Short-term gut microbiota's shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) represent two of the most used bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS) procedures. Gut microbiota (GM) shift after bypass surgeries, currently understated, may be a possible key driver for the short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study enrolling patients with severe obesity, randomized between OAGB or RYGB. Fecal and blood samples were collected, pre- (T0) and 24 months postoperatively (T1). GM was determined by V3-V4 16S rRNA regions sequencing and home-made bioinformatic pipeline based on Qiime2 plugin and R packages. OBJECTS: To compare OAGB vs RYGB microbiota profile at T1 and its impact on metabolic and nutritional status. RESULTS: 54 patients completed the study, 27 for each procedure. An overall significant variation was detected in anthropometric and serum nutritional parameters at T1, with a significant, similar decrease in overall microbial alpha and beta diversity observed in both groups. An increase in relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria and a reduction of Bacteroidetes, no significant changes in Firmicutes and Verrucomicrobia, with an increase of the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio were observed. CONCLUSIONS: BMS promotes a dramatic change in GM composition. This is the first multicenter, RCT evaluating the impact of OAGB vs Roux-en-Y bypass on GM profile. The bypass technique per se did not impact differently on GM or other examined metabolic parameters. The emergence of slightly different GM profile postoperatively may be related to clinical conditions or may influence medium or long-term outcomes and as such GM profile may represent a biomarker for bariatric surgery's outcomes.

Advanced Non-linear Modeling and Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Predicting 30-Day Complications in Bariatric Surgery: A Single-Center Study.

PURPOSE: Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) became integral to managing severe obesity. Understanding surgical risks associated with MBS is crucial. Different scores, such as the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP), aid in patient selection and outcome prediction. This study aims to evaluate machine learning (ML) models performance in predicting 30-day post-operative complications and compare them with the MBSAQIP risk score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 424 consecutive patients (2006-2020) who underwent MBS, analyzing 30-day surgical complications according to Clavien-Dindo Classification. ML models, including logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, multi-layer perceptron, and extreme gradient boosting, were analyzed and compared to MBSAQIP risk score. Performance was measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. RESULTS: Random forest showed the highest AUROC in the training (AUROC = 0.94) and the validation set (AUROC = 0.88). ML algorithms, particularly random forest, outperformed MBSAQIP in predicting negative 30-day outcomes in both the training and validation sets (AUROC = 0.64, DeLong's Test p < 0.001). The five features that were more relevant for the prediction of the random forest model were serum alkaline phosphatase, platelet count, triglycerides, glycated hemoglobin, and albumin. CONCLUSION: We developed several ML model that identifies patients at risk for 30-day complications after MBS. Among these, random forest is the most performing one and outperforms the already established MBSAQIP score. This model could increase the identification of high-risk patients before MBS.

Analysis of long-term outcome of modified gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric and metabolic surgery have been routinely performed following the rapid increase in obesity and metabolic diseases worldwide. Of all evolving procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. RYGB was introduced in China nearly 20 years ago, but the number of RYGB surgeries only accounts for 3.1% of the total number of weight loss and metabolic surgeries in China, it's effect on Chinese people still needs further study. AIM: To investigate the effect and safety of a modified gastric bypass performed in Chinese patients with T2DM. METHODS: Patients with obesity and T2DM who underwent modified gastric bypass, with > 5-year follow-up data, were analyzed. RESULTS: All 37 patients underwent uneventful laparoscopic surgery, no patient was switched to laparotomy during the surgery, and no severe complications were reported. Average weight and body mass index of the patients reduced from 84.6 ± 17.3 (60.0-140.0) kg and 30.9 ± 5.0 (24.7-46.2) kg/m2 to 67.1 ± 12.2 (24.7-46.2) kg and 24.6 ± 3.9 (17.7-36.5) kg/m2, respectively, and fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin decreased from 7.4 ± 3.4 mmol/L and 8.2% ± 1.7% preoperatively to 6.5 ± 1.3 mmol/L and 6.5% ± 0.9% 5-years postoperatively, respectively. Only 29.7% (11/37) of the patients used hypoglycemic drugs 5-years postoperatively, and the complete remission rate of T2DM was 29.7% (11/37). Triglyceride level reduced significantly but high-density lipoprotein increased significantly (both P < 0.05) compared with those during the preoperative period. Liver and renal function improved significantly postoperatively, and binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the patients' preoperative history of T2DM and fasting C-peptide were significant prognostic factors influencing complete T2DM remission after RYGB (P = 0.006 and 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION: The modified gastric bypass is a safe and feasible procedure for Chinese patients with obesity and T2DM, exhibiting satisfactory amelioration of weight problems, hyperglycemia, and combination disease.

