Impact of a formal manual small-incision cataract surgery curriculum in an American ophthalmology residency program.

Purpose: Global ophthalmology educational activities often include the ability of ophthalmology residents to partake in low-resource clinical care at home and abroad. Low-resource surgical techniques have become a pillar of education during formalized global ophthalmology fellowships. A formal manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) curriculum was started in the University of Colorado's residency training program to meet the growing demand for this surgical skill and to allow for more sustainable outreach work from our graduates. The survey was conducted to collect evaluations on the value of formal MSICS training within a United States-based residency program. Methods: This was a survey study in a US ophthalmology residency program. A formal MSICS curriculum was created that included didactic lectures on epidemiology of global blindness, MSICS technique, and how MISCS compared to phacoemulsification in terms of cost and sustainability in low-resource settings, followed by a formal wet lab experience. Residents were then exposed to MSICS procedures in the operating room (OR) under supervision of an experienced MSICS surgeon. An anonymous online survey was conducted on three consecutive cohorts of recently graduated senior ophthalmology residents from 2019 to 2021 with the aim of eliciting opinions about and outcomes from the new curriculum. Results: Fifteen graduating senior residents comprised the three cohorts with a 100% survey response rate. All residents agreed or strongly agreed that "MSICS is a valuable skill to have". Eighty percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that "exposure to MSICS has increased my likelihood of doing any type of outreach work in the future" and 86.67% agreed or strongly agreed that "exposure to MSICS increased my understanding about sustainable outreach work". The average number of cases assisted or performed per resident was 8.2 (SD 2.7, range 4-12). Conclusion: A formal MSICS curriculum for US-based ophthalmology residents was well-received by the trainees. The majority felt it increased their likelihood of pursuing and improved their understanding of sustainable outreach work. The curriculum, which included lectures, wet lab training, and formal teaching in the OR, could add value to a residency program's curriculum. Furthermore, a formal domestic program can avoid ethical pitfalls that can be seen with resident teaching during international mission work.

The Organization of Outreach Work for Vulnerable Patients in General Practice during COVID-19: Results from the Cross-Sectional PRICOV-19 Study in 38 Countries.

The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected vulnerable populations' access to health care. By proactively reaching out to them, general practices attempted to prevent the underutilization of their services. This paper examined the association between practice and country characteristics and the organization of outreach work in general practices during COVID-19. Linear mixed model analyses with practices nested in countries were performed on the data of 4982 practices from 38 countries. A 4-item scale on outreach work was constructed as the outcome variable with a reliability of 0.77 and 0.97 at the practice and country level. The results showed that many practices set up outreach work, including extracting at least one list of patients with chronic conditions from their electronic medical record (30.1%); and performing telephone outreach to patients with chronic conditions (62.8%), a psychological vulnerability (35.6%), or possible situation of domestic violence or a child-rearing situation (17.2%). Outreach work was positively related to the availability of an administrative assistant or practice manager (p < 0.05) or paramedical support staff (p < 0.01). Other practice and country characteristics were not significantly associated with undertaking outreach work. Policy and financial interventions supporting general practices to organize outreach work should focus on the range of personnel available to support such practice activities.

Chasing targets in a pandemic: The impact of COVID-19 on HIV outreach workers for MSM (men who have sex with men) in Jakarta, Indonesia.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on HIV services globally, including community-based outreach programmes. This article draws on a qualitative study of HIV outreach workers for men who have sex with men (MSM) in Jakarta, Indonesia undertaken between July and September 2020. The research documented the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV outreach programmes for MSM based on interviews, focus group discussions and video diaries collected from outreach workers. As a result of the pandemic, and in response to the guidelines issued by international donors and the Indonesian government, outreach workers shifted activities to 'virtual outreach' where possible. However, outreach workers consistently performed in-person work to address what they referred to as 'urgent' cases (e.g. required them to attend the clinic). Regardless of delivery mode, the steps comprising outreach work during the pandemic aligned with the 'cascade of care', which forms the dominant policy narrative for the management of HIV. Outreach work during the pandemic therefore continued to be based primarily on the objective of maintaining testing and treatment rates. Although outreach workers responded innovatively to the pandemic, including to the risk of COVID-19 infection, they were limited by the prevailing emphasis on targets in HIV programmes.

