Breathlessness, frailty, and sarcopenia in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Breathlessness shares aging mechanisms of frailty and sarcopenia. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are frailty and sarcopenia associated with breathlessness itself? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a population-based, prospective cohort study of 780 community-dwelling older adults. Breathlessness was defined using the modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (≥2 points) and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (≥10 points). Frailty was defined by frailty index (FI), frailty phenotype, and FRAIL questionnaire. Sarcopenia was defined by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019. Sarcopenia phenotype score quantifies the number of criteria met. The associations of frailty and sarcopenia with breathlessness was evaluated by logistic regression analyses. Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) were calculated, accounting for age, sex, chronic airway disease, smoking status, body mass index, lung functions, socioeconomic status (living alone, income, education), comorbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, malignancy, myocardial infarction, heart failure), and other geriatric contributors (cognitive dysfunction, depression, malnutrition, polypharmacy, fall history in the past year). Institutionalization-free survival was compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: The prevalence of frailty is higher in the breathlessness group compared to non-breathlessness group (42.6% vs. 10.5% by FI, 26.1% vs. 8.9% by frailty phenotype, and 23.0% vs. 4.2% by FRAIL) and sarcopenia (38.3% vs. 26.9%), with P < 0.01 for all comparisons. The multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that frailty (FI [aOR: 9.29], FRAIL questionnaire [aOR: 5.21], and frailty phenotype [aOR: 3.09]) and sarcopenia phenotype score (score 2 [aOR: 2.00] and score 3 [aOR: 2.04] compared to score 0) were associated with breathlessness. The cumulative incidence of institutionalization-free survival was higher in the breathlessness group than counterparts (P = 0.02). INTERPRETATION: The findings suggest that frailty and sarcopenia strongly contribute to breathlessness in community-dwelling older adults. Measuring sarcopenia and frailty in older adults may offer opportunities to prevent age-related breathlessness.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Japan: The REMIND Study.

INTRODUCTION: Symptom status and treatment changes among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using inhaler treatment in real-world clinical settings are not well understood, particularly according to class of treatment. We investigated the proportion of symptomatic patients among those with COPD using inhaler treatment, based on COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in clinical practice, and changes in inhaler treatments and symptoms at 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study conducted at medical institutions with respiratory specialists in Japan. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with CAT scores ≥ 10 or < 10 in each inhaler treatment group at registration. RESULTS: Of 414 patients in the full analysis set, 76 (18.4%), 261 (63.0%), and 77 (18.6%) were using long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), LAMA + long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) + LABA, respectively, at registration. The proportions of patients with CAT scores ≥ 10 or < 10 per inhaler treatment group at registration, respectively, were 32.9% and 67.1% in the LAMA group, 55.0% and 45.0% in the LAMA + LABA group, and 50.0% and 50.0% in the ICS + LABA group. Most patients (> 75%) in each inhaler treatment group showed no change in inhaler treatment at 1 year, regardless of their CAT score at registration. Approximately 70-80% of patients with CAT scores ≥ 10 at registration still had CAT scores ≥ 10 at 1 year; 10-30% of patients with CAT scores < 10 at registration had CAT scores ≥ 10 at 1 year. CONCLUSION: In real-world Japanese clinical practice, a considerable proportion of patients have persistent symptoms (CAT score ≥ 10) despite using mono or dual inhaler treatment; > 75% of symptomatic patients with COPD using inhaler treatment did not undergo treatment escalation at 1-year follow-up and remained symptomatic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05903989.

Chest CT Findings at Six Months Following COVID-19 ARDS - Correlation With the mMRC Dyspnea Scale and Pulmonary Function Tests.

