RESUMEN
Cardiac arrest during pregnancy does not occur infrequently and is influenced by obstetric and non-obstetric factors. The patient described in this case report is a pregnant woman who suffered a leg injury that required urgent surgical repair. Moments prior to that procedure, the fetus experienced extreme bradycardia on fetal heart tone monitoring. An emergent cesarean section was performed, which was followed by the patient suffering cardiac arrest secondary to an acutely provoked pulmonary embolism. The patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy followed by EkoSonic endovascular system (EKOS) therapy, which was then complicated by a subcapsular hematoma. The patient ultimately had an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placed, was started on oral anticoagulation, and eventually recovered with discharge to her home with her newborn infant. This report aims to discuss this critical case of obstetric cardiac arrest, detailing the emergent response, clinical management, challenges faced during resuscitation, and subsequent outcomes. Through this report, we seek to contribute to the growing body of knowledge on effectively managing cardiac emergencies in pregnancy, emphasizing interdisciplinary coordination and tailored interventions to enhance survival and recovery in this high-risk group.
RESUMEN
Background: With regard to the treatment of massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) with circulatory and respiratory collapse and thrombolytic contraindications, current guidelines and researches usually give the priority to veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO). However, the objective of this clinical case report is to highlight the effective use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) in a 35-year-old pregnant woman with MPE complicated by hemorrhage, persistent hypoxia and multiple cardiac arrests. Case Description: A 35-year-old pregnant woman with gestational mellitus suddenly presented with complaints of nausea, vomiting and dyspnea after going to the toilet, combined with increasing heart rate (HR) of 150 bpm, decreasing pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 94%, larger right heart and the growing D-dimer at 11.2 µg/mL, who was considered as the pulmonary embolism. Unpredictable cardiac arrest occurred repeatedly before and after the cesarean section. Although cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started timely and successfully, the maintenance of blood pressure still depended on high-dose pressor drugs, even terribly, the oxygenation was unstable under the assistance of mechanical ventilation with pure oxygen. Thus, V-V ECMO supporting was commenced following by gradual recovering in haemodynamics and respiratory function. And the diagnosis of MPE was ascertained again through computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and pulmonary angiography. Directing at the pathogeny, thrombolysis infusion catheters and anticoagulant therapy were initiated after bilateral uterine artery embolism for postpartum haemorrhage, later the patient discharged from hospital after recovery and had a good prognosis. Conclusions: V-V ECMO could be effective for some patients with MPE who suffer from successful CPR after cardiac arrest while still combined with severe hypotension and refractory hypoxemia.
RESUMEN
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease with variable clinical signs and symptoms, and the diagnosis often requires a high index of suspicion. Patients can have a variety of risk factors that predispose them to venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease. This is a case of a female who presented to the emergency room with new-onset fatigue and shortness of breath for five days. The patient was diagnosed with a sub-massive PE with high-risk features. The patient was also hyperglycemic and diagnosed with new-onset diabetes mellitus. For the PE, she was treated with systemic thrombolysis followed by a standard oral factor Xa inhibitor; for her new onset of diabetes, the patient was started on glargine and lispro insulin. This case underscores the importance of comprehensive management for patients with PE and concurrent metabolic conditions.
RESUMEN
This case report highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by pulmonary embolism (PE) in a young, otherwise healthy 33-year-old African American male with no apparent risk factors. The patient presented with penile pain, swelling, hematuria, flank pain, and rash, and was admitted for balanoposthitis and acute urinary retention. Despite prophylactic heparin, he suffered two cardiac arrests secondary to PE on the fifth day of hospitalization. Prompt thrombolytic therapy and heparin infusion were initiated, but his course was complicated by anuric acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, shock liver, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Imaging revealed a substantial thrombus burden in the pulmonary arteries. Notably, a hypercoagulable workup was negative. The absence of typical risk factors, negative hypercoagulable workup, and occurrence of PE despite prophylaxis underscore the importance of vigilance in recognizing atypical presentations. This case emphasizes the need for a high index of suspicion and comprehensive evaluation to diagnose PE in young patients without clear predisposing factors.
