Leveraging sensor-based functional outcomes to enhance understanding of the patient experience: challenges and opportunities.

INTRODUCTION: Sensor-based digital health technology (DHT) has emerged as a promising means to assess patient functioning within and outside clinical trials. Sensor-based functional outcomes (SBFOs) provide valuable insights that complement other measures of how a patient feels or functions to enhance understanding of the patient experience to inform medical product development. AREAS COVERED: This perspective paper provides recommendations for defining SBFOs, discusses the core evidence required to support SBFOs to inform decision-making, and considers future directions for the field. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The clinical outcome assessment (COA) development process provides an important starting point for developing patient-centered SBFOs; however, given the infancy of the field, SBFO development may benefit from a hybrid approach to evidence generation by merging exploratory data analysis with patient engagement in measure development. Effective SBFO development requires combining unique expertise in patient engagement, measurement and regulatory science, and digital health and analytics. Challenges specific to SBFO development include identifying concepts of interest, ensuring measurement of meaningful aspects of health, and identifying thresholds for meaningful change. SBFOs are complementary to other COAs and, as part of an integrated evidence strategy, offer great promise in fostering a holistic understanding of patient experience and treatment benefits, particularly in real-world settings.

Patient-advocate-led global coalition adapting fit-for-purpose outcomes measures to assure meaningful inclusion of DEEs in clinical trials.

Existing clinical tools that measure non-seizure outcomes lack the range and granularity needed to capture skills in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE)-affected individuals who also fall in the severe to profound range of intellectual disability. This effectively excludes those with severe impairments from clinical trials, impeding the ability of sponsors to evaluate disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The Inchstone Project, an international, patient advocate-led collaboration, brings together leading researchers, clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, and advocates to develop an adapted, validated assessment battery within 5 years. The goal is to support trials of DMTs for the DEEs by providing sufficiently sensitive measurement tools to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy. An initial pilot study administered 7 established assessments to 10 individuals affected by SCN2A-DEE, identifying specific limitations of existing measures and areas for improvement. It was clear that most tools do not account for challenges throughout the DEE population, including vision impairments, significant motor impairments and profound intellectual disability, which need to be accounted for in creating a 'fit-for-purpose' battery for the DEE population. Several novel assessments, including two measures of responsivity developed for use in monitoring recovery after acquired brain injury as well as individualized Goal Attainment Scaling, showed promise in this group. The team also completed a DEE-wide survey with over 270 caregivers documenting their children's abilities and priorities for their improvement from new treatments. The Inchstone team is using this information to evaluate how existing tools might be updated to better capture what is most important to families and measure their child's small but important improvements over time. These efforts are building a coherent picture across multiple DEEs of what domains, or concepts of interest, have the greatest impact on most patients and families. The Inchstone team is on course to adapt non-seizure outcome measures that are (1) sufficiently sensitive to measure small increments of meaningful change ('Inchstones') and (2) applicable to multiple DEE conditions.

DEE-P Connection's Inchstone project is adapting assessment tools to measure the smallest developmental changes in those affected by developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) - severe epilepsy and related developmental disorders. More sensitive measures will allow profoundly impacted individuals to be effectively included in clinical trials and result in better DEE treatments. Caregivers of children with DEEs understand firsthand that clinical tools intended to measure non-seizure outcomes, like communication and motor skills, were not designed for and don't work for their children. More sensitive tools are needed to measure the small changes that occur in DEEs. The limitations of existing measurement tools for DEEs have significant consequences: - Non-seizure responses to new therapies cannot be measured without tools designed specifically for individuals with severe to profound intellectual disability.- If a response cannot be measured in a trial, a potentially beneficial impact will be missed and a therapy, having failed to demonstrate an effect, may not gain regulatory approval.- DEE-affected individuals are less likely to benefit from the wave of new disease-modifying therapies providing hope for many other rare genetic diseases. DEE-P Connections, a patient advocacy organization supporting families caring for those severely affected by DEEs, launched The Inchstone Project to address this problem. This team science research collaborative unites researchers, pharmaceutical companies, advocates and others around a shared vision of adapting existing tools to reliably capture the small but important changes in skills in those severely affected by DEEs. To better understand these gaps, the Inchstone team conducted a pilot study with 10 children with SCN2A DEE. The team administered multiple assessments to explore how to adapt the tools to better capture the abilities and growth of this population. The team also completed a comprehensive DEE-wide survey with over 270 caregivers documenting their children's abilities and priorities for their improvement from new treatments, helping to document how existing tools may be updated to better capture what's most important to families and measure their children's small but important improvements over time. The Inchstone Project is on course to assure those profoundly impacted by DEEs are meaningfully included in clinical trials by establishing trusted and reliable non-seizure measurement tools.