Background: Many survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia experience lingering respiratory issues. There is limited research on follow-up chest imaging findings in patients with COVID-19 ARDS, particularly in relation to their mMRC dyspnea scores and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). This study addresses this gap by investigating the clinical characteristics, mMRC dyspnea scores, PFTs, and chest CT findings of COVID-19 ARDS patients at the 6 months post-recovery. By analyzing these variables together, we aim to gain a better understanding of the long-term health consequences of COVID-19 ARDS. Methods: This prospective observational study included 56 subjects with COVID-19 ARDS with dyspnea at the six-month follow-up visits. These patients were evaluated by chest CT, mMRC dyspnea scale, and PFT. The CT severity score was calculated individually for each of the four major imaging findings - ground glass opacities (GGOs), parenchymal/atelectatic bands, reticulations/septal thickening, and consolidation - using a modified CT severity scoring system. Statistics were carried out to find any association between individual CT chest findings and the mMRC dyspnea scale and forced vital capacity (FVC). p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Our study population had a mean age of 55.86 ± 9.60 years, with 44 (78.6%) being men. Grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 on the mMRC dyspnea scale were seen in 57.1%, 30.4%, 10.7%, and 1.8% of patients respectively. Common CT findings observed were GGOs (94.6%), reticulations/septal thickening (96.4%), parenchymal/atelectatic bands (92.8%), and consolidation (14.3%). The mean modified CT severity scores for GGOs, reticulations/septal thickening, parenchymal/atelectatic bands, and consolidation were 10.32 ± 5.51 (range: 0-21), 7.66 ± 4.33 (range: 0-19), 4.77 ± 3.03 (range: 0-14) and 0.29 ± 0.91 (range 0-5) respectively. Reticulations/septal thickening (p = 0.0129) and parenchymal/atelectatic bands (p = 0.0453) were associated with an increased mMRC dyspnea scale. Parenchymal/atelectatic bands were also associated with abnormal FVC (<80%) (p = 0.0233). Conclusion: Six-month follow-up chest CTs of COVID-19 ARDS survivors with persistent respiratory problems showed a statistically significant relationship between increased mMRC dyspnea score and imaging patterns of reticulations/septal thickening and parenchymal/atelectatic bands; while parenchymal/atelectatic bands also showed a statistically significant correlation with reduced FVC.

Impact of Frailty on Symptom Burden in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the sixth leading cause of death in the United States in 2022 and the third leading cause of death in England and Wales in 2022, is associated with high symptom burden, particularly dyspnoea. Frailty is a complex clinical syndrome associated with an increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. The aim of this review was to explore the current evidence of the influence of frailty on symptoms in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD according to GOLD guidelines. Fourteen studies report a positive association between frailty and symptoms, including dyspnoea, assessed with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. Data were analysed in a pooled a random-effects meta-analysis of mean differences (MDs). There was an association between COPD patients living with frailty and increased CAT score versus COPD patients without frailty [pooled SMD, 1.79 (95% CI 0.72-2.87); I2 = 99%]. A lower association was found between frailty and dyspnoea measured by the mMRC scale versus COPD patients without frailty [pooled SMD, 1.91 (95% CI 1.15-2.66); I2 = 98%]. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 8.8% to 82% and that of pre-frailty from 30.4% to 73.7% in people living with COPD. The available evidence supports the role of frailty in worsening symptom burden in COPD patients living with frailty. The review shows that frailty is common in patients with COPD. Future research is needed to have further details related to the data from CAT to improve our knowledge of the frailty impact in this population.

Study on predictive models for swallowing risk in patients with AECOPD.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is considered a complication in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, AECOPD may have risk factors for dysphagia. METHODS: Through a cross-sectional study, which included 100 patients with AECOPD. General information, Pulmonary function, COPD assessment test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) were collected by questionnaire. The questionnaires were administered by uniform-trained investigators using standard and neutral language, and swallowing risk was assessed by using a water swallow test (WST) on the day of patient admission. RESULTS: Among the 100 included patients, 50(50%) were at risk of swallowing. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 74 years old, mMRC ≥ level 2, hospitalization days ≥ 7 days and the use of BIPAP assisted ventilation were important influencing factors for swallowing risk in patients with AECOPD. CONCLUSION: Patients with AECOPD are at risk for dysphagia, assessing age, mMRC, hospitalization days and the use of BIPAP assisted ventilation can be used to screen for swallowing risk, thus contributing to the implementation of early prevention measures.

Ayurveda management of a patient having bronchial asthma and hemorrhoids- A case report.

