Prejudice and Fear as Influences in Relation to a Successful Organ Donation - Experiences of Immigrants Living in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether fear and prejudice in relation to organ donation and the transplantation of organs may influence the decision to become an organ donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected through four group interviews using open-ended questions and qualitative content analysis. Forty participants, 16 males and 24 females from seven countries, participated in the focus group interviews. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in three main categories, and nine subcategories. Fears and prejudice caused by tradition and customs, approval of organ donation by family members, perception of the body as a gift from parents, the influence of religious leaders, knowledge about the religious understanding of organ donation, influence of social ambience on respondents, knowledge of the donation process in the healthcare system, including knowing about life after eventual organ donation, were some of predictors in the decision to agree to organ donation. CONCLUSION: More education on the factors that influence organ donation, more information in schools, health institutions and through the media, as well as more research with the aim of "dispelling" fears and prejudice about organ donation would significantly improve the current situation and result in a larger number of potential organ donors.

Impact of Dual Thoracic Recovery from Circulatory Death Donors on Heart and Lung Transplant Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Concomitant heart and lung recovery can result in increased operative complexity, ischemic time, and competition for resources and anatomic territory. Dual thoracic recovery from circulatory death donors (DCD) may have additional risks that are not fully understood. We investigated the effects of dual heart and lung recovery from DCD donors on thoracic transplant outcomes. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we categorized all adult thoracic DCD transplants 2019-2023 by whether the donor heart, lung, or both (dual donors) were recovered. Heart and lung transplant outcomes were compared between dual recovery donors and heart-only or lung-only donors, respectively, using multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of the 2,513 donors included, 42.9% were heart-only,45.0% were lung-only, and 12.0% were dual donors. Recipients of dual versus heart-only donors had similar likelihood of post-transplant dialysis (18.9% vs. 18.3%, p=0.84), likelihood of stroke (2.9% vs. 4.7%, p=0.34), and 2-year risk of mortality (aHR 1.15 [95% CI: 0.90-1.47], p=0.26), but lower likelihood of acute rejection (10.2% vs. 16.1%, p=0.04). Recipients of dual and lung-only donors had similar likelihood of pre-discharge acute rejection (7.6% vs. 8.5%, p=0.70), intubation at 72 hours (38.9% vs. 45.1%, p=0.13), and ECMO at 72 hours (13.1% vs. 18.1%, p=0.11), as well as 2-year risk of mortality (aHR 1.16 [95% CI: 0.74-1.82], p=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Recovering both the heart and lungs from a DCD donor does not negatively impact transplant outcomes. Outcomes in this population should continue to be investigated as more data and longer-term follow up become available.

Cold ischemia time in liver transplantation: An overview.

The standard approach to organ preservation in liver transplantation is by static cold storage and the time between the cross-clamping of a graft in a donor and its reperfusion in the recipient is defined as cold ischemia time (CIT). This simple definition reveals a multifactorial time frame that depends on donor hepatectomy time, transit time, and recipient surgery time, and is one of the most important donor-related risk factors which may influence the graft and recipient's survival. Recently, the growing demand for the use of marginal liver grafts has prompted scientific exploration to analyze ischemia time factors and develop different organ preservation strategies. This review details the CIT definition and analyzes its different factors. It also explores the most recent strategies developed to implement each timestamp of CIT and to protect the graft from ischemic injury.

Living Donor Decision-Making and the Complex Interplay of Finances and Other Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators.

