FLASH Effect Is Not Always Induced by Ultra-high Dose-rate Proton Irradiation Under Hypoxic Conditions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pre-clinical studies have shown that irradiation with electrons at an ultra-high dose-rate (FLASH) spares normal tissue while maintaining tumor control. However, most in vitro experiments with protons have been conducted using a non-clinical irradiation system in normoxia alone. This study evaluated the biological response of non-tumor and tumor cells at different oxygen concentrations irradiated with ultra-high dose-rate protons using a clinical system and compared it with the conventional dose rate (CONV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-tumor cells (V79) and tumor cells (U-251 and A549) were irradiated with 230 MeV protons at a dose rate of >50 Gy/s or 0.1 Gy/s under normoxic or hypoxic (<2%) conditions. The surviving fraction was analyzed using a clonogenic cell survival assay. RESULTS: No significant difference in the survival of non-tumor or tumor cells irradiated with FLASH was observed under normoxia or hypoxia compared to the CONV. CONCLUSION: Proton irradiation at a dose rate above 40 Gy/s, the FLASH dose rate, did not induce a sparing effect on either non-tumor or tumor cells under the conditions examined. Further studies are required on the influence of various factors on cell survival after FLASH irradiation.

Extracellular vesicles in tumor angiogenesis and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy.

Tumor angiogenesis plays an important role in the development of cancer as it allows the delivery of oxygen, nutrients, and growth factors as well as tumor dissemination to distant organs. Although anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) has been approved for treating various advanced cancers, this potential strategy has limited efficacy due to resistance over time. Therefore, there is a critical need to understand how resistance develops. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nano-sized membrane-bound phospholipid vesicles produced by cells. A growing body of evidence suggests that tumor cell-derived EVs (T-EVs) directly transfer their cargoes to endothelial cells (ECs) to promote tumor angiogenesis. Importantly, recent studies have reported that T-EVs may play a major role in the development of resistance to AAT. Moreover, studies have demonstrated the role of EVs from non-tumor cells in angiogenesis, although the mechanisms involved are still not completely understood. In this review, we provide a comprehensive description of the role of EVs derived from various cells, including tumor cells and non-tumor cells, in tumor angiogenesis. Moreover, from the perspective of EVs, this review summarized the role of EVs in the resistance to AAT and the mechanisms involved. Due to their role in the resistance of AAT, we here proposed potential strategies to further improve the efficacy of AAT by inhibiting T-EVs.

Nanomaterial-induced pyroptosis: a cell type-specific perspective.

This review presents the advancements in nanomaterial (NM)-induced pyroptosis in specific types of cells. We elucidate the relevance of pyroptosis and delineate its mechanisms and classifications. We also retrospectively analyze pyroptosis induced by various NMs in a broad spectrum of non-tumorous cellular environments to highlight the multifunctionality of NMs in modulating cell death pathways. We identify key knowledge gaps in current research and propose potential areas for future exploration. This review emphasizes the need to focus on less-studied areas, including the pathways and mechanisms of NM-triggered pyroptosis in non-tumor-specific cell types, the interplay between biological and environmental factors, and the interactions between NMs and cells. This review aims to encourage further investigations into the complex interplay between NMs and pyroptosis, thereby providing a basis for developing safer and more effective nanomedical therapeutic applications.

[Latest Research Findings on the Role of Non-Tumor Cells in Glioma Microenvironment].

As the tumor cell-centered treatment strategies cannot curb the malignant progression of glioblastoma effectively, the therapeutic effect of glioblastoma is still not satisfactory. In addition to glioma cells, glioma microenvironment (GME) comprises massive numbers of non-tumor cells and soluble cytokines. The non-tumor cells include endothelial cells, pericytes, microglia/macrophages, mesenchymal cells, astrocytes, neurons, etc. These non-tumor cell components, together with glioma cells, form one organism which regulates the progression of glioma. Considerable progress has been been in research on GME, which will be conducive to the development of non-tumor cell targeted therapies and and improvements in the prognosis of glioma patients. Herein, we summarized the interaction of glioma cells with endothelial cells, pericytes, microglia/macrophages, astrocytes, neurons and mesenchymal cells, a topic that has been extensively researched, as well as the corresponding translational studies. We also discussed the potential challenges and opportunities of developing glioma treatments based on tumor microenvironment.