Assessing Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes of an Elbow Orthosis Intervention in Youth Baseball: Preliminary Results.

Proper orthosis design may help youth baseball players develop safer pitching mechanics to prevent elbow injuries. This study evaluated the impact of a custom elbow orthosis on pitching biomechanics and adverse events. Ten 11-12-year-old players (mean age 11.5 years) from a regional league team were recruited. The inclusion criteria were at least two years of baseball experience. Six players were randomly assigned to the orthosis group, with four in the control group. Anthropometric data and baseline characteristics were recorded. A video analysis assessed elbow flexion angle during pitching at baseline and at 2 months. The frequency of orthosis wear was also tracked. Adverse events during twice-weekly practices were documented. Post-study surveys evaluated orthosis comfort, stability, and safety perceptions. In the orthosis group (n = 6), four participants showed improved elbow flexion angle, and two of the six participants showed almost no change. The overall median difference was 23.5°. In the control group (n = 4), three participants showed improvement, with a median improvement of 5.5°. Twelve adverse events, including pain, were reported by players not wearing orthoses, whereas no events occurred with orthosis use. Individual players in the control group or who did not wear the orthosis correctly experienced multiple episodes of pain from pitching over the study period. This preliminary study indicates a custom elbow orthosis can optimize pitching biomechanics and prevent adverse events in youth baseball players over the course of two months.

Elbow varus torque and ball velocity associations in high school and professional pitchers with increased sagittal-plane trunk tilt.

BACKGROUND: Increased sagittal-plane trunk tilt is thought to increase drive in the anterior direction toward home plate, transferring energy from the trunk to the distal upper extremity, ultimately generating greater ball velocity. Increased sagittal trunk tilt has also been implicated in the risk of upper-extremity joint loading in baseball pitchers by way of elbow varus torque (EVT), a metric previously associated with elbow injury in professional pitchers. The purposes of this study were (1) to compare sagittal trunk tilt positioning between high school and professional pitchers throughout the pitch and (2) to identify the potential associations between sagittal-plane trunk tilt, ball velocity, and EVT for both cohorts. METHODS: Professional and high school pitchers were instructed to throw fastballs while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Sagittal trunk tilt motion throughout the pitching motion was compared between cohorts from maximum knee height to maximum shoulder internal rotation. To assess the effects of sagittal-plane trunk tilt on ball velocity and EVT, linear mixed-effect models were created. RESULTS: Professional pitchers (n = 100, 882 pitches) achieved greater sagittal trunk tilt than high school pitchers (n = 57, 519 pitches) during early portions of the pitching motion, including maximum positive sagittal trunk tilt (46.6° ± 8.3° vs. 43.6° ± 10.2°, P = .042). Professional pitchers also had greater sagittal trunk tilt excursion throughout the pitch motion (68.0° ± 11.4° vs. 62.5° ± 11.0°, P = .004). For every 10° increase in sagittal trunk tilt at ball release for professional pitchers, ball velocity increased by 0.36 m/s (B = 0.036 and ß = 0.194, P < .001) or 0.9% average ball velocity whereas EVT increased by 0.14% body weight × body height (B = 0.014 and ß = 0.159, P < .001) or 2.9% average normalized EVT. For every 10° increase in sagittal trunk tilt at ball release for high school pitchers, ball velocity increased by 0.34 m/s (B = 0.097 and ß = 0.025, P = .025) or 1.1% average ball velocity whereas EVT increased by 0.07% body weight × body height (B = 0.007 and ß = 0.086, P = .016) or 1.7% average normalized EVT. CONCLUSION: Increased positive sagittal-plane trunk tilt was significantly associated with greater ball velocity and increased EVT for both professional and high school pitchers. Peak EVT estimates were consistently more pronounced than ball velocity benefits for both populations, suggesting that no specific time point may provide a ball velocity benefit while concomitantly minimizing EVT. Both professional and high school pitchers should consider this trade-off, which may influence injury risk, when engaging in higher degrees of positive sagittal-plane trunk tilt.