INTRODUCTION: The decision to become a living donor requires consideration of a complex, interactive array of factors that could be targeted for clinical, policy, and educational interventions. Our objective was to assess how financial barriers interact with motivators, other barriers, and facilitators during this process. METHODS: Data were obtained from a public survey assessing motivators, barriers, and facilitators of living donation. We used multivariable logistic regression and consensus k-means clustering to assess interactions between financial concerns and other considerations in the decision-making process. RESULTS: Among 1592 respondents, the average age was 43; 74% were female and 14% and 6% identified as Hispanic and Black, respectively. Among employed respondents (72%), 40% indicated that they would not be able to donate without lost wage reimbursement. Stronger agreement with worries about expenses and dependent care challenges was associated with not being able to donate without lost wage reimbursement (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0-1.3; OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.3, respectively). Four respondent clusters were identified. Cluster 1 had strong motivators and facilitators with minimal barriers. Cluster 2 had barriers related to health concerns, nervousness, and dependent care. Clusters 3 and 4 had financial barriers. Cluster 3 also had anxiety related to surgery and dependent care. CONCLUSIONS: Financial barriers interact primarily with health and dependent care concerns when considering living organ donation. Targeted interventions to reduce financial barriers and improve provider communication regarding donation-related risks are needed.

A ten-year retrospective analysis of decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy after severe brain injury and its implications for donation after brain death.

Craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy are among the therapeutic options to prevent or treat secondary damage after severe brain injury. The choice of procedure depends, among other things, on the type and severity of the initial injury. It remains controversial whether both procedures influence the neurological outcome differently. Thus, estimating the risk of brain herniation and death and consequently potential organ donation remains difficult. All patients at the University Hospital Münster for whom an isolated craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy was performed as a treatment after severe brain injury between 2013 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Proportion of survivors and deceased were evaluated. Deceased were further analyzed regarding anticoagulants, comorbidities, type of brain injury, potential and utilized donation after brain death. 595 patients were identified, 296 patients survived, and 299 deceased. Proportion of decompressive craniectomy was higher than craniotomy in survivors (89% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Brain death was diagnosed in 12 deceased and 10 donations were utilized. Utilized donations were comparable after both procedures (5% vs. 2%, p = 0.194). Preserved brain stem reflexes as a reason against donation did not differ between decompressive craniectomy or craniotomy (32% vs. 29%, p = 0.470). Patients with severe brain injury were more likely to survive after decompressive craniectomy than craniotomy. Among the deceased, potential and utilized donations did not differ between both procedures. This suggests that brain death can occur independent of the previous neurosurgical procedure and that organ donation should always be considered in end-of-life decisions for patients with a fatal prognosis.

Potential kidney donors among patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and a termination of resuscitation rule.

IMPORTANCE: Uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCD) has been developed and can serve as a source of kidneys for transplantation, especially when considering patients that meet extended criteria donation (ECD). OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the theorical size and characteristics of the potential pool of kidney transplants from uDCD with standard criteria donation (SCD) and ECD among patients who meet Termination of Resuscitation (TOR) criteria following Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA). METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: This study focused on adult patients experiencing unexpected OHCA, who were prospectively enrolled in the Parisian registry from May 16th, 2011, to December 31st, 2020. RESULTS: During the study period, EMS attempted resuscitation for 19,976 OHCA patients, of which 64.5% (12,890) had no return of spontaneous circulation. Among them, 47.4% (9,461) had TOR criteria, representing no chance of survival, and from them, 8.8% (1,764) met SCD criteria and could be potential organ donors and 33.6% (6,720) met ECD for kidney donors. The mean potential number per year of uDCD candidates with SCD and ECD remain stable respectively around 98 (±10.8) and 672 (±103.8) cases per year. Elderly patients (≥65 y.o.) represented 61.2% (n=5,763/9,461) of patients who met TOR and 100% (5763/5763) of patients who could have matched both ECD criteria and TOR. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Implementing uDCD program including SCD and ECD for kidney transplantation among OHCA cases quickly identified by the TOR, holds significant potential to substantially broaden the pool of organ donors. These programs could offer a viable solution to address the pressing burden of kidney shortage, particularly benefiting elderly recipients who may otherwise face prolonged waiting times and limited access to suitable organs.

Qualitative Content and Discourse Analysis Comparing the Current Consent Systems for Deceased Organ Donation in Spain and England.