Clinical outcome assessments of disease burden and progression in late-onset GM2 gangliosidoses.

The late-onset GM2 gangliosidoses, comprising late-onset Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases, are rare, slowly progressive, neurogenetic disorders primarily characterized by neurogenic weakness, ataxia, and dysarthria. The aim of this longitudinal study was to characterize the natural history of late-onset GM2 gangliosidoses using a number of clinical outcome assessments to measure different aspects of disease burden and progression over time, including neurological, functional, and quality of life, to inform the design of future clinical interventional trials. Patients attending the United States National Tay-Sachs & Allied Diseases Family Conference between 2015 and 2019 underwent annual clinical outcome assessments. Currently, there are no clinical outcome assessments validated to assess late-onset GM2 gangliosidoses; therefore, instruments used or designed for diseases with similar features, or to address various aspects of the clinical presentations, were used. Clinical outcome assessments included the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale, the 9-Hole Peg Test, and the Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech. Twenty-three patients participated in at least one meeting visit (late-onset Tay-Sachs, n = 19; late-onset Sandhoff, n = 4). Patients had high disease burden at baseline, and scores for the different clinical outcome assessments were generally lower than would be expected for the general population. Longitudinal analyses showed slow, but statistically significant, neurological progression as evidenced by worsening scores on the 9-Hole Peg Test (2.68%/year, 95% CI: 0.13-5.29; p = 0.04) and the Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale neurological examination (1.31 points/year, 95% CI: 0.26-2.35; p = 0.02). Time since diagnosis to study entry correlated with worsening scores on the 9-Hole Peg Test (r = 0.728; p < 0.001), Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale neurological examination (r = 0.727; p < 0.001), and Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech intelligibility (r = -0.654; p = 0.001). In summary, patients with late-onset GM2 gangliosidoses had high disease burden and slow disease progression. Several clinical outcome assessments suitable for clinical trials showed only small changes and standardized effect sizes (change/standard deviation of change) over 4 years. These longitudinal natural history study results illustrate the challenge of identifying responsive endpoints for clinical trials in rare, slowly progressive, neurogenerative disorders where arguably the treatment goal is to halt or decrease the rate of decline rather than improve clinical status. Furthermore, powering such a study would require a large sample size and/or a long study duration, neither of which is an attractive option for an ultra-rare disease with no available treatment. These findings support the development of potentially more sensitive late-onset GM2 gangliosidoses-specific rating instruments and/or surrogate endpoints for use in future clinical trials.

Video-based assessments of activities of daily living: generating real-world evidence in pediatric rare diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Preserving function and independence to perform activities of daily living (ADL) is critical for patients and carers to manage the burden of care and improve quality of life. In children living with rare diseases, video recording ADLs offer the opportunity to collect the patients' experience in a real-life setting and accurately reflect treatment effectiveness on outcomes that matter to patients and families. AREAS COVERED: We reviewed the measurement of ADL in pediatric rare diseases and the use of video to develop at-home electronic clinical outcome assessments (eCOA) by leveraging smartphone apps and artificial intelligence-based analysis. We broadly searched PubMed using Boolean combinations of the following MeSH terms 'Rare Diseases,' 'Quality of Life,' 'Activities of Daily Living,' 'Child,' 'Video Recording,' 'Outcome Assessment, Healthcare,' 'Intellectual disability,' and 'Genetic Diseases, Inborn.' Non-controlled vocabulary was used to include human pose estimation in movement analysis. EXPERT OPINION: Broad uptake of video eCOA in drug development is linked to the generation of technical and clinical validation evidence to confidently assess a patient's functional abilities. Software platforms handling video data must align with quality regulations to ensure data integrity, security, and privacy. Regulatory flexibility and optimized validation processes should facilitate video eCOA to support benefit/risk drug assessment.