Barriers for bariatric surgery in provincial New Zealand: a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with obesity. It has been shown that there's is a complex psychosocial overlay in the pathophysiology and treatment, which requires specific consideration when delivering care. There is a significant drop out rate for patients accepted on to bariatric programmes in New Zealand, resulting in failure to progress to surgical intervention. METHODS: We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with patients who were accepted onto the bariatric surgery programme but did not complete the programme, or receive an operation between 2015 and 2020. Grounded theory methodology was used to create an exploratory framework to identify and describe the themes encountered. An iterative process of thematic analysis and comparison between participants experiences was used to consolidate the shared key barriers. This study aims to explore patients experiences of a bariatric surgery programme to understand barriers and enablers to complete a bariatric programme and receive an operation. Adding to previous qualitative work investigating patients experience of bariatric surgery programmes in New Zealand. RESULTS: Five themes of barriers that patients face to receiving bariatric surgery were identified. These were preoperative weight loss requirement, experiencing the social stigma of obesity, communication, socioeconomic and geographic barriers, and community support. These five themes often co-exist in patients experiences and combine, to cause patients to disengage with the bariatric service. CONCLUSION: Many factors contribute to eligible patients not receiving bariatric surgery once accepted onto the programme. Specified weight loss goals was the most significant barrier. Community support and online resources were significant enablers. This study should inform changes to bariatric programmes in New Zealand.

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on PAI-1 Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of bariatric surgery on circulating PAI-1. The meta-analysis was provided by comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) V4 software. Meta-analysis of 33 studies showed a significant decrease in circulating PAI-1 after bariatric surgery (p < 0.001). A significant reduction was observed for two types of surgery) (p < 0.001 for LSG and p < 0.001 for RYGB). Furthermore, there was a significant change in circulating PAI-1 based on the follow-up duration (p < 0.001 for follow-up < 12 months and p < 0.001 for follow-up ≥ 12). We showed that bariatric surgery changed PAI-1 level significantly and changes in BMI after surgery were not related to PAI-1 alteration. Furthermore, this result was consistent based on follow-up duration and type of surgery.

Clinical Perspectives, Eligibility, and Success Criteria for Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery.

Obesity is a worldwide chronic, complex, and progressive disease that poses a challenge for physicians to pursue optimal therapeutic decision making. This chapter focuses on the definition of obesity, based on excessive fat accumulation, and thus underscores the importance of body composition, and the clinical tools used to diagnose it in the context of excess weight, metabolic alteration, and obesity-associated comorbidity development. Additionally, it addresses the indications for surgery that are currently applicable and the description of the different types of patients who could benefit the most from the surgical management of excessive body fat and its associated metabolic derangements and quality of life improvement. Furthermore, it also highlights plausible underlying mechanisms of action for the beneficial effects following bariatric/metabolic surgery.

Future Prospects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

BACKGROUND: The field of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is currently an expanding surgical field with constant refinements in techniques, outcomes, indications, and objectives. MBS has been effectively applied across diverse patient demographics, including varying ages, genders, body mass indexes, and comorbidity statuses. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review of published retrospective cohort studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and literature reviews from inception to 2024, reporting outcomes of MBS using databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Springer Link. RESULTS: MBS is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for patients with obesity and associated medical conditions (mortality rate 0.03-0.2%; complication rates 0.4-1%). The favorable safety profile of MBS in the short-, mid-, and long-term offers the potential to treat patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, chronic anticoagulation, neoplastic disease, and end-organ failure without increased morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the future of MBS lies in the ongoing innovation and adapted therapeutic strategies along with the integration of a variety of other techniques for managing obesity. Careful preoperative assessments, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach, remain essential to ensure optimal surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after MBS.

Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Spanish Experience with Latero-Lateral Duodeno-Ileostomy + Sleeve Gastrectomy with Magnet Anastomosis System.