England switched to an opt-out system of consent in 2020 aiming to increase the number of organs available. Spain also operates an opt-out system yet has almost twice the organ donations per million population compared with England. We aimed to identify both differences and similarities in the consent policies, documents and procedures in deceased donation between the two countries using comparative qualitative content and discourse analysis. Spain had simpler, locally tailored documents, the time taken for families to review and process information may be shorter, there were more pathways leading to organ donation in Spain, and more robust legal protections for the decisions individuals made in life. The language in the Spanish documents was one of support and reassurance. Documents in England by comparison appeared confusing, since additions were designed to protect the NHS against risk and made to previous document versions to reflect the law change rather than being entirely recast. If England's ambition is to achieve consent rates similar to Spain this analysis has highlighted opportunities that could strengthen the English system-by giving individuals' decisions recorded on the organ donor register legal weight, alongside unifying and simplifying consent policies and procedures to support families and healthcare professionals.

Japanese Perception of Organ Donation and Implications for New Medical Technologies: Quantitative and Qualitative Social Media Analyses.

BACKGROUND: The Rapid Autopsy Program (RAP) is a valuable procedure for studying human biology and diseases such as cancer. However, implementing the RAP in Japan necessitates a thorough understanding of concepts such as good death and the integration of sociocultural aspects. By revising perceptions of organ donation on social media, we bring attention to the challenges associated with implementing new medical research procedures such as the RAP. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine YouTube and Twitter/X to identify stakeholders, evaluate the quality of organ donation communication, and analyze sociocultural aspects associated with organ donation. Based on our findings, we propose recommendations for the implementation of new medical research procedures. METHODS: Using the term "" (organ donation), we collected data from YouTube and Twitter/X, categorizing them into 5 dimensions: time, individuality, place, activity, and relationships. We utilized a scale to evaluate the quality of organ donation information and categorized YouTube videos into 3 groups to analyze their differences using statistical methods. Additionally, we conducted a text-based analysis to explore narratives associated with organ donation. RESULTS: Most YouTube videos were uploaded in 2021 (189/638, 29.6%) and 2022 (165/638, 25.9%), while tweets about organ donation peaked between 2019 and 2022. Citizens (184/770, 23.9%), media (170/770, 22.0%), and unknown actors (121/770, 15.7%) were the primary uploaders of videos on organ donation. In a sample of average retweeted and liked tweets, citizens accounted for the majority of identified users (64/91, 70%, and 65/95, 68%, respectively). Regarding Japanese regions, there were numerous information videos about organ donation in Hokkaido (F2.46,147.74=-5.28, P=.005) and Kyushu and Okinawa (F2.46,147.74=-5.28, P=.005). On Twitter/X, Japan and China were the most frequently mentioned countries in relation to organ donation discussions. Information videos often focused on themes such as borrowed life and calls to register as donors, whereas videos categorized as no information and misinformation frequently included accusations of organ trafficking, often propagated by Chinese-American media. Tweets primarily centered around statements of donation intention and discussions about family consent. The majority of video hyperlinks directed users to YouTube and Twitter/X platforms, while Twitter/X hyperlinks predominantly led to news reports from Japanese media outlets. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant potential to implement new medical research procedures such as the RAP in Japan. Recommendations include conceptualizing research data as borrowed data, implementing horizontally diversified management of donation programs, and addressing issues related to science misinformation and popular culture trends.

Oxygenated versus non-oxygenated flush out during deceased donor liver procurement: The first proof-of-concept study in humans.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is used for treating end-stage liver disease, fulminant hepatitis, and oncological malignancies and organ shortage is a major limiting factor worldwide. The use of grafts based on extended donor criteria have become internationally accepted. Oxygenated machine perfusion technologies are the most recent advances in organ transplantation; however, it is only applied after a period of cold ischemia. Due to its high cost, we aimed to use a novel device, OxyFlush®, based on oxygenation of the preservation solution, applied during liver procurement targeting the maintenance of ATP during static cold storage (SCS). METHODS: Twenty patients were randomly assigned to the OxyFlush or control group based on a 1:1 ratio. In the OxyFlush group, the perfusion solution was oxygenated with OxyFlush® device while the control group received a non-oxygenated solution. Liver and the common bile duct (CBD) biopsies were obtained at three different time points. The first was at the beginning of the procedure, the second during organ preparation, and the third after total liver reperfusion. Biopsies were analyzed, and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels and histological scores of the liver parenchyma and CBD were assessed. Postoperative laboratory tests were performed. RESULTS: OxyFlush® was able to maintain ATP levels during SCS and improved the damage caused by the lack of oxygen in the CBD. However, OxyFlush® did not affect laboratory test results and histological findings of the parenchyma. CONCLUSION: We present a novel low-cost device that is feasible and could represent a valuable tool in organ preservation during SCS.