RESUMEN
We report the case of an 18-year-old male who presented to the Emergency Department with sudden onset dyspnea. The patient was intubated on arrival, but suffered a cardiac arrest soon after. Point-of-care echocardiography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation revealed a grossly dilated right atrium and right ventricle, which alerted the Emergency physician to the possibility of massive pulmonary embolism leading to cardiac arrest. Due to no discernible history or risk factors in favour of pulmonary embolism, a decision was taken for thrombolysis with half dose Tenecteplase. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved 14 min after thrombolysis, with massive pulmonary embolism subsequently being confirmed on CT Pulmonary Angiography.
RESUMEN
Massive/high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with a 30-day mortality rate of approximately 65%. In searching for strategies that may make a dent on this dismal mortality rate, investigators have, over the last decade, shown renewed interest in the potential beneficial role of venoarterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of patients with high-risk PE. There is a dearth of high-quality evidence regarding the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE. Studies examining this issue have generally been retrospective, often single center and frequently with small patient numbers. Moreover, these reported studies are not matched with appropriate controls, and, accordingly, it is difficult to regulate for inherent treatment bias. Not surprisingly, there are no randomized controlled trials examining the value of ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, as such trials would pose formidable feasibility challenges. Over the past several years, there has been increasing support for upfront use of V-A ECMO in the treatment of massive PE, when it is complicated by cardiac arrest. In those patients without cardiac arrest, but who have contraindications for thrombolysis, V-A ECMO combined with anticoagulation may be used to stabilize the patient. If after 3 to 5 days, such patients demonstrate persistent right ventricular dysfunction, embolectomy (either surgical or catheter based) should be performed. Well-designed, multicenter, prospective studies are urgently needed to better define the role of V-A ECMO in the treatment of patients with massive PE.
RESUMEN
Cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality globally, and mechanical CPR devices like the LUCAS system are designed to improve outcomes by enhancing consistency and reducing rescuer fatigue. However, this case report of a 76-year-old female who suffered cardiac arrest post-flight reveals significant complications associated with mechanical CPR. Despite achieving initial resuscitation, she developed extensive liver damage and additional complications, which ultimately led to her death. This case underscores the importance of precise training and strict adherence to guidelines when using mechanical CPR devices. It highlights that while these devices offer potential benefits, they also pose risks, especially for vulnerable patients, necessitating careful consideration and ongoing evaluation to optimize safety and effectiveness.
RESUMEN
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common acute cardiovascular condition. Within this review, we discuss the incidence, pathophysiology, and treatment options for patients with high-risk and massive pulmonary embolisms. In particular, we focus on the role of mechanical circulatory support devices and their possible therapeutic benefits in patients who are unresponsive to standard therapeutic options. Moreover, attention is given to device selection criteria, weaning protocols, and complication mitigation strategies. Finally, we underscore the necessity for more comprehensive studies to corroborate the benefits and safety of MCS devices in PE management.
RESUMEN
Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) is a serious condition affecting the pulmonary arteries and is difficult to diagnose, triage, and treat. The American College of Chest Physicians (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have different classification approaches for PE, with the AHA defining three subtypes and the ESC four. Misdiagnosis is common, leading to delayed or inadequate treatment. The incidence of PE-related death rates has been increasing over the years, and mortality rates vary depending on the subtype of PE, with MPE having the highest mortality rate. The current definition of MPE originated from early surgical embolectomy cases and discussions among experts. However, this definition fails to capture patients at the point of maximal benefit because it is based on late findings of MPE. Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERTs) have emerged as a fundamental shift in the management of MPE, with a focus on high-risk and MPE cases and a goal of rapidly connecting patients with appropriate therapies based on up-to-date evidence. This review highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing MPE and emphasizes the importance of PERTs and risk stratification scores in improving outcomes for patients with PE.