Ayurveda is a holistic science that treats root cause of diseases. One disease can become a causative factor for another disease. This concept is fundamentally described as Nidanarthakar Vyadhi in Ayurveda. In the same way, treating causative diseases is helpful in managing another diseases. However, many published clinical trials on Ayurveda management of Bronchial asthma and Hemorrhoids exist. There is a dearth of published case reports or clinical trials showing an association between Arsha (hemorrhoids) and Shwasa (bronchial asthma). This case report gives important viewpoints about the role of hemorrhoids and its treatment in pathogenesis and treatment of bronchial asthma. This case report of a 38-year-old female patient known case of bronchial asthma who came to the OPD of Kayachikitsa Government Ayurved College and Hospital, Nagpur with complaints of cough with sputum, breathlessness, chest pain (on/off) for three years. The severity of these symptoms increased for three months. The patient was treated with conventional Shwasghna Chikitsa (treatment of bronchial asthma) for five days, but the response was unsatisfactory. After five days of Shwasghna treatment, the patient gave a history of hemorrhoids. Considering Nidanarthakar Roga (one disease can cause of another disease), treatment was planned. The treatment principle is the treatment of causative disease (Arsha). Hence, Arshoghna treatment was added. Significant increases in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), Sustained minimal inspiration (SMI), and Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea scale (mMRC) were observed. The respiratory rate was also reduced from 28/min to 18/min. Improvement in the subjective and objective parameters of the patient was observed. The inclusion of Arsha treatment can be helpful in the management of Tamakshwas (Bronchial Asthma). The need for further research in this direction is warranted.

Clinical Efficacy of Mobile App-Based, Self-Directed Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is well known to improve clinical symptoms (including dyspnea), quality of life, and exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, researchers have reported difficulties in practicing center-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Recently, mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation has become available in clinical practice. We investigated the clinical outcomes of mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation versus conventional center-based pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with COPD, using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search of the literature published between January 2007 and June 2023 was performed, using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials involving patients with COPD. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs needed to provide an exercise program on a smartphone app. Study outcomes, including exercise capacity, symptom scores, quality of life, and hospitalization, were evaluated. The meta-analysis evaluated mean differences in 6-minute walk test distances (6MWDs), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale scores, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores, and risk ratios for hospitalization resulting from disease exacerbation. Results: Of the 1173 screened studies, 10 were included in the systematic review and 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Further, 6 studies were multicenter studies. There were a total of 1050 participants, and most were aged ≥65 years. There were discrepancies in the baseline participant characteristics, smartphone apps, interventions, and study outcomes among the included studies. In the meta-analysis, 5 studies assessed 6MWDs (mean difference 9.52, 95% CI -3.05 to 22.08 m), 6 studies assessed CAT scores (mean difference -1.29, 95% CI -2.39 to -0.20), 3 studies assessed mMRC dyspnea scale scores (mean difference -0.08, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.13), 2 studies assessed SGRQ scores (mean difference -3.62, 95% CI -9.62 to 2.38), and 3 studies assessed hospitalization resulting from disease exacerbation (risk ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.27-1.53). These clinical parameters generally favored mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation; however, a statistically significant difference was noted only for the CAT scores (P=.02). Conclusions: Despite some discrepancies in the baseline participant characteristics and interventions among studies, mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation resulted in favorable exercise capacity, symptom score, quality of life, and hospitalization outcomes when compared with conventional pulmonary rehabilitation. In the meta-analysis, the CAT scores of the mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P=.02). In real-world practice, mobile app-based pulmonary rehabilitation can be a useful treatment option when conventional center-based pulmonary rehabilitation is not feasible.

Factors affecting work productivity and activity impairment among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can negatively affect patients' employment and work-life activities with a significant indirect economic impact. The current study aimed to measure unemployment, work productivity, activity impairment, and their associated factors among COPD patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Chest outpatient clinic, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt. COPD patients completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire including sociodemographic, occupational data, clinical history, medical research council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, the COPD assessment test (CAT), and work productivity and activity impairment Questionnaire (WPAI-COPD). A total 140 patients were included in the study and 22.1% of them gave up their jobs because of their COPD. Due to COPD, the mean percentage of daily activity impairment was 39.8 among all patients. The mean percentages of absenteeism, presenteeism, and overall work impairment among the 84 working patients were 0.07, 24.4, and 24.5. The CAT score was the significant predictor of all components of WPAI. In conclusion, COPD causes early retirement, high work productivity loss, and impaired daily activities. Higher CAT scores and increased disease severity significantly increase absenteeism, presenteeism, overall work, and activity impairment. Thus, timely diagnosis of COPD with appropriate management can help improve outcomes and lower the disease burden and economic impact.