Increased Shoulder Distraction Force and Shoulder Horizontal Abduction in Professional Baseball Pitchers With Discordant Torso Rotation Order.

BACKGROUND: Inefficient energy transfer from the pelvis and trunk has been shown to increase compensation at the level of the shoulder. Kinetic chain sequencing of the core segments is underexamined in professional baseball pitchers, especially as it relates to changes in upper extremity kinetics. PURPOSE: To evaluate elbow and shoulder kinetics in a cohort of professional pitchers differentiated by instances of discordant pelvic to upper torso sequencing during the pitch. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: 285 professional baseball pitchers were evaluated using 3D motion capture (480 Hz). Pitchers were divided into "chronological" and "discordant" groups based on whether maximum pelvic rotation velocity occurred before (chronological) or after (discordant) maximum upper torso rotation velocity during the pitch motion. Pelvic, upper torso, and shoulder kinematic parameters, shoulder distraction force, shoulder internal rotation torque, and pitch efficiency (PE) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Pitchers with discordant torso sequencing (n = 30; 110 pitches) had greater shoulder horizontal adduction at maximum external rotation (mean difference, 3.6°; 95% CI, -5.2° to -2.0°; t = -4.5; P < .001) and greater maximum shoulder external rotation (mean difference, 3.7°; 95% CI, 5.7° to 1.5°; t = -3.5; P < .001) than chronological pitchers (n = 255; 2974 pitches). PE did not differ between groups (P = .856), whereas ball velocity was significantly faster in the discordant group (mean difference, 0.6 m/s; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.3 m/s; t = -3.3; P = .0012). Chronological pitchers had significantly reduced shoulder distraction force (mean difference, -4.7% body weight (BW); 95% CI, -7.9% to -1.5% BW; t = -2.9; P = .004) with no difference in shoulder internal rotation torque (P = .160). These kinematic and kinetic differences were not observed when accounting for interpitcher variability. CONCLUSION: Between pitchers, those who had a discordant pelvic to upper torso sequence experienced significantly greater shoulder distraction forces, potentially compensating by increasing maximum shoulder external rotation and horizontal abduction. Achieving maximal pelvic rotation velocity before maximal rotation velocity may be advantageous in preventing compensation at the upper extremity and excessive throwing arm loading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Identifying risk factors for increased upper extremity forces has potential implications in injury prevention. Specifically, mitigating shoulder distraction forces may be beneficial in reducing risk of injury.

The Association of Baseball Pitch Delivery and Kinematic Sequence on Stresses at the Shoulder and Elbow Joints.

Although there is a commonly held belief within the baseball community that delivery from the stretch confers more stress at the elbow and shoulder joints than delivery from the windup, there remains little evidence in the literature investigating this hypothesis. This study aimed to help address this gap in the literature by studying both intra-pitcher kinematic sequence variability, and intra-pitcher joint torque variability when throwing from the windup vs. the stretch. We hypothesized that 1) each pitchers' kinematic sequence would remain similar whether throwing from the windup or stretch, and 2) Kinematic sequence would influence peak arm torque more than delivery method. This cross-sectional 3D biomechanical study included 88 pitches thrown by ten (6 collegiate, 4 high school) pitchers with a mean age of 17.60 ± 2.63 years. Pitch velocity, throwing shoulder/elbow torques and the kinematic sequence of each pitch utilizing segmental peak angular velocities were captured. No statistically significant differences in ball velocity (p = 0.17), peak shoulder external rotation torque (p = 0.80), shoulder extension torque (p = 0.97), or elbow valgus torque (p = 0.83) were found between delivery approaches. Three primary kinematic sequences were identified. Shoulder external rotation torque [F(53,2) = 10.992, ɳ2 = .293, p < 0.00], shoulder extension torque [F(53,2) = 15.517, ɳ2 = .369, p < 0.00] and elbow valgus torque [F(53,2) = 9.994, ɳ2 = .274, p < 0.00] did vary significantly across these three kinematic sequence patterns. Our data suggest that the kinematic sequence influences shoulder and elbow torque more than the delivery approach. Instructing ideal kinematic sequence may be more influential for injury avoidance than delivery method.