Discrimination and health: A cross-sectional study comparing Muslims with other-religious.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to report perceived discrimination among Muslims living in Norway and to address and compare associations between perceived discrimination and health among Muslims with an immigrant background and other-religious with an immigrant background. METHOD: A representative sample of individuals with an immigrant background in Norway was used in a cross-sectional study design that included 5484 respondents aged 16 to 74 years. The respondents were sub-grouped after religious affiliation, and as immigrants and Norwegian-born. This sample is from 'The Survey on living conditions among persons with an immigrant background 2016', conducted by Statistics Norway. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the relationship between perceived discrimination and self-rated health and between perceived discrimination and mental health problems. RESULTS: Our findings show that Muslims with an immigrant background are more likely to report perceived discrimination than non-Muslims with an immigrant background. Perceived discrimination was associated with poor self-rated health and mental health problems among immigrant Muslims and Norwegian-born Muslims. Among other-religious with an immigrant background, perceived discrimination had an inverse relationship with mental health problems among immigrants, while an association between perceived discrimination and poor self-rated health was found among Norwegian-born. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that perceived discrimination does play a role in health among minorities with an immigrant background in Norway, regardless of religion. However, the association between perceived discrimination and poor health seems to be stronger among Muslims, especially Norwegian-born Muslims.

Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength.

Muscle strength is routinely measured in patients with neuromuscular disorders by hand-held dynamometry incorporating a wireless load cell to evaluate disease severity and therapeutic efficacy, with magnitude of effect often based on normative reference values. While several hand-held dynamometers exist, their interchangeability is unknown which limits the utility of normative data. We investigated the variability between six commercially available dynamometers for measuring the isometric muscle strength of four muscle groups in thirty healthy individuals. Following electro-mechanical sensor calibration against knowns loads, Citec, Nicholas, MicroFET2, and Commander dynamometers were used to assess the strength of ankle dorsiflexors, hip internal rotators, and shoulder external rotators. Citec, Jamar Plus, and Baseline Hydraulic dynamometers were used to capture hand grip strength. Variability between dynamometers was represented as percent differences and statistical significance was calculated with one-way repeated measures ANOVA. Percent differences between dynamometers ranged from 0.2% to 16%. No significant differences were recorded between the Citec, Nicholas, and MicroFET2 dynamometers (p > 0.05). Citec grip strength measures differed to the Jamar Plus and Baseline Hydraulic dynamometers (p < 0.01). However, when controlling for grip circumference, they were comparable (p > 0.05). Several hand-held dynamometers can be used interchangeably to measure upper and lower limb strength, thereby maximising the use of normative reference values.

Defining clinical endpoints in limb girdle muscular dystrophy: a GRASP-LGMD study.

BACKGROUND: The Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophies (LGMDs) are characterized by progressive weakness of the shoulder and hip girdle muscles as a result of over 30 different genetic mutations. This study is designed to develop clinical outcome assessments across the group of disorders. METHODS/DESIGN: The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of a set of outcome measures on a wide range of LGMD phenotypes and ability levels to determine if it would be possible to use similar outcomes between individuals with different phenotypes. We will perform a multi-center, 12-month study of 188 LGMD patients within the established Genetic Resolution and Assessments Solving Phenotypes in LGMD (GRASP-LGMD) Research Consortium, which is comprised of 11 sites in the United States and 2 sites in Europe. Enrolled patients will be clinically affected and have mutations in CAPN3 (LGMDR1), ANO5 (LGMDR12), DYSF (LGMDR2), DNAJB6 (LGMDD1), SGCA (LGMDR3), SGCB (LGMDR4), SGCD (LGMDR6), or SGCG (LGMDR5, or FKRP-related (LGMDR9). DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the largest consortium organized to prospectively validate clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in LGMD at its completion. These assessments will help clinical trial readiness by identifying reliable, valid, and responsive outcome measures as well as providing data driven clinical trial decision making for future clinical trials on therapeutic agents for LGMD. The results of this study will permit more efficient clinical trial design. All relevant data will be made available for investigators or companies involved in LGMD therapeutic development upon conclusion of this study as applicable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03981289; Date of registration: 6/10/2019.