Does the use of double hormone replacement therapy for trauma patient organ donors improve organ recovery for transplant.

BACKGROUND: With an ongoing demand for transplantable organs, optimization of donor management protocols, specifically in trauma populations, is important for obtaining a high yield of viable organs per patient. Endocrine management of brain-dead potential organ donors (BPODs) is controversial, leading to heterogeneous clinical management approaches. Previous studies have shown that when levothyroxine was combined with other treatments, including steroids, vasopressin, and insulin, BPODs had better organ recovery and survival outcomes were increased for transplant recipients. AIM: To determine if levothyroxine use in combination with steroids in BPODs increased the number of organs donated in trauma patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult BPODs from a single level 1 trauma center over ten years was performed. Exclusion criteria included patients who were not solid organ donors, patients who were not declared brain dead (donation after circulatory death), and patients who did not receive steroids in their hospital course. Levothyroxine and steroid administration, the number of organs donated, the types of organs donated, and demographic information were recorded. Univariate analyses were performed with P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients met inclusion criteria, 69 (78%) of whom received levothyroxine and steroids (ST/LT group) vs 19 (22%) receiving steroids without levothyroxine (ST group). No differences were observed between the groups for gender, race, pertinent injury factors, age, or other hormone therapies used (P > 0.05). In the ST/LT group, 68.1% (n = 47) donated a high yield (3-5) of organ types per donor compared to 42.1% (n = 8) in the ST group (P = 0.038). There was no difference in the total number of organ types donated between the groups (P = 0.068). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that combining levothyroxine and steroid administration increases high-yield organ donation per donor in BPODs in the trauma patient population. Limitations to this study include the retrospective design and the relatively small number of organ donors who met inclusion criteria. This study is unique in that it mitigates steroid administration as a confounding variable and focuses specifically on the adjunctive use of levothyroxine.

Critical care specialists, the missing link in organ procurement for transplantation.

The procurement process for organ donation begins with the identification of potential organ donors in emergency or critical care units (CCU), followed by their clinical evaluation, diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic interventions, mostly conducted in CCUs. It concludes with the request for organ donation and, if accepted, the retrieval of organs. Despite most interventions occurring in detection units, there has been a neglect of the strategic role played by critical care specialists (CCS) in managing and caring for brain-dead or near-brain-death patients. Questions arise: Are they willing to undertake this responsibility? Do they fully comprehend the nature of organ procurement? Are they aware of the specific interventions required to maintain possible organ donors in optimal physiological condition? Our objective is to examine the role of CCS in organ procurement and propose ways to enhance it, ultimately aiming to increase and enhance organ donation rates.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Organ Donation Among the Population of Al-Majma'ah Region, Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Organ donation plays a pivotal role in addressing the global demand for transplantable organs and saving lives. The success of organ transplantation relies not only on medical advancements but also on the willingness of communities to participate in organ donation programs. In Saudi Arabia, specifically within the Al-Majma'ah region, understanding the dynamics of knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to organ donation is crucial for promoting a sustainable and ethical organ donation system. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective study was utilized in this research, employing data from a sample of 564 participants from the general population of the Al-Majma'ah region, Saudi Arabia. The participants completed a self-administered questionnaire and ensured anonymity. RESULTS: About 545 (96.6%) respondents were familiar with the concept of organ donation, and 455 (80.7%) participants recognized the necessity for the blood groups of the donor and recipient to match before the transplant process. About 412 (73.0%) participants agreed with the practice of organ donation with 326 (57.8%) expressing support for the practice. About 417 (73.9%) participants reported that their religion permits or endorses organ donation/transplantation. A total of 151 individuals (26.8%) had a low knowledge level, with total scores below 50% (6 or lower). In contrast, 280 people (4.7%) demonstrated a moderate level of knowledge (scoring between 50% and 75%) (7 to 9). Additionally, 133 individuals (23.5%) showcased a high level of knowledge, with scores exceeding 75% (10 or higher). The study established a statistically significant association between age, marital status with p-values < 0.05 (0.001*), and the knowledge score toward organ donation. However, gender and monthly household income were not significantly associated with knowledge score toward organ transplant with p-values (p-value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The research findings indicated a moderate level of knowledge and a positive attitude toward organ donation among the general population of the Al-Majma'ah region in Saudi Arabia. Age and marital status were found to be significantly associated with the knowledge score toward organ donation. The study noted the desire and willingness to save lives through organ donation by the residents of the Al-Majma'ah region in Saudi Arabia.

