0%, a specificity of 77.3%, and an area under the curve of 0.97. Among 6 parameters of LRINEC score, only C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) had significant differences between two groups. Most of the patients with ONJ-NF were rescued by antibiotic therapy and surgical drainage including debridement of necrotic tissues, but unfortunately, one patient did not survive. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that the LRINEC score may be a useful diagnostic tool to predict ONJ-NF but valuating only CRP and WBC may be sufficient particularly in patients with osteoporosis.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a lethal soft tissue infection involving skin and subcutaneous tissue with significant morbidity and mortality. AIM: To validate the diagnostic and prognostic role of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring system for NF in patients who present with soft tissue infections. METHODS: The study was conducted on 100 patients who presented with soft tissue infections. Based on the histopathological findings, they were divided into NF and non-necrotizing soft tissue infection groups. Patients were clinically assessed. The lab parameters were assessed and the LRINEC score was calculated. Patients were stratified based on score and grouped into low, intermediate, and high risk. For patients who went into sepsis, the death rate and length of hospital stay, including ICU, were noted based on the scoring system. RESULTS: In our study, the diagnostic role of LRINEC score ≥ 6 had a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 62.7%, and score ≥ 8 had a sensitivity of 67.3% and specificity of 82.3% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78.5 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 72.4, of which 8 is a better cut-off as a diagnostic criterion. The area under the curve was found to be 0.835. To predict the prognostic role, a cut-off value was calculated from the receiver operating characteristic curves of both mortality and sepsis patients in relation to the LRINEC score of 9. With the LRINEC score cut-off as 9, with mortality and sepsis as variables, the sensitivity was 50% and 53.3%, specificity was 94.2% and 91.4%, PPV was 78.9% and 72.7%, and NPV was 81.4% and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The LRINEC score is quick, safe, reproducible, noninvasive, cost-effective, and easily calculated, and has high sensitivity and specificity to predict early diagnosis, and it could be used for risk stratification and prognosis of necrotizing soft tissue infections.

A Case Report of Culture-Negative Necrotizing Fasciitis With Low Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) Score: A Diagnostic Dilemma.

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score is a diagnostic tool used to help clinicians identify necrotizing fasciitis (NF) in its early stages. This tool uses six laboratory values including the patient's white blood cell count, C-reactive protein level, serum sodium level, creatinine level, and hemoglobin level to help with risk stratification. Each of these laboratory values is assigned a point value and the total score is used to determine the likelihood that a patient has NF, with a score of 6 or higher considered to be strongly indicative. The LRINEC score has gained popularity in recent years, having been included in guidelines and society recommendations for the management of NF. However, some studies have challenged the validity of the LRINEC score. Prompt and accurate diagnosis of NF is imperative given the associated mortality rate, which can be as high as 30%-40%, especially if the diagnosis is delayed. We present a case of a patient with a delayed diagnosis of NF that was initially missed in the early stages in the setting of a low LRINEC, however, growing clinical suspicion eventually led to an accurate diagnosis and management.

Necrotizing Fasciitis-Severe Complication of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review, Risk Factors, and Treatment Challenges.

Background and objectives: Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune skin blistering disease (AIBD) has an estimated annual incidence of 2.4 to 42.8 new cases per million in different populations, designating it an orphan disease. Characterized by disruption of the skin barrier combined with therapy-induced immunosuppression, BP could pose a risk for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection, with a prevalence of 0.40 cases per 100,000 to 15.5 cases per 100,000 population, often associated with immunosuppression. Low incidences of NF and BP classify them both as rare diseases, possibly contributing to the false inability of making a significant correlation between the two. Here, we present a systematic review of the existing literature related to the ways these two diseases correlate. Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature review was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. The primary outcome was prevalence of NF in BP patients, while the secondary outcome was prevalence and mortality of SSTI in BP patients. Due to the scarcity of data, case reports were also included. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, six case reports of BP complicated by NF with six retrospective studies and one randomized multicenter trial of SSTIs in BP patients. Conclusions: Loss of skin integrity, immunosuppressive therapy, and comorbidities commonly related to BP patients are risk factors for necrotizing fasciitis. Evidence of their significant correlation is emerging, and further studies are deemed necessary for the development of BP-specific diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Differences Between Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Those Without in Cases of Necrotizing Fasciitis.