BACKGROUND: The partial diversion of intestinal contents facilitates achieving and maintaining weight loss and improving glycemic control in patients with obesity and with or without T2DM. The purpose of this study is to report our experience and 1-year follow-up with novel modification of SADI-S. METHODS: This study is a part of a multicentric trial of patients that underwent primary side-to-side duodeno-ileostomy and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with GT metabolic solutions magnetic anastomosis system. Feasibility, safety, and initial efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients included was 48 ± 8.75 years and the preoperative BMI was 43.32 ± 2.82 kg/m2. The complications were present in 30% of patients. The anastomosis patency was confirmed by the passage of radiological contrast under fluoroscopy at a mean of 17 days (17-29 days), and the mean expulsion time was 42 days (32-62). The mean diameter of the anastomosis after the magnet expulsion was 13.8 × 11.4 mm. The percentage of total weight lost at 1 year was 38.68 ± 8.48% (p < 0.001). The percentage of excess weight loss 82.5 ± 18.44% (p < 0.001) and improvements in glucose profiles were observed. Mean baseline HbA1c 5.77 ± 0.31% was reduced to 5.31 ± 0.26% (p < 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Latero-lateral duodeno-ileostomy + SG with magnetic duodenal bipartition is afeasible and reasonably safe technique and induces weight loss in patients with obesity and improvement of glycemic control. This modification could be considered as an option to standard SADI-S or as a first step in two stages procedure. However, larger studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: #NCT05322122.

Predictive factors of weight loss in obese patients referred to an obesity specialized centre.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: In obese patients, long-term weight loss maintenance remains challenging. Identifying factors predicting adhesion to lifestyle therapy and weight loss would help optimizing obesity management. AIMS: to identify predictive factors of weight loss after one year of medical therapy in obese patients (primary) and predictive factors of drop-out during the year of therapy (secondary). METHODS: In this retrospective study, obese patients consulting for the first time in an obesity specialized center were included. All patients fulfilled the criteria for obesity surgery and were managed to change their lifestyle by following a 1-year therapeutical education program based on intuitive eating. Significant weight loss was defined by ≥ 5 % after 1 year. Patients were considered as dropouts, i.e. absence of adhesion to therapy, once they missed one consultation without informing the unit. Stepwise multivariable analyses determined the predictive factors. RESULTS: Of the 310 patients (mean age, 44.5 ± 11.9 yr, 79% women) included, 155 (50%) maintained their follow-up at 1 year and 37 (24%) experienced weight loss ≥5%. Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 6.25 [95% confidence interval, 1.78; 21.92], P = 0.004), ≥5 consultations with intuitive eating (OR = 3.69 [1.14; 11.87], P = 0.03), and tobacco addiction (OR = 0.18 [0.04; 0.82], P = 0.03) were associated to weight loss ≥5%. Older age (OR = 0.97 [0.95; 0.99], P = 0.014), physical activity (OR = 0.11 [0.05; 0.24], P < 0.0001) and the patient desire for obesity surgery (OR = 0.22 [0.12; 0.41], P < 0.0001) were associated with a better adhesion to therapy. CONCLUSION: The identified predictive factors would help identifying the patients with the greater chance of losing weight and adhering to therapy. Offering more therapeutic education sessions should increase therapy success in obese patients fulfilling the criteria for obesity surgery.

American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Clinical care pathways help guide and provide structure to clinicians and providers to improve healthcare delivery and quality. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (QIPS) of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) has previously published care pathways for the performance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and pre-operative care of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). OBJECTIVE: This current RYGB care pathway was created to address intraoperative care, defined as care occurring on the day of surgery from the preoperative holding area, through the operating room, and into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). METHODS: PubMed queries were performed from January 2001 to December 2019 and reviewed according to Level of Evidence regarding specific key questions developed by the committee. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations are made for care of patients undergoing RYGB including the pre-operative holding area, intra-operative management and performance of RYGB, and concurrent procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This document may provide guidance based on recent evidence to bariatric surgeons and providers for the intra-operative care for minimally invasive RYGB.

Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Might be More of a Benefit than a Risk During a Pandemic Outbreak.