The role of critical care nurses in organ and tissue donation: A position statement of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses.

INTRODUCTION: Australian organ and tissue donation rates are low compared to other countries. Acknowledging that donation practices vary across Australia, the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses supported the development of a position statement to explicate critical care nurses' role in supporting organ and tissue donation. Several Australian peak professional organisations provide guidance to inform and support organ and tissue donation. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a position statement using contemporary Australian research evidence to build upon and complement existing guidance, focussing on the role of critical care nurses in organ and tissue donation in Australian critical care. METHOD: An approach similar to a rapid review was used, providing a streamlined approach to synthesising evidence. A comprehensive search using Medical Subject Headings, keywords, and synonyms was undertaken using Medline and CINAHL Complete via EBSCOhost to identify peer-reviewed Australian research evidence about critical care nurses' role, obligations, expectations, and scope of practice during organ and tissue donation. Narrative synthesis was used to synthesise the research evidence. FINDINGS: The importance of separating death from organ donation in discussions with family, the timing and the approach to organ donation conversations, and working in collaboration with the DonateLife Donation Specialist Nurses were identified. The importance of understanding family perspectives, caring for families, and collegial support for critical care clinicians were also identified. With the guidance of peak professional organisations, the research evidence was then used to develop practice recommendations for critical care units, leaders, and critical care nurses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The recommendations explicate the important contribution critical care nurses can make to ensuring timely, sensitive communication, providing high-quality end-of-life care, supporting families irrespective of the donation decision and supporting colleagues from the wider critical care team, thereby optimising the processes related to organ and tissue donation in Australian critical care settings.

CT-Based Hounsfield Units for Pre-donation Liver Steatosis Assessment: Enhancing Transplant Outcomes and Efficiency.

Steatotic liver grafts are associated with increased post-transplant complications and graft failure. The field of transplantation faces a challenge in the absence of a reliable pre-donation protocol for quantitatively assessing steatosis in cadaveric liver grafts. Current pre-donation evaluation protocols often involve non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest and/or abdomen as an initial step in organ donation assessment. These routine scans have the potential to identify and quantify hepatic fat content when more than 20% of the liver parenchyma is affected. By incorporating both abdominal and thoracic CT scans during the donor workup, an assessment of the quality of the liver and spleen can be achieved. Our study is based on the hypothesis that a precise pre-donation evaluation utilizing Hounsfield units (HU) derived from CT images of the liver and spleen can provide transplant programs with crucial data regarding the extent of steatosis. This approach is envisioned as a significant advancement that could potentially eliminate the need for preoperative liver biopsies by offering essential information to streamline the evaluation process.

Ten Years of Quality Monitoring of Abdominal Organ Procurement in the Netherlands and Its Impact on Transplant Outcome.