Development of a Conceptual Model for the Patient Experience of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy (IgAN): A Qualitative Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a kidney disorder that can lead to progressive kidney disease. Currently, there lacks a comprehensive overview of the symptoms and impacts experienced by those living with IgAN that would help inform the selection or development of fit-for-purpose clinical outcome assessments (COA) to be used in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to develop a conceptual model of the adult and pediatric patient experience of IgAN, including disease signs and symptoms, treatment side effects, and impact on functioning and well-being. METHODS: This study comprised a systematic review and thematic analysis of qualitative studies with adults and children diagnosed with IgAN. Data sources were identified through an electronic database search of journal articles (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO; June 2021), hand-searching of conference proceedings, patient advocacy group websites, and gray literature. Non-English articles were excluded. Identified data (patient/caregiver quotes, author summaries, and interpretations of patient experiences) were extracted from articles. Extracted data were qualitatively analyzed, aided by ATLAS.ti v7. Codes were applied to data; concepts (i.e., symptoms) were identified, named, and refined. A conceptual model was developed by grouping related concepts into domains. RESULTS: In total, five sources were identified for analysis: two journal articles, two online anthologies of patient stories, and one patient organization-sponsored "Voice of the Patient" meeting report. Conceptual model symptom domains included swelling/puffiness (edema), pain/aches/discomfort, fatigue, weight gain, sleep problems, urinary problems, and gastrointestinal problems. Impact domains included emotional/psychological well-being, physical functioning/activities of daily living, social functioning, work/school, and relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary analysis of published qualitative literature permitted development of a novel conceptual model depicting the patient experience of IgAN; however, its depth is limited by a lack of available literature. Further qualitative research is recommended to refine and/or confirm the concepts and domains, determine any relationships between them, and explore the outcomes that are most meaningful to patients. The refined model will provide a useful tool to inform the selection, development, and/or amendment of COAs for use in future IgAN clinical trials.

Clinician-Reported Physical and Cognitive Impairments After Convulsive Status Epilepticus: Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Clinician-reported outcome (ClinRO) measures are emerging as useful contributors to assessments of treatment benefits. The objective of this study was to collect ClinRO measures of physical and cognitive impairments after convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) requiring intensive care unit admission. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the data from HYBERNATUS, a multicenter open-label controlled trial that randomized 270 critically ill patients with CSE requiring mechanical ventilation in 11 French intensive care units to therapeutic hypothermia (32-34 °C for 24 h) plus standard care or standard care alone. We included all patients who attended a day 90 in-person neurologist visit with measurement of the functional independence measure (FIM) score (range from 18 [total assistance] to 126 [total independence]), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (range 0-30), and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score (1, death; 2, vegetative state; 3, severe disability; 4, moderate disability; and 5, mild or no disability). These three scores were compared across groups defined by several patient and CSE characteristics. RESULTS: Of 229 patients with GOS scores ≥ 3 on day 90 (male sex, 58.2%; median age, 56 years [47-67]), 67 (29%) attended an in-person neurologist visit. Twenty-nine (43%) patients had a previous history of epilepsy, and 16 (24%) patients had a primary brain insult. CSE was refractory in 22 (33%) patients. On day 90 after CSE onset, median FIM and MMSE scores were 121 (112-125) and 26.0 (24.0-28.8), respectively. The GOS score was 3 in 16 (33.8%) patients, 4 in 9 (13.4%) patients, and 5 in 42 (62.7%) patients. Worse GOS score values were significantly associated with worse FIM and MMSE scores. CONCLUSIONS: In patients attending the in-person neurologist visit on day 90 after CSE onset, ClinRO measures indicated that the main impairments were cognitive. FIM and MMSE scores were associated with GOS scores. Further studies are needed to evaluate the possible impact of neuroprotective and rehabilitation strategies on disability and cognitive impairments in survivors of CSE. Clinical trial registration NCT01359332.

Role of FDG PET/CT in Patients With Lymphoma Treated With Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy: Current Concepts.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a cellular therapy in which the patient's T cells are enhanced to recognize and bind to specific tumor antigens. CAR T-cell therapy was initially developed for the treatment of leukemia, but its current main indication is the treatment of relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. FDG PET/CT plays a fundamental role in the diagnosis, staging, therapy response assessment, and recurrence evaluation of patients with metabolically active lymphoma. Consistent with the examination's role in lymphoma management, FDG PET/CT is also the imaging modality of choice to evaluate patients before and after CAR T-cell therapy, and evidence supporting its utility in this setting continues to accumulate. In this article, we review current concepts in CAR T-cell therapy in patients with lymphoma, emphasizing the critical role of FDG PET/CT before and after therapy. A framework is presented that entails performing FDG PET/CT at four time points over the course of CAR T-cell therapy: pretherapy at baseline at the time of decision to administer CAR T-cell therapy and after any bridging therapies and posttherapy 1 and 3 months after infusion. PET parameters assessed at these time points predict various patient outcomes.