Longitudinal analysis of chest Q-SPECT/CT in patients with severe COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk for microvascular lung thrombosis. In order to evaluate the type and prevalence of perfusion defects, we performed a longitudinal analysis of combined perfusion single-photon emission and low-dose computed tomography (Q-SPECT/CT scan) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 (B.1.1.7 variant SARS-CoV-2) and respiratory insufficiency underwent chest Q-SPECT/CT during hospitalization, and 3 months after discharge. At follow-up (FU), Q-SPECT/CT were analyzed and compared with pulmonary function tests (PFT), blood analysis (CRP, D-dimers, ferritin), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, and high-resolution CT scans (HRCT). Patients with one or more segmental perfusion defects outside the area of inflammation (PDOI) were treated with anticoagulation until FU. RESULTS: At baseline, PDOI were found in 50 of 105 patients (47.6 %). At FU, Q-SPECT/CT scans had improved significantly (p < 0.001) and PDOI were recorded in 14 of 77 (18.2 %) patients. There was a significant correlation between mMRC score and the number of segmental perfusion defects (r = 0.511, p < 0.001), and a weaker correlation with DLCO (r = -0.333, p = 0.002) and KCO (r = -0.373, p = 0.001) at FU. Neither corticosteroid therapy nor HRCT results showed an influence on Q-SPECT/CT changes (p = 0.94, p = 0.74). CRP, D-Dimers and ferritin improved but did not show any association with the FU Q-SPECT/CT results (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: Segmental mismatched perfusion defects are common in severe COVID-19 and are correlated with the degree of dyspnea. Longitudinal analyses of Q-SPECT/CT scans in severe COVID-19 may help understand possible mechanisms of long COVID and prolonged dyspnea.

30-Day Readmission Rate of Patients with COPD and Its Associated Factors: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Purpose: Readmission of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been used as a measure of performance for COPD care. This study aimed to determine the rate of readmission of COPD in tertiary care hospital in Malaysia and its associated factors. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Malaysia from 1st January to 21st May 2019. Seventy admissions for COPD exacerbation involving 58 patients were analyzed. Results: The majority of the patients were male (89.8%), had a mean age of 71.95 ± 7.24 years and a median smoking history of 40 (IQR = 25) pack-years, 84.5% were in GOLD group D and 91.4% had a mMRC grading of 2 or greater. Approximately 60.3% had upper or lower respiratory tract infection as the cause of exacerbation; one in five patients had uncompensated hypercapnic respiratory failure at presentation, and 27.6% needed mechanical ventilatory support. Approximately 43.1% of patients had a history of exacerbation that required hospitalisation in the past year. The mean blood eosinophil concentration was 0.38 ± 0.46 x109 cells/L. The 30-day readmission rate was 20.3%, revisit rate to the emergency room within 30 days after discharge was 3.4%, and in-hospital mortality rate was 1.7%. Among all characteristics, a higher baseline mMRC grade (p = 0.038) and history of exacerbation in the past 1 year (p < 0.001) were statistically associated with 30-day readmission. Conclusion: The 30-day readmission rate for COPD exacerbation in a Malaysian tertiary hospital is similar to the rates in high-income countries. Exacerbation in the previous year and a higher baseline mMRC grading were significant risk factors for 30-day readmission in patients with COPD. Strategies of COPD management should concentrate on improvement of symptoms control by optimisation of pharmacotherapy, and early initiation of pulmonary rehabilitation, and structured integrated care programs to reduce readmission rates.