In this study, 10 years of procurement quality monitoring data were analyzed to identify potential risk factors associated with procurement-related injury and their association with long-term graft survival. All deceased kidney, liver, and pancreas donors from 2012 to 2022 and their corresponding recipients in the Netherlands were retrospectively included. The incidence of procurement-related injuries and potential risk factors were analyzed. Of all abdominal organs procured, 23% exhibited procurement-related injuries, with a discard rate of 4.0%. In kidneys and livers, 23% of the grafts had procurement-related injury, with 2.5% and 4% of organs with procurement-related injury being discarded, respectively. In pancreas procurement, this was 27%, with a discard rate of 24%. Male donor gender and donor BMI >25 were significant risk factors for procurement-related injury in all three abdominal organs, whereas aberrant vascularization was significant only for the kidney and liver. In the multivariable Cox regression analyses, procurement-related injury was not a significant predictor for graft failure (kidney; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.75-1.33, p = 0.99, liver; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66-1.28, p = 0.61, pancreas: HR 1.16; 95% CI 0.16-8.68, p = 0.88). The findings of this study suggest that transplant surgeons exhibited good decision-making skills in determining the acceptability and repairability of procurement-related injuries.

What Italian PICU Healthcare Providers Think About Donation After Cardiocirculatory Determination of Death: A National Survey.

BACKGROUND: Italy presently does not have a pediatric organ donation program after cardiocirculatory determination of death (pDCDD). Before implementing a pDCDD program, many centers globally have conducted studies on the attitudes of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff. This research aims to minimize potential adverse reactions and evaluate the acceptance of the novel donation practice. METHODS: We conducted an electronic and anonymous survey on attitudes toward pDCDD among healthcare professionals (HCPs) working at eight Italian PICUs. The survey had three parts: (I) questions about general demographic data; (II) 18 statements about personal wishes to donate, experience of discussing donation, and knowledge about donation; (III) attitudinal statements regarding two pediatric Maastricht III scenarios of organ donation. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.4%, and the majority of respondents were nurses. Of those who responded, 45.3% worked in the Center, 40.8% in the North, and 12.8% in the South of Italy. In total, 93.9% supported pediatric organ and tissue donation, 90.3% supported donation after neurological determination of death (DNDD), 78.2% supported pDCDD, and 69.7% felt comfortable about the idea of participating in pDCDD on Type III patients, with a higher percentage of supportive responses in the Center (77.2%) than in the North (65.1%) and South (54.5%) of Italy (p-value < 0.004). Concerning scenarios, 79.3% of participants believed that organ retrieval took place in a patient who was already deceased. Overall, 27.3% considered their knowledge about DCDD to be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insight into the attitudes and knowledge of PICU staff members regarding pDCDD in Italy. Despite a general lack of knowledge on the subject, respondents showed positive attitudes toward pDCDD and a strong consensus that the Italian legislation protocol for determining death based on cardiocirculatory criteria respects the "dead donor rule." There were several distinctions among the northern, central, and southern regions of Italy, and in our view, these disparities can be attributed to the varying practices of commemorating the deceased. In order to assess how practice and training influence the attitude of PICU staff members, it would be interesting to repeat the survey after the implementation of a program.

A theory-driven organ donation campaign: a field intervention among university students in Iran.

Background: This study conducted an empirical evaluation of an intervention derived from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) aimed at implementing a health campaign among medical students at Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Methods: In this interventional study, a valid and reliable TPB-based questionnaire was administered before launching a health campaign titled "Organ Donation=Life Donation" among 260 medical students. The campaign was structured around nine steps: situation analysis, goal identification, target audience identification, strategy development, tactics establishment, media selection, timetable creation, budget planning, and program evaluation. Two months after the campaign, participants completed a posttest and were offered an organ donation card. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS ver. 16, employing descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage) and tests such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the paired-samples t-test. Results: All participants adopted more prodonation stances across all constructs measured, both immediately and 2 months after exposure to the health campaign, compared to their pretest scores. These results indicate that the health campaign had a significant impact on psychological variables such as attitudes (P<0.001), subjective norms (P<0.001), and perceived behavioral control (P<0.038), as well as on the actual acceptance of an organ donor card. Conclusions: Effective health education and promotion interventions, including health campaigns, are essential to encourage the use of organ donation cards. Additionally, current experiences indicate that the TPB serves as a suitable theoretical framework for designing organ donation interventions.