Clinical profiles and outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving standard and escalated doses of targeted therapies: findings from a global real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: Although dosing regimens of targeted therapies (TT) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are guided by market authorizations and clinical guidelines, little is known about clinical guideline adherence or outcomes in patients receiving escalated doses of TT due to lack of response. This real-world study explored the prevalence of dose escalation and compared outcomes between patients receiving standard and escalated TT doses. METHODS: Data were from the 2020-2021 Adelphi Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and their UC and CD patients across five European countries and the US. Physicians provided retrospective data collection of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment history, and satisfaction; patients reported quality-of-life and work productivity. Patients were grouped by TT maintenance dose; standard and escalated dose groups were compared. Outcomes were adjusted for time on current TT and severity at current TT initiation using regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1,241 UC and 1,477 CD patients, 19.1% and 24.1%, respectively, received escalated TT doses. Despite escalation, a substantial proportion of patients had not achieved remission, had moderate or severe disease activity, or were flaring. Most physicians were not fully satisfied with treatment in the escalated dose group and were more likely to switch patients to another treatment regimen than patients on standard dose. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation is not always an effective approach to resolve inadequate or loss of response in UC and CD, highlighting a need for more therapeutic options or alternative treatment strategies in patients unresponsive to TT.

Providing meaningful interpretation of performance outcome measures by co-calibration with patient-reported outcomes through the Rasch model: illustration with multiple sclerosis measures.

Performance outcome (PerfO) measures are based on tasks performed by patients in a controlled environment, making their meaningful interpretation challenging to establish. Co-calibrating PerfO and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of the same target concept allow for interpretation of the PerfO with the item content of the PRO. The Rasch model applied to the discretized PerfO measure together with the PRO items allows expressing parameters related to the PerfO measure in the PRO metric for it to be linked to the PRO responses. We applied this approach to two PerfO measures used in multiple sclerosis (MS) for walking and manual ability: the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) and the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). To determine meaningful interpretation of these two PerfO measures, they were co-calibrated with two PRO measures of closely related concepts, the MS walking scale - 12 items (MSWS-12) and the ABILHAND, using the data of 2,043 subjects from five global clinical trials in MS. The probabilistic relationships between the PerfO measures and the PRO metrics were used to express the response pattern to the PRO items as a function of the unit of the PerfOs. This example illustrates the promises of the co-calibration approach for the interpretation of PerfO measures but also highlights the challenges associated with it, mostly related to the quality of the PRO metric in terms of coverage of the targeted concept. Co-calibration with PRO measures could also be an adequate solution for interpretation of digital sensor measures whose meaningfulness is also often questioned.

Defining Clinical Endpoints in Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy: A GRASP-LGMD study.

Background: The Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophies (LGMDs) are characterized by progressive weakness of the shoulder and hip girdle muscles as a result of over 30 different genetic mutations. This study is designed to develop clinical outcome assessments across the group of disorders. Methods/design: The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the utility of a set of outcome measures on a wide range of LGMD phenotypes and ability levels to determine if it would be possible to use similar outcomes between individuals with different phenotypes. We will perform a multi-center, 12-month study of 188 LGMD patients within the established Genetic Resolution and Assessments Solving Phenotypes in LGMD (GRASP-LGMD) Research Consortium, which is comprised of 11 sites in the United States and 2 sites in Europe. Enrolled patients will be clinically affected and have mutations in CAPN3 (LGMDR1), ANO5 (LGMDR12), DYSF (LGMDR2), DNAJB6 (LGMDD1), SGCA (LGMDR3), SGCB (LGMDR4), SGCD (LGMDR6), or SGCG (LGMDR5, or FKRP-related (LGMDR9). Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the largest consortium organized to prospectively validate clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in LGMD at its completion. These assessments will help clinical trial readiness by identifying reliable, valid, and responsive outcome measures as well as providing data driven clinical trial decision making for future clinical trials on therapeutic agents for LGMD. The results of this study will permit more efficient clinical trial design. All relevant data will be made available for investigators or companies involved in LGMD therapeutic development upon conclusion of this study as applicable. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03981289; Date of registration: 6/10/2019.

Experience of Daily Life with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Qualitative Investigation and Assessment of Instrument Content Validity.