Introduction: This report aimed to analyze the outcomes of patients with obesity who were on a bariatric program during the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic outbreak and compare those who received surgery with the ones who were not operated on. Methods: This was a retrospective study between 2020 and 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent surgery (O) and those who were not operated (NO). The evolution of the risk factors identified for severe COVID infection and death was studied (ASMBS criteria). For this study, a follow-up period of 12 months was initiated. Results: In the O group, 83 patients were included and 99 were in the NO group. In the O group, patients with body mass index (BMI) > 35 Kg/m2 before surgery resolved the condition in 73.5% (61) cases, and this was done in the first 30 days by 38 (45.7%). Type 2 diabetes mellitus remission was documented in 18 patients (85.7%) of the O group, and the mean time elapsed for remission was 102.2 days (P < .01). Hypertension remitted in 66.7% (20) of the patients in group O in 82.4 days (P < .01). The subgroup of patients with obesity and one high-risk associated condition (30.2%, 25) resolved both in 44% (11) cases and one in 48% (12) cases. In the group of patients with obesity and two high-risk associated conditions (15.6%, 13), 47% (6) patients resolved the three conditions, 38% (5) resolved two conditions, and 15% (2) resolved one condition. Among the NO group, no comorbidity resolutions were recorded (P < .01). Admission because of COVID infection was necessary for 7.1% of NO and 1.2% of O (P = .04). Conclusion: Bariatric metabolic surgery would not increase the risk of COVID infection or of suffering serious complications resulting from it. Patients undergoing bariatric metabolic surgery rapidly resolved high-risk comorbidities and had less need for hospitalization because of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Improving the management of morbidly obese patients with postoperative bleeding undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To improve the management of morbidly obese patients who undergo gastric bypass surgery to reduce the number of postoperative complications, in particular, bleeding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: From 2011 to 2022, a total of 348 patients with morbid obesity (MO) underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass treatment at the clinical base of the Department of General Surgery №2 of Bogomolets National Medical University. The retrospective group included 178 patients who received treatment between 2011 and 2019. 170 patients were enrolled in the prospective group for the period from 2019 to 2022. RESULTS: Results: Retrospective group had 8 episodes of postoperative bleeding, representing a rate of 4.49%, prospective group - 3 episodes of postoperative bleeding, representing a rate of 1.76% Four factor characteristics associated with the probability of bleeding were identified: "number of comorbid conditions", "arterial hypertension", "chronic liver diseases" and "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease". CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The factors responsible for the occurrence of postoperative bleeding in morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery were the number of comorbid conditions, the presence of arterial hypertension, the presence of chronic liver diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A new strategy for the management of morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic gastric bypass was developed. This strategy involves changing cassettes to create gastroentero- and enteroenteroanastomoses, reducing the period of use of the nasogastric tube, drains, and urinary catheter from 3-4 days to 1 day, and resuming the drinking regimen 6 hours after extubation.

Association between geospatial disparities in food security with weight loss and nutritional outcomes of metabolic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity has been linked to higher rates of obesity. It has also been shown to diminish the effectiveness of weight loss strategies, including intensive lifestyle interventions. One essential component of food insecurity is having a geospatial disadvantage in access to healthy, affordable food, such as living within a food desert. This study aims to determine if food insecurity also impacts weight loss and nutritional outcomes in patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: Clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RYGB or SG at Cleveland Clinic or affiliate regional hospitals in the United States from 2010 to 2018 were collected. Modified Retail Food Environmental Index (mRFEI) data was collected from the Center for Disease Control and merged with patient census tract data, allowing the patient cohort to be divided into those living in areas identified as food secure (mRFEI > 10%), food swamps (mRFEI = 1-10%), or food deserts (mRFEI = 0). Postoperative weight change was evaluated with quadratic growth mixture models and stratified by surgery type. RESULTS: A total of 5097 patients were included in this study cohort, including 3424 patients who underwent RYGB and 1673 who underwent SG. The median duration of follow-up was 2.3 years (IQR 0.89-3.6 years). Food security status was not associated with postoperative weight change (RYGB p = 0.73, SG p = 0.60), weight loss nadir (RYGB p = 0.60, SG p = 0.79), or weight regain (RYGB p = 0.93, SG p = 0.85). Deficiencies in nutritional markers at 1-2 years after surgery were also not significantly different between food security groups. CONCLUSION: Despite the established relationship between food insecurity and obesity, food insecurity does not negatively impact weight loss or nutritional outcomes following RYGB or SG, demonstrating metabolic surgery as a powerful and equitable tool for treating obesity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

High prevalence of dysfunctional uterine bleeding in candidates for metabolic/bariatric surgery: increased endometrial cancer risk?