Why partial heart transplantation could be regulated as organ transplantation.

Partial heart transplant (PHT) is a recent clinical innovation involving the transplantation of a segment of the heart (valves) directly from the deceased donor into the recipient patient. This procedure holds out the possibility of significant benefit, especially for pediatric patients because these grafts show growth potential after transplant, reducing or eliminating the current need for repeat procedures. The clinical process for donation and transplant of partial heart (PH) grafts generally follows an organ clinical pathway; however, the Food and Drug Administration has recently stated its intent to regulate PH as tissues, raising a host of regulatory considerations. PHT requires donor testing and eligibility determinations within a short, clinically viable timeframe and, similar to organ transplant, involves donor-recipient matching. Waitlist allocation policies that are a regulatory focus of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network including equity and efficiency may become relevant. Oversight of PHT by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network could be accomplished through interpretation of the vascular composite allograft definition or through designation by the US Department of Health and Human Services of PH grafts as organs. While some clinical questions remain unanswered, it is important to carefully address these regulatory considerations to support the emergence of this innovation and ensure the continued trust of the donating public and the patients who may benefit from PHT.

Increasing positive attitudes towards organ donation and improving the competence of coping with death through organ transplant nursing course: A two-group quasi-experimental study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of an organ transplant nursing course offered to nursing students on increasing positive attitudes towards organ donation and developing competence in coping with death. BACKGROUND: Incorporating organ donation education into undergraduate nursing curricula and promoting of coping mechanisms for coping with death, has been emphasized as a critical foundation for the preparating of the next generation of nurses. DESIGN: Two-groups pre- and post-intervention evaluation quasi-experimental design study. METHODS: This study was conducted between February and July 2023 with a total of 237 nursing students studying at two different universities, 116 of whom took the organ transplant course and 121 of whom did not take the course. Sociodemographic Characteristics Form, Coping with Death Scale-Short Form and Organ Donation Attitudes Scale were used for data collection. Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-Square, t-test, Pearson correlation and linear regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the students who took organ transplant nursing courses and those who did not in terms of the mean scores of coping with death competence and positive and negative attitudes toward organ donation (p<0.05). It was found that taking an organ transplant nursing course affected nursing students' coping with death competence and their positive and negative attitudes toward organ donation (p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Taking the organ transplant nursing course was associated with improved competence in coping with death a increased positive and decreased negative attitudes.

The learning curve of COVID-19 and organ donation: Potential missed opportunities in the COVID era.

Background: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, positive COVID-19 status often disqualified potential organ donors due to perceived risks, despite limited evidence. Subsequent studies have clarified that the COVID-19 status of donors, particularly when incidental and not the cause of death, does not adversely affect non-lung transplant outcomes. This study quantifies the potential loss of eligible organ donors and the corresponding impact on organ availability during the initial phase of the pandemic. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we examined deceased donor referrals to a major organ procurement organization from June 2020 to January 2022. Referrals were categorized as All Referrals, Medically Ruled Out (MRO), or Procured Donors (PD). We used Chi-square tests for categorical comparisons and logistic regression to model additional donors and organs, contrasting COVID-negative and positive cases within age-matched cohorts. Results: Among 9478 referrals, 23.4 % (2221) were COVID-positive. Notably, COVID-positive referrals had a substantially higher MRO rate (80.6 % vs. 29.6 %, p < 0.01) and a markedly lower PD rate (0.2 % vs. 8.2 %, p < 0.01). Potential missed donations of 103 organs from COVID-positive referrals were identified. Conclusion: This OPO-level study demonstrates a substantial impact of COVID-19 status on organ donation rates, revealing significant missed opportunities. Improved management of donor COVID-19 status could potentially increase organ donations nationwide, taking into account evolving evidence and vaccine availability changes.