Purposes This study aims to evaluate further differences between patients with diabetes and those without who have been diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis (NF) to assist clinicians in improving morbidity and mortality. Methods All patients diagnosed with NF of an extremity were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups based on a diagnosis of diabetes. Patient charts were reviewed to obtain multiple variables, which were compared between groups. Results From 2015 to 2021, 115 patients underwent surgical intervention due to concern for NF of an extremity with 92 patients included for data computation. Patients with diabetes had an average Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score of 9.02 compared to 7.24 (p=0.02). Patients with diabetes had a significantly higher rate of undergoing amputation when diagnosed with NF (p<0.0001). The mortality rate for diabetes and non-diabetes cohorts were 30.9% and 18.9%, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion This study demonstrated that patients with diabetes with confirmed NF of an extremity had a significantly higher LRINEC score were more likely to undergo an amputation primarily, and were more likely to have a polymicrobial infection compared to those without. The overall mortality rate of NF was 26.1%.

The performance of clinical risk scores in the diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis.

OBJECTIVE: Necrotising fasciitis (NF) is a quickly progressing and potentially life-threatening infection, involving the fascia and subcutaneous tissues. The diagnosis of this disease is challenging, especially due to a lack of specific clinical signs. In order to ensure a better and quicker identification of NF patients, a laboratory risk indicator score has been developed for NF (LRINEC). A variant has widened this score by adding clinical parameters (modified LRINEC). This study shows current outcomes of NF and compares the two scoring systems. METHODS: This study was conducted between 2011 and 2018, and included patient demographics, clinical presentations, sites of infection, comorbidities, microbiological and laboratory findings, antibiotic therapies and LRINEC as well as modified LRINEC scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A cohort of 36 patients, diagnosed with NF, were included in this study. The mean hospital stay was 56 days (±38.2 days). The mortality rate in the cohort was 25%. The sensitivity of the LRINEC score was 86%. Calculation of the modified LRINEC score showed an improvement of the sensitivity to 97%. The average LRINEC score and modified LRINEC score for patients who died and who survived were equal (7.4 versus 7.9 and 10.4 versus 10.0, respectively). CONCLUSION: The mortality rate of NF remains high. The modified LRINEC score increased the sensitivity in our cohort to 97%, and this scoring system could be supportive in the diagnosis of NF for early surgical debridement.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) based on an 18 years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Necrotising fasciitis (NF) represents a rare but often life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and surgical treatment are of vital importance. The LRINEC score was developed to distinguish necrotising fasciitis from other soft tissue infections (STI) at initial evaluation using six laboratory values. In this retrospective study, we attempted to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of the LRINEC score. METHODS: A total of 125 patients, hospitalised in our clinic between 2003 and 2021 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis (NF group) and 319 patients with surgically treated soft tissue infections (STI group) were included in this study. Individual LRINEC scores were calculated and analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the LRINEC score at the cut-off point of ≥ 6 was 59%, whereas the specificity was 82%. The positive and negative predictive values were 57% and 84%, respectively. The mean LRINEC score was significantly higher in the NF group than in the STI group (6.0 compared to 2.4, respectively). All clinical outcome parameters such as amputation and mortality rates (15% vs 1%) were found to be significantly higher in the NF group (p<0.001). Within the NF group, there was no statistically significant association between the LRINEC score and clinical outcomes except for the necessary number of operations. CONCLUSION: In isolation, we found the LRINEC score not to be a reliable enough diagnostic tool for the differentiation between NF and other soft tissue infections, because of its low sensitivity. Although we cannot recommend it as a prognostic tool either, we do believe it can be a useful adjunct to the clinical suspicion of NF.