Value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the assessment of symptoms and quality of life in Asian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: The natural course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by symptom exacerbation and quality-of-life reduction. Therefore, symptoms should be properly assessed. Some studies have demonstrated a weak correlation between cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters and symptoms in patients with COPD; however, data on Asian patients are lacking. We investigated the value of CPET parameters in assessing symptoms and quality of life in Asian patients with COPD. Methods: Of 681 patients who underwent CPET at Asan Medical Center between January 2020 and June 2022, we analyzed 195 patients with COPD in this retrospective study. A cycle ergometer was used for the incremental protocol. The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) were administered to assess the patients' symptoms. Results: The mMRC grade was related to maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max, L/min) (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ=-0.295, P<0.001) and physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio at peak exercise (VD/VT peak) (ρ=0.256, P<0.001). The CAT score was significantly correlated with VO2 max (L/min) (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ=-0.297, P<0.001) and VD/VT peak (ρ=0.271, P<0.001), but had no correlation with breathing reserve (ρ=-0.122, P=0.089). The optimal cut-off values of VO2 max and VD/VT peak for predicting the onset of clinically significant dyspnea were 1.099 L/min and 0.295, respectively. Conclusions: VO2 max and VD/VT peak comprehensively reflect the symptoms and health-related quality of life of patients with COPD.

Breathlessness Predicts Mortality in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Breathlessness is a commonly encountered symptom, and although its relationship with mortality is well established for many conditions, less clear is this relationship in healthy adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines whether breathlessness is associated with mortality in a general population. This is important in understanding the impact of this common symptom on a patient's prognosis. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023394104). Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and EMCARE were searched for the terms 'breathlessness' and 'survival' or 'mortality' on January 24, 2023. Longitudinal studies of >1,000 healthy adults comparing mortality between breathless and non-breathless controls were eligible for inclusion. If an estimate of effect size was provided, studies were included in the meta-analysis. Eligible studies underwent critical appraisal, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. A pooled effect size was estimated for the relationship between the presence of breathlessness and mortality and levels of severity of breathlessness and mortality. Of 1,993 studies identified, 21 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and 19 for the meta-analysis. Studies were of good quality with a low risk of bias, and the majority controlled for important confounders. Most studies identified a significant relationship between the presence of breathlessness and increased mortality. A pooled effect size was estimated, with the presence of breathlessness increasing the risk of mortality by 43% (risk ratio (RR): 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-1.61). As breathlessness severity increased from mild to severe, mortality increased by 30% (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.21-1.38) and 103%, respectively (RR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.75-2.35). The same trend was seen when breathlessness was measured using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnoea Scale: mMRC grade 1 conferred a 26% increased mortality risk (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.16-1.37) compared with 155% for grade 4 (RR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.86-3.50). We conclude that mortality is associated with the presence of breathlessness and its severity. The mechanism underlying this is unclear and may reflect the ubiquity of breathlessness as a symptom of many diseases.

Dyspnea Associates With a Widely Impaired Quality of Life in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: A Longitudinal Study Using 15D.

Background: Research on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is crucial for developing comprehensive palliative care in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Objectives: To study IPF patients' HRQoL compared with general population and its association with dyspnea in a longitudinal follow-up. Design: Assessment of IPF patients' HRQoL by a generic tool. Comparison of baseline data with the general population and a 30-month follow-up with 6 months intervals. Setting/Subjects: In total, 246 IPF patients were recruited from the Finnish nationwide real-life study, FinnishIPF. Measurements: Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale for dyspnea and the generic HRQoL tool 15D for the total and dimensional HRQoL were used. Results: At baseline, the mean 15D total score was lower (0.786, standard deviation [SD] 0.116) in IPF patients than in the general population (0.871, SD 0.043) (p < 0.001) and among the IPF patients with MMRC ≥2 compared with those with MMRC <2 (p < 0.001). In patients with MMRC ≥2, significant impairment compared with general population existed in 11 dimensions of HRQoL, such as breathing, usual activities, and sexual activity, whereas this was true in only 4 dimensions in MMRC <2 category. Mental function was not impaired in either group. During the follow-up, 15D total score decreased in both MMRC categories (p < 0.001) but stayed constantly worse in the MMRC ≥2 group. Seven and two dimensions of HRQoL significantly declined in the categories of MMRC <2 and MMRC ≥2, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with IPF, especially if dyspnea limits everyday life, suffer from widely impaired HRQoL, although self-assessed mental capability is preserved. Integrated palliative care is supported to face the multiple needs of IPF patients.