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the strongest obesity-associated malignancy and the fastest-growing cancer in young women. Early identification of EC and other endometrial pathology (malignant and nonmalignant) in women with severe obesity may improve treatment options and uterine preservation. Screening for endometrial pathology using abnormal or postmenopausal uterine bleeding (APUB) as a surrogate in women pursuing metabolic/bariatric surgery may be clinically beneficial, but data supporting this effort are limited. OBJECTIVE: To develop and institute a screening program for APUB as a surrogate for endometrial pathology in bariatric surgery candidates. SETTING: Two, academic metabolic/bariatric surgery programs in Louisiana, United States. METHODS: The Modified SAMANTA is a 10-item questionnaire that was implemented to identify patients with APUB, specifically combining tools designed to identify anovulatory/postmenopausal and heavy menstrual bleeding. Demographic (age, race), body mass index, and questionnaire data were analyzed with respect to positive screening using data from March 2021 through May 2023. RESULTS: Of 1371 eligible women presenting for surgical evaluation, 664 (48.4%) positive screens were identified and referred for gynecologic evaluation to rule out endometrial hyperplasia/cancer or other endometrial pathology. The likelihood of positive screening for APUB was associated with increasing BMI (P = .001) and Black/African American race (P = .003), as well as increasing SAMANTA score (P < .001). In contrast, risk of positive screening was negatively associated with increasing age (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Women presenting for metabolic/bariatric surgery have a high prevalence of APUB and, given this dysfunctional bleeding and concurrent obesity, are at greater risk for underlying EC. Potential risk factors for APUB, given their associations with screening positive, include increased body mass index, younger age, and Black/African American race. Standardized screening with appropriate gynecologic referral should be a routine part of the overall evaluation for women with severe obesity.

Bariatric surgery and diabetes: Current challenges and perspectives.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity have become public issues of global concern. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of obesity combined with type 2 DM has been shown to be a safe and effective approach; however, there are limited studies that have systematically addressed the challenges of surgical treatment of obesity combined with DM. In this review, we summarize and answer the most pressing questions in the field of surgical treatment of obesity-associated DM. I believe that our insights will be of great help to clinicians in their daily practice.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The rapid increase in obesity and related problems has heightened the importance of obesity and metabolic surgery, resulting in a continuing search for the ideal surgical method. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), which is the gold standard method, and the relatively newer method of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent RYGB and SASI bypass were reviewed and compared regarding excess weight loss (EWL) and HgA1c, fasting glucose, serum iron, ferritin, hemoglobin (Hgb), and vitamin B12 levels. RESULTS: The body mass index was significantly lower (p = 0.003), and the %EWL was significantly higher (p = 0.023) at 6 months postoperative in patients who underwent SASI bypass. Both groups had similar results at the other follow-up visits. The mean HgA1c levels at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits were significantly lower in SASI patients (p = 0.037 and p = 0.012, respectively). At the 24-month follow-up, no difference was detected in HgA1c levels between the groups (p = 0.476). In patients who underwent RYGB, ferritin (p < 0.001), plasma iron (p = 0.001), and Hgb levels (p = 0.001) were significantly lower at 12, 24, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSION: SASI bypass is effective and comparable to RYGB in terms of EWL and metabolic control and has the advantage of not producing excluded segments and reducing nutritional deficiencies.

Role of GLP1-RA in Optimizing Weight Loss Post-Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bariatric surgery is a widely used intervention for significant weight loss, yet some patients face challenges with insufficient weight loss or weight regain post-surgery. To address this issue, adjunctive treatments like glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are being explored for their potential to enhance weight loss outcomes. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of GLP1-RAs in improving weight loss after bariatric surgery compared to a placebo. By systematically reviewing and analyzing data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 130 patients, we found that GLP1-RA therapy, particularly liraglutide (1.8-3 mg), significantly reduced mean BMI and body weight percentage at six months. Future studies should explore newer GLP1-RAs with weekly dosing and include longer follow-up periods to assess the durability of these outcomes.

Characteristics of Patients Lost to Follow-up after Bariatric Surgery.

After bariatric surgery lifelong follow-up is recommended. Evidence of the consequences and reasons for being lost to follow-up (LTFU) is sparse. In this prospective study follow-up data of all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2008 and 2017 at a certified obesity centre were investigated. LTFU patients were evaluated through a structured telephone interview. Overall, 573 patients (female/male 70.9%/29.1%), aged 44.1 ± 11.2 years, preoperative BMI 52.1 ± 8.4 kg/m2 underwent bariatric surgery. Out of these, 33.2% had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 74.4% had arterial hypertension. A total of 290 patients were LTFU, of those 82.1% could be reached. Baseline characteristics of patients in follow-up (IFU) and LTFU were comparable, but men were more often LTFU (p = 0.01). Reported postoperative total weight loss (%TWL) and improvements of comorbidities were comparable, but %TWL was higher in patients remaining in follow-up for at least 2 years (p = 0.013). Travel issues were mentioned as the main reason for being LTFU. A percentage of 77.6% of patients reported to regularly supplement micronutrients, while 71.0% stated regular monitoring of their micronutrient status, mostly by primary care physicians. Despite comparable reported outcomes of LTFU to IFU patients, the duration of the in-centre follow-up period affected %TWL. There is a lack of sufficient supplementation and monitoring of micronutrients in a considerable number of LTFU patients.