Risk factors and outcomes in patients with severe Necrotizing fasciitis admitted to surgical intensive Care unit: a retrospective cohort study from pakistan.

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a debilitating condition that has high mortality and morbidity even in specialized centres. This study aims to determine risk factors in our local population and identify variables that contribute to mortality in the necrotizing fasciitis patients treated in the surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 39 patients admitted to the surgical ICU from January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2019. They were analyzed for comorbidities, symptoms at presentation, predisposing factors, location of the infection, microbiological analysis and mortality. Results: There were 27 (69.2%) males and 12 (30.8%) females while the age was distributed as 47.44±15 years. Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (89.7%), followed by swelling (79.5%) and tenderness (77%). Significant predisposing factors included trauma in 14 (35.9%) and Intramuscular injections (IM) in 10 (25.6%) patients. On univariate and multiple logistic regression, patients with chronic kidney disease (AOR:1.27, 95% CI: 0-691.22) and ischemic heart (AOR: 1.55, 95% CI: 0.02-153.26) disease had higher odds of mortality than those with no comorbidity. The overall mortality was 12/39 (30.8%). Conclusion: Intramuscular injections without aseptic measures in our local population are a significant predisposing risk factor for severe necrotizing fasciitis. High laboratory risk Indicators for necrotizing fasciitis and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores at admission were associated with increased mortality.

Suggested organism entry portal of necrotizing fasciitis with complete DNA from fascia, blood, and pharyngeal ulcers: A case report.

Introduction and importance: In approximately 50% of patients with necrotizing fasciitis, infection begins deep in the soft tissues. A history of trauma is often absent. The mechanism of spread has not been elucidated. We report a case of type II necrotizing fasciitis in which the streptococcal strain was identical to isolates from other locations in the same patient. Case presentation: A 42-year-old man presented with left leg pain. Two days prior, he had a non-penetrating injury to the left thigh while playing futsal. Workup revealed swelling of the left gastrocnemius. He was admitted to orthopaedics. On the third hospital day, he was referred to our department for hypotension, impending respiratory failure, and decreased sensorium, and subsequently admitted to the ICU. A biopsy was done on the left gastrocnemius fascia. He was diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis. On the seventh hospital day, left hip amputation and extensive debridement of the trunk were done. Patient improved and eventually recovered. Clinical discussion: Group A streptococcus was isolated in from the fascia, blood, and pharyngeal ulcer. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis showed all isolates to be genetically identical. An oral route of infection was considered. Conclusions: This is the first report in which etiologic agent of necrotizing fasciitis is genetically identical with isolates from other parts in the absence of trauma.

Time Is Fascia: Laboratory and Anamnestic Risk Indicators for Necrotizing Fasciitis.

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis is a potentially fatal soft tissue infection in which the timing of surgical intervention significantly affects clinical outcome. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score, the Site other than the lower limb, Immunosuppression, Age <60 years, Renal impairment (creatinine >141), and Inflammatory markers (CRP ≥150, WCC >25) (SIARI) score, and procalcitonin levels are intended to aid in the decision-making process to differentiate between necrotizing fasciitis and soft tissue infections. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cases of necrotizing fasciitis and soft tissue infections treated at Klinikum Nürnberg was performed. The two scores as well as procalcitonin levels were tested for their diagnostic value and a new score, the Laboratory and Anamnestic Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LARINF), was created based on the results. Results: Procalcitonin, LRINEC score, and SIARI score showed insufficient discriminatory ability in our study. The newly created LARINF score combined laboratory parameters of the LRINEC score (hemoglobin and C-reactive protein) with procalcitonin and three comorbidities, resulting in a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 75% and the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.83. Conclusions: The LARINF score is a novel decision-supporting tool. The decision, in which cases surgical exploration should be initiated, remains a clinical one. However, the score seems to provide an improved basis for identifying a rare clinical picture.