COPD exacerbations and patient-reported outcomes according to post-bronchodilator FEV1 - a post-hoc analysis of pooled data.

BACKGROUND: Management strategies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) need to be tailored to the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), exacerbations, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of individual patients. In this study, we analyzed the association and correlation between the FEV1, exacerbations, and PROs of patients with stable COPD. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two cross-sectional studies that were previously conducted in Malaysia from 2017 to 2019, the results of which had been published separately. The parameters measured included post-bronchodilator FEV1 (PB-FEV1), exacerbations, and scores of modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD (SGRQ-c). Descriptive, association, and correlation statistics were used. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients were included in the analysis. The PB-FEV1 predicted was < 30% in 85 (22.7%), 30-49% in 142 (38.0%), 50-79% in 111 (29.7%), and ≥ 80% in 36 (9.6%) patients. Patients with PB-FEV1 < 30% predicted had significantly more COPD exacerbations than those with PB-FEV1 30-49% predicted (p < 0.001), 50-79% predicted (p < 0.001), and ≥ 80% predicted (p = 0.002). The scores of mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c were not significantly higher in patients with more severe airflow limitation based on PB-FEV1 (p = 0.121-0.271). The PB-FEV1 predicted had significant weak negative correlations with exacerbations (r = - 0.182, p < 0.001), mMRC (r = - 0.121, p = 0.020), and SGRQ-c scores (r = - 0.114, p = 0.028). There was a moderate positive correlation between COPD exacerbations and scores of mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c (r = 0.407-0.482, all p < 0.001). There were significant strong positive correlations between mMRC score with CAT (r = 0.727) and SGRQ-c scores (r = 0.847), and CAT score with SGRQ-c score (r = 0.851) (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In COPD patients, different severity of airflow limitation was not associated with significant differences in the mMRC, CAT, and SGRQ-c scores. Exacerbations were significantly more frequent in patients with very severe airflow limitation only. The correlation between airflow limitation with exacerbations, mMRC, and SGRQ-c was weak.

Dyspnea assessment in myotonic dystrophy type 1.

In myotonic mystrophy type 1 (DM1), combining respiratory symptom screening and respiratory function testing, is crucial to identify the appropriate time for ventilatory support initiation. Dyspnea has been little investigated in DM1. To provide a multidimensional description of dyspnea, questionnaires assessing dyspnea were administered to 34 consecutive adult patients with DM1 (median (25th-75th centile) age of 36 (28-49), Vital Capacity (VC) of 74 (64-87)% of predicted value). Dyspnea scores were low whatever the questionnaire used: Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile score of 2(0-4.7)/50 for dyspnea sensory descriptor and of 0 (0-4.7)/60 for the emotional descriptor, Visual Analogue Scale score of 0 (0-0)/10 in sitting and supine position and Borg score after six-minute walk test (6MWT) of 2.2 (1.8-4.2)/10. Eleven patients (32%) reported disabling dyspnea in daily living (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥ 2). In comparison with patients with mMRC score < 2, patients with mMRC score ≥ 2 had a more severe motor handicap (Muscular Impairment Rating score of 4.0 (4.0-4.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.5), p<0.01), a lower 6MWT distance (373 (260-424) vs 436 (346-499)m, p = 0.03) and a lower VC (64 (48-74)% vs 75 (69-89)%, p = 0.02). These data suggest that the mMRC scale might be an easy-to-use and useful tool to assess dyspnea in daily living in DM1 patients. However, the interest of integrating the mMRC dyspnea scale in clinical practice to guide therapeutic management of DM1 patients remains to be assessed in further studies.

The COPD assessment test and the modified Medical Research Council scale are not equivalent when related to the maximal exercise capacity in COPD patients.