INTRODUCTION: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare autoimmune disease. Symptoms of gMG are diverse, and understanding of their impact on patients is limited. This qualitative study aimed to provide an in-depth exploration of patients' daily experiences of gMG. METHODS: Published qualitative studies were reviewed to identify the most important signs, symptoms, and functional impacts related to the patient experience in gMG. Semi-structured hybrid concept elicitation interviews (allowing spontaneous generation of disease concepts) and cognitive debriefing interviews (assessing the validity of existing disease assessments) were conducted with clinicians and adult patients with gMG. Signs, symptoms, and impacts were reviewed to understand which were most salient (i.e., reported by at least 50% of patients, with disturbance rating 5 or higher [10-point numeric scale]); concept saturation was also assessed. The disease conceptual model was updated. Existing clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) that capture how patients feel, function, and survive were assessed. RESULTS: Interviews with patients (n = 24) identified seven new signs and symptoms and 37 new impacts compared with the literature. Concept saturation was reached. Signs and symptoms identified by patients as most important (salient) were shortness of breath, general fatigue, muscle weakness of arms, legs, and neck, dysphonia, dysarthria, trouble swallowing liquids, choking, and heat sensitivity. Patient-identified salient impacts were work life, depression, difficulty walking, grooming hair, showering, and brushing teeth, eating, personal relationships, family life, and participating in social activities. Clinicians considered ocular, respiratory, swallowing, speech/talking, and extremity function as key clinical manifestations of gMG. Patients and clinicians found clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to be conceptually relevant and comprehensive. CONCLUSION: This research provides a holistic understanding of gMG signs, symptoms, and impacts experienced by patients, as observed by patients and clinicians. The conceptual model of gMG highlights the range of signs, symptoms, and impacts that adult patients with gMG experience in their everyday lives, emphasizing the humanistic impact and unmet needs.

Special Issue PRO-Analysis of Clinically Meaningful Change on Patient-Reported Outcomes: Renewed Insights About Covariate Adjustment.

Determining clinically meaningful change (CMC) in a patient-reported (PRO) measure is central to its existence in gauging how patients feel and function, especially for evaluating a treatment effect. Anchor-based approaches are recommended to estimate a CMC threshold on a PRO measure. Determination of CMC involves linking changes or differences in the target PRO measure to that in an external (anchor) measure that is easier to interpret than and appreciably associated with the PRO measure. One type of anchor-based approach for CMC is the "mean change method" where the mean change in score of the target PRO measure within a particular anchor transition level (e.g. one-category improvement) is subtracted from the mean change in score of within an adjacent anchor category (e.g. no change category). In the literature, the mean change method has been applied with and without an adjustment for the baseline scores for the PRO of interest. This article provides the analytic rationale and conceptual justification for keeping the analysis unadjusted and not controlling for baseline PRO scores. Two illustrative examples are highlighted. The current research is essentially a variation of Lord's paradox (where whether to adjust for a baseline variable depends on the research question) placed in a new context. Once the adjustment is made, the resulting CMC estimate reflects an artificial case where the anchor transition levels are forced to have the same average baseline PRO score. The unadjusted estimate acknowledges that the anchor transition levels are naturally occurring (not randomized) groups and thus maintains external validity.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE: This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

AIM: The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease." METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE: This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Patient Experience of Lichen Planus: A Qualitative Exploration of Signs, Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life Impacts.

INTRODUCTION: Lichen planus (LP) is an inflammatory skin disorder that can present in various forms across the body, including lesions on the skin (cutaneous LP [CLP]), scalp (lichen planopilaris [LPP]), and mucosal regions (mucosal LP [MLP]). Qualitative exploration of the patient experience of LP, notably symptoms and impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), is limited. A scarcity of research was also identified relating to emotional wellbeing impacts of CLP patients. Two qualitative studies were conducted with LP patients to address these gaps. METHODS: Study 1 consisted of exit interviews conducted with a subset of adult patients with MLP (n = 5), CLP (n = 4), and LPP (n = 4) enrolled in an LP clinical study in the United States (US) to explore the patient experience. Study 2 consisted of independent qualitative interviews conducted with adult CLP patients (n = 13) from the US and Germany to further explore impacts on emotional wellbeing. RESULTS: Exit interviews found that itch , pain, and skin lesions were most frequently reported as signs/symptoms of LP. Itch and skin lesions were experienced across all LP subtypes, while pain was only reported by CLP and MLP patients. These signs/symptoms impacted HRQoL including emotional wellbeing (frustration, embarrassment), daily activities (oral hygiene, clothing options), social functioning (intimacy, social activities), and physical functioning (chewing/swallowing, opening/moving mouth). Impacts on activities of daily living (ADL) and physical functioning were mostly experienced by MLP patients. Independent qualitative interviews, which further explored impacts of CLP on patients' emotional wellbeing, identified frustration, worry, sadness, embarrassment, and depression as the most frequently experienced. CONCLUSION: The findings contribute to the literature by providing qualitative insights into signs/symptoms and HRQoL impacts of LP, from the adult patient perspective. The findings also highlight the importance of considering assessment of HRQoL impacts in future clinical LP research, particularly impacts on emotional wellbeing when selecting instruments for assessment of HRQoL in the CLP population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04300296.