From opiates to methamphetamine: building new harm reduction responses in Jakarta, Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Despite the rise of stimulant use, most harm reduction programs still focus on people who inject opioids, leaving many people who use methamphetamine (PWUM) underserviced. In Asia, especially, where methamphetamine prevalence has overtaken opioids prevalence, harm reduction programs assisting PWUM are rare. The few existing innovative practices focusing on methamphetamine use lie underreported. Understanding how these programs moved their focus from opiates to methamphetamine could help inspire new harm reduction responses. Hence, this paper analyzes a newly implemented outreach program assisting methamphetamine users in Jakarta, Indonesia. It addresses the program's critical learning points when making the transition to respond to stimulant use. METHODS: This case study is part of a more extensive research on good practices of harm reduction for stimulant use. For this case study, data was collected through Indonesian contextual documents and documents from the program, structured questionnaire, in-depth interviews with service staff and service users, a focus group discussion with service users, and in-loco observations of activities. For this paper, data was reinterpreted to focus on the key topics that needed to be addressed when the program transitioned from working with people who use opioids to PWUM. RESULTS: Four key topics were found: (1) getting in touch with different types of PWUM and building trust relationships; (2) adapting safer smoking kits to local circumstances; (3) reframing partnerships while finding ways to address mental health issues; and (4) responding to local law enforcement practices. CONCLUSIONS: The meaningful involvement of PWUM was essential in the development and evaluation of outreach work, the planning, and the adaptation of safer smoking kits to local circumstances. Also, it helped to gain understanding of the broader needs of PWUM, including mental health care and their difficulties related to law enforcement activities. Operating under a broad harm reduction definition and addressing a broad spectrum of individual and social needs are preferable to focusing solely on specific interventions and supplies for safer drug use. Since many PWUM smoke rather than inject, securing funding for harm reduction focused on people who do not inject drugs and/or who do not use opioids is fundamental in keeping programs sustainable.

[Intensive psychiatric care of children and adolescents in their natural environment : Alternatives to inpatient treatment]. / Aufsuchende Behandlungsformen für psychisch kranke Kinder und Jugendliche : Alternativen zur stationären Aufnahme.

Mental health disorders are one of the main diseases in children and adolescents, the persistence rate into adulthood being around 50%. Early intervention is therefore essential. However, present treatment options reach only 50% of children and adolescents with mental health problems.The objective of this article is to depict why legal deficits complicated the establishment of outreach treatment in the past and to illustrate recent legal changes that now allow innovative outreach treatment programs that meet the need of children and adolescents with mental health issues.This review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed and Cochrane Library concerning types of home treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry, with due reference to the authors' own experience with intensive home treatment.The literature shows that outreach work has been effective in many other countries. In Germany however, clear separation in finances between outpatient and inpatient treatment did not allow the establishment of outreach teams in the past. On 01.01.2017 a new law, the PsychVVG, entered into force, and now provides a sound legal basis for outreach work. Home treatment in the form of, for example, intensive outreach work that equals the intensity and frequency of inpatient treatment (StäB) or continuum of care school (CCSchool), a project that joins school-based diagnostic elements with school-based treatment, can now be installed and evaluated.Intensive outreach work, especially in child and adolescent psychiatry, will now be a good alternative to inpatient treatment that integrates parents into the treatment approach.

Working With Chinese Triad Youth Gangs: Correct Diagnosis and Strategic Intervention.

Across the world, youth workers have been active in helping vulnerable youth groups. In Hong Kong, government-funded youth services are conducted by professional social workers to help vulnerable youths. This article adopted a case study approach to investigate a youth group who committed a murder. Nine murderers and two social workers were interviewed. It aims to uncover the structure and activities of the group and analyse the gang intervention prior to the murder to find out what had gone wrong and identify the lessons that social workers can learn from the murder. Four misconceptions in gang intervention have been identified. First, because of the Triad (Chinese-organised crime) affiliation, this is not just a group of deviant youths but a youth gang. Second, because it is a gang, the social workers should not group them but should instead degroup them to avoid contamination. Third, diagnosis is different from labelling. With the right diagnosis, services can be tailor-made to delabel them. Fourth, when the youths are diagnosed as a gang, outreach work instead of centre work should be provided-social workers should reach out to the gangland to uncover the youths' gang participation and crime involvement.

CHECKING: A última fronteira para a redução de riscos em contextos festivos / CHECKING: The last frontier for harm reduction in party settings

No contexto atual de proliferação de novas substâncias psicoativas (NSP) e de adulteração de substâncias psicoativas que circulam no mercado negro o Drug Checking é aqui encarado como uma estratégia major de redução de riscos e minimização de danos (RRMD). É um serviço que se tem vindo a afirmar como uma necessidade em termos de saúde pública, através da monitorização informal de mercados informais de substâncias psicoativas e emitindo alertas sempre que se identificam substâncias potencialmente tóxicas. É também uma boa prática na mediação da comunicação entre o técnico de RRMD e o utilizador de substâncias psicoativas, fornecendo informação objetiva sobre a substância que o utilizador disponibilizou para análise e produzindo e disseminando informação sobre os padrões de adulteração locais. Através da apresentação de práticas e resultados referentes à intervenção do projeto CHECK!NG, pretende-se neste artigo levantar pistas para uma reflexão sobre a pertinência e as particularidades de um serviço de Drug Checking em contexto festivos.

In the current context of proliferation of new psychoactive substances, and of adulteration of substances that circulate in the black market, Drug Checking is viewed here as a major Harm Reduction strategy. It is a service that has become a need in terms of public health, as it monitors informal drug markets and disseminates alerts whenever potentially toxic substances are identified. It also mediates communication between the harm reduction technician and the drug user, providing objective information about the drug that the user supplied for analysis, and also producing and disseminating information about local adulteration patterns. By presenting the main processes and outcomes of the intervention of the CHECK!NG project, the authors intend to reflect on the relevance, characteristics and constraints of a Drug Checking service in party settings.