INTRODUCTION: The management and treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are based on a cutoff point either of ≥ 10 on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) or of ≥ 2 of the Medical Research Council (mMRC). Up to now, no study has assessed the equivalence between CAT and mMRC, as related to exercise tolerance in COPD. The aim of this study was to investigate as primary outcome the relationship between CAT and mMRC and maximal exercise capacity in COPD patients. We also evaluated as secondary outcome the agreement between CAT (≥ 10) and mMRC (≥ 2) to categorize patients according to their exercise tolerance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 118 consecutive COPD patients (39 females), aged between 47 and 85 years with a wide range of airflow obstruction and lung hyperinflation were studied. Maximal exercise capacity was assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test. RESULTS: CAT and mMRC scores were significantly related to VO2 peak (p<0.01). CAT (≥ 10) and mMRC (≥ 2) have a high likelihood to be associated to a value of VO2 peak less than 15.7 and 15.6 mL/kg/min, respectively. The interrater agreement between CAT (≥ 10) and mMRC (≥ 2) was found to be fair (κ = 0.20) in all patients but slight when they were subdivided in those with VO2 peak < 15 mL/kg/min and in those with VO2 peak ≥ 15 mL/kg/min (κ = 0.10 and κ = 0.20 respectively). CONCLUSION: This study shows that CAT and mMRC are useful tools to predict exercise tolerance in COPD, but they cannot be considered as supplementary measures.

COVID-19 vaccination coverage in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A cross-sectional study in Hungary.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus infection is a particular risk for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), because they are much more likely to become severely ill due to oxygen supply problems. Primary prevention, including COVID-19 vaccination is of paramount importance in this disease group. The aim of our study was to assess COVID-19 vaccination coverage in COPD patients during the first vaccination campaign of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study (CHANCE) has been conducted in COPD patients in the eastern, western and central regions of Hungary from 15th November 2021. The anthropometric, respiratory function test results and vaccination status of 1,511 randomly selected patients were recorded who were aged 35 years and older. RESULTS: The median age was 67 (61-72) years, for men: 67 (62-73) and for women: 66 (60-72) years, with 47.98 % men and 52.02 % women in our sample. The prevalence of vaccination coverage for the first COVID-19 vaccine dose was 88.62 %, whereas 86.57 % of the patients received the second vaccine dose. When unvaccinated (n = 172) and double vaccinated (n = 1308) patients were compared, the difference was significant both in quality of life (CAT: 17 (12-23) vs 14 (10-19); p < 0.001) and severity of dyspnea (mMRC: 2 (2-2) vs 2 (1-2); p = 0.048). The COVID-19 infection rate between double vaccinated and unvaccinated patients was 1.61 % vs 22.67 %; p < 0.001 six months after vaccination. The difference between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients was significant (8.14 % vs 0.08 %; p < 0.001) among those with acute COVID-19 infection hospitalized. In terms of post-COVID symptoms, single or double vaccinated patients had significantly fewer outpatient hospital admissions than unvaccinated patients (7.56 vs 0 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 vaccination coverage was satisfactory in our sample. The uptake of COVID-19 vaccines by patients with COPD is of utmost importance because they are much more likely to develop severe complications.

Factors associated with the quality of life and persistent dyspnea severity in COVID-19 survivors: A cross-sectional study among healthcare workers.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a significant impact on global health. The alterations in quality of life (QoL) and the persistent symptoms of dyspnea have been the healthcare workers' challenges during and after the pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with the QoL and persistent dyspnea experienced by COVID-19 survivors, particularly among healthcare workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare workers at H. Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia, using direct interviews to collect the data. The EuroQol 5-dimensional 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) and the self-assessment EuroQol-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) were employed to assess the QoL of the healthcare workers; and persistent dyspnea was evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. Several possible risk factors such as demographic characteristics (gender and age), clinical characteristics (comorbidities, history of hospitalization, oxygen usage, history of COVID-19 vaccination, the severity of previous COVID-19, existence of post-COVID syndrome) and the symptoms of the post-COVID syndrome were collected. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to identify the risk factors associated with the QoL and persistent dyspnea. A total of 100 healthcare workers were included in the study. The EQ-5D-5L assessment found that 2% of healthcare workers experienced pain/discomfort and 4% experienced anxiety/depression. The average healthcare worker's EQ-VAS score was 87.6±8.1. There was no significant association between studied demographics and clinical characteristics with QoL dimensions. However, post-COVID symptoms of activity limitation (p=0.004), sore throat (p=0.026), headache (p=0.012), myalgia (p=0.006), and arthralgia (p=0.001) were associated with pain/discomfort dimension of QoL. In addition, there was a significant association between activity limitation (p=0.012), headache (p=0.020), myalgia (p=0.015) and arthralgia (p=0.032) with anxiety/depression dimension of QoL. Our data suggested that the presence of post-COVID syndrome (p=0.006) and the presence of post-COVID syndrome symptoms of cough (p=0.021) and fatigue (p=0.015) were associated with persistent dyspnea. In conclusion, this study suggests that the presence of post-COVID syndrome and its symptoms are associated with low quality of health-related QoL and persistent dyspnea. Therefore, cautions are needed for such patients to prevent low QoL in the future.