Enabling endpoint development for interventional clinical trials in individuals with Angelman syndrome: a prospective, longitudinal, observational clinical study (FREESIAS).

BACKGROUND: Angelman syndrome (AS) is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by the absence of a functional UBE3A gene, which causes developmental, behavioral, and medical challenges. While currently untreatable, comprehensive data could help identify appropriate endpoints assessing meaningful improvements in clinical trials. Herein are reported the results from the FREESIAS study assessing the feasibility and utility of in-clinic and at-home measures of key AS symptoms. METHODS: Fifty-five individuals with AS (aged < 5 years: n = 16, 5-12 years: n = 27, ≥ 18 years: n = 12; deletion genotype: n = 40, nondeletion genotype: n = 15) and 20 typically developing children (aged 1-12 years) were enrolled across six USA sites. Several clinical outcome assessments and digital health technologies were tested, together with overnight 19-lead electroencephalography (EEG) and additional polysomnography (PSG) sensors. Participants were assessed at baseline (Clinic Visit 1), 12 months later (Clinic Visit 2), and during intermittent home visits. RESULTS: The participants achieved high completion rates for the clinical outcome assessments (adherence: 89-100% [Clinic Visit 1]; 76-91% [Clinic Visit 2]) and varied feasibility of and adherence to digital health technologies. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impacted participants' uptake of and/or adherence to some measures. It also potentially impacted the at-home PSG/EEG recordings, which were otherwise feasible. Participants achieved Bayley-III results comparable to the available natural history data, showing similar scores between individuals aged ≥ 18 and 5-12 years. Also, participants without a deletion generally scored higher on most clinical outcome assessments than participants with a deletion. Furthermore, the observed AS EEG phenotype of excess delta-band power was consistent with prior reports. CONCLUSIONS: Although feasible clinical outcome assessments and digital health technologies are reported herein, further improved assessments of meaningful AS change are needed. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, remote assessments facilitated high adherence levels and the results suggested that at-home PSG/EEG might be a feasible alternative to the in-clinic EEG assessments. Taken altogether, the combination of in-clinic/at-home clinical outcome assessments, digital health technologies, and PSG/EEG may improve protocol adherence, reduce patient burden, and optimize study outcomes in AS and other rare disease populations.

Causes of Early Mortality After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Recognition of the causes of early mortality after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is essential for the improvement of patient safety. This study sought to determine the causes of early mortality (≤90 days) after AF ablation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of AF ablation from January 1, 2013, to December 1, 2021 at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville). Causes of death were identified through a comprehensive chart review of the electronic health record from within the Mayo Clinic system and outside records when available. RESULTS: A total of 6723 patients were included in the study. The 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 0.22% (n=15). Among all 90-day deaths, majority of the deaths (73.3%) did not have a direct relationship with the procedure. Sudden death was the most common cause of early death (20%), followed by peri-procedural stroke (13%), respiratory failure (13%), atrioesophageal fistula (13%), infection (7%), heart failure (7%), and traumatic brain injury (7%). The 90-day mortality rate directly due to AF ablation procedural complications was 0.06% (n=4). CONCLUSIONS: AF ablation procedure has a 90-day mortality of 0.22%, and the most common cause of early mortality was sudden death. The majority (73.3%) of early mortality was not directly associated with a procedural complication, and the mortality rate due to complications associated with the AF ablation procedure was low at 0.06%. Further studies are required to investigate causes and risk factors associated with sudden death in this patient population.