Risk factors for respiratory failure after tuberculosis-destroyed lung surgery and increased dyspnea score at 1-year follow-up.

Background: Although pneumonectomy is an important surgical treatment for tuberculosis-destroyed lung (TDL), few studies have investigated long-term postoperative TDL prognosis. Here, risk factors were determined for postoperative secondary respiratory failure and modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC ≥1) at discharge and at 1-year post-surgical follow-up. Methods: A two-way cohort study was conducted of 116 patients admitted to our thoracic surgery department for surgical TDL treatment from January 2001 to June 2020. General clinical data were collected then patient postoperative mMRC scores were monitored for 1 year. Dyspnea-associated factors (mMRC ≥1) were identified then risk factors for postoperative respiratory failure and compromised long-term respiratory function were identified using multivariate adjusted logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 116 patients, 27.6% (32/116) developed respiratory failure secondary to surgery. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative serum albumin of <30 g/L [adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 6.613, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.064-41.086] and intraoperative bleeding of >1,000 mL (aOR 6.876, 95% CI: 1.236-38.243) were risk factors for subsequent respiratory failure only in patients experiencing postoperative secondary respiratory failure. Sorting of patient mMRC dyspnea index scores into two groups (mMRC =0, mMRC ≥1) followed by logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors for 1-year postoperative dyspnea included mMRC score ≥1 at discharge (aOR 14.446, 95% CI: 1.102-189.361) and postoperative respiratory failure occurrence (aOR 9.946, 95% CI: 1.063-93.034). Conclusions: TDL patient preoperative hypoalbuminemia and extensive intraoperative bleeding were risk factors for postoperative secondary respiratory failure. Postoperative secondary respiratory failure and high mMRC (≥1) at discharge were associated with reduced postoperative long-term recovery of respiratory function.

Long-term follow-up of tuberculosis-destroyed lung patients after surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: To monitor dypsnea and mortality at 5 and 10 years, respectively, after surgical treatment of tuberculosis-destroyed lung (TDL) patients. METHODS: TDL patients treated surgically at Beijing Chest Hospital from November 2007 to June 2019 were monitored in this observational study. Follow-up assessments of respiratory function indicators and survival conducted 5 and 10 years post-surgery led to patient grouping based on mMRC score into a dyspnea group (mMRC ≥ 1) and a non-dyspnea group (mMRC = 0). Cox regression analysis detected effects of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, surgical factors and respiratory function on 5 year post-surgical survival. RESULTS: By study completion (June 30, 2020), 32 of 104 patients were lost and 72 completed follow-up for a study total of 258.9 person-years. 45 patients (62.5%, 45/72) had mMRC scores of 0, while 12 (16.7%, 12/72), 21 (36.2%, 21/58) and 27 (60.0%, 27/45) patients exhibited dyspnea by 1, 3 and 5 years post-surgery, respectively. Low lung carbon monoxide diffusion score (DLCO% pred) and scoliosis contributed to dyspnea occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Most TDL patients lacked subjective dyspnea signs post-surgery, while dyspnea rates increased with time. Preoperative low lung diffusion function and Scoliosis were associated with factors for postoperative dyspnea. Surgical treatment increased TDL